Printable View
Real name is Kelsey. I met her over a year ago. This is her second profile. She lives pretty far out and cannot host. Either not DTF or I never offered enough. She is an occasional stripper and travels to do it. LOTS of drama!! I have PII for contributing seniors.
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/77c68837-08da-4b0e-b7d9-3aafcba4f156[/URL]
I will now be responding to messages only from men who use the wishlist when they start a conversation. My last Daddy taught me how I want to be treated.
Yeah and no. That is her profiles opening message. Has three different locations listed. Smells like a wish list scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5a37dfae-367d-4446-b1bd-815c97297ef8[/URL]
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5740616]I will now be responding to messages only from men who use the wishlist when they start a conversation. My last Daddy taught me how I want to be treated.
Yeah and no. That is her profiles opening message. Has three different locations listed. Smells like a wish list scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5a37dfae-367d-4446-b1bd-815c97297ef8[/URL][/QUOTE]She's a traveler and those are her tour spots.
Madison, IN is dead center in the middle off I-71 in Indiana between Cincy and L'ville.
If she's legit, not much different than a touring girl on Tryst or Eros requiring a deposit.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5740463]Real name is Kelsey. I met her over a year ago. This is her second profile. She lives pretty far out and cannot host. Either not DTF or I never offered enough. She is an occasional stripper and travels to do it. LOTS of drama!! I have PII for contributing seniors.
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/77c68837-08da-4b0e-b7d9-3aafcba4f156[/URL][/QUOTE]Lucy, I'm HOOOOME! Or not. As per her profile:
[I]Let me first and foremost say that I am not looking to nor am I going to sleep with you before meeting you or after the first time meeting you. I’m not looking for anything serious but we have to have some type of connection.[/I]
Seeking page is already gone.
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5736062]Cheerful Gorgeous on Seeking appears to be Anna on Tryst and EC. Guessing. No other info available.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5eee9326-beda-41a3-9b02-300f7752136d[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/0vr-anna-lyzing[/URL]
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/5139128219[/URL][/QUOTE]
I posted the following reply on the Richmond SB thread. I am cross-posting here for anyone who doe not check there regularly.
I have had experience on all three but SA is the only one that works reliably for me. I also find that most of the profiles that interest me are cross-posted on SA meaning I am not missing chances. For me the big issue is wasting money. On SA, I pay one (large) payment and can approach as many people as I choose. Granted, a substantial number are or might be scammers, bots or predators but I am pretty good now at detecting them. Also, on SA all they can do is a waste a bit of my time. On both SB and WYP, I have to buy credits and then spend them opening communication with interesting profiles. Too many of those profiles are scammers, predators or bots. I have successfully reclaimed credits on WTP multiple times but it is a PITA and huge hassle. In any case, the vast majority of credits you spend are going to be totally wasted. That drives ME nuts. There are guys who claim they have methods that allow them to narrow their focus to mostly real people but it must have taken them a lot of wasted credits to acquire that ability. For them, it is possible they actually spend less than the increasingly mounting expense on Seeking. However, that would not be true for me and would not be true for you initially. Assuming you have the coin to play in the sugar bowl, you might spend a few hundred on each site sequentially and then report your experience. Yours is a perennial question and we would benefit from hearing a recent report.
BAM.
[QUOTE=phaedrus2004;5744583]There is a lot to read on pros and cons of SA. In the past there were reports that didn't make SB a better choice. Recently I came across WYP which had a different spin on fixing a date. Online review doesn't make it look very promising. Can anyone share their experience in RVA with WYP?[/QUOTE]
I met this one for a MnG. I had already offered 400 ppm. After the MnG, she was eager to go the FC at her place. It was a horrible experience. First, she is easily 30-40# heavier than her pics. I have her PII and SM. She has heavily photo-shopped or filtered ALL the pictures on her profile and on her SM. She makes up and dresses well. With winter wear she can hide her weight. Second, she is horrible in bed: unresponsive, slow to get naked, shows no pleasure and wants to get it over as quick as possible. YMMV but do not say you weren't warned. Video chat first if you can. PII available via PM for contributing seniors.
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dcccc560-48ed-4a01-bae1-2600cf13e943[/URL]
[QUOTE=BamBam;5745525]I met this one for a MnG. I had already offered 400 ppm. After the MnG, she was eager to go the FC at her place. It was a horrible experience. First, she is easily 30-40# heavier than her pics. I have her PII and SM. She has heavily photo-shopped or filtered ALL the pictures on her profile and on her SM. She makes up and dresses well. With winter wear she can hide her weight. Second, she is horrible in bed: unresponsive, slow to get naked, shows no pleasure and wants to get it over as quick as possible. YMMV but do not say you weren't warned. Video chat first if you can. PII available via PM for contributing seniors.
BAM.[/QUOTE]Holy crap. Thanks for the heads-up. I've been working hard on this one.
Does anyone have any insight on this one? I am working on a MnG for dinner with her and one of her friends. Any input would be much appreciated. Thank you!!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fd5d6d07-7697-41ab-8fe7-fb8ec48e1bc6[/URL]#x.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5745525]I met this one for a MnG. I had already offered 400 ppm. After the MnG, she was eager to go the FC at her place. It was a horrible experience. First, she is easily 30-40# heavier than her pics. I have her PII and SM. She has heavily photo-shopped or filtered ALL the pictures on her profile and on her SM. She makes up and dresses well. With winter wear she can hide her weight. Second, she is horrible in bed: unresponsive, slow to get naked, shows no pleasure and wants to get it over as quick as possible. YMMV but do not say you weren't warned. Video chat first if you can. PII available via PM for contributing seniors.
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dcccc560-48ed-4a01-bae1-2600cf13e943[/URL][/QUOTE]BAM,
I am really surprised a senior guy like yourself was taken by this young chick for 400. Did you not try negotiating with her? Her social network profiles wide open of you Google.
I met her too 3 weeks back when she had another profile which got suspended and this is her new profile. She did play the same rush hush game with me we agreed for 300 for 2 hrs however when she tried to rush me I gave her only 200 and enjoyed my 45 minutes of fun. While dropping her off I told her you short me on time I am going to short you on allowance, next time when we spend couple hrs together I will spend agreed upon allowance and kissed her goodbye. Didn't say a word in return.
Lesson learned: When chick shorts us on time we short her on allowance. Stand your ground.
[QUOTE=BarnesMike32;5746709]Does anyone have any insight on this one? I am working on a MnG for dinner with her and one of her friends. Any input would be much appreciated. Thank you!!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fd5d6d07-7697-41ab-8fe7-fb8ec48e1bc6[/URL]#x.[/QUOTE]What's the strategy for the "platonic" tag on the profile?
What info did you use to find her social media? What are some tips for finding that info from a SA profile if you don't mind. I'm not that computer savvy, LOL. Thanks.
[QUOTE=MattChavan23;5748187]BAM,
I am really surprised a senior guy like yourself was taken by this young chick for 400. Did you not try negotiating with her? Her social network profiles wide open of you Google.
I met her too 3 weeks back when she had another profile which got suspended and this is her new profile. She did play the same rush hush game with me we agreed for 300 for 2 hrs however when she tried to rush me I gave her only 200 and enjoyed my 45 minutes of fun. While dropping her off I told her you short me on time I am going to short you on allowance, next time when we spend couple hrs together I will spend agreed upon allowance and kissed her goodbye. Didn't say a word in return.
Lesson learned: When chick shorts us on time we short her on allowance. Stand your ground.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Decatur21;5748585]What info did you use to find her social media? What are some tips for finding that info from a SA profile if you don't mind. I'm not that computer savvy, LOL. Thanks.[/QUOTE]I am interested as well as to how you perform those searches. Thanks.
I admit; I got taken. I thought I had cleverly confirmed her appearance via access to a variety of her social media including a recent trip to Miami. If she was as hot as her photos, she would be worth the amount I offered (in todays climate.) After we met, she talked a really good game, was wearing a puffy coat and was flashing some nice cleavage. It was only after we were back at her place, and I eventually got her naked, and we started to fool around, did I realize how thoroughly I had been snookered. I was glad to get out as quickly as possible. I considered the allowance an acceptable loss given the circumstances.
If you were seriously disappointed at her cutting your time short, I have to assume you are relatively new to the game and not yet spoiled by the superior quality generally available in our part of the bowl. In my view she was not even worth the two bills you eventually gave her. Are you actually contemplating repeating??
To the people asking for search techniques, these are skills slowly accumulated over time. They confer an advantage in capturing the attention of some sugar babies. I regularly share with contributing seniors who in turn offer me info in exchange. I will always offer alerts to the general community. Especially with regards to safety. That said, I am not giving away any hard-earned edge I have going for me. Seniors? Am I off base?
BAM.
[QUOTE=MattChavan23;5748187]BAM,
I am really surprised a senior guy like yourself was taken by this young chick for 400. Did you not try negotiating with her? Her social network profiles wide open of you Google.
I met her too 3 weeks back when she had another profile which got suspended and this is her new profile. She did play the same rush hush game with me we agreed for 300 for 2 hrs however when she tried to rush me I gave her only 200 and enjoyed my 45 minutes of fun. While dropping her off I told her you short me on time I am going to short you on allowance, next time when we spend couple hrs together I will spend agreed upon allowance and kissed her goodbye. Didn't say a word in return.
Lesson learned: When chick shorts us on time we short her on allowance. Stand your ground.[/QUOTE]
Uses pro language and takes you straight to text. 300 ppm, can host in Blue Ash, immediately ready BUT! You have to send half first over Paypal. Name on Paypal is either a dude or someone not in this area. No confirmed PII. AVOID!
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bd466ed3-cbe7-46c3-bef9-84af78a56a5c[/URL]
[QUOTE=BamBam;5748790]I admit; I got taken. I thought I had cleverly confirmed her appearance via access to a variety of her social media including a recent trip to Miami. If she was as hot as her photos, she would be worth the amount I offered (in todays climate.) After we met, she talked a really good game, was wearing a puffy coat and was flashing some nice cleavage. It was only after we were back at her place, and I eventually got her naked, and we started to fool around, did I realize how thoroughly I had been snookered. I was glad to get out as quickly as possible. I considered the allowance an acceptable loss given the circumstances.
If you were seriously disappointed at her cutting your time short, I have to assume you are relatively new to the game and not yet spoiled by the superior quality generally available in our part of the bowl. In my view she was not even worth the two bills you eventually gave her. Are you actually contemplating repeating??
To the people asking for search techniques, these are skills slowly accumulated over time. They confer an advantage in capturing the attention of some sugar babies. I regularly share with contributing seniors who in turn offer me info in exchange. I will always offer alerts to the general community. Especially with regards to safety..[/QUOTE]Bam, we are cool bro. I was not disappointed at all I got the job done with Hailey, however, It was more of wham bam thank you mam kinda session which I don't expect with SB encounter but with LC or EB escorts and I like them little thick with bootie, just personal choice, so overall it wasn't bad, but I would give it B- grade. And that's why I paid LC prices too. I don't plan any repeat one and done types.
And remember, my friend we don't pay this pussies for pounding but we pay them so they can walk away after pounding without any drama all I did was cut my loses, It was a fair game. I have cut allowances many times in past when the session didn't happen as per agreed upon time. You won't believe but I have paid less than 100 many times when chick lowballed me and I did the same as return favour.
Also, I am not newbie. Been dooing this from last 6 yrs when SA was on prime and already finished my century a while back.
My home turf is KY but I have played in many states and international too. I would appreciate if you can point us to the "Superior Quality' you mentioned in your home turf. I promise drinks on me. I cannot find any lately, haha. I always enjoy drinks with similar minded homeie and exchange notes.
Moral of the story is when chick lowballs us for time and service we lowball her too on allowance and send her home with small lecture on customer service.
Matt.
[QUOTE=MattChavan23;5749969]Bam, we are cool bro. I was not disappointed at all I got the job done with Hailey, however, It was more of wham bam thank you mam kinda session which I don't expect with SB encounter but with LC or EB escorts and I like them little thick with bootie, just personal choice, so overall it wasn't bad, but I would give it B- grade. And that's why I paid LC prices too. I don't plan any repeat one and done types.
And remember, my friend we don't pay this pussies for pounding but we pay them so they can walk away after pounding without any drama all I did was cut my loses, It was a fair game. I have cut allowances many times in past when the session didn't happen as per agreed upon time. You won't believe but I have paid less than 100 many times when chick lowballed me and I did the same as return favour.
Also, I am not newbie. Been dooing this from last 6 yrs when SA was on prime and already finished my century a while back.
My home turf is KY but I have played in many states and international too. I would appreciate if you can point us to the "Superior Quality' you mentioned in your home turf. I promise drinks on me. I cannot find any lately, haha. I always enjoy drinks with similar minded homeie and exchange notes.
Moral of the story is when chick lowballs us for time and service we lowball her too on allowance and send her home with small lecture on customer service.
Matt.[/QUOTE]I'm kinda like Matt. I look at the overall value I am getting. When that crazy SB in Carlisle stop in the middle of our session, I gave her 120 when we had agreed on 250 previously. She asked 300 originally. Funny, I am watching the Bengals game with her on Sunday and it's all holes open. It will be interesting. Anyways, I don't have the level of experience you two have, but, I am getting better at it. Happy sugaring gents!
[QUOTE=Potus2020;5748700]I am interested as well as to how you perform those searches. Thanks.[/QUOTE]If you're interested in learning about this type of thing, shoot me a PM and I'll send you some online guides to doing research, along with some tools that I use for verifying identity and facial recognition.
I don't want this information really easily out there, but, I'm more than happy to share with my fellow mongers.
Apparently she moved to San Antonio overnight.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5749052]Uses pro language and takes you straight to text. 300 ppm, can host in Blue Ash, immediately ready BUT! You have to send half first over Paypal. Name on Paypal is either a dude or someone not in this area. No confirmed PII. AVOID!
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bd466ed3-cbe7-46c3-bef9-84af78a56a5c[/URL][/QUOTE]
What you see is what you get. Looks exactly like pictures. Very nice person in person. PPM 500 but you can negotiate. No MnG fee. Well known Seniors can PM for more info. (May be slow to reply tho).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/147de34a-bd16-4592-85e9-db9625dc7870[/URL]
I can second this. I met her almost exactly a year ago when she appeared as technobunny. She is a really cool chick and has traveled all over the world. She is safe and worth the time.
BAM.
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5750856]What you see is what you get. Looks exactly like pictures. Very nice person in person. PPM 500 but you can negotiate. No MnG fee. Well known Seniors can PM for more info. (May be slow to reply tho).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/147de34a-bd16-4592-85e9-db9625dc7870[/URL][/QUOTE]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9a41856c-589b-4c19-a1ed-5860f37e8f3f[/URL]
Anyone know this preggo? I suspect selling pic.
I earlier reported on the scammer, KindMiss. Now the same person has cerated a new profile called jessy. He is using the same language and even the same name for a paypal transfer: [EMAIL]momanyijessy01@gmail.com[/EMAIL].
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4cbea4c3-8a72-4aa1-802a-bc2c6a182ca8[/URL]
[QUOTE=BarnesMike32;5746709]Does anyone have any insight on this one? I am working on a MnG for dinner with her and one of her friends. Any input would be much appreciated. Thank you!!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fd5d6d07-7697-41ab-8fe7-fb8ec48e1bc6[/URL]#x.[/QUOTE]Has one close to it that I've been chatting with.
CulturedPrimaDonna.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/557c8b36-f18d-4267-af6a-20514a9c8a7e[/URL]
Makes me wonder if SA has a name suggestion logic when the girls are setting up their profile or if they bot created.
Thanks for the link. I guess if you am to cheap to sign up again for the membership, she is out of my price range. But would love to Spurge on on her. I'm sure the dream would last a while in my mind.
Thanks for sharing guys. Will get out there at some point.
Joe.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5750909]I can second this. I met her almost exactly a year ago when she appeared as technobunny. She is a really cool chick and has traveled all over the world. She is safe and worth the time.
BAM.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5751960]Has one close to it that I've been chatting with.
CulturedPrimaDonna.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/557c8b36-f18d-4267-af6a-20514a9c8a7e[/URL]
Makes me wonder if SA has a name suggestion logic when the girls are setting up their profile or if they bot created.[/QUOTE]I've been wondering the same thing. Seems like every other profile name is 2 words, with the second one being "Duchess", "Princess", "Temptress", "Seductress", "Angel", etc. It _has_ to be some kind of name suggestion thing. Or fake / bot profiles.
[QUOTE=Zcochran00;5752043]I've been wondering the same thing. Seems like every other profile name is 2 words, with the second one being "Duchess", "Princess", "Temptress", "Seductress", "Angel", etc. It _has_ to be some kind of name suggestion thing. Or fake / bot profiles.[/QUOTE]Or like this: "Here for a good time not a long time. " Oh brother cut me a break.
This is a fairly recent phenomenon. For a long time, the profiles typically had some unusual and unique names. Some still do. It leads me to believe that the site has implemented a suggested naming tool for women. I also used to routinely find some profiles using searchable photos. I believe the site is now checking to make sure photos are NOT searchable before approving them. A few still slip through but only rarely now.
BAM.
[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5751960]Has one close to it that I've been chatting with.
CulturedPrimaDonna.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/557c8b36-f18d-4267-af6a-20514a9c8a7e[/URL]
Makes me wonder if SA has a name suggestion logic when the girls are setting up their profile or if they bot created.[/QUOTE]
Does anyone have info on Bella?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0071d67d-ddff-4b49-adc6-2dae518bf8cb[/URL]
[QUOTE=BamBam;5750909]I can second this. I met her almost exactly a year ago when she appeared as technobunny. She is a really cool chick and has traveled all over the world. She is safe and worth the time.
BAM.[/QUOTE][URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/rZy1ga285vp1pawAd9Pvjxbo[/URL]
I was talking with her a bit. She lives in Hyde Park with no car. Can host. I was getting a provider vibe. I wanted to meet in person first since I had a feeling she was larger than she let on. We set up 3 times to meet and she disappeared when I was confirming the meet right before. Quit trying after the 3rd time. Seem like there is some drama there.
[QUOTE=Goo3215;5752479]Does anyone have info on Bella?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0071d67d-ddff-4b49-adc6-2dae518bf8cb[/URL][/QUOTE]
Yea, before all new members were defaulted to "Attractive Member" so it was easy to see the new ones. Now it's things like SensualLady, ClassyPrincess, InnocentLady, BeautifulPrincess.
[QUOTE=Zcochran00;5752043]I've been wondering the same thing. Seems like every other profile name is 2 words, with the second one being "Duchess", "Princess", "Temptress", "Seductress", "Angel", etc. It _has_ to be some kind of name suggestion thing. Or fake / bot profiles.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the info, appreciate the detail.
I've been looking around and it seems that the variety and possibilities are about the same as the last few years. Although it's always infiltrated with scammers and professionals, I enjoy the hunt for the occasional unicorn. The is definitely an abundance of women who appear to be legitimate, although it's funny to see some of the same faces claiming to be "new at this" LOL. I have to admit, I enjoy the hunt as much as the spoils.
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5701487]I landed a few good ones in 2021, just like I landed a few good ones in 2020. I define "good ones" as college-aged (under 26) and reasonably priced ($300 or less).
However, it took a *lot* more work than it did just a few years ago.
Seeking has always attracted a certain number of scammers, GPS girls, and delusional ladies who think that there are legions of men just waiting to send them online money. The difference is that in the past, there were also many attractive young women who were willing to hook up for a reasonable amount.
So you could ignore the scammers and the fakes, because they were a small percentage of the total. Now the scammers and the fakes comprise roughly half of the profiles on the site. And most of the real women on Seeking are older ladies who have been on the site for years, like the recently discussed Amor_fati.
I think the COVID economy has exacerbated the situation. It's extremely expensive to hire anyone to do anything right now, and there is no reason why this should be any different. Look at the selection of escorts on Tryst: It's all old and overweight women asking for fees that used to be reserved for the young hotties.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Decatur21;5753896]I was talking with her a bit. She lives in Hyde Park with no car. Can host. I was getting a provider vibe. I wanted to meet in person first since I had a feeling she was larger than she let on. We set up 3 times to meet and she disappeared when I was confirming the meet right before. Quit trying after the 3rd time. Seem like there is some drama there.[/QUOTE]Thanks. I've been chatting with her and will report back.
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5750856]What you see is what you get. Looks exactly like pictures. Very nice person in person. PPM 500 but you can negotiate. No MnG fee. Well known Seniors can PM for more info. (May be slow to reply tho).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/147de34a-bd16-4592-85e9-db9625dc7870[/URL][/QUOTE]Totally agree. Looks exactly like her pictures, maybe even better. Originally met her way back when she first entered the the SB scene. In my opinion, one of the most beautiful women from head to toe you may ever meet. Top that with being very genuine, really nice and a very cool girl. Likes to keep a fairly low profile.
CFG.
[QUOTE=TheWolverineJP;5755030]Thanks for the info, appreciate the detail.
I've been looking around and it seems that the variety and possibilities are about the same as the last few years. Although it's always infiltrated with scammers and professionals, I enjoy the hunt for the occasional unicorn. The is definitely an abundance of women who appear to be legitimate, although it's funny to see some of the same faces claiming to be "new at this" LOL. I have to admit, I enjoy the hunt as much as the spoils.[/QUOTE]I think eventually the online only ladies will vanish and things will return to some kind of normal. Higher rates are here to stay for the most part IMHO.
[QUOTE=RickMann;5756368]I think eventually the online only ladies will vanish and things will return to some kind of normal. Higher rates are here to stay for the most part IMHO.[/QUOTE]I tend to agree. The online ladies were a byproduct of the COVID pandemic, and COVID provided a semi-plausible excuse for that. COVID (fingers crossed) seems to be in its last wave.
As for rates: When I first joined Seeking in 2011, I was getting hot college girls for $200.
What's driving the high prices, IMO, is what's driving the high price of everything: There is a real labor shortage and anyone who wants to make some extra money can get a signing bonus at McDonalds or Kroger.
This decreases the number of women entering the hobby. If you look at the girls on Tryst, almost all of them are still pre-pandemic girls. You've seen the conversations in the other threads about washed-up, over-the-hill providers asking (and in some cases, getting) $400.
Prices will levelize when the labor market levelizes.
I have seen this happen before. At the height of the dotcom boom, circa 2000, very average women were asking for $400. (There was no Seeking then, but there were escort sites.) This was because unemployment was at 3%.
After the implosion of the housing bubble in 2007 to 2009, there was a rush of new girls into the hobby. Seeking also started around this time, and there were a lot of options on the market.
The bottom line is that because of supply and demand conditions, you currently have an imbalance in the marketplace. We may never get back to hot college girls for $200, but prices will at some point stabilize, and even back off.
This is also a good time to take a hiatus, if you've been thinking about taking one. Come back in 6 months or a year and things will probably be better.
[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;5756050]Totally agree. Looks exactly like her pictures, maybe even better. Originally met her way back when she first entered the the SB scene. In my opinion, one of the most beautiful women from head to toe you may ever meet. Top that with being very genuine, really nice and a very cool girl. Likes to keep a fairly low profile.
CFG.[/QUOTE]Could you please tell me her services?
BeautifulBlonde Been on SA since 2018.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ab7332c3-6ad7-4343-9b52-33f86b183131[/URL]
ClassyMadame Initial response after approach was basically "give me one good reason why I should talk to you".
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3ed8353d-6713-4a5c-aa1e-68b9e6298734[/URL]
BeautifulBlonde wanted plutonic to start so I passed. Plus her face is chubbier in the closeups of her face and her her body pics vary in size. I just imagined she is bigger in person. If you look at her tattoo on her arm she is definitely getting bigger as more is done. Her hottest pic is standing in the bathroom and the tattoo is just barely started. The one with the Farris wheel is the banks and that Farris wheel was taken down right when covid hit so that is 2 years ago. In the closeup of her with the covid mask she is definitely bigger.
[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5757082]BeautifulBlonde Been on SA since 2018.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ab7332c3-6ad7-4343-9b52-33f86b183131[/URL]
ClassyMadame Initial response after approach was basically "give me one good reason why I should talk to you".
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3ed8353d-6713-4a5c-aa1e-68b9e6298734[/URL][/QUOTE]