Positive Escort Reviews

[QUOTE=RobertDeniro;5936309]To each his own. Pictures are posted if you do a search. I've seen her pics and quite frankly she is not remotely attractive and looks like a boy. Again, to each his own but let's not build these ladies up to be the holy grail when they are not. There is a reason her face pics are not posted frequently on here.[/QUOTE]You certainly can have your opinion no problem. The main reason no face pics is that she is UTR. She does not want her face all over the web. She also is not in the "here today and gone to another city in 2 weeks" kind of person. Some of use have higher regard for her and her dependability and low volume.

[QUOTE=DavidTnOrl;5936376]You certainly can have your opinion no problem. The main reason no face pics is that she is UTR. She does not want her face all over the web. She also is not in the "here today and gone to another city in 2 weeks" kind of person. Some of use have higher regard for her and her dependability and low volume.[/QUOTE]To each his own. Sure she's a lovely person however I can't get past the boyish looks and features. Orlando seems to lack quality beautiful women. Some guys feel they have to settle for anything. YMMV.

[QUOTE=JonDoe1344;5936136]Can you post a pic or link for both maitland mom sarah and maitland mom susan? Thanks.[/QUOTE]She got digits.

Can someone at least post a link for each 1 please?

[QUOTE=OdinsBeard78;5936149]I don't think she wants pictures of her self out here, there may be someone that has some that can pm you. Anyway Sarah is very petite and cute girl next door type with nice full tits and eraser sized nipples. She's lots of fun and very pleasant to be around, but she is very petite other than her tits.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=LeonRocks;5935290]We all know her and we all love her. Not much to add, dreamt of Sarah 3 times and all those times it was great! Amazing comms, talkative but not in the annoying way, no candy use just cigs but no bad smell as she keeps clean. Only dreamt of bbbjcimws, she has an insane trunk on her and I hope to dream of it one day but the first time I tried the room was cold as hell and it was early days so performance anxiety kicked in for me.

All in all good dream and highly recommend! Ad below for reference:

[URL]https://orlando.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/altamonte-springs-today-and-to/661390261923[/URL][/QUOTE]Correction, Maitland Susan, not Sarah. Different people, just typed the wrong name. Review is accurate for Maitland Susan though, can be confirmed by other reviews here.

Got a text from her the other day so I went over to her incall by UCF to see what she's all about. She's a cute latina, very voluptuous, my god those milk jugs!! Anyway, we went right to BBBJ and we did a couple of positions and I finished in her mouth. She was very enthusiastic and friendly, I had a good time! 80 clams.

[QUOTE=DiknahzTee;5936019]Please by good to this one all of my 5 visits have good and I don't believe the bad reviews.[/QUOTE]

Sarah definitely does not want ANY pics of her posted up on here. She also doesn't want her digits sent out to anyone. She has an account on USASG. It is SarahMaitland. Anyone interested in contacting her can simply PM her.

Ad is true, pics are recent. CBJ. Standard performance.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/florida/orlando/female-escorts/2809113[/URL]

Enjoy.

Sarah is probably the nicest provider you will ever find. She can carry on a conversation for hours and is just an all around great person. Is she the hot little girl next door type? Absolutely not and she will be the first to tell you that, but she is comfortable with how she looks and has a take me or leave me attitude about it. She's a bit too boyish for me but to each his own. Her performance is good if you can get past the boyish looks. Some say BBBJ but no BBBJCIM. I guess that's a YMMV issue. Some say cfs some say BBFS, again YMMV. I have only seen her twice, once just to see her and once to screen for M1 L, but had no issues with the latter of either of the two issues above. It basically comes down to if you don't mind the boyish looks, Sarah is the most dependable, reliable, nicest, and easiest to talk to providers you will ever find. She's definitely not every bodies cup of tea, but to a lot of guys here she's exactly what they are looking for. I would say though to those that say they like her because she is low volume lmmfao, have you not watched the reviews roll in on this forum? She is a very clean person and will shower before you pick her up and again when you get to the stumpgrinder, but she's not even close to being low volume, but hey neither am I LOL. I've been known to book a room at the grinder as many as 3 times in a day for 3 hours at a time, and seen Sarah going to a room 2 of those times in the same day. If you are looking for a dependable provider that is easy to talk to and can carry on an intelligent conversation, has good skills, and looks are not high on your list of priorities then Sarah is your girl. If you are looking for a hot little spinner or low volume provider then keep looking because Sarah is neither.

[QUOTE=Dugglc;5937129]Sarah is probably the nicest provider you will ever find. She can carry on a conversation for hours and is just an all around great person. Is she the hot little girl next door type? Absolutely not and she will be the first to tell you that, but she is comfortable with how she looks and has a take me or leave me attitude about it. She's a bit too boyish for me but to each his own. Her performance is good if you can get past the boyish looks. Some say BBBJ but no BBBJCIM. I guess that's a YMMV issue. Some say cfs some say BBFS, again YMMV. I have only seen her twice, once just to see her and once to screen for M1 L, but had no issues with the latter of either of the two issues above. It basically comes down to if you don't mind the boyish looks, Sarah is the most dependable, reliable, nicest, and easiest to talk to providers you will ever find. She's definitely not every bodies cup of tea, but to a lot of guys here she's exactly what they are looking for. I would say though to those that say they like her because she is low volume lmmfao, have you not watched the reviews roll in on this forum? She is a very clean person and will shower before you pick her up and again when you get to the stumpgrinder, but she's not even close to being low volume, but hey neither am I LOL. I've been known to book a room at the grinder as many as 3 times in a day for 3 hours at a time, and seen Sarah going to a room 2 of those times in the same day. If you are looking for a dependable provider that is easy to talk to and can carry on an intelligent conversation, has good skills, and looks are not high on your list of priorities then Sarah is your girl. If you are looking for a hot little spinner or low volume provider then keep looking because Sarah is neither.[/QUOTE]Here are a few pictures for those that can't seem to operate the search feature on the forum.

Saw an old friend of this forum recently. Amy, Amanda, Amy Bear is a few of her handles. Saw her in the neighborhood and we talked about old times. She said she is still in the business just doesn't advertise. Did I mention she is pregnant. Set up a date, picked her up and brought her back to my place. Good bbj, cover on, she got on top, side doggy, then Mish to finish. She cleaned up, cleaned me up. Pussy was tiny and tight as always. She's a good girl at heart. Always liked her and we always got along.

P.S. I see Maitland Mom Sarah regularly and she is beautiful to me and the best in the business. My opinion but we all know about those.

Forgot pic.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely antagonistic[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=Dugglc;5937129]Sarah is probably the nicest provider you will ever find. She can carry on a conversation for hours and is just an all around great person. Is she the hot little girl next door type? Absolutely not and she will be the first to tell you that, but she is comfortable with how she looks and has a take me or leave me attitude about it. She's a bit too boyish for me but to each his own. Her performance is good if you can get past the boyish looks. Some say BBBJ but no BBBJCIM. I guess that's a YMMV issue. Some say cfs some say BBFS, again YMMV. I have only seen her twice, once just to see her and once to screen for M1 L, but had no issues with the latter of either of the two issues above. It basically comes down to if you don't mind the boyish looks, Sarah is the most dependable, reliable, nicest, and easiest to talk to providers you will ever find. She's definitely not every bodies cup of tea, but to a lot of guys here she's exactly what they are looking for. I would say though to those that say they like her because she is low volume lmmfao, have you not watched the reviews roll in on this forum? She is a very clean person and will shower before you pick her up and again when you get to the stumpgrinder, but she's not even close to being low volume, but hey neither am I LOL. I've been known to book a room at the grinder as many as 3 times in a day for 3 hours at a time, and seen Sarah going to a room 2 of those times in the same day. If you are looking for a dependable provider that is easy to talk to and can carry on an intelligent conversation, has good skills, and looks are not high on your list of priorities then Sarah is your girl. If you are looking for a hot little spinner or low volume provider then keep looking because Sarah is neither.[/QUOTE]I disagree with you on the low volume issue. What would you consider low volume? There are times she has no work at all for the day. She cut her hair very short last year but it has grown back out. Maybe you seen her then? I am not a fan of short buzz cut on a woman. My daughter and niece both did the same last year as well. Maybe it was just a quick fad.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]