Printable View
[QUOTE=ILoveKGirls;4308583]Reading up on the boards it makes sense now why Sera would only advertise for her and Ruby. It was Sera all along!
The sounds of it, I could only imagine. Wow![/QUOTE]Sera has being dbls for along time. She is very particular whom she does it with.
Used to experience her dbls when she and Yoco offered dbls many years ago when there we're roomies.
[QUOTE=ILoveKGirls;4306704]Sera in the Bay now too, huh?
I noticed they pay less for the Korean hoes out there. I wonder why they go up there by and abandon LA. I remember reading once, from the TER posts that the Korean hoes were leaving in droves because of the mongers demanding bb. I wonder how much of that is true to leave LA for the sorry ass Bay and then charge less? Sounds like a dumb business move, but then again, they are hoes and not MBA's or CEOs. I don't stress them out for bb because I would think as providers they are at a high risk.
But why?! WHY? If anyone has any insight I would be interested. Maybe I should jackhammer and thrash them less? I would think they would just not let me book again if I fuck them too hard. Especially Ruby. Seesh! I devastate that fat ass Korean hoe every time I would fuck her. That fat ass Korean hoe would always have to fix her fake hair and turn on the fans from the heat of the friction of the merciless and intense boning I would tax that fat ass Korean hoe with. Never once was I denied access to her, so doubt the boning was the issue. Probably the bb demands. Ijs.[/QUOTE]From my experience in the Bay Area (SJ / Silicon Valley), I have always gotten BB without having to request it. The rates seem lower in the Bay Area too. I'm not sure what the profit motive is for this, but I'm sure the girls are not doing the decision making. Some of my LA regulars have been shuttled around LA, OC, SJ and back East on a whim. They really don't elaborate. One of my ATFs has mentioned it's not her choice.
So not sure, it may be the volume is better for the management in the Bay Area.
[QUOTE=TomKeen;4309027]She's $300/ HR, doubt that you actually got to see her or maybe you've been BL'ed by her or couldn't get an appointment.[/QUOTE]OP is probably gay or got bait and switched. Shannon is super model level. Hence why she can charge $300/ hr.
I try to see one new girl a week and see mostly cute young girls. I do this since before FOSTA and don't miss the old days. I think you guys need more legit reviewers to increase the demand. LA is not as bad as you think. I always donate standard rate and I am usually happy to see a girl.
Some girls prefer to work in LA than OC or NorCal but they were not busy enough here so they need to go. The MILFs thrive in NorCal because of BB and mongers who shill for them. Demand is not enough in LA and immigration is much tougher now so the young quality pros are not coming. It's easier to hire MILFs or GND girls off the street in Korea or here. Easy money for a few months. Also why you can get mediocre service because they plain don't care.
[QUOTE=Socalimp;4307827]Not to be argumentative but supply and demand will always dictate the market and the market has spoken where the grannies thrive off of the few mongers that overpay for mediocre service.[/QUOTE]
Are you talking about this girl? Haven't seen her yet but I thought about seeing her 3 years ago because of the same photos below. I can try her when I have nobody else to see.
She had about 46 reviews on TER and 7. 5 on looks and 7. 72 on performance. I usually see girls 8 or above on looks and performance. Her profile was 5. 0, 100 lbs, 34 D-24-34.
[URL]https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/asian-naughty-tiffany-323-591-9464-waiting-to-meet-you-come-play/578feac0221e53eeac8b45b0[/URL]
[QUOTE=ShipItFres;4307328]Was surfing hx and stumbled on an ad from Naughty Tiffany. Her photos look amazing! Anyone have intel?[/QUOTE]
She might have started out at the standard rate but I saw her after she got popular. She is still very popular now. I didn't call her beautiful or pretty but about 70 TER reviewers gave her 8. 7 in looks. Her body is definitely very hot to me. Those big round hooters are very well done. Her sensuality also makes her better than many girls I saw.
Don't try to contact her at the number below but these are her real and accurate pics. I have seen her recently. Her face is blur but you can see what DHorn is talking about if you look closely. Her butt has gotten bigger and rounder than pics now. I made the mistake of not seeing her sooner because I didn't like her face in the pics. It doesn't matter if some guys don't like her, just mean it's easier for me to see her. Peace.
[URL]https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/sexy-shannon-213-448-9666-shannon-in-playa-vista/5964cb60221e53edc98b4735[/URL]
[QUOTE=TomKeen;4309027]She's $300/ HR, doubt that you actually got to see her or maybe you've been BL'ed by her or couldn't get an appointment.[/QUOTE]
It's truly unfortunate but it looks like the kgirl scene has descended into a situation where getting any real information on a gal is becoming near impossible. First off, there are the pictures which in so many cases have gone beyond "glamorizing" or photoshopping. Many are just out and out fake pictures of models. My advice here is that if she looks too good to be true and is charging $250 - 300 per hour, be prepared to get screwed, and not in the literal sense. With fake reviews on the monkey site, the guys posting them aren't even being clever. Take the latest review of Yoco. Yoco has had the same phone number for years, now there's a new review with a totally different number. And no matter that she has been in Japan for the last two months. And then there's the review of Kate, EMID 270146. This is the Kate that was booked by M, and she has been gone from the LA scene for two years, much less ever having done outcall service.
I'm grateful this board exists so as to provide some semblance of reality. Hopefully more reviews will be posted here and guys will be honest in posting how the gals really looked.
Took a few FTT.
Aly (asian ********).
Photos: Fake. Pics do no resemble person.
Looks: Okay. Skin tone is more dark, same goes for the nipples. Fit build.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: B- attitude. As if she is wearing a mask.
Service: Serviceable. BBBJ, fiv, cfs.
Ye-seul (fruit store).
Photos: Fake. Eyes are similar to the photos, not the chin though.
Looks: Good. Fit build, nicely augmented Ds, with kinda inverted nipples.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: A+ attitude. GND like. Down to earth, very frank.
Service: Serviceable. Nice and slow BBBJ. Cfs. No fiv.
Bagel (kte).
Photos: Fake.
Looks: Okay, build. A bit chunky.
English: Good.
Attitude: A attitude. GND like. Super chill.
Service: Aimed to please. A bit aggressive, but I can take it.
Been some talk about Taylor and Shannon lately. Wanted to know what people have thought about the other ladies at sag. I recently asked for "feedback" on the ladies and was told that Laura was better than Taylor from the Booker. Mind you they also recommended Viki to me before, and that wasn't great. I've seen Taylor a few times, but curious to know if they are being upfront with their recommendations.
Booker is probably right. I saw Laura awhile back. Not her pics so I can't say if you will see same girl I saw. I haven't seen Amber, Julie, and Erika yet but I know about Erika. Been too long to remember much but I thought Laura was attractive, nice body and natural B cups, good service. I think she is more attractive and younger than both Shannon and Taylor but YMMV. Worth a try. I don't know why she can't stay long at one place.
By the way, she started out from NorCal.
[QUOTE=TickingTock;4311709]Been some talk about Taylor and Shannon lately. Wanted to know what people have thought about the other ladies at sag. I recently asked for "feedback" on the ladies and was told that Laura was better than Taylor from the Booker. Mind you they also recommended Viki to me before, and that wasn't great. I've seen Taylor a few times, but curious to know if they are being upfront with their recommendations.[/QUOTE]
What is the "fruit store"? Can't you just spell it out?
[QUOTE=VincentFreemen;4311482]Took a few FTT.
Aly (asian ********).
Photos: Fake. Pics do no resemble person.
Looks: Okay. Skin tone is more dark, same goes for the nipples. Fit build.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: B- attitude. As if she is wearing a mask.
Service: Serviceable. BBBJ, fiv, cfs.
Ye-seul (fruit store).
Photos: Fake. Eyes are similar to the photos, not the chin though.
Looks: Good. Fit build, nicely augmented Ds, with kinda inverted nipples.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: A+ attitude. GND like. Down to earth, very frank.
Service: Serviceable. Nice and slow BBBJ. Cfs. No fiv.
Bagel (kte).
Photos: Fake.
Looks: Okay, build. A bit chunky.
English: Good.
Attitude: A attitude. GND like. Super chill.
Service: Aimed to please. A bit aggressive, but I can take it.[/QUOTE]
Stop TOFTT if you get disappointed back to back. Ask question here and if I am interested then I will TOFTT or if I know something I will answer. Best advice is to post here about the girls you guys like. I have another new young beautiful girl to post about in a week. My review is going to suck because I have tunnel vision from trying to BB. That's why I call myself a boner.
Those fake reviewers read this site and probably review girls we talk about here. I posted that link to Kate a week ago in Korean BB and there was no recent review. You may think those guys are not clever but someone still fall for them. Some new guys may believe Yoco new number is real.
[QUOTE=Veni1;4310125]It's truly unfortunate but it looks like the kgirl scene has descended into a situation where getting any real information on a gal is becoming near impossible. First off, there are the pictures which in so many cases have gone beyond "glamorizing" or photoshopping. Many are just out and out fake pictures of models. My advice here is that if she looks too good to be true and is charging $250 - 300 per hour, be prepared to get screwed, and not in the literal sense. With fake reviews on the monkey site, the guys posting them aren't even being clever. Take the latest review of Yoco. Yoco has had the same phone number for years, now there's a new review with a totally different number. And no matter that she has been in Japan for the last two months. And then there's the review of Kate, EMID 270146. This is the Kate that was booked by M, and she has been gone from the LA scene for two years, much less ever having done outcall service.
I'm grateful this board exists so as to provide some semblance of reality. Hopefully more reviews will be posted here and guys will be honest in posting how the gals really looked.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4309951]Are you talking about this girl? Haven't seen her yet but I thought about seeing her 3 years ago because of the same photos below. I can try her when I have nobody else to see.
She had about 46 reviews on TER and 7. 5 on looks and 7. 72 on performance. I usually see girls 8 or above on looks and performance. Her profile was 5. 0, 100 lbs, 34 D-24-34.
[URL]https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/asian-naughty-tiffany-323-591-9464-waiting-to-meet-you-come-play/578feac0221e53eeac8b45b0[/URL][/QUOTE]My cocker spaniel would demolish this puny Korean hoe. 5'6" and up for me. 150 pounds minimum. Ruby can hang, Min too, Taylor, Shannon and the dearly departed Quinn (she fled to the Bay) she text me back to confirm.
[QUOTE=VincentFreemen;4311482]Took a few FTT.
Aly (asian ********).
Photos: Fake. Pics do no resemble person.
Looks: Okay. Skin tone is more dark, same goes for the nipples. Fit build.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: B- attitude. As if she is wearing a mask.
Service: Serviceable. BBBJ, fiv, cfs.
Ye-seul (fruit store).
Photos: Fake. Eyes are similar to the photos, not the chin though.
Looks: Good. Fit build, nicely augmented Ds, with kinda inverted nipples.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: A+ attitude. GND like. Down to earth, very frank..[/QUOTE]Which one has the latest ass in order.
Thank you in advance.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4311722]Booker is probably right. I saw Laura awhile back. Not her pics so I can't say if you will see same girl I saw. I haven't seen Amber, Julie, and Erika yet but I know about Erika. Been too long to remember much but I thought Laura was attractive, nice body and natural B cups, good service. I think she is more attractive and younger than both Shannon and Taylor but YMMV. Worth a try. I don't know why she can't stay long at one place.
By the way, she started out from NorCal.[/QUOTE]Haha what the hell, SAG's website replaced Erika's real photos with fake ones what a scummy thing to do! There were real photos before.
Regardless, her tits are huge but not great, kinda chunky and barebacks easily so if your into that go for it.