[QUOTE=Motoyo;5559488]Yea. The JohnDough0203 one about the 2 girls. EVERY post they have is only about them, and how its 'mostly good'.
Either it's them, or their PR firm :P
Even went as far as saying saw them a few times. Then a few post later saying "Not sure of the names, I'm sure they were fake names if they did gave them. Didn't care to ask." Soooo claimed to have fucked a provider 3-4 times in a month and don't even vaguely know a name (or even street name)?
Add in the very pointed noticeable subtle attempt to state rules as if a monger was relaying them "no CIM or Bareback" and also "I saw these ladies for a fetish type thing, nothing super sexual" (IE we do fetish, wink wink just not really weird ones) in one post.
Also is always a response about them, to another post about them. A bit on the nose suspicious to me.
Newbies are OK, we all was one at one time, but a newbie with 4 posts all related to relating a good experience with one particular girl. Not so much newbie as an advertisement: P.
I'm 100% with LowBaller here. Selfie fake reviews make me have 0% of contacting you. Be upfront who you are, and why you dispute a posts claim (mongers CAN lie too). We will trust you 10x more if you are open on honest on your side of the story if what the monger said was false, than if you fake a counter review as a reply to the monger.[/QUOTE]Say what you want homes, but I have a wife and kids so I'm not out banging hookers as a sport. Call it a noob. Not my style. All I'm saying is out of the 3 chicks I've met they were the only ones I seemed to stick with due to not looking strung out so its something to rave about considering in my time of looking through stg for days I never see anyone of quality. I'll be damned if I stick my dick in a crusty tweaker.
