I think we are all delusional to some degree in this game
The women love to believe they are not prostitutes despite offering sex for money.
The mongers like to believe the young sexy women would fuck us even if we didn't pay them.
And when they do fuck us (or let us fuck them) we like to believe we are the best fuck they ever had, and their multiple orgasms were real and unique to our actions.
And that they really mean it when they compliment our looks, body, performance, and cock size.
If everyone is happy with these delusions, I'd say the system works.
Will AirTags Be The End Of Sugar Daddies?
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/11/technology/airtags-gps-surveillance.html[/URL]
Why'all Ready to & Start Dating Up?
The transition to the new Seeking has happened.
Only mention of arrangements is in the potted company history, under "About Us".
Sugar Daddy Relationships are Organic, Not Arranged
My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.
Desperate Situations are the Ones to Avoid
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5781229]My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.[/QUOTE]To somewhat echo RO, I think what you are describing here is even worse than what he says, in that both of these arrangements were with desperate, vulnerable women.
Precisely the sort of situation I strive to avoid in my arrangements.
Needing Help Isn't Always "Desperate"
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5781821]To somewhat echo RO, I think what you are describing here is even worse than what he says, in that both of these arrangements were with desperate, vulnerable women.
Precisely the sort of situation I strive to avoid in my arrangements.[/QUOTE]There is always a danger when I don't provide "details" to help paint a clear and accurate picture of the situation. People naturally draw conclusions and assume they understand the situation. In these cases I think you drew the wrong conclusion.
First, the Runaway, was 20, so lets get that understood right away. I was 29 at the time. Runaway was perhaps the wrong phrase, lets say she left home abruptly without all the proper means to fully support herself. At the time I jokingly called her the "runaway" and that is how I described her in my post. My error.
Secondly, both were in need of counseling and friendship when they were in a tough situation, and we became friends. Our relationship in both cases blossomed from there. In the process I provided some assistance, when they needed a little financial help now and then, because I had it, and wanted too.
Neither was, desperate, forced, coerced, or under any other negative powers to do anything they didn't want to do. I am a firm believer that women have the right to say "no" when ever they want for what ever reason they want. I'm all about consent, I like them wanting to be with me as much as I want to be with them. Any that don't want to be with me, don't have to be.
It is good to see that you mongers do have a moral compass. Glad you spoke up otherwise others may have drawn other negative conclusions that were not accurate to the situations.
My own fault for not providing enough of the details to give you an accurate picture.
My point still stands, I believe that a SB / SD relationship should be organic where you naturally like each other. Not a business arrangement like a Independent provider.
To take this further. If I wanted to fully support a Fuck Buddy, I'll get a Mistress and have exclusive access to her not be another guy in line waiting for his time with her.
MXK.
How do you know if it's organic.
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5781229]My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.[/QUOTE]Some of these episodes of 60 min have SB stating they date 4-5 SD at a time.
You even stated, "They were free to have sex with anyone they wanted".
No one checks. I have seen vids where a guy creampies women and some of them say.
Their boyfriend knows.
[URL]https://www.peppahub.com/babe-porn/1352-compilation---unwanted-creampies-compila.html[/URL]
Time 4:59.
Funny ones time 4:04, time 11:30.
I'll have to disagree that it will be cheaper to find an independent with establish chemistry. Not unless you look like an "A-lister celebrity".
Brandon Wade couldn't get a date without paying for it.