[QUOTE=JWalker350;5738263]Thanks for our help. Unfortunately, I could not find that option when made a payment to SA membership.[/QUOTE]It says in the app, right?
Printable View
[QUOTE=JWalker350;5738263]Thanks for our help. Unfortunately, I could not find that option when made a payment to SA membership.[/QUOTE]It says in the app, right?
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5739312]It says in the app, right?[/QUOTE]I always use the browser, not app. Maybe that is the reason.
You can look up what you could get with Caligirl22 .
[URL]https://www.xvideos.com/profiles/mandymynxx1/photos/6048155/mandy_mynx_pics[/URL]
Several of her movies on the web, including anal, here is an example of a BJ.
[URL]https://www.xnxx.com/video-1143m7e3/deep_and_wet_bj[/URL]
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5741258]You can look up what you could get with Caligirl22 .
[URL]https://www.xvideos.com/profiles/mandymynxx1/photos/6048155/mandy_mynx_pics[/URL]
Several of her movies on the web, including anal, here is an example of a BJ.
[URL]https://www.xnxx.com/video-1143m7e3/deep_and_wet_bj[/URL][/QUOTE]Yeah she's all over listcrawler too. Very mechanical and straight to the point. Definitely not a SB experience.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d03e97b4-baf0-4fd3-bde1-4596a957c78b[/URL]
Located in Nebraska but listed as San Diego
https://members.seeking.com/member/d3d9508a-2f30-4132-b123-f69aa158d446
[QUOTE=CPMachine;5741726]Yeah she's all over listcrawler too. Very mechanical and straight to the point. Definitely not a SB experience.[/QUOTE]Never met her, so I can't confirm or deny. I just posted FYI.
If she is on Listcrawler, then you must be right about the experience though!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/16613b11-7e16-40e7-bdf7-101ea5fd28eb[/URL]
Asked to do online initially before meeting in person. Selling nude pictures for $50. The lady profile pictures are from internet.
This one asked to be paid via gift card prior to meeting.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/81106ca7-7758-4742-9098-37e7cc879a32[/URL]
As of last night, within a 25 mile search radius there were:
Over 10,000 local SBs on SA. Not that many over that number as far as I can tell. And of course many of these are inactive.
About 2,650 SDs. So roughly a 4:1 ratio of SBs tto SDs, just as SA claim.
Of the SDs:
1, yes just one, was "ID verified".
25 were Diamond members, and.
20 were background checked.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5752436]As of last night, within a 25 mile search radius there were:
Over 10,000 local SBs on SA. Not that many over that number as far as I can tell. And of course many of these are inactive.
About 2,650 SDs. So roughly a 4:1 ratio of SBs tto SDs, just as SA claim.
Of the SDs:
1, yes just one, was "ID verified".
25 were Diamond members, and.
20 were background checked.[/QUOTE]I love data! That's interesting. So if PP's data is taken from our county, that means we have around 2,500 active SDs vs over 10,000 "SBs." However, as PP pointed out, many of them are inactive, plus scammers & "online only due to COVID," so in reality, the number is around 2.5:1
[QUOTE=KingBaby;5752659]I love data! That's interesting. So if PP's data is taken from our county, that means we have around 2,500 active SDs vs over 10,000 "SBs." However, as PP pointed out, many of them are inactive, plus scammers & "online only due to COVID," so in reality, the number is around 2.5:1[/QUOTE]Data are indeed for San Diego.
I think ratio will be over 2. 5:1, as many of the SDs will also be inactive, and there are some scammers in the mix for sure too!
I did not look at too many SD profiles in my alternate persona as PumpedPussy, but there were some clear categories:
- The hung hunks. Some quite explicit about having a large endowment to play with, and / or buff bodies.
- The experience daddies. Promising vacations, shopping, spas, etc.
- The lifestyle flaunters. Featuring photos of sports cars, yachts, etc. Not clear if they were going to deliver experiences, or money.
- The youthful daddies (20's). Promising youth, looks and money. Somehow I wonder about these ones. Why be on SA if they are so blessed?
- The "blah" daddies. Nothing remarkable in either their looks, or what they said.
- The lame. Fully 1,000 of the 2,650 SD profiles had no photos at all. A very large number (unquantified) wrote almost nothing.
- The average remainder.
So, I wonder, which category do some of our regulars fit into? .
I will confess to being one of the "average remainder".
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5752756]Data are indeed for San Diego.
I think ratio will be over 2. 5:1, as many of the SDs will also be inactive, and there are some scammers in the mix for sure too!
I did not look at too many SD profiles in my alternate persona as PumpedPussy, but there were some clear categories:
- The hung hunks. Some quite explicit about having a large endowment to play with, and / or buff bodies.
- The experience daddies. Promising vacations, shopping, spas, etc.
- The lifestyle flaunters. Featuring photos of sports cars, yachts, etc. Not clear if they were going to deliver experiences, or money.
- The youthful daddies (20's). Promising youth, looks and money. Somehow I wonder about these ones. Why be on SA if they are so blessed?
- The "blah" daddies. Nothing remarkable in either their looks, or what they said.
- The lame. Fully 1,000 of the 2,650 SD profiles had no photos at all. A very large number (unquantified) wrote almost nothing.
- The average remainder.
So, I wonder, which category do some of our regulars fit into? .
I will confess to being one of the "average remainder".[/QUOTE]I used to be on a special SA category when I started. They had to also verify what I have worth 😂. In realty, you just have to invest time, screen and do your due diligence. I learned that I message as many and try to get them in bulk to a separate platform asap. I have 100% SBs in a Snapchat account and that's where I do my selection process. Not on the SA site. Some have been on my snap for years. Some of them I met years after interaction and some immediately. So no real formula since all SBs are different. And all SDs can be categorized, but it's still about hit rates.
Anyone want to help this gal out with her house buying?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/df508547-abaf-4902-b035-8a6e697dd4c2[/URL]
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5752756]Data are indeed for San Diego.
I think ratio will be over 2. 5:1, as many of the SDs will also be inactive, and there are some scammers in the mix for sure too!
I did not look at too many SD profiles in my alternate persona as PumpedPussy, but there were some clear categories:
- The hung hunks. Some quite explicit about having a large endowment to play with, and / or buff bodies.
- The experience daddies. Promising vacations, shopping, spas, etc.
- The lifestyle flaunters. Featuring photos of sports cars, yachts, etc. Not clear if they were going to deliver experiences, or money.
- The youthful daddies (20's). Promising youth, looks and money. Somehow I wonder about these ones. Why be on SA if they are so blessed?
- The "blah" daddies. Nothing remarkable in either their looks, or what they said.
- The lame. Fully 1,000 of the 2,650 SD profiles had no photos at all. A very large number (unquantified) wrote almost nothing.
- The average remainder.
So, I wonder, which category do some of our regulars fit into? .
I will confess to being one of the "average remainder".[/QUOTE]Speaking as a younger guy. Its VERY difficult, if not impossible to find a chick when you are in your 20's unless you are a chad. Its TOUGH out there.
[QUOTE=LolBoat;5755365]Speaking as a younger guy. Its VERY difficult, if not impossible to find a chick when you are in your 20's unless you are a chad. Its TOUGH out there.[/QUOTE]OK, please give us your definition of a chad so we don't have to go to urban dictionary.