-
[QUOTE=IslandDreams;5874932]He had a long run as a scheduler, but they get them all eventually. Promoting is a felony and they have two counts against him right now, but more charges may be forthcoming. They like the term trafficking these days and he managed across state lines, so that could be an issue for him.
I believe a conviction will place him on the sex offenders registry, but I could be wrong on that. Not sure of KY laws. Vinelink says he has ben released, needless to say, I would not contact him until this has all been resolved.
All in all a heavy price to pay for a small percentage of income.
I sure hope he can afford a good lawyer.[/QUOTE]Will they go after his clients?
-
I don't know
[QUOTE=Holdrhem;5874999]Will they go after his clients?[/QUOTE]But I assume if they have his phone and access to his home computers, then you have to presume they know the people that booked through him, at least by phone number and user name. Each escort they can show worked for him is a separate felony charge. Steve has been at this for many many years, so the investigation will take time as they track down those ladies and lean on them. In the hierarchy of criminal charges Steve is at the top. There are tons of user in this forum that have talked about using various escorts from him.
I would think this is going to be a tough case for him. From the other comments about him, it sounds like they have know about him for quite a while.
Like I said before since the scheduler gets the most serious charges, I sure don't think what he was doing was worth whatever he got out of it.
-
[QUOTE=Clem12;5874569]He wasn't the greatest guy to deal with.[/QUOTE]He was a total asshole but don't take any pleasure out of his problems.
-
Boone or Kenton?
Which PD got EE yesterday?
-
Clients
I would think that's tough to do. How would "they" prove anything happened?
These reports are all fiction anyways, aren't they?
[QUOTE=Holdrhem;5874999]Will they go after his clients?[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Holdrhem;5874999]Will they go after his clients?[/QUOTE]They usually just release whatever client information he was dumb enough to keep and let the journalists track down the congressmen and church leaders who were using their work phones to book. Too hard to get a conviction off of a series of texts that say, "Is Brookee available at 4 pm?" "Yes, address" "here" "room 203" with no proof they ever even put on shoes, let alone went to the hotel or whatever.
-
[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;5875116]I would think that's tough to do. How would "they" prove anything happened?
These reports are all fiction anyways, aren't they?[/QUOTE]So what if the providers kept dna evidence and she bargains with them to turn it over. And what about text messaging over text now?
-
Yes just stories
[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;5875116]I would think that's tough to do. How would "they" prove anything happened?
These reports are all fiction anyways, aren't they?[/QUOTE]Modern day Penthouse letters. Pay for sex? Hell no, why would anyone do that?
-
Relax
Free. Press time. It is an election year. LOL.
[QUOTE=IslandDreams;5875014]But I assume if they have his phone and access to his home computers, then you have to presume they know the people that booked through him, at least by phone number and user name. Each escort they can show worked for him is a separate felony charge. Steve has been at this for many many years, so the investigation will take time as they track down those ladies and lean on them. In the hierarchy of criminal charges Steve is at the top. There are tons of user in this forum that have talked about using various escorts from him.
I would think this is going to be a tough case for him. From the other comments about him, it sounds like they have know about him for quite a while.
Like I said before since the scheduler gets the most serious charges, I sure don't think what he was doing was worth whatever he got out of it.[/QUOTE]
-
Jane
[QUOTE=AlanDodson;5873683]2 different times made the trip up north only to get stood up last minute. Usually one strike and done with me but thought I'd try again based on reviews from last year. Sounds like I didn't miss much.[/QUOTE]I can also attest to her downward slide. She used to be a reliable good provider but then ripped me off for $200 so she is definitely off my list.
-
Jane
[QUOTE=GenxDad;5875220]I can also attest to her downward slide. She used to be a reliable good provider but then ripped me off for $200 so she is definitely off my list.[/QUOTE]She was a decent time in beginning if you could get ahold of her, great bbbjws always fresh.
Last 2 times she was late by hours, wanted me to front next visit I declined.
Last visit she also was not fresh I hate stinky pussy.
I won't return.
-
Promoting prostitution
[QUOTE=Holdrhem;5875161]So what if the providers kept dna evidence and she bargains with them to turn it over. And what about text messaging over text now?[/QUOTE]Several co operating witnesses would do it.
-
[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;5875116]I would think that's tough to do. How would "they" prove anything happened?
These reports are all fiction anyways, aren't they?[/QUOTE]They're not going after clients. The girls probably as witnesses. As far as this all being fiction, you really think anyone buys the "in my dream" crap?
-
Just a guess
[QUOTE=Holdrhem;5875161]So what if the providers kept dna evidence and she bargains with them to turn it over?[/QUOTE]These ladies are not storing vials of baby batter in their apartment. I could be wrong!
-
[QUOTE=Holdrhem;5875161]So what if the providers kept dna evidence and she bargains with them to turn it over. And what about text messaging over text now?[/QUOTE]What if the provider had a camera in her vagina and has the video? What if what if what if. Jezz just relax.