Sugarbabies?

Kiki: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1bb80377-1566-4911-ae19-0607bd7dd035[/URL].

Spoke with her seems real and hot. But asking $700 for an physical benefits. Anybody interested I can share her number (for exchange though) I am not going to pay that much anyway.

ConfidentChick: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/35ebd3d1-7fca-443a-9e96-933c63a64f35[/URL].

Another fake says only online.

SpoiledBabe98: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7[/URL].

Met her and she is good. Willing to share her info for an exchange. She constantly changes her number though.

Aprohodite: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e052649-d2ee-41af-ae2e-bd280e01e93c[/URL].

Some stupid must have paid for just meet and greet (not sure if she is faking it). Asking $400 for just meet and greet. Hard pass.

Daisyduke004: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ed6feec2-40dd-471b-a263-c0990204cec0[/URL].

She seems real but not good at response. Still need to get her digits.

Luvsky20: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/805f295c-6cf4-4438-88a9-9baa5e2beb4d[/URL].

Shared her snap with me but not responsive. She has been in seeking long time if anybody met her let me know. Seems high end though.

Exotiicbb: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc243300-060d-4f1a-976e-6feca8b0e80a[/URL].

Met her not great experience though but YMMV. DM me for info.

Added some additional info.

BAM.

[QUOTE=Prat652;5776389]

SpoiledBabe98: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7[/URL].

She is also using the following profile. I am texting with her over voip. No PII; no offer yet. SexySavannah:

https://members.seeking.com/member/92cbc964-1507-4596-afbc-f54a5fc50cab

Aprohodite: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e052649-d2ee-41af-ae2e-bd280e01e93c[/URL].

Profile gone or has me blocked.

[/QUOTE]

Evecalliope asking for $600 ppm. Settles on $500. In past was asking for $400 and doing $300. Now you know her range. Looks like pictures. Nice yet hippie type valley girl sound like in demeanor. Has a live in BF Northside area.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/58e04be3-f681-403e-96c7-23e2312f0116[/URL]

SexySavannah asking for $300 ppm. She says CFS. Lives in Florence.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/92cbc964-1507-4596-afbc-f54a5fc50cab[/URL]

Rosie out of Dayton asking $400 ppm. She has quite the sob story she sent. Lost wallet. Money. Grandmas wedding ring. Etc. Certainly not drama free.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/569e9d04-50f1-41bf-b65a-7f804445f238[/URL]

Exotiicbb below is asking for $400 ppm. Lives in Avondale. Profiles hint her figure being average is stature. She is Rubenesque.
[QUOTE=Prat652;5776389]
Exotiicbb: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc243300-060d-4f1a-976e-6feca8b0e80a[/URL].
Met her not great experience though but YMMV. DM me for info.[/QUOTE]

We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.

Seekings attempt to project themselves as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5777435]We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.

Seeking's attempt to project itself as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.[/QUOTE]If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.

I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.

At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.

Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.

Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.

When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.

Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.

I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.

Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.

Although Seeking is changing I don't think it is all their fault. The government is cracking down on the language used on sites like this. The whole paying for sex is a big no no. Also credit card companies are having a bigger say on what sites can use their services. And Pornhub are 2 sites recently that were targeted.

Unfortunately Seeking is by far the best option right now. It will change even more as time goes on and they crack down on things more. All the dating sites are going through this. Try signing up for any of them and put "sugar baby" or "arrangement" in your profile and you get a lifetime ban by the end of the day.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5777481]If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.

I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.

At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.

Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.[/QUOTE]

Newb question: it seems like all of the posts here focus on seeking arrangements. Does anyone here use secret benefits? I like the verified feature they have but is there a downside that site?

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5777491]Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.

When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.

Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.

I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.

Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.[/QUOTE]I've been away from isurgardaddy for me for several months since it switched over to Seeking. Sucked because you could find some out there every once in a while. Good luck hunting.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5777491]Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.

When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.

Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.

I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.

Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.[/QUOTE]I had used SDM a year back. You are not losing anything as most chicks that are on SDM are on seeking as well. It's cheap at 59.99 and best thing about it is they have 3 day moneyback guarantee if you are unsatisfied customer and cancel before 3 days by emailing customer service. I was able to get few numbers and sent my snap to truckload of chicks before canceling right at 3 days mark and got my money back successfully. Unfortunately most chicks contacted were wayy too curvy and out of my league, so it didn't work and I never tried again. It has very limited selection and operates on similar platform like Tinder I. E. Swipe left and right crap and you deal with scammers and pic sellers there as well. I heard it works well in big cities but mid / small tier cities have very limited selection and most chicks don't even bother to check messages on there. Other good thing is it has location tracker, so it shows actual gps location I. E city / county of profile in case someone is faking location it's easy to figure out, from what I saw. Hope that helps.

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5777912]Although Seeking is changing I don't think it is all their fault. The government is cracking down on the language used on sites like this. The whole paying for sex is a big no no. Also credit card companies are having a bigger say on what sites can use their services. And Pornhub are 2 sites recently that were targeted.

Unfortunately Seeking is by far the best option right now. It will change even more as time goes on and they crack down on things more. All the dating sites are going through this. Try signing up for any of them and put "sugar baby" or "arrangement" in your profile and you get a lifetime ban by the end of the day.[/QUOTE]Very true, and due to some of that govt bs, switter is closing, it was announced.

[QUOTE=Mikse;5777939]Newb question: it seems like all of the posts here focus on seeking arrangements. Does anyone here use secret benefits? I like the verified feature they have but is there a downside that site?[/QUOTE]The selection on SB was impressive at first. I worked to connect with a few before paying using their profile clues. I was getting nowhere.

Then a woman I knew sent me a message. I reached out to her directly and asked if she meant to write me there. She said she hadn't.

The site generates a lot of fake messages and photo access invitations so guys use up lots of credits. I decided not to put any money into that machine and closed my account.

I also got in contact with another woman from there. She'd given up on it a long time ago. The site made her appear active.

Maybe some are real, but I decided the value wasn't there for me.

[QUOTE=TickleJay;5778975]Very true, and due to some of that govt bs, switter is closing, it was announced.[/QUOTE]Tryst is closing too. Maybe that will help with the automatic $200 price bumps when they post ads there.

"In a statement on Monday, Assembly Foura collective of sex workers and technologists who run Switter, as well as advertising site Tryst would shut down permanently on March 14. ".

[URL=https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb7vx/switter-the-twitter-for-sex-workers-is-shutting-down]Switter, the Twitter for Sex Workers, Is Shutting Down[/URL]

It appears that seeking is rebranding as a dating site but I don't see anything different. Everything looks the same as before.

Of course its not as good as the old days, BUT there is still new talent to find, just more drama, scams, fake, on and on. Been on SA for years and I keep a nice stable of talent, a few I've known for years, and to me that's the key, and then every now in the then I zip back on for a month, and EVERYTIME I still find at least 1 or 2 and make it worth my time. If you think now you can just open an account and blast thru 10 girls in a month or whatever, not saying its impossible, but the probability is lower now, then say a few years ago.

The way I ready the actual statement is that only Switter is shutting down.

I'll put the rest in Rants.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5779355]Tryst is closing too. Maybe that will help with the automatic $200 price bumps when they post ads there.

"In a statement on Monday, Assembly Foura collective of sex workers and technologists who run Switter, as well as advertising site Tryst would shut down permanently on March 14. ".

[URL=https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb7vx/switter-the-twitter-for-sex-workers-is-shutting-down]Switter, the Twitter for Sex Workers, Is Shutting Down[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5779580]It appears that seeking is rebranding as a dating site but I don't see anything different. Everything looks the same as before.[/QUOTE]Just FYI there is a good bit of chatter in the Chicago Arrangements forum about Seeking's re-imaging attempt if you want to stroll over there for a look-see and not duplicate post info here. Nothing you don't already know.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?19231-Arrangement-Reports[/URL]

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5780729]Just FYI there is a good bit of chatter in the Chicago Arrangements forum about Seeking's re-imaging attempt if you want to stroll over there for a look-see and not duplicate post info here. Nothing you don't already know.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?19231-Arrangement-Reports[/URL][/QUOTE]What a great opportunity for someone to start a site like the old "SA" would be a gold mine.

[QUOTE=RickMann;5780803]What a great opportunity for someone to start a site like the old "SA" would be a gold mine.[/QUOTE]Guys pussymarket is one othe world's oldest profession and its not going to go anywhere until mankind exists, it will change platforms / avenues / stores as change is always name of this game. In my last 15 years of mongering, I / we have seen several websites come and disappear but market is there and will exist. Where there is demand there will always be supply. Maybe in future, some smart dude (like myself, LOL) will figure out how to use Metaverse or any other verse to feel the tightness of pussy and warmth of mouth virtually before actually pounding and paying for it and will soon become the next American billionaire like Brandon W did,. Platform will change, business will still be there. Keep hunting guys, don't be discouraged and change with changing times.

What other sites are there for sugar babies besides:

WhatsYourPrice.

SecretBefefits.

I used to have success on tinder and ************* but both have so many fake profiles it's not worth the time.

[QUOTE=MattChavan23;5782639]Guys pussymarket is one othe world's oldest profession and its not going to go anywhere until mankind exists, it will change platforms / avenues / stores as change is always name of this game. In my last 15 years of mongering, I / we have seen several websites come and disappear but market is there and will exist. Where there is demand there will always be supply. Maybe in future, some smart dude (like myself, LOL) will figure out how to use Metaverse or any other verse to feel the tightness of pussy and warmth of mouth virtually before actually pounding and paying for it and will soon become the next American billionaire like Brandon W did,. Platform will change, business will still be there. Keep hunting guys, don't be discouraged and change with changing times.[/QUOTE]

And besides Seeking of course.

Here are some to watch for:

Says her name is Nancy and she lives near Akron.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fafd543e-e7a2-4202-8bfa-310685514131[/URL]

Says her name is Renee. Number traces to Dawn. No PII. Has a flat tire, no spare, needs $57 to get it fixed. Fairfield.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f190e056-863e-432d-a128-00fc8462d943[/URL]

Says her name is Taylor. Acts coy but later discloses she lives near Frankfurt but willing to drive to Cincinnati.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dad88ad5-9f8b-4e4a-8127-a89c173ab7a5[/URL]

On WYP as Favor. Asks $7 dollars for a date. Actually a SCAMMER using pictures of Ivy LeBelle. Tried to get me to book a hotel room and send her the number. Would not videochat first. Lake Tahoe number.

[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/739YwOLk5gprLdV0GjyENdXv[/URL]

So far, WYP has refunded me every credit I have spent on multiple scammers. I am not sure their business model is working. However, I am able to play a long time at low cost at this rate. Of course, I am not getting laid, so there's that to consider.

BAM.

ClassyLover 35 Mixed.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2104d247-d9f3-41f3-91e8-f64decfbc6f4[/URL]

This is a typical fake Chinese operated profile. These types of listings always have an age in the early to mid 30's. Ethnicity is either Asian or Mixed. Say they are independently wealthy. Own their own business. Trade on side in Crypto or FEx. Almost always are interested in a relationship and not sugaring. Below is the text from this profile. Other than the divorce intro its pretty typical posting for these fake profiles.

I got divorced in 2018 and have been busy with my career since my divorce, I own a company that manufactures medical devices and have invested in the field of cryptocurrency with good results, I love to travel and enjoy good food. I like to travel and enjoy good food. I usually keep a proper exercise at home so that I can stay healthy and energetic, and I often do yoga besides working at home on the computer. I am looking for long term emotional connection here and like mature and sincere gentlemen. We can travel together and enjoy a stress free life.

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5785343]What other sites are there for sugar babies besides:

WhatsYourPrice.

SecretBefefits.

I used to have success on tinder and ************* but both have so many fake profiles it's not worth the time.[/QUOTE]Sometimes you can find ladies on Tinder who are also on Seeking.

[QUOTE=Zeotch2;5787024]Sometimes you can find ladies on Tinder who are also on Seeking.[/QUOTE]Sugar Daddy Meet has worked for me. I have three Dayton area UTRs from that site. Beware the catfishers and the CashAppers and the fakes, but if you're looking for a non-pro with low expectations it's fishing in a barrel.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5786990]ClassyLover 35 Mixed.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2104d247-d9f3-41f3-91e8-f64decfbc6f4[/URL]

This is a typical fake Chinese operated profile. These types of listings always have an age in the early to mid 30's. Ethnicity is either Asian or Mixed. Say they are independently wealthy. Own their own business. Trade on side in Crypto or FEx. Almost always are interested in a relationship and not sugaring. Below is the text from this profile. Other than the divorce intro its pretty typical posting for these fake profiles.

I got divorced in 2018 and have been busy with my career since my divorce, I own a company that manufactures medical devices and have invested in the field of cryptocurrency with good results, I love to travel and enjoy good food. I like to travel and enjoy good food. I usually keep a proper exercise at home so that I can stay healthy and energetic, and I often do yoga besides working at home on the computer. I am looking for long term emotional connection here and like mature and sincere gentlemen. We can travel together and enjoy a stress free life.[/QUOTE]There are a lot of dead giveaways beyond this:

1) Girl is whiter than snow in the pic but claims to be "mixed" or Asian.

2) Proliferation of a variation of the same name, I once got faved 7 x all in one evening by various "Heiress" names from all over the country.

3) "I just moved here to _ and its a city 300 miles away but they show as being in Cincy.

4) They seem to all have a maximum height of 4' 11"

My take from a lot of this is that either the scammer bots have gotten really good at making fake profiles or this is part of Seeking's business model just as it was with Ashley Madison.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5788000]There are a lot of dead giveaways beyond this:

1) Girl is whiter than snow in the pic but claims to be "mixed" or Asian.

2) Proliferation of a variation of the same name, I once got faved 7 x all in one evening by various "Heiress" names from all over the country.

3) "I just moved here to _ and its a city 300 miles away but they show as being in Cincy.

4) They seem to all have a maximum height of 4' 11"

My take from a lot of this is that either the scammer bots have gotten really good at making fake profiles or this is part of Seeking's business model just as it was with Ashley Madison.[/QUOTE]I've noticed a lot of them, too. This seems to be just the latest version of scam on Seeking.

Fortunately, this one is so glaringly obvious, it's easy to recognize. The pics are always staged, and the background never looks like Ohio. The women in the pics have a particular "look" that tends to predominate among commercial models in China.

I love Asian women, but I've long since resigned myself to the fact that there aren't a lot of them in the Cincinnati area, and only a handful of them show up on Seeking. (In 10 years of sugaring, I've met exactly 7 legit Asian women from Seeking; and I actively seek them out.) So when an Asian profile turns up on the site, I give it more than a usual amount of scrutiny.

And if the profile language doesn't sound natural, I immediately hide the profile to get it out of my feed. (The latest raft of fake Chinese profiles all mention bitcoin, LOL.).

I don't think that whoever is behind this is going to gain much from it, and it will likely be short-lived.

MaeDior is back on SA. Wants 500 ppm. She is into FinDom and Paypigs. Previous reports posted on here of bad temper.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/817d8699-00bc-4d31-b07d-09c4f03029bb[/URL]

AbbyHawaii also back on SA. Also wants 500 ppm. Previous profile pics were fake. The ones posted now are real. Sister of MaeDior.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d38d865d-a1bf-438d-80c2-e095cc658964[/URL]

Passed on both. Drama and message attitude. YMMV.

Fake. Says just moved to Chicago. Listing Cincinnati for safety reasons. Won't post a private pic showing who this person is. That private pic would prob be fake too. Just don't bother unless you have time to waste.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9d4fb32e-9e71-4f16-a40d-0bcc42dae9c8[/URL]

This is an interesting report. Since others have said SDM is a dry hole, can you say more about your process? Perhaps you could post some pictures of your successes? Without giving too much away? In the past, I dismissed reports like yours due to poor personal experience. Now, though, with Seeking at risk of changing its nature, I think it is time to branch out and start exploring how to be successful on other sites. We need backups and alternatives. The need carries mounting weight as Seeking regularly increases its price while decreasing its value. It is hard for me to believe all the other sites are just giving up and abandoning the market completely to Seeking. Especially if Seeking is abandoning the market also.

Thanks much in advance!

BAM.

[QUOTE=UnoMas2022;5787268]Sugar Daddy Meet has worked for me. I have three Dayton area UTRs from that site. Beware the catfishers and the CashAppers and the fakes, but if you're looking for a non-pro with low expectations it's fishing in a barrel.[/QUOTE]

Something a little different for this forum.

Anyone ever catfish their current Sugar Baby after she tells you she is not seeing anyone else, says she is not on any sugar websites, and you see her active on Seeking or Secret Benefits?

If yes, how did you mess with her? What was the end result?

[QUOTE=BamBam;5788964]This is an interesting report. Since others have said SDM is a dry hole, can you say more about your process? Perhaps you could post some pictures of your successes? Without giving too much away? In the past, I dismissed reports like yours due to poor personal experience. Now, though, with Seeking at risk of changing its nature, I think it is time to branch out and start exploring how to be successful on other sites. We need backups and alternatives. The need carries mounting weight as Seeking regularly increases its price while decreasing its value. It is hard for me to believe all the other sites are just giving up and abandoning the market completely to Seeking. Especially if Seeking is abandoning the market also..[/QUOTE]The site is terribly painful to navigate, and the number of prospects compared to SA is tiny. Their logo says since 2007 - they should have spent some time and $ working on the site!

Yuuuuppp. Years ago. Suspected something going on. Using my back up profile on SEEKING I reached out her (yes I paid for 2 profiles at the time) . Used fake pics. Had an additional burner number (I still have 2 burner numbers). Set up a lunch meet. Waited in parking lot until I saw her go in. I had instructed her form the fake profile to wait in the lobby for me. I walked in and said heyyyy. "LacY' . Looking for "Bob" . She said. Wellll guess this is over. I said "YuP'. She left and I had a nice lunch. LOL.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5788999]Something a little different for this forum.

Anyone ever catfish their current Sugar Baby after she tells you she is not seeing anyone else, says she is not on any sugar websites, and you see her active on Seeking or Secret Benefits?

If yes, how did you mess with her? What was the end result?[/QUOTE]

SB promised she was exclusive. Is any SB? Didn't really care one way or the other. Fine to see other SD's. Just don't lie about was only ask. Prime SA account was disabled. Back up profile with catfish info and pic was active. SB popped up on SA. Coughed up the membership fee. Pinged her. Bingo. Replied. She asked for 100 less than what she was getting each week. Wanted discreet. Was open to meeting at hotel downtown. Gave her second burner number. Texted a bit. Set up private meet. Day of meetup told her got room. When she arrived at hotel to text for room number. She did. Gave her a room number. She said coming up. Waited until she text saying she knocked on the door and the guy that answered had no idea who she was or what was going on. Told her oops I transposed the last two digits of the room number. Sent her to another room near the first on same floor and blocked her on burner and main phone. Called hotel main desk from burner. Said there was some girl on my floor knocking on doors looking for a date can you check it out? Dont know what happened next to her. Never talked to her again.

[QUOTE=LikeMike1963;5789577]Yuuuuppp. Years ago. Suspected something going on. Using my back up profile on SEEKING I reached out her (yes I paid for 2 profiles at the time) . Used fake pics. Had an additional burner number (I still have 2 burner numbers). Set up a lunch meet. Waited in parking lot until I saw her go in. I had instructed her form the fake profile to wait in the lobby for me. I walked in and said heyyyy. "LacY' . Looking for "Bob" . She said. Wellll guess this is over. I said "YuP'. She left and I had a nice lunch. LOL.[/QUOTE]

And if you expect otherwise, then you should probably be on eHarmony, and not Seeking.

If you're handing a woman cash to be with you, she's not your girlfriend, plain and simple. Any expectations to the contrary are going to result in heartbreak and disappointment.

I recently took up with a very young, very hot SB whom I *know* is seeing another member of this board. When I asked her if she was already seeing anyone else, she looked me in the eye and said "no".

I find that 98% of the SBs I meet, even if they've been on the site for 2 years, assure me that I am not only their *only* guy at present, I am the only guy they have *ever* gone beyond the MnG stage with.

It's just a part of the game. Just like the many married SDs who withhold that information.

Get this, and get this good: SBs are not girlfriends you pay, SBs are escorts with whom you have a more informal, relaxed relationship.

And escorts, by nature, are communal women, free agents. So are SBs.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5790164]SB promised she was exclusive. Is any SB? Didn't really care one way or the other. Fine to see other SD's. Just don't lie about was only ask. Prime SA account was disabled. Back up profile with catfish info and pic was active. SB popped up on SA. Coughed up the membership fee. Pinged her. Bingo. Replied. She asked for 100 less than what she was getting each week. Wanted discreet. Was open to meeting at hotel downtown. Gave her second burner number. Texted a bit. Set up private meet. Day of meetup told her got room. When she arrived at hotel to text for room number. She did. Gave her a room number. She said coming up. Waited until she text saying she knocked on the door and the guy that answered had no idea who she was or what was going on. Told her oops I transposed the last two digits of the room number. Sent her to another room near the first on same floor and blocked her on burner and main phone. Called hotel main desk from burner. Said there was some girl on my floor knocking on doors looking for a date can you check it out? Dont know what happened next to her. Never talked to her again.[/QUOTE]That's funny and probably felt pretty good. I just don't have the time or energy for that shit. If it bugged me that she lied, I'd just block her and move on. Let her wonder what happened. It cost you $100 and a few hours of your time for that feeling, when it takes less than an afternoon to just move on to the next one.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5791097]And if you expect otherwise, then you should probably be on eHarmony, and not Seeking.

If you're handing a woman cash to be with you, she's not your girlfriend, plain and simple. Any expectations to the contrary are going to result in heartbreak and disappointment.

I recently took up with a very young, very hot SB whom I *know* is seeing another member of this board. When I asked her if she was already seeing anyone else, she looked me in the eye and said "no".

I find that 98% of the SBs I meet, even if they've been on the site for 2 years, assure me that I am not only their *only* guy at present, I am the only guy they have *ever* gone beyond the MnG stage with.

It's just a part of the game. Just like the many married SDs who withhold that information.

Get this, and get this good: SBs are not girlfriends you pay, SBs are escorts with whom you have a more informal, relaxed relationship.

And escorts, by nature, are communal women, free agents. So are SBs.[/QUOTE]Well said Todd, especially the last two lines. I have a SB that treats me like her boyfriend. She cooks for me, treats me real well, etc. And pursues me more than I pursue her. Nonetheless, I don't know if I am her only SD and I really don't care. The escorts I see are there to give me variety because I get bored with the same SB after awhile.

[QUOTE=Potus2020;5791516]Well said Todd, especially the last two lines. I have a SB that treats me like her boyfriend. She cooks for me, treats me real well, etc. And pursues me more than I pursue her. Nonetheless, I don't know if I am her only SD and I really don't care. The escorts I see are there to give me variety because I get bored with the same SB after awhile.[/QUOTE]"I get bored with the same SB after awhile. ".

Ain't it the truth. There is an old saying - "Show me a beautiful woman and I'll show you some guy who's tired of fucking her. ".

Or how about this one - "Man has five essential needs: Food, water, sleep, pussy, and strange pussy. ".

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;5791613]"I get bored with the same SB after awhile. ".

Ain't it the truth. There is an old saying - "Show me a beautiful woman and I'll show you some guy who's tired of fucking her. ".

Or how about this one - "Man has five essential needs: Food, water, sleep, pussy, and strange pussy. ".[/QUOTE]It is simple, I am addicted to "more". Be it alcohol, money, pussy, adrenilin rushes. Anything that changes how I feel at a particular momemt, I want more.

Anyone else notice that there seems to be a lot more 30+ year olds on the site recently?