Asian Providers

[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]Yes I apologize guys. That was a typo. I meant to type late 30's. But you are correct her body does look like she's in her twenties.

[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]Kiko has had many names over the years and she is the same girl that you're thinking of. Definitely nowhere close to 20's and I agree with you that she's probably in her 40's. Her body is the most fit out of the SDAG girls imo, almost 0 body fat. Tatum has a nicer ass but I prefer Kiko's tits even though they're both sporting manmades. She's also one of the only girls at SDAG that still uses real pictures (the topless pic on the website, all others are fake). I've always gotten good service from her but she does have a tendency to get chatty at times. Just keep her mouth occupied with something else, LOL. She was quite popular in LA and still gets talked about on the LA boards.

[URL=https://www.foxylists.com/glow]Old Pics[/URL] - photoshopped some to enhance her T&A but she really is that thin.

[URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/bunny---glow-348246]San Diego reviews[/URL]

[URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/tomi---pink-264622]Orange County reviews[/URL]

[URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/glow-2133787971-337889]Los Angeles reviews[/URL]

[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5442242]Hey DragonWolf!

I appreciate you pointing out her possible age. Even the ad on HX indicates she's 31 and we all know that most girls shed at least 3-5 years off their actual age in this industry. Now if reviewers would just state something along the line of, she LOOKS like she's in her 20's/late 20s instead of provider being in her late 20's that would be helpful for someone like me who prefers "younger" providers. Well, maybe not in their early 20's, but late 20's to mid 30's is ideal. LOL.

If she was in her 30s when you saw her a decade a go, then she is probably in her 40s. Which is okay if she looks like shes in her late 20s or early 30s, has a pretty face, banging body and has great service. I keep hearing good things about, and have her on my list. Maybe one day. Lol[/QUOTE]I'm with you on that. The age can be so misleading, so what's more important is the appearance / how well they've maintained themselves, along with personality. Sometimes a super fit, veteran, who's maintained their looks, can suffer on the personality side, just from having been in the scene for however long.

Sometimes people want someone on the younger side to avoid that jaded personality from the veterans.

So it's all about accurate representation. Back in the day I questioned the alleged age, and gave her a 7 for look, but an 9 for service and a a yes for the repeat. It would've been my first review, but it got denied since I think I submitted it after she left SD, so she'd been taken off the site.

New girl at FEC. She was in OC last month and Boston (as Cora) a couple months ago. Sounds like 30's with a decent face, not a spinner, big boobs, average service.

OC reviews - [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/violet-7146441854-360584]review1[/URL] [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/violet-7148642886-360653]review2[/URL].

Boston review - [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?32529-Boston-Top-Ten&p=5330960&viewfull=1#post5330960]here[/URL].

[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5442486]Kiko is my favorite provider here in San Diego, hands down! She's definitely in her late 40's, if not 50. She has the body of a 20 year old, in fact a better body than most. She was my first agency provider I met and I've been seeing her ever since. I did notice she's now advertising BBFS with the additional tip, she's probably been giving it away to most of her regulars, but now with the upcharge.[/QUOTE]She's definitely not *late* 40's. She was 29 when I first met her in 2010 going by the name Kandy at a now defunct (I assume) agency called SD Suite Dreams.

[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442572]I'm with you on that. The age can be so misleading, so what's more important is the appearance / how well they've maintained themselves, along with personality. Sometimes a super fit, veteran, who's maintained their looks, can suffer on the personality side, just from having been in the scene for however long.

Sometimes people want someone on the younger side to avoid that jaded personality from the veterans.

So it's all about accurate representation. Back in the day I questioned the alleged age, and gave her a 7 for look, but an 9 for service and a a yes for the repeat. It would've been my first review, but it got denied since I think I submitted it after she left SD, so she'd been taken off the site.[/QUOTE]I am bummed to see the resurgence for Kiko. In the past, I thought that I clicked with other providers better but would occasionally crave her appearance. She really upped her game the last time I saw her and I was going to keep quiet about it and keep it to myself. I guess the Kiko / Bunny appreciation society is alive and well!

[QUOTE=Pete8911;5442895]I am bummed to see the resurgence for Kiko. In the past, I thought that I clicked with other providers better but would occasionally crave her appearance. She really upped her game the last time I saw her and I was going to keep quiet about it and keep it to myself. I guess the Kiko / Bunny appreciation society is alive and well![/QUOTE]Ha, Kiko always makes me feel like she likes me the most. Beyond looks, I'm convinced she may be mentally gifted as well. She's skilled socially and her memory is outstanding. There is definitely an addictive quality to her that is unexplainable.

[QUOTE=MaxwellEsq;5443092]Ha, Kiko always makes me feel like she likes me the most. Beyond looks, I'm convinced she may be mentally gifted as well. She's skilled socially and her memory is outstanding. There is definitely an addictive quality to her that is unexplainable.[/QUOTE]I hear you. She's always even hot and friendly but I've had sessions where she has been excessively chatty or distracted easy. Not this last time though. That was one of my best sessions ever.

I just tried again for the third time in like ten years to get verified with SDAG. I don't know why it keeps going wrong. I had no problems with previous agencies in San Diego, and FEC and I have been on great terms for years. I just never get any response from SDAG even after I provide a lot of details that I'd rather not provide. LOL. Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Did I see something about how having an HX account could help?

[QUOTE=Senchi;5444868]I just tried again for the third time in like ten years to get verified with SDAG. I don't know why it keeps going wrong. I had no problems with previous agencies in San Diego, and FEC and I have been on great terms for years. I just never get any response from SDAG even after I provide a lot of details that I'd rather not provide. LOL. Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Did I see something about how having an HX account could help?[/QUOTE]You've been hobbying for 10 years and don't have an HX account? Make an account on HX, pay to get out of quarantine, ask the agencies / providers you are already in with to rate you on HX, once you've gotten a few ratings send SDAG a message on HX.

[QUOTE=Apharmd;5444937]You've been hobbying for 10 years and don't have an HX account? Make an account on HX, pay to get out of quarantine, ask the agencies / providers you are already in with to rate you on HX, once you've gotten a few ratings send SDAG a message on HX.[/QUOTE]I know, it probably sounds crazy, but I mostly frequent AMPs or apartment providers like FEC, so using a service like HX was never necessary. It does make it hard if I ever want to reach out to independent providers though because I have no one to verify me. It's just one of those chicken and egg problems, and I didn't realize that it might affect my ability to get verified with SDAG as it has never been an issue with other providers of this sort. I'll take your advice however, thanks.

So is Kiko formerly Bunny who was at SDAG back around 2012?

[QUOTE=Pete8911;5442895]I am bummed to see the resurgence for Kiko. In the past, I thought that I clicked with other providers better but would occasionally crave her appearance. She really upped her game the last time I saw her and I was going to keep quiet about it and keep it to myself. I guess the Kiko / Bunny appreciation society is alive and well![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RolfTorren;5448745]So is Kiko formerly Bunny who was at SDAG back around 2012?[/QUOTE]Yes and damn that makes me feel old.

You and me both. She was a great fuck back then.

[QUOTE=FingerLicking;5448812]Yes and damn that makes me feel old.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RolfTorren;5449147]You and me both. She was a great fuck back then.[/QUOTE]She was my first experience w / these agencies, back in day. LOL.