Escort Reviews

[QUOTE=Ruollis;2003291]I'm new to the provider world and was getting frustrated with the reference process (which I understand fully), but through email we agreed to dinner which allowed time for vetting.

After dinner we went shopping for toys Then back to her place. No rush, made me feel comfortable.

Had a great time. Thanks![/QUOTE]I find it interesting that so many NEW members have reviewed Angel. Makes you wonder.

I once was active on another site. Last year about this time I was pmed by Angel offering me a free session for a review. I actually showed up. She was doing doubles with another lady. Was afraid to leave my car parked in the area but did. This was the projects! Walked to the door and Angel answered. The place was a mess. Found both ladies to be very ghetto, they seemed high and I just couldn't stay. Not even for free. Angel pmed me later and apologized and then trash talked the other provider and said she had a crazy big black boyfriend. That they lived next door and that she was afraid of them. She was actually banned from the other site for quite sometime, I am told because of fake reviews and the like. Anyone involving them self with this lady is asking for trouble. She is a train wreck waiting to go off the tracks again.

I wish her the best but just think she is a conniving drama queen. I would not trust. But do so at your own risk.

[QUOTE=Ichfickemich;2003087]An escort provides full services.[/QUOTE]Does this report not qualify as a pointless and unproductive drama. I think after the 1,000 time we get it you don't want to see somebody that doesn't provide FS. What I don't get is why keep sticking you nose into other mongers dreams. Do they need your " Good House Keeping Seal of Approval" in order to be considered real mongers?

I chose her soley because of the reviews on THIS site.

[QUOTE=BallBuster;2003720]I find it interesting that so many NEW members have reviewed Angel. Makes you wonder.

I once was active on another site. Last year about this time I was pmed by Angel offering me a free session for a review. I actually showed up. She was doing doubles with another lady. Was afraid to leave my car parked in the area but did. This was the projects! Walked to the door and Angel answered. The place was a mess. Found both ladies to be very ghetto, they seemed high and I just couldn't stay. Not even for free. Angel pmed me later and apologized and then trash talked the other provider and said she had a crazy big black boyfriend. That they lived next door and that she was afraid of them. She was actually banned from the other site for quite sometime, I am told because of fake reviews and the like. Anyone involving them self with this lady is asking for trouble. She is a train wreck waiting to go off the tracks again.

I wish her the best but just think she is a conniving drama queen. I would not trust. But do so at your own risk.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=InFromBehind;2003557]Amen Brother![/QUOTE]If Whitney ever did go FS, I'm afraid you would have to start a whole new thread dedicated to everything Whitney. She is at the very least a professional "provider" and a very nice addition to the area.

[QUOTE=Mundane;2003453]You've made this statement before and it seems to be a real issue for you, but I have to wonder, why is it such a big deal? I have not had the pleasure of seeing Whitney, but her reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Now, you can say that she's not an escort and that's fine, but the real question is "what is an escort?" I think it's different for everyone. We all have different interests and desires. Some of us don't care about FS, so does that mean we're not a "monger?" Some guys are into Bondage and want to submit to a Dominatrix. Usually, there is no sex involved in those sessions, but most would still consider her a form of escort. In fact, I have been in some cities where some "Escorts" are just that: Escorts for time and companionship. When calling the service (in the escort section of the phone book), it is made very clear that nothing of a sexual activiity will occur. Escort is a broad term.

I think most here do not care if Whitney is discussed in the "Escort." thread or the "General" thread or the "Massage" thread. It really doesn't matter! (if I was to go to an AMP and the provider never massaged me but immeadiately stripped and got sexual, would I be wrong for putting comments in the "Massage" section? It just doesn't matter!) Whitney obviously provides a service that many men are happy with. That is why this site is valuable. Now you know that she does not provide Full Service. If that's a deal breaker for you, simply don't go![/QUOTE]I don't call a diamond a rock, nor do I call a rock a diamond. There is a classification set for a reason. I suppose I do not get why you do not get it? There were many that spoke up behind me and said they felt the same.

Sadly, there will be the case where a man could care less about where he discusses the v between the legs. Some would lump them all together and could care less. USASG has a basic outline and we build upon it. A great system. Now if I build an outline and I am discussing brain patterns for two paragraphs, but in the middle start talking about rainbows blowing out someones ass. I have done wrong.

[QUOTE=Ichfickemich;2003973]I don't call a diamond a rock, nor do I call a rock a diamond. There is a classification set for a reason. I suppose I do not get why you do not get it? There were many that spoke up behind me and said they felt the same.

Sadly, there will be the case where a man could care less about where he discusses the v between the legs. Some would lump them all together and could care less. USASG has a basic outline and we build upon it. A great system. Now if I build an outline and I am discussing brain patterns for two paragraphs, but in the middle start talking about rainbows blowing out someones ass. I have done wrong.[/QUOTE]

Okay, there's no way I'm going to argue with that kind of logic. When a discussion reaches a "rainbows blowing out of someone's ass" analogy, it's pretty much beyond agreement. Good luck making everyone post the way you think they should...

[QUOTE=Mundane;2004079]Okay, there's no way I'm going to argue with that kind of logic. When a discussion reaches a "rainbows blowing out of someone's ass" analogy, it's pretty much beyond agreement. Good luck making everyone post the way you think they should...[/QUOTE]My apologies. I didn't mean to start something here. I realized I posted in the wrong forum and immediately posted in the correct one. I wasn't sure how to delete this one. I will definitely be more careful in posting in the future.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]

[QUOTE=BallBuster;2003720]I find it interesting that so many NEW members have reviewed Angel. Makes you wonder.

I once was active on another site. Last year about this time I was pmed by Angel offering me a free session for a review. I actually showed up. She was doing doubles with another lady. Was afraid to leave my car parked in the area but did. This was the projects! Walked to the door and Angel answered. The place was a mess. Found both ladies to be very ghetto, they seemed high and I just couldn't stay. Not even for free. Angel pmed me later and apologized and then trash talked the other provider and said she had a crazy big black boyfriend. That they lived next door and that she was afraid of them. She was actually banned from the other site for quite sometime, I am told because of fake reviews and the like. Anyone involving them self with this lady is asking for trouble. She is a train wreck waiting to go off the tracks again.

I wish her the best but just think she is a conniving drama queen. I would not trust. But do so at your own risk.[/QUOTE]Buster, I can understand that a sour experience in the past can leave you with a bad impression, but I will say that I have seen Angel recently (for the first time) and I did not get this impression at all. She was lucid and sweet and showed no signs of drug use or erratic behavior. She was upfront with me about her past and that she was trying very hard to change her life. I'm a pretty cynical person most of the time, but I have to admit it seemed very sincere. After reading the recent reviews, I have to agree with the positve response. She really was quite an "Angel" and I enjoyed my time with her immensely.

I appluad her attempt to clean up her life and make a better one for herself. It's not easy to pull yourself out of a downward spiral and start over. I wish her the best!

[QUOTE=BallBuster;2003720]I find it interesting that so many NEW members have reviewed Angel. Makes you wonder.

I once was active on another site. Last year about this time I was pmed by Angel offering me a free session for a review. I actually showed up. She was doing doubles with another lady. Was afraid to leave my car parked in the area but did. This was the projects! Walked to the door and Angel answered. The place was a mess. Found both ladies to be very ghetto, they seemed high and I just couldn't stay. Not even for free. Angel pmed me later and apologized and then trash talked the other provider and said she had a crazy big black boyfriend. That they lived next door and that she was afraid of them. She was actually banned from the other site for quite sometime, I am told because of fake reviews and the like. Anyone involving them self with this lady is asking for trouble. She is a train wreck waiting to go off the tracks again.

I wish her the best but just think she is a conniving drama queen. I would not trust. But do so at your own risk.[/QUOTE]I can't speak to your previous experiences with her, but if all that is true, that isn't the situation now. She's improved her location, and is only in business now trying to make ends meet and get by. She's always been straight with me. As far as trusting her, after a few visits we realized we knew each other from years ago. Needless to say, she could easily ruin a lot of things for me if she chose to, but she keeps things on professional level. As far as providers go, she's on the VERY short list that I've encountered that I believe are clean and honest with me.

Think, there maybe some confusion?

Angeleyezmama, is very safe and very good at what she does!

Wonder if this is the Angel with the negative posts?

[URL]http://knoxville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/simply-the-best-west-knox-incalls-and-outcalls-21/9609925[/URL]

[QUOTE=Ichfickemich;2003087]An escort provides full services.[/QUOTE]I am not sure this post should go here so if not, admin. Please let me know where to post. But since other discussion is included here on the topic, here it is.

When I saw Whitney for the first time, I do not even remember in which section I read about her. But I do know that it was clear that a HE was provided to others. Different sites seem to have different definitions, but since I discovered this site has an abbreviations and definitons section, it has shed some light. So I am not sure why we are having this discussion here. Here is the official USA definition that you can find here:

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?1897-Terms-and-Abbreviations-List[/URL]

Escort A woman who is paid for her companionship.

As I looked at some other sites for the definition, often they say "may or may not include sex". Now we know many have different definitions for this also. If I were caught at an MP, I assume if I told my SO that I only had a HJ, that she would not buy it that it was not really sex. But different strokes for different folks.

Saw the Oliver Springs utr hottie again Friday just gets better and better 20 yrs 5'8 120 lbs mmm so hot so pretty and great time.

[QUOTE=WheelerJim;2004807]Saw the Oliver Springs utr hottie again Friday just gets better and better 20 yrs 5'8 120 lbs mmm so hot so pretty and great time.[/QUOTE]Is this the chick that advertised on BP? If so, she is not UTR. IS this also the same chick the newspaper reported set up guys for OS Uncle? If so, damn man I wish you luck.

[QUOTE=BallBuster;2004999]Is this the chick that advertised on BP? If so, she is not UTR. IS this also the same chick the newspaper reported set up guys for OS Uncle? If so, damn man I wish you luck.[/QUOTE]This is not the girl that worked with LEO as she was much older than this girl, she did post once on BP and no one responded so she hasn't reposted I myself posted when it came on BP that she was no longer a utr but since she dropped off line and only me an one other guy has seen her then I will call her a utr.