Printable View
[QUOTE=Accolon;3730579]Oh jesus, if I had known this I wouldn't have gone near her with a ten foot pole.[/QUOTE]No worries, man — show her your commitment, and you will be getting it too!
By the way, it was a compliment when I compared her to Angela, who is my all- time favorite. Angela might be old and ugly now, but what can I do, love is love.
[URL]https://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/thp/d/acuspaasian-massage/6500279149.html[/URL]
I decided to try this place out the other day. Called later and got the last appointment of the evening. Arrived at the location its on the second floor and not exactly a discreet place.
There was only one girl working there named "Yo Yo" I paid for the hour which was 60. Yo Yo did a good job. I asked for soft and she just smiled said "okay honey" . She chatted me up a bit her English wasn't that great so some miscommunications She hit all the right spots and when I flipped she got me a pillow and went right to work. Yo Yo was very friendly and not distant like some of the places I have been to. Finished up with the usual HE release. I tipped 60 and was on my way after the hot towel clean up and the water bottle. Yo Yo was very friendly and she didn't try to haggle or upsell and was happy with the tip at the end of the session will repeat.
Clear your inbox.
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;3730317] so she filters out new guys. [/QUOTE]This part of the post is very accurate, seems most guys that are new to her are getting the HJ only treatment. Not trying to dissuade anyone from visiting but it is most certainly not a slam dunk at an expanded menu.
PM me, maybe I have found her still here in the boston area.
In revere I have been to 7 Foster Street, Holistic and Julia's electric revolution. For years I have seen the multiple vague other adds for waxing, facials, massage, etc. Does anyone know if any of these places offer anything we are interested in?
Thanks,
DP.
[QUOTE=Dickpalmer;3731996]In revere I have been to 7 Foster Street, Holistic and Julia's electric revolution. For years I have seen the multiple vague other adds for waxing, facials, massage, etc. Does anyone know if any of these places offer anything we are interested in?
Thanks,
DP.[/QUOTE]Julia's is beyond horrible. Can't answer your Q but I've been to 333 Broadway and the one advertising as near Shirley Ave. , it's an AAMP. Both not worth bothering with.
MM.
Anyone been to 157 LATELY? I saw Angela in Danvers shop couple weeks ago & she said Lola & a younger provider were working in Malden shop. Been a while for me there. Any comments anyone?
MM.
Masseuse: Sara.
AMP Looks: 6/10.
Real World: 4/10.
Time paid: 30 min.
Time given: 40 min.
Cost: . 4.
Tip: standard.
Facility: Kind of sketchy, but clean seeming and warm.
Repeat: No.
Notes:
With all the hype, I stopped by on an evening hoping to see a beautiful, older masseuse in a nice uniform. I did not find Sara to be very attractive. What people say about the uniform is true, and she has great legs for her age, but I will not be repeating. I don't doubt the reports about extras here after multiple visits, but that's not my thing. Parking down the street is super easy and it is discrete at night, but sketchier seeming at night too. She dims the lights to great effect and has a very warm personality, but she is older and her hair is receding a little.
[QUOTE=PadMe5;3732272]AMP Looks: 6/10.
Real World: 4/10.[/QUOTE]Wow, man, you are so demanding! I am curious how your AMP 8/10 or 9/10 look like and where you get them in Bostonian suburbs. Care to share a name or two?
[QUOTE=Chuggo;3730438]Agree completely, my experience was identical, including the odd post finish massage holding my package in one hand and rubbing the length of my leg with the other. Will not repeat, BBBJ was all teeth, and disjointed with constant stopping to kiss my legs and nuts. Kudos to those that enjoy her service, not for me though.[/QUOTE]Which 569, Boylston or Cambridge St or? Is Mia at this place!
Float.
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;3732323]Wow, man, you are so demanding! I am curious how your AMP 8/10 or 9/10 look like and where you get them in Bostonian suburbs. Care to share a name or two?[/QUOTE]No need to take it personal, we all have our preferences, and I'm always willing to share, that's the point of these forums! Angela at CB Waltham and Coco in Framingham were both much cuter than Sara at 90 B, but I don't know if either is still working. So is anyone at 1060 (all more real, less plastic-looking and makeup, but also less done up). Tulip in Brookline occasionally has a real looker (4 years ago they had an Angela that was my ATF for looks, only 9/10 I've ever met, but they rotate fast). Then there's always taking the drive to RI for clubs and spas when things are dry up here (clubs if you want a real looker for 15 min). Used to be a huge fan of Opulence down there before they shut down. I'm still on the lookout for my ideal masseuse and don't have a current "real world 8/10," but that's no reason to stop the hunt.
I'm not into "extra extras," so yes, I realize that I am demanding when it comes to looks and then massage skill as a distant second. Sara is very sensual (if you like her, you'd like Angie at Spa Tao who is similar in attractiveness- teeth aren't great) and does have a great body in a mini-skirt that feels really nice when she's crawling all over the table (all that was great). If you're looking for that extra thing, I agree that she'd be a good deal for some. With the dim lights and two beers, I could see her being a 7+ or more in looks. Her ponytail is long and cute as well, but she's got an older face (GILF?) with a receding hair line. Not my thing. I hope you understand. Since I'm not interested in the mileage she may provide, and since her massage skills were just OK to good, her looks weren't enough to bring me back. She was very nice.
If anyone can recommend true stunners who provide a limited massage, I'd be appreciative! It sounds like Miss Venice is the way to go, but I prefer fixed locations with a store front.
Stopped into Lotus in Danvers as a walk in. I asked if Suzy was still there but unfortunately she isn't. My masseuse was Gia. Pretty girl with a very friendly and fun personality. Very good English too. Good hard massage which bordered on painful at times but it was just what I needed. She mixed in a fair amount of teasing. Nice ST and she told me to flip when I wanted. She has an interesting technique on the finish and while it's nothing more than what is usually available here, it was done very well. Suzy may no longer be there but Gia is a nice replacement and I will repeat with her.
[QUOTE=PadMe5;3732272]Masseuse: Sara.
AMP Looks: 6/10.
Real World: 4/10.
Time paid: 30 min.
Time given: 40 min.
Cost: . 4.
Tip: standard.
Facility: Kind of sketchy, but clean seeming and warm.
Repeat: No.
Notes:
With all the hype, I stopped by on an evening hoping to see a beautiful, older masseuse in a nice uniform. I did not find Sara to be very attractive. What people say about the uniform is true, and she has great legs for her age, but I will not be repeating. I don't doubt the reports about extras here after multiple visits, but that's not my thing. Parking down the street is super easy and it is discrete at night, but sketchier seeming at night too. She dims the lights to great effect and has a very warm personality, but she is older and her hair is receding a little.[/QUOTE]The ambivalence of posting a good report. RTF leads to further exploration and corroboration. The intel seems solid. So many will take a visit to see for them self. The place and provider feel the influx of business maybe with short term increase in their cash business. Human nature takes over soon and give less for more $. Local business may or may not like the extra street traffic depending on the local area. More reports will be posting possibly saying the service is less due to either fear of provider or "dues / mult visits gets more access.
[QUOTE=PadMe5;3732272]Masseuse: Sara.
AMP Looks: 6/10.
Real World: 4/10.
Time paid: 30 min.
Time given: 40 min.
Cost: . 4.
Tip: standard.
Facility: Kind of sketchy, but clean seeming and warm.
Repeat: No.
Notes:
With all the hype, I stopped by on an evening hoping to see a beautiful, older masseuse in a nice uniform. I did not find Sara to be very attractive. What people say about the uniform is true, and she has great legs for her age, but I will not be repeating. I don't doubt the reports about extras here after multiple visits, but that's not my thing. Parking down the street is super easy and it is discrete at night, but sketchier seeming at night too. She dims the lights to great effect and has a very warm personality, but she is older and her hair is receding a little.[/QUOTE]The ambivalence of posting a good report. RTF leads to further exploration and corroboration. The intel seems solid. So many will take a visit to see for them self. The place and provider feel the influx of business maybe with short term increase in their cash business. Human nature takes over soon and give less for more $. Local business may or may not like the extra street traffic depending on the local area. More reports will be posting possibly saying the service is less due to either fear of provider or "dues / mult visits gets more access. Then buisness may drop off if the place "has jumped the shark". Then a few months later you read it is easier to get again.
Please delete first.
Report if posted twice.