[URL]https://nypost.com/2019/03/28/lawyer-for-robert-kraft-blasts-sheriff-as-liar-in-prostitution-case/[/URL]
[URL]https://nypost.com/2019/03/28/lawyer-for-robert-kraft-blasts-sheriff-as-liar-in-prostitution-case/[/URL]
[QUOTE=punteruk;4210711][URL]https://nypost.com/2019/03/28/lawyer-for-robert-kraft-blasts-sheriff-as-liar-in-prostitution-case/[/URL][/QUOTE]Would it be perjury or at least lying to a judge if the claim on a search warrant request identified probable cause for human trafficking? Or can they claim anything (aliens, spilt milk, Bigfoot) and it becomes the judges responsibility to believe them or not? If someone lies to a judge as a defendant or witness its perjury. The sheriff is a witness to a crime and the search warrant is produced based on that proof or probable proof?
[QUOTE=Miketastic69;4210728]Would it be perjury or at least lying to a judge if the claim on a search warrant request identified probable cause for human trafficking? Or can they claim anything (aliens, spilt milk, Bigfoot) and it becomes the judges responsibility to believe them or not? If someone lies to a judge as a defendant or witness its perjury. The sheriff is a witness to a crime and the search warrant is produced based on that proof or probable proof?[/QUOTE]Pretty sure the worst that can happen is the evidence gets thrown out if the warrant was improperly obtained. But in this case, the damage they were seeking is done anyway. That's why they offered him the deal.
Just hoping next time the media treats the trafficking claim with healthy skepticism. The irony is that if trafficking is actually taking place (rare) this will actually hurt the cause. Kind of the Jussie Smollet effect.
Perjury is lying under oath. Lying to a Federal Agent is also a felony, as Mr. Flynn discovered. But obtaining a warrant under false pretenses is never prosecuted.
In today's Globe:
[URL]https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/27/wayland-suburban-moms-take-aim-sex-trafficking/h9Mts6VbKjY7zQoAN76lZK/story.html[/URL]
I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.
A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.
Bunch of fucking busy bodies. Wait until they find one of their husbands walking out of one.
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;4250799]In today's Globe:
[URL]https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/27/wayland-suburban-moms-take-aim-sex-trafficking/h9Mts6VbKjY7zQoAN76lZK/story.html[/URL]
I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.
A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;4250799]In today's Globe:
[URL]https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/27/wayland-suburban-moms-take-aim-sex-trafficking/h9Mts6VbKjY7zQoAN76lZK/story.html[/URL]
I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.
A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.[/QUOTE]All of them concerned about the sex trafficking in FL. Which turned out not to be happening.
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;4250799]In today's Globe:
[URL]https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/27/wayland-suburban-moms-take-aim-sex-trafficking/h9Mts6VbKjY7zQoAN76lZK/story.html[/URL]
I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.
A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.[/QUOTE]Go walk your effing dogs.
[QUOTE=IGotID69;4250996]Go walk your effing dogs.[/QUOTE]Those old crusty fat bags have nothing else better to do with their time.
[QUOTE=MeatMan;4251293]Those old crusty fat bags have nothing else better to do with their time.[/QUOTE]To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.
[QUOTE=ThatGuy23;4251521]To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.[/QUOTE]And they don't see the irony when after their meetings they stop and get their nails done at the expensive salon with Vietnamese woman servicing them.
[QUOTE=ThatGuy23;4251521]To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.[/QUOTE]Actually it's not that they "believe" that these girls are being trafficked. They just refuse to believe that they are NOT being trafficked.
There is ample info out there that says that 99.9% of those girls do it on their own accord, and many are even proud to be able to support their families back home. Also, considering the quality of life in rural China many of those girls never had it as good as when working in America's whorehouses and look at any attempt to remove it from there as an attempt to do them harm. But accepting that would go against these ladies puritanical heritage (Cotton Mather is grinning in his grave about his values are being alive and well after all that time if not in word then in spirit), would make them feel like evil-doers instead of the heroes, and also hit something Fraudean inside, first of all this action makes them feel superior: since they're saving hoes they not hoes themselves, even if back in the day they were their HS football team's "goto" toys. Also by doing that they're almost "chasing the devil away" from themselves. Also many women who live in Wayland (I personally know two) have a lot of time on their hands and that keeps it all busy and interesting.
There are a lot of reasons for those women doing that but when you strip it all down benevolence is the last one on their list.
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;4250799]In today's Globe:
[URL]https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/27/wayland-suburban-moms-take-aim-sex-trafficking/h9Mts6VbKjY7zQoAN76lZK/story.html[/URL]
I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.
A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.[/QUOTE]Someone want to copy and paste the article? I'm over my limit for the paywall.
[QUOTE=ThatGuy23;4251521]To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.[/QUOTE]If by chance they actually come across a "real" trafficking establishment, would guess they would not be able to leave and would be put to work themselves.
[URL]https://turtleboysports.com/woke-white-wayland-savior-moms-drive-2-asian-immigrant-businesses-out-of-town-by-harassing-them-for-months-because-they-think-theyre-sex-trafficking/[/URL]
[QUOTE=TopFloor;4260498][URL]https://turtleboysports.com/woke-white-wayland-savior-moms-drive-2-asian-immigrant-businesses-out-of-town-by-harassing-them-for-months-because-they-think-theyre-sex-trafficking/[/URL][/QUOTE]I want to light bags of shit on fire on each of their doorsteps.
[URL]https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/05/07/human-trafficking-arrest-boston-chinatown-zhou-feng-mei-zhang-arraignment/[/URL]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited or deleted to [u]remove references to Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales[/u]. As provided in the Forum's Posting Guideline, members may not discuss Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
[URL]https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-ne-cb-robert-kraft-spa-cases-failings-20190518-gqduneepjvcq3lykburpemy35a-story.html[/URL]
But Hanser concluded the warrant still broke federal law, because police didn't do enough to focus only on crimes and to minimize the cameras' intrusiveness. At all of the spas with the secret cameras, police wound up recording people receiving lawful services, even though the focus was supposed to be only on men paying for sex acts.
Failing to be vigilant and not record women "is a serious flaw in the search warrant, especially considering that the search warrant did not allege women were seeking illegal contact," Hanser wrote. He called it "unacceptable" that "some totally innocent women and men had their entire lawful time spent in a massage room fully recorded. ".
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited or deleted to [u]remove references to Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales[/u]. As provided in the Forum's Posting Guideline, members may not discuss Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
Sex work may be decriminalized in New York soon!
[URL]https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/New-York-Sex-Work-Legalization-511067151.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.boston25news.com/news/cities-and-towns-see-surge-in-prostitution-in-surprising-places-across-state/901849298[/URL]
It was posted back in January. What surprised me more is prostitution is prevalent in SouthBridge, MA. I honestly never knew. This opioid crisis is way beyond control!.
Lets see, the news is that street walking has surged because of the shutdown of Backpage, etc. Oh, and because of the opioid crisis.
It has increased significantly in Southbridge, Worcester, Lawrence, and Boston. Who could have seen that coming, eh?
A female judge is trying to get a program established to help the ladies, because "Psychologically, they've been brainwashed and dependent on their pimp and abusers," said Judge Coffey. And there aren't enough programs for drug addicts and women already.
I guess there are no ladies out there that are independent enough to get hooked on drugs or to prostitute themselves on their own. It is always those wicked men that lead them astray.
And yet, all women are the equal of all those wicked, wicked men, until they are not equal, and need to be treated special. What a world we live in.
Any chance that there are any guys out there that are addicts that need help too??
[QUOTE=MeatMan;4336284][URL]https://www.boston25news.com/news/cities-and-towns-see-surge-in-prostitution-in-surprising-places-across-state/901849298[/URL]
It was posted back in January. What surprised me more is prostitution is prevalent in SouthBridge, MA. I honestly never knew. This opioid crisis is way beyond control!.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CheezeFist;4313020]Sex work may be decriminalized in New York soon!
[URL]https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/New-York-Sex-Work-Legalization-511067151.html[/URL][/QUOTE]With the middle aged frumpy white woman. They'll try to destroy it.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4336383]Lets see, the news is that street walking has surged because of the shutdown of Backpage, etc. Oh, and because of the opioid crisis.
It has increased significantly in Southbridge, Worcester, Lawrence, and Boston. Who could have seen that coming, eh?
A female judge is trying to get a program established to help the ladies, because "Psychologically, they've been brainwashed and dependent on their pimp and abusers," said Judge Coffey. And there aren't enough programs for drug addicts and women already.
I guess there are no ladies out there that are independent enough to get hooked on drugs or to prostitute themselves on their own. It is always those wicked men that lead them astray.
And yet, all women are the equal of all those wicked, wicked men, until they are not equal, and need to be treated special. What a world we live in.
Any chance that there are any guys out there that are addicts that need help too??[/QUOTE]They can't get by on their minimum wage jobs.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4336383]Lets see, the news is that street walking has surged because of the shutdown of Backpage, etc. Oh, and because of the opioid crisis.
It has increased significantly in Southbridge, Worcester, Lawrence, and Boston. Who could have seen that coming, eh?
A female judge is trying to get a program established to help the ladies, because "Psychologically, they've been brainwashed and dependent on their pimp and abusers," said Judge Coffey. And there aren't enough programs for drug addicts and women already.
I guess there are no ladies out there that are independent enough to get hooked on drugs or to prostitute themselves on their own. It is always those wicked men that lead them astray.
And yet, all women are the equal of all those wicked, wicked men, until they are not equal, and need to be treated special. What a world we live in.
Any chance that there are any guys out there that are addicts that need help too??[/QUOTE]Dude, the answer is very simple. We're getting pussywhipped and we're not tough enough to resist it. We're just not made that way. We were always an inferior sex but were made believe to be superior when it served the purpose of the superior sex. Now they don't even need us anymore to work for them or make babies. You know what happens to species that lose their purpose for existence, right? Right. It would take less than 100 years in my estimate. Nature is cruel but predictable.
[URL]https://whdh.com/news/ag-9-charged-in-sex-trafficking-ring-that-extended-from-north-shore-to-boston/[/URL]
After reading this, it seems that making this a State responsibility and taking it out the hands of the local Gov.
May actually slow down raids on AMPs due to $$.
[URL]https://www.wickedlocal.com/news/20190907/framingham-marlborough-officials-body-work-bill-has-limits[/URL]
This not exactly new but I didn't see it previously. There was a parlor bust in Texas, some time ago and the article, describing it, says: "During an investigation of area massage parlors, police said they found hidden cameras in the massage rooms showing approximately 400 persons involved in sex acts with the trafficking victims", implying that someone else installed the cameras, not them. A customer perhaps? I wonder how common is this, and whether it happens here in MA as well.
[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/texas/amp/Texas-prostitution-bust-arrest-massage-parlor-waco-12825788.php[/URL]
[QUOTE=NewbieStyle;4463267]This not exactly new but I didn't see it previously. There was a parlor bust in Texas, some time ago and the article, describing it, says: "During an investigation of area massage parlors, police said they found hidden cameras in the massage rooms showing approximately 400 persons involved in sex acts with the trafficking victims", implying that someone else installed the cameras, not them. A customer perhaps? I wonder how common is this, and whether it happens here in MA as well.
[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/texas/amp/Texas-prostitution-bust-arrest-massage-parlor-waco-12825788.php[/URL][/QUOTE]I don't think the audio / video monitoring is common but it happens as we speak. Was warned by someone about this a couple of months ago, and purchased an advanced hidden microphone / camera detector. It's totally legal and you can find many of those online. Was taking it with me, and in only one well-known local parlor an actively transmitting device was detected. No idea who installed it, but there aren't too many possibilities to consider.
[QUOTE=Trickster666;4464454]I don't think the audio / video monitoring is common but it happens as we speak. Was warned by someone about this a couple of months ago, and purchased an advanced hidden microphone / camera detector. It's totally legal and you can find many of those online. Was taking it with me, and in only one well-known local parlor an actively transmitting device was detected. No idea who installed it, but there aren't too many possibilities to consider.[/QUOTE]Wait a minute, are you saying that one of the popular local parlors is constantly videomonitored inside the massage rooms? May I ask which one, please? I will never be there again.
[QUOTE=OldtimerMa;4465029]Wait a minute, are you saying that one of the popular local parlors is constantly videomonitored inside the massage rooms? May I ask which one, please? I will never be there again.[/QUOTE]That is Beech place in Belmont. Ir was still there as recently as a couple of days ago. I never parked at the parlor and couldn't figure out why Candy (goes by Lisa now) repeatedly asked me where I am parking and why I am not parking at their lot. That was odd, why would be that of any interest to her. It all makes sense now, as they, probably, wanted the plate info to identify people on videos. Anyway, if you still go there, don't park at their lot ever. It seems to be closely watched.
[QUOTE=Trickster666;4465551]That is Beech place in Belmont. Ir was still there as recently as a couple of days ago. I never parked at the parlor and couldn't figure out why Candy (goes by Lisa now) repeatedly asked me where I am parking and why I am not parking at their lot. That was odd, why would be that of any interest to her. It all makes sense now, as they, probably, wanted the plate info to identify people on videos. Anyway, if you still go there, don't park at their lot ever. It seems to be closely watched.[/QUOTE]Always park a few blocks away or somewhere away from businesses. 2019 has many folks getting security cams for their safety of their businesses and if someone tends to be stupid and does something, the mafia will come and get ya for ruining it for them. Just don't be a dumbass and park near the door. First, it is easy to get busted right outside of the door. I know most of ya watch MSNBC, by Chris Hansen, let's face it, it is a lesson. Hahaha.
[QUOTE=NewbieStyle;4463267]This not exactly new but I didn't see it previously. There was a parlor bust in Texas, some time ago and the article, describing it, says: "During an investigation of area massage parlors, police said they found hidden cameras in the massage rooms showing approximately 400 persons involved in sex acts with the trafficking victims", implying that someone else installed the cameras, not them. A customer perhaps? I wonder how common is this, and whether it happens here in MA as well.
[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/texas/amp/Texas-prostitution-bust-arrest-massage-parlor-waco-12825788.php[/URL][/QUOTE]I have a friend I met in a spa several years ago who's now opened a couple AMPs of her own. I had dinner with her recently and she showed me how she gets a notification on her phone each time a customer enters one of her shops. It was apparently motion activated by the video monitor and the app sends her a frame from the video. She swiped her thumb over her phone and it whizzed down scrolling through images of a ton of dudes. I'd expect that most places have a similar setup these days.
As far as cameras / microphones in the rooms? I hope that's not common. I guess there's a bunch of reasons why they might do it. To coach the girls on what to do, to ensure that certain activities aren't happening; to ensure that customers aren't getting too much time without paying the correct house fee; for quality assurance; just to snoop; or to build up material to blackmail with. I've heard rumors of this type of stuff before. Sometimes not even involving technology, things like the owner/manager watching through a grate or a false mirror. Maybe just age-old monger paranoia.
But it does make you look back on certain interactions and wonder if there was more to the story. Like when you ask for certain acts and the girl shushes you. She complies but insists that you don't make a sound.
[QUOTE=TheBoobHound;4466756]I have a friend I met in a spa several years ago who's now opened a couple AMPs of her own. I had dinner with her recently and she showed me how she gets a notification on her phone each time a customer enters one of her shops. It was apparently motion activated by the video monitor and the app sends her a frame from the video. She swiped her thumb over her phone and it whizzed down scrolling through images of a ton of dudes. I'd expect that most places have a similar setup these days.
As far as cameras / microphones in the rooms? I hope that's not common. I guess there's a bunch of reasons why they might do it. To coach the girls on what to do, to ensure that certain activities aren't happening; to ensure that customers aren't getting too much time without paying the correct house fee; for quality assurance; just to snoop; or to build up material to blackmail with. I've heard rumors of this type of stuff before. Sometimes not even involving technology, things like the owner/manager watching through a grate or a false mirror. Maybe just age-old monger paranoia.
But it does make you look back on certain interactions and wonder if there was more to the story. Like when you ask for certain acts and the girl shushes you. She complies but insists that you don't make a sound.[/QUOTE]I too got pretty close to a girl in Dover NH AMP, they didn't open until 10 a and I went by there everyday and learned which car was the mamasan, so I knew if she was there or not, I asked the girl if I could come at 8 or 9 so we could have sex with no rush or interruptions, she told me that there was a motion activated camera that the mamasan got a notification when someone entered, I asked if there were other cameras, any in the rooms and she said no, just at the front door. The mamasan showed the girl on her phone her first day there and showed all the girls that worked there that she was watching, keeping them honest. I think this is more common then we want to think about.
[QUOTE=Amppro95;4466874]I too got pretty close to a girl in Dover NH AMP, they didn't open until 10 a and I went by there everyday and learned which car was the mamasan, so I knew if she was there or not, I asked the girl if I could come at 8 or 9 so we could have sex with no rush or interruptions, she told me that there was a motion activated camera that the mamasan got a notification when someone entered, I asked if there were other cameras, any in the rooms and she said no, just at the front door. The mamasan showed the girl on her phone her first day there and showed all the girls that worked there that she was watching, keeping them honest. I think this is more common then we want to think about.[/QUOTE]Its got to be 15 years or more I have been at this, spas always have cameras, some you can see the monitor. Far east has a sign in the parking lot saying video survalance never been an issue.
[QUOTE=Amppro95;4466874]I too got pretty close to a girl in Dover NH AMP, they didn't open until 10 a and I went by there everyday and learned which car was the mamasan, so I knew if she was there or not, I asked the girl if I could come at 8 or 9 so we could have sex with no rush or interruptions, she told me that there was a motion activated camera that the mamasan got a notification when someone entered, I asked if there were other cameras, any in the rooms and she said no, just at the front door. The mamasan showed the girl on her phone her first day there and showed all the girls that worked there that she was watching, keeping them honest. I think this is more common then we want to think about.[/QUOTE]It's completely understandable when the parlor owner has something like that at the shop to ensure that the fraction of the house fee goes to her / him. But video recording inside the massage rooms brings everything to a completely new level. I don't think I will come even close to Beech ever. Not sure what Candy was thinking opening a FS shop in the heavily populated residential area in Belmont. It's just unavoidable that the parlor will be busted at some point, and what if they found all these video recordings, or at least part of them.
These days and with tech revolution, the girls working in spas even don't know that there are cameras in the room which they can't see. Forget about clients. Every move is recorded and can be used against girls or clients if need be. I guess how quickly we forgot Robert Kraft and Patriots saga! Regardless of legality on these matters, it is fact that we are watched once in parking lot till we leave. Few years back I spoke with this girl who used to work in Providence on Branch avenue in a studio. After she quit there, visited her at her own place and she told me that studio had cameras in each room and being watched for what services she provided clients. It was for how much she charged for each services and not to really watch client activities! Studio wanted to make sure that she was not giving out FS at cheap rate! Massage parlor girls / mamasun can say anything they want to clients. But it is being watched. In fact, I was going to meet this 35 year old woman in Pawtucket last year and casually asked her if she has camera in her apt and she said yes. Of course, I didn't go there. If we think that we are not being taped / watched then we are ALL fool (Including myself). Motels / hotels have cameras in parking lots / doors / hallways and so on as well. We can't hide anymore!
[QUOTE=Amppro95;4466874]I too got pretty close to a girl in Dover NH AMP, they didn't open until 10 a and I went by there everyday and learned which car was the mamasan, so I knew if she was there or not, I asked the girl if I could come at 8 or 9 so we could have sex with no rush or interruptions, she told me that there was a motion activated camera that the mamasan got a notification when someone entered, I asked if there were other cameras, any in the rooms and she said no, just at the front door. The mamasan showed the girl on her phone her first day there and showed all the girls that worked there that she was watching, keeping them honest. I think this is more common then we want to think about.[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=OldtimerMa;4466951]It's completely understandable when the parlor owner has something like that at the shop to ensure that the fraction of the house fee goes to her / him. But video recording inside the massage rooms brings everything to a completely new level. I don't think I will come even close to Beech ever. Not sure what Candy was thinking opening a FS shop in the heavily populated residential area in Belmont. It's just unavoidable that the parlor will be busted at some point, and what if they found all these video recordings, or at least part of them.[/QUOTE]Right, it's not somewhere, some time -- it's right here, right now at a place where people come in massive numbers for a raw quickie. Too close for comfort, coming to the realization that it's all stored on someone's hard drive.
Tourist Fined for Wearing 'Tiny' Bikini on Popular Beach in the Philippines.
Here is link to report and pic of woman wearing the offending bathing suit. It was definitely an itsy bitsy.
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tourist-fined-wearing-tiny-bikini-195555772.html[/URL]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4495174]Tourist Fined for Wearing 'Tiny' Bikini on Popular Beach in the Philippines.
Here is link to report and pic of woman wearing the offending bathing suit. It was definitely an itsy bitsy.
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tourist-fined-wearing-tiny-bikini-195555772.html[/URL][/QUOTE]I'd pay the fine for her to keep it on!! WOW.