"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

[QUOTE=BamBam;6444677]I agree with Shampoo: this is a positive sign that they are feeling the pain of frequent and indiscriminate banning. Warning people and blocking bad messages is more desirable than permanent bans. It is also fairly easy to implement.

It would not have helped me. They told me I was banned for "Spamming. " They could have saved my revenue by simply putting a message / day limit. Perhaps that is coming next.

BAM.[/QUOTE]I once long ago got suspended for spamming, I created a new profile and started messaging girls, and I do have a standard opener, and I guess I got a little carried away (which I tend to do on the site). I probably sent out 25 of the same message in a short time, I can see why I had this problem. They just prevented me from sending messages for 24 hours, then it normalized and I settled down.

I recently got temporarily suspended, had to read the TOS and watch a 2 min video to get bakc.

[QUOTE=BamBam;6444677]I agree with Shampoo: this is a positive sign that they are feeling the pain of frequent and indiscriminate banning. Warning people and blocking bad messages is more desirable than permanent bans. It is also fairly easy to implement.

It would not have helped me. They told me I was banned for "Spamming. " They could have saved my revenue by simply putting a message / day limit. Perhaps that is coming next.

BAM.[/QUOTE]Has to at some point realize that suspending members on a whim is a lose-lose situation.

Whether its seeking or this site.

Suspending members on a whim reduces the quality of content or reduces what one can rake in and it is obvious here.

[QUOTE=RegularJoe1985;6445623]Has to at some point realize that suspending members on a whim is a lose-lose situation.

Whether its seeking or this site.

Suspending members on a whim reduces the quality of content or reduces what one can rake in and it is obvious here.[/QUOTE]Yes, it might be a lose-lose proposition, but in SA's case they have to weigh the legality of their site and the potential it gets shutdown and the owner tossed in jail. I forget the actual figures, but seems like SA was netting Brandon Wade around $30-$50 MM per year. I noted that once FOSTA / SESTA passed and was signed into law, many sites, like this one moved offshore. CityXGuide bit the dust on "promoting prostitution" as well, so how does B Wade escape what we all know is going on? Me thinks he's using a narrow "affirmative defense" type of strategy. How that defense holds up if he "coaches" dudes on how to get around the 'no prostitution' notion is really the key!

Now as to sites like this one, I have several thoughts. First, they do NOT permit ANY advertising. So if a dude posts what is deemed to be an advert or a girl posts and looks like she is self promoting then it usually gets taken down. Again, avoiding "promoting prostitution" appears to be key. But dudes expressing their opinions of prostitutes is apparently still legal and allowed.

But as far as banning goes, THAT is a tight rope to walk. Had a buddy that moderated a website with 3 other dudes most of which had prior moderation experience. He said there were ALOT of dudes who just wanted to be douchebags, stir up fights or start flame wars: over abundant supply of testosterone. But then there were those that didn't read the TOS and got cross-wise. The three dudes who moderated before wanted to quickly ban everyone. My buddy took a "do unto others" approach and politely pointed out mistakes by posters. He said it was amazing that most people, when realizing their mistake, were contrite and corrected their approach. That said, there are always a few douchebags that don't or won't get it and thumb their nose at the "kinder & gentler" approach, and yeah they got banned. But he said it was a tough job as, yes, you don't want to banish so many that you hurt metrics, but then again, you can't have dudes fighting, threatening each other, etc.

But this site, if memory serves, does try to follow a bit of a coaching approach. Looks like there is a demerit system in which demerits fade with time. So it appears as if someone builds up demerits or ignores the comments on taken down posts, that poster might get "moderation" of posts or kicked out.

Then there are stealthy moderated sites, that certainly are frustrating. I'm sure what is egregious at that site that reviews AMPs is that the banishment comes with no warnings, no coaching and appears to be random in nature: based on what side of the bed the dude got up on today. Hey, Admins are human too! So that AMP site could learn from the example here. Dudes who get banned there should migrate their content here.

So I suspect there are similar, but different drivers for the different sites.

[QUOTE=GeechieDan;6442432]See my attachment. I got this message not too long ago. It was my fault, because I mentioned "ppm". They were at least nice enough to warn me before I sent the message. I just found it interesting because I'd never gotten that before.[/QUOTE]I have told a girl I am used to paying when we meet instead of an allowance, but never used the ppm abbreviation. Any other magic words I should avoid Thank god, women I have been in relationships have never asked for money (LOL) or that would be prostitution.

[QUOTE=OriolesMagic;6446165]I have told a girl I am used to paying when we meet instead of an allowance, but never used the ppm abbreviation. Any other magic words I should avoid Thank god, women I have been in relationships have never asked for money (LOL) or that would be prostitution.[/QUOTE]Well IF you told a girl you "are use to paying" when you meet, rather than an "allowance" then you suggested money for dating! Give yer head a shake! Read my post below. SA is trying to thread a needle legally and has to be extreme in banning anything that looks like prostitution. Hey, no one likes it, but thems the rules of the game.

[b]Just don't talk about money, allowance or anything remotely related on the site. Period.[/b]

I have found that serious girls are willing to quickly go off site and THERE I discuss details. Girls who don't get that lose out. I try to operate in a way that I don't need to risk violating rules, getting banned or the target of something nefarious.

Good luck hunting!

Ambyymaye.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/38d9f4cb-63bc-4e64-9e37-f735efa2d8be[/URL]

Another probable scammer here. Needs money urgently, like within hours, to make her biweekly rent (and then couldn't send a picture holding three fingers up. I thought it was funny when I asked for the verification photo, and she said "one sec I'm on a zoom call" and then sends a picture in a winter coat holding a dog LOL.

I put this in the Escorts section, but I'll try here too. I need recommendations for a quality threesome (MFF). The ladies need to be 7's or better.

[QUOTE=GeechieDan;6457105]I put this in the Escorts section, but I'll try here too. I need recommendations for a quality threesome (MFF). The ladies need to be 7's or better.[/QUOTE]Only threesome girl I know was LRF for MFM, good luck.

Any info on this lady. Communication was great at first. But then she has been silent for a while.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/61c448d8-1b69-4183-985a-5ed762098705[/URL]

Just curious, is she hitting up anyone else for help?

Anyone seen this hottie? [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4b23ea1e-6dec-4119-b45a-10de8c78c91d[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8ea46412-5ef6-416b-b22e-246a26e5e0a2[/URL]

Anyone have any info on this lady? Comms have been good so far will about m & g by text. Thank you.

It is crazy how small the world is. I've been talking w Kdsw2001 on SB and we are meeting up next weekend; no m&g, straight to the main event. I've always thought she looked familiar and now I know why: the first pic she uses on her SB profile is the same one HER MOTHER posted when announcing her daughter's 21st birthday. Her mother and I are fb friends because almost 30 years ago her mom was a sorority girl and unrepentant bar ****: she fucked her way through every bartender in the area, my self included until her senior year, then she "fell in love". She was never great looking but had a top tier body and absolutely no limits. Hopefully like mother like daughter. The one thing we have not discussed is money. There's been zero mention of cash so I'm rolling with it. Details to follow.

[QUOTE=Eagle7415;6460748][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8ea46412-5ef6-416b-b22e-246a26e5e0a2[/URL]

Anyone have any info on this lady? Comms have been good so far will about m & g by text. Thank you.[/QUOTE]Seen her couple times. Very open and fun.

[QUOTE=Vince2000;6463344]Seen her couple times. Very open and fun.[/QUOTE]Does she host?