Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Just Cruzin]Sad to say, it sounds like I drew the same one last Tuesday. Short hair, late 30ies, nice body, little to no English. Her name sounds like Swichie. Said Tuesday was her first day. All the encouraging, didn't produce results. Not a bad massage if that is all you were expecting. No tip and no return for me.
Safe cruzin'
JC[/QUOTE]

Managers and business owners appreciate it when they are told someone in their employ is not meeting customer expectations. You would be doing IT a favor if you would give them a call. I know it is not the most comfortable situation, but when "stuck" with a therapist I knew would not be a good experience, I said sorry, I would like someone else.

Thanks for letting us know one to avoid.

I read an article recently about a bust in South Florida and Brevard County involving three AMPs. I seems from reading the articles that the LEOs had cameras in the AMPs. Anyone ever hear of that technique before and it so, is it legal and can they be doing that everywhere?

[QUOTE=Indian River]I read an article recently about a bust in South Florida and Brevard County involving three AMPs. I seems from reading the articles that the LEOs had cameras in the AMPs. Anyone ever hear of that technique before and it so, is it legal and can they be doing that everywhere?[/QUOTE]

Can you post a link to the articles? In order to get the cameras inside the AMP, they would either need permission from the owners or a very broadly-written warrant and then go in to covertly wire everything in place.

Sounds like a bit much for an AMP bust.

[QUOTE=Indian River]I read an article recently about a bust in South Florida and Brevard County involving three AMPs. I seems from reading the articles that the LEOs had cameras in the AMPs. Anyone ever hear of that technique before and it so, is it legal and can they be doing that everywhere?[/QUOTE]I knew a provider who was told this was happening a couple of months ago but she could not prove it. Scared her though...

Interesting to know where you got that info from? Not sure if it's legal but I am sure there are some on the forum who could comment.

Happy 2009 guys and lets hope it's better than 2008!

[QUOTE=Sponge Worthy]Can you post a link to the articles? In order to get the cameras inside the AMP, they would either need permission from the owners or a very broadly-written warrant and then go in to covertly wire everything in place.

Sounds like a bit much for an AMP bust.[/QUOTE]The article does not say that cameras were used but rather " other surveillance methods" were used. To me that means camera. Here is the link to the article.

[url]http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2008/dec/20/police-prostition-ring-busted/[/url]

Scary stuff:

[url]http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081231/BREAKINGNEWS/312310001&s=d&page=12#pluckcomments[/url]

I don't know if that means they were video-taped, but in my limited knowledge of the law, some type of evidence must have been produced to get warrants.




[QUOTE=Indian River]I read an article recently about a bust in South Florida and Brevard County involving three AMPs. I seems from reading the articles that the LEOs had cameras in the AMPs. Anyone ever hear of that technique before and it so, is it legal and can they be doing that everywhere?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Bone Yard]Scary stuff:
[url]http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081231/BREAKINGNEWS/312310001&s=d&page=12#pluckcomments[/url] [/QUOTE]

Crazy thing 13 pages of comments and 80 percent do not see anything wrong with this. The other 20 percent are just amazed at the age of the unfortunate.

Why is it the public understands what to consenting adults are, yet the government is unable to see the revenue that is available? This really is a big waste of the taxpayers money.

To Melbourne: Howard Reid, 88. If your member of this forum, I'm sorry for your public publication however your my hero, at 88 your still hitting pay dirt. As someone has stated in the comments I'm sure the women in your neighborhood are really giving you the looks today. Maybe this is a good sign you won't have to pay anymore.

[QUOTE=Indian River]The article does not say that cameras were used but rather " other surveillance methods" were used. To me that means camera. Here is the link to the article.

[url]http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2008/dec/20/police-prostition-ring-busted/[/url][/QUOTE]Thanks for that and interesting they said they wouldn't state what surveillence methods were used. Just scaremongering I guess.

I suppose there is a point that taxes are not being paid on the money that changes hands but that also applies to many, many other trades.

"The agencies dubbed the investigation as Operation Unhappy Ending"

Is that supposed to be funny?

I guess we just have to live with it, as has been the case for quite a while now. The whole thing will just be driven futher underground though and I'm not sure who will gain from that.

It just gets so hard sometimes.

(and on that note, let's have some reports.

Went to Asahi on Wednesday and had the most beautiful asian girl ever at a massage parlor. Her name was Summer and I couldn't believe she worked there. I'm used to some of them being pretty, but not as pretty as she was, and young too. Probably about 25. The massage itself was nothing special, more of a rub down, but still felt great. On the flip her top came off and she pulled her shorts down so I could see her ass. This girl had legs that felt like silk, I couldn't believe how smooth they were. Deff. Will return for some Summer lovin'.

[QUOTE=Viamx]Thanks for that and interesting they said they wouldn't state what surveillence methods were used. Just scaremongering I guess.

I suppose there is a point that taxes are not being paid on the money that changes hands but that also applies to many, many other trades.

"The agencies dubbed the investigation as Operation Unhappy Ending"

Is that supposed to be funny?

I guess we just have to live with it, as has been the case for quite a while now. The whole thing will just be driven futher underground though and I'm not sure who will gain from that.

It just gets so hard sometimes.

(and on that note, let's have some reports.[/QUOTE]I want to see how they're going to prove that a customer got more than a massage. Unless they actually saw the act, then it's "he said, she said". If the state is going to try and prosecute each and every named patron, then I don't want to hear Chaingang Charlie bitching about the state being broke.

[QUOTE=Peterpiper52]I want to see how they're going to prove that a customer got more than a massage. Unless they actually saw the act, then it's "he said, she said". If the state is going to try and prosecute each and every named patron, then I don't want to hear Chaingang Charlie bitching about the state being broke.[/QUOTE]

I think Leo is less concerned about the prosecution of the mongers and is just pleased to have their names, ages and addresses plastered all over the news media. I'm guessing several are in awkward positions and could even lose their jobs over being arrested. Remember that Florida is a "right to work state" and an employer can certainly use the arrest as an excuse to terminate.

WOF

[QUOTE=Worldsoffun]I think Leo is less concerned about the prosecution of the mongers and is just pleased to have their names, ages and addresses plastered all over the news media. I'm guessing several are in awkward positions and could even lose their jobs over being arrested. Remember that Florida is a "right to work state" and an employer can certainly use the arrest as an excuse to terminate.

WOF[/QUOTE]

And, don't forget about the Missus or Significant Other. It is all Gestapo tactics meant to intimidate.

Some of us who travel have the pleasure of meeting and respecting real police. One day we actually might have a few in Florida.

The article states, "...many of the men who admitted to or were seen having sexual acts in the parlors..."

It says they were SEEN having sexual acts.

It could be a new type of infrared camera or an actual hidden camera placed with one of those new 'secret' warrants that Bush authorized under the Heinous Patriot Act, an act that puts the American populous under more scrutiny than the terrorists.

[QUOTE=Worldsoffun]I think Leo is less concerned about the prosecution of the mongers and is just pleased to have their names, ages and addresses plastered all over the news media. I'm guessing several are in awkward positions and could even lose their jobs over being arrested. Remember that Florida is a "right to work state" and an employer can certainly use the arrest as an excuse to terminate.

WOF[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=J Melbourne27]The article states, "...many of the men who admitted to or were seen having sexual acts in the parlors..."

It says they were SEEN having sexual acts.

It could be a new type of infrared camera or an actual hidden camera placed with one of those new 'secret' warrants that Bush authorized under the Heinous Patriot Act, an act that puts the American populous under more scrutiny than the terrorists.[/QUOTE]And maybe we can't always believe what we read? Just more scaremongering maybe?

Who knows for sure but I say we stay as we were. I bet it's just a little flurry of activity. It will all go away again soon and they'll have something different to worry about. Keep on trucking.

[QUOTE=J Melbourne27]The article states, "...many of the men who admitted to or were seen having sexual acts in the parlors..."

It says they were SEEN having sexual acts.

It could be a new type of infrared camera or an actual hidden camera placed with one of those new 'secret' warrants that Bush authorized under the Heinous Patriot Act, an act that puts the American populous under more scrutiny than the terrorists.[/QUOTE]

"Sex acts." Isn't that such a wonderful, yet scary, phrase to use? If the girl bumps your nuts during a table shower, it could be a sex act. The phrase makes it seem that everyone who goes in there is getting some pussy

I WISH!

There's a difference between the average person's concept of sex and what legally constitutes a sex act or prostitution. Hell, even Bill Clinton was convinced he didn't have sex. If he can get a blowjob and it's not sex, why can't we get a hand job and be safe from unscrupulous LEOs and newspapers who use intimidation and scare tactics?

Jesus. H. Christ, it's a room without windows. Is that what makes it so scary to people; the fact that they can't see what we're doing, so it must be something horrid and vile? Maybe some AMPs need to have an Open House day or something to get rid of the myth of the unknown.