My rule on unknowns is worth repeating
[QUOTE=Ambidextrous;2272274]I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.
Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.
A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.
She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".
This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.[/QUOTE]You must be doing well to roll the dice at $300 on a pig in a poke. No reviews, fake pix, and there's a 5 behind Door #1, but you still laid down that coin? If we lived in the 1700's, we'd put you in the stocks and throw fruit at you to shame you into better behavior. At least you had the good sense to abort and walk out with $240, so we'll only keep you in the stocks for a few minutes.
My rule is worth repeating here: for an unknown, unreviewed provider, start with the shortest-available session. Don't pour your life savings into a speculative land deal before even seeing the soil test, LOL. Once you've seen her, and things are going well, you can always suggest extending, and I've rarely heard of a girl who refuses more money.
If things don't go well, you're only out $60-$120, leaving you more than enough for a make-up visit with someone else.
And why are you still messing around with the Asian ads which have been proven over and over and over to be fake pix? The girl in the room is ALWAYS 10+ years older, 3 points lower in appearance, and no better than a 5-6 in performance.
$300 is a lot of money, even in DC. If you're determined to drop $300, there are some well-reviewed, Grade-A girls around town that hit 9-10 on the civilian scale, and you're guaranteed an 8-9 experience. If I were going to spend that kind of $, I'd go see someone like Bedroom Barbie, a well-reviewed Roanoke girl who travels around the state. She's phenomenal looking, and has great reviews.
[URL]http://www.bedroombarbie.com/[/URL]
How to save yourself time + aggravation + $60
[QUOTE=Ambidextrous;2272274]I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.
Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.
A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.
She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".
This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.[/QUOTE]First, I'm assuming this is the (incredible GFE) Miko to whom you're referring:
[URL]http://www.eros.com/us/washington_dc/files/520423.htm[/URL]
I heartily concur with the sage advice posted by BB and in addition I would like to offer the observation that a simple google search of the number would have led you to an ad using the EXACT same wording (except for the name) even including the way the text in the ad is underlined, which should have been a red flag.
[URL]http://www.eros.com/us/washington_dc/files/509655.htm[/URL]
The second ad, even without doing a search on the photos (which come back to porn sites, BTW), would have clued you in to the fact you weren't dealing with an independent and would at least have put you more on your guard.
Also, 646 is a NYC prefix and while there are a number of great, legit providers who visit from NYC there are also plenty of scam agencies and individual scam providers who prey on gullible and horny hobbyists. At a minimum, IMHO, a NYC phone prefix is an indicator that extra homework is warranted.
And the fact the girl who opened the door was a 5 instead of the advertised 8+ should have been the final red flag to make you walk away. Here's why: when a low-to-med priced BP girl doesn't match her pics that's not ideal but not altogether unexpected. But it's much more unusual when a supposedly top-notch, high-end, sophisticated provider (who advertises herself in superlative terms) is so far off the mark. A true high-end provider is generally very concerned about her reputation and is less likely to misrepresent herself or her services. The minute you saw a 5 on the other side of the door it meant there was absolutely nothing about the ad you could trust.
If you're in the mood for a $300 girl, then do a search on the oThER site, or Eros or BP with the price as your search parameter and then do some homework on those search results. Or, if you're in the mood for Asian providers, search specifically for them and let those results guide your homework efforts.
No matter what process you use, a little homework is absolutely a better way to save yourself the time, aggravation and $ you waste when you wing it and hope for the best.
P.S. Extremely lucky for you she didn't have a "manager" nearby when you decided to take back part of the fee. If she had, that situation could have gone sideways in a hurry, and not in a good way.
P. P.S. All the EROS ads look good, including (or maybe, especially) the scam ones.