Printable View
Anyone see Danelle yet and care to report?
K-Girl Ria looks to be in PDX in a week and is pre-booking. Have not seen her but she looks hot and has good reviews: [URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/community/threads/tour-of-portland-aug-22-23-highly-reviewed-and-skilled-k-girl-ria-visiting-for-the-first-time.3106950/[/URL].
[QUOTE=Burner77;7372710]Anyone see Danelle yet and care to report?
K-Girl Ria looks to be in PDX in a week and is pre-booking. Have not seen her but she looks hot and has good reviews: [URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/community/threads/tour-of-portland-aug-22-23-highly-reviewed-and-skilled-k-girl-ria-visiting-for-the-first-time.3106950/[/URL].[/QUOTE]TOFTT on Danielle. Service-wise, good I think. Playful throughout, good vocals, good BBBJ. Looks-wise, she's at least 10 years older than the "super young" tag would lead you to believe (To me that means early to mid 20's). I'm fairly certain the pictures are hers, but either photoshopped to soften aging by 10 years, or of her 10 years ago. I'd put her at mid 30's AT LEAST. Prob no older than 45. Soft mid-section, good tits. Couldn't tell if MM or natural. Thin, no ass. I wouldn't repeat, but I don't really repeat with anyone.
[QUOTE=Burner77;7372952]TOFTT on Danielle. Service-wise, good I think. Playful throughout, good vocals, good BBBJ. Looks-wise, she's at least 10 yea
rs older than the "super young" tag would lead you to believe (To me that means early to mid 20's). I'm fairly certain the pictures are hers, but either photoshopped to soften aging by 10 years, or of her 10 years ago. I'd put her at mid 30's AT LEAST. Prob no older than 45. Soft mid-section, good tits. Couldn't tell if MM or natural. Thin, no ass. I wouldn't repeat, but I don't really repeat with anyone.[/QUOTE]Is there a link for the Danielle of whom you speak? On.
[QUOTE=JRBonner;7372988]Is there a link for the Danielle of whom you speak? On.[/QUOTE]Never mind I see her now. I find their website a little wonky.
Met her last night easy setup but building confusing. Have seen several k girl nice girl but more mechanical not my usual 9/10 experience. Very little kissing so no dfk, nipples and skin sensitive, no Fiv and really didn't like daty but switched positions and she can take a pounding and wore her out. Just not my first class experience that I'm accustomed too from the east coast.
[QUOTE=FreeWilly12;7391726]Met her last night easy setup but building confusing. Have seen several k girl nice girl but more mechanical not my usual 9/10 experience. Very little kissing so no dfk, nipples and skin sensitive, no Fiv and really didn't like daty but switched positions and she can take a pounding and wore her out. Just not my first class experience that I'm accustomed too from the east coast.[/QUOTE]Yeah this place charges too much compared to California and even worse, under delivers on the selection and service. Do they still have those stupid sheets on the windows instead of actual curtains? Portland desperately needs another k-girl service.
[QUOTE=FreeWilly12;7391726]Met her last night easy setup but building confusing. Have seen several k girl nice girl but more mechanical not my usual 9/10 experience. Very little kissing so no dfk, nipples and skin sensitive, no Fiv and really didn't like daty but switched positions and she can take a pounding and wore her out. Just not my first class experience that I'm accustomed too from the east coast.[/QUOTE]Thanks for your report. Sounds like you saved me $$ I thought I saw some good reports on her from back east and was thinking about seeing her. Sorry you didn't get the experience you hoped for.
[QUOTE=FreeWilly12;7391726]Met her last night easy setup but building confusing. Have seen several k girl nice girl but more mechanical not my usual 9/10 experience. Very little kissing so no dfk, nipples and skin sensitive, no Fiv and really didn't like daty but switched positions and she can take a pounding and wore her out. Just not my first class experience that I'm accustomed too from the east coast.[/QUOTE]Photos accurate though?
Was tempted by "YOUNGEST FLOWER TO VISIT" but she wasn't available in the morning or early afternoon. No fresh reports here. Wondering who was hogging her all this time.
[QUOTE=PuntBagger;7392663]Photos accurate though?[/QUOTE]Yes. Pics were accurate.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7394417]Was tempted by "YOUNGEST FLOWER TO VISIT" but she wasn't available in the morning or early afternoon. No fresh reports here. Wondering who was hogging her all this time.[/QUOTE]Was curious about her too. Not enough to take the plunge until someone can confirm details, though.
[QUOTE=Burner77;7394745]Was curious about her too. Not enough to take the plunge until someone can confirm details, though.[/QUOTE]I had an above average experience with her on her first day. She's a true spinner with minimal body fat. I found the TER reviews to be fairly accurate for her. The hero image of her on the kgfe site is her with some air brushing (at least I'm fairly confident it is). Would repeat.
Same booker that advertises for Candy has a big-titted, allegedly Japanese chick in a hotel near PDX: (364) 200-4007.
The ad is on skipthegames, can't find it. Same services as kgfe, same rates. Wasn't offered the upcharge, didn't ask not sure if available.
Mid to late 30's, not ugly, very very nice boobs, probably E, they claim way bigger cup. Massage is meh, service is week but the boobs are very nice.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7400996]Same booker that advertises for Candy has a big-titted, allegedly Japanese chick in a hotel near PDX: (364) 200-4007.
The ad is on skipthegames, can't find it. Same services as kgfe, same rates. Wasn't offered the upcharge, didn't ask not sure if available.
Mid to late 30's, not ugly, very very nice boobs, probably E, they claim way bigger cup. Massage is meh, service is week but the boobs are very nice.[/QUOTE]I was interested until I got to the park that they're charging the same rates as kgfe. Thanks for sharing but that's a hard pass. It's ridiculous that they are charging more than California k girl agencies. We need another kgirl agency.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7400996]The ad is on skipthegames, can't find it. Same services as kgfe, same rates. Wasn't offered the upcharge, didn't ask not sure if available.
Mid to late 30's, not ugly, very very nice boobs, probably E, they claim way bigger cup. Massage is meh, service is week but the boobs are very nice.[/QUOTE]Phone number brings up.
[URL]https://portland.escortrush.com/female-escorts/693647747982561280?ref=phone[/URL]
[URL]https://us.escortsaffair.com/portland/detail/6859481d7453df578d00b5d7[/URL]
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/baltimore/female-escorts/asian/100nicebbbjbbfs69kiss/800249715363[/URL]
Perhaps I didn't phrase it correctly, I couldn't find the specific ad that talks about this girl. The number itself brings results, but among those you listed the first two are Candy ads and the last one is not in Oregon.
[QUOTE=PoonHound1969;7401486]Phone number brings up.
[URL]https://portland.escortrush.com/female-escorts/693647747982561280?ref=phone[/URL]
[URL]https://us.escortsaffair.com/portland/detail/6859481d7453df578d00b5d7[/URL]
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/baltimore/female-escorts/asian/100nicebbbjbbfs69kiss/800249715363[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7401466]I was interested until I got to the park that they're charging the same rates as kgfe. Thanks for sharing but that's a hard pass. It's ridiculous that they are charging more than California k girl agencies. We need another kgirl agency.[/QUOTE]Well that's been always (this way, we need more than a couple of them to start charging less. And if not for her boobs I doubt would have bothered posting, I usually don't about average experiences. It's been at least two years since I've seen such a nice natural pair in E size, soft yet holding the shape, perfect conical nipples, both tits are the same size, etc.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7400996]Same booker that advertises for Candy has a big-titted, allegedly Japanese chick in a hotel near PDX: (364) 200-4007.
The ad is on skipthegames, can't find it. Same services as kgfe, same rates. Wasn't offered the upcharge, didn't ask not sure if available.
Mid to late 30's, not ugly, very very nice boobs, probably E, they claim way bigger cup. Massage is meh, service is week but the boobs are very nice.[/QUOTE]I contacted candy was told there is no such person at another location. What number are you using?
[QUOTE=SpoofPdx;7394752]I had an above average experience with her on her first day. She's a true spinner with minimal body fat. I found the TER reviews to be fairly accurate for her. The hero image of her on the kgfe site is her with some air brushing (at least I'm fairly confident it is). Would repeat.[/QUOTE]Kiwi's service is above average in my opinion. Very tiny (less than 5'1), mid to late 20's manmade tits bigger than her frame. Was pleasantly surprised that her nipples weren't too sensitive for pulling and nibbling. Mutual shower, even for 30 min appt available. All the upgrades available with minimal hassle. 300/400. Better than the hot, lethargic safety girls charging the same.
Only pain is the secured private apartment building in high traffic downtown area.
The number I posted
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7401603]I contacted candy was told there is no such person at another location. What number are you using?[/QUOTE]This is not [B]the[/B] ad, again, can't find the specific one but this one has both number and location (location 2): [URL]https://honeyaffair.com/oregon/portland-escorts/40985/[/URL]#.
The specific one was talking about big tits and short stay.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7401628]The number I posted
This is not [B]the[/B] ad, again, can't find the specific one but this one has both number and location (location 2): [URL]https://honeyaffair.com/oregon/portland-escorts/40985/[/URL]#.
The specific one was talking about big tits and short stay.[/QUOTE]You are saying that using this number, I can book girls at candy and also at a hotel? The person at Candy denies there is no other number. The person at the other number says yes I can book girls at Candy through them. Also when I read your original post it reads to say that the Japanese girl in the hotel is the same rate as the girls at kgfe. Feeling a bit confused here.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7401651]You are saying that using this number, I can book girls at candy and also at a hotel? The person at Candy denies there is no other number. The person at the other number says yes I can book girls at Candy through them. Also when I read your original post it reads to say that the Japanese girl in the hotel is the same rate as the girls at kgfe. Feeling a bit confused here.[/QUOTE]That's the number I texted (over the weekend), asked about second location, 1st location is obviously Candy. They said the girl at second location was indisposed, tried to push Candy, I wasn't interested.
On Wednesday, got a text from them saying I could come. They gave me a laundry list of prices but the ones I cared about were the same as kgfe: 40 minutes of everything 300, HR of everything 400. Everything doesn't include BBFS. There were also options for massage (w / o penetration), multiple hours, etc.
No idea why they don't want to book. I gave you an ad, as an example of them advertising both Candy and a hotel location together. Another thing of note, I met one of girls I've seen at Candy in a hotel via a similar ad this past summer, different number and a different hotel. Was told another girl is available in the same hotel but when I texted them in a couple of days they didn't respond. Don't know if and how it's connected.
Attached a pic I was sent, not her face but also had pink hair and body/boobs very similar
BTW, if you try to google the pic you'll get a bunch of hits in Canada, and the description: body measurements, attributes, services, pricing structure (not the prices themselves)... is very similar to what I was told over text
[QUOTE=BobA0;7401692]That's the number I texted (over the weekend), asked about second location, 1st location is obviously Candy. They said the girl at second location was indisposed, tried to push Candy, I wasn't interested.
On Wednesday, got a text from them saying I could come. They gave me a laundry list of prices but the ones I cared about were the same as kgfe: 40 minutes of everything 300, HR of everything 400. Everything doesn't include BBFS. There were also options for massage (w / o penetration), multiple hours, etc.
No idea why they don't want to book. I gave you an ad, as an example of them advertising both Candy and a hotel location together. Another thing of note, I met one of girls I've seen at Candy in a hotel via a similar ad this past summer, different number and a different hotel. Was told another girl is available in the same hotel but when I texted them in a couple of days they didn't respond. Don't know if and how it's connected.
Attached a pic I was sent, not her face but also had pink hair and body/boobs very similar
BTW, if you try to google the pic you'll get a bunch of hits in Canada, and the description: body measurements, attributes, services, pricing structure (not the prices themselves)... is very similar to what I was told over text[/QUOTE]Thanks for the feedback.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7401692]That's the number I texted (over the weekend), asked about second location, 1st location is obviously Candy. They said the girl at second location was indisposed, tried to push Candy, I wasn't interested.
On Wednesday, got a text from them saying I could come. They gave me a laundry list of prices but the ones I cared about were the same as kgfe: 40 minutes of everything 300, HR of everything 400. Everything doesn't include BBFS. There were also options for massage (w / o penetration), multiple hours, etc.
No idea why they don't want to book. I gave you an ad, as an example of them advertising both Candy and a hotel location together. Another thing of note, I met one of girls I've seen at Candy in a hotel via a similar ad this past summer, different number and a different hotel. Was told another girl is available in the same hotel but when I texted them in a couple of days they didn't respond. Don't know if and how it's connected.
Attached a pic I was sent, not her face but also had pink hair and body/boobs very similar
BTW, if you try to google the pic you'll get a bunch of hits in Canada, and the description: body measurements, attributes, services, pricing structure (not the prices themselves)... is very similar to what I was told over text[/QUOTE]Do you recall the girl's name? I may be interested. Pair of natural E's is tempting.
[QUOTE=BobA0;7400996]Same booker that advertises for Candy has a big-titted, allegedly Japanese chick in a hotel near PDX: (364) 200-4007.
The ad is on skipthegames, can't find it. Same services as kgfe, same rates. Wasn't offered the upcharge, didn't ask not sure if available.
Mid to late 30's, not ugly, very very nice boobs, probably E, they claim way bigger cup. Massage is meh, service is week but the boobs are very nice.[/QUOTE]How weak is the service? She's not one of those girls that claims to have sensitive titties so all you're allowed to do is look at them is she?
[QUOTE=Burner77;7401906]How weak is the service? She's not one of those girls that claims to have sensitive titties so all you're allowed to do is look at them is she?[/QUOTE]Didn't get a name, she seemed uninterested and had her hand there at all times to limit penetration, except for riding but again she specifically worked very shallow angles.
No issue with her tits, no pasties or other nonsense. In fact she took my hands off of her butt and put them on her tits. She uses them too, more than her mouth.
Any one see the two new girls and care to report?
[QUOTE=Burner77;7417507]Any one see the two new girls and care to report?[/QUOTE]Neither is available apparently because I tried on Megs supposed first day. Apparently Poppy left after 2 days because it's too slow and told her friend Meg to stay away too.
Pretty strange honestly.
[QUOTE=Grounds;7417548]Neither is available apparently because I tried on Megs supposed first day. Apparently Poppy left after 2 days because it's too slow and told her friend Meg to stay away too.
Pretty strange honestly.[/QUOTE]Doesn't surprise me. What do they expect. Poppy has mediocre reviews and Meg zero reviews. These are the girls that keep me (and I assume others) away. I did see my ATF Itzel is back on rotation though.
[QUOTE=Grounds;7417548]Neither is available apparently because I tried on Megs supposed first day. Apparently Poppy left after 2 days because it's too slow and told her friend Meg to stay away too.
Pretty strange honestly.[/QUOTE]It's so weird to think that customers like being lied to. The pictures are almost never of the girl. Maybe the girl selected photos of someone else that is similar, but if you can clearly see the face then you know it's not her. Seems to be the norm in the Asian provider space, but that doesn't make it acceptable. If business is slow, maybe try not lying to us. I'd rather see a blurred face but clear picture of the actual providers body, not a representation of her.
[QUOTE=DragonBow76;7418324]It's so weird to think that customers like being lied to. The pictures are almost never of the girl. Maybe the girl selected photos of someone else that is similar, but if you can clearly see the face then you know it's not her. Seems to be the norm in the Asian provider space, but that doesn't make it acceptable. If business is slow, maybe try not lying to us. I'd rather see a blurred face but clear picture of the actual providers body, not a representation of her.[/QUOTE]A reminder to all the fellas, if you don't like what you see, you don't have to commit. Like yeah it's pretty shtty to inconvenience Booker J. Sometimes the juice is not worth the squeeze.
[QUOTE=Grounds;7417548]Neither is available apparently because I tried on Megs supposed first day. Apparently Poppy left after 2 days because it's too slow and told her friend Meg to stay away too.
Pretty strange honestly.[/QUOTE]It's the agency's own fault for charging higher prices than California, and also charging the girl more money per customer than the agencies in California do. We need another agency.
Itzel has returned to KGFE. She's been reviewed before, but I never personally saw her. Finally took the plunge. My overall reaction: meh.
Her rates are slightly higher than the normal KGFE rates, and her BBFS upcharge is double the normal. I'm not exactly sure why.
She has a very thin, petite frame, but she has ridiculously massive gigantic fake tits compared to her frame. Like, they just look silly on her, IMO. They're big and firm, and hang off her chest like two big beach balls. They're all veiny because the skin is so stretched out that you can see the veins underneath. I know I'm often in the minority on this, but I prefer proportional tits, even if they're fake. If a girl has a very petite frame, she should have B cups, maybe small C's at the most. But, if you weigh 90 pounds with DD's, it's kinda ridiculous.
Otherwise, she's very pleasant, very giggly, and very cute. Standard shower and blue toast, no BJ in the shower. Back to the bed, short BBBJ, not really interested in kissing at all, then DATY (she's responsive), mish, doggy, a few other positions. As our time winded down, I decided the condom wasn't working for me, and asked if she'd finish me with her mouth while I took off the condom. She laughed and said, "no!" and suggested a handjob instead, which got the job done.
Overall, the encounter was fine. But given the higher rates, the freakishly large fake tits, and the restrictions on services, I won't be repeating.
Just curious if anyone has found something other than KGFE and the Chinese agencies.
Anyone seen this Dia at KGFE? She's been on longer than usual for a "short stay" and the description has changed. Wonder if they finally gave up updating the fake pics and just decided to update the details. Natural D's has me curious.
[QUOTE=Burner77;7436755]Anyone seen this Dia at KGFE? She's been on longer than usual for a "short stay" and the description has changed. Wonder if they finally gave up updating the fake pics and just decided to update the details. Natural D's has me curious.[/QUOTE]Yes, it seems Dia has taken up residency here since the "short visit" has been like 3 weeks. After reading her reviews which seem to be all over the place she does have a plethora of a 8-9 rating so SO I took the plunge against my best judgement. I opted for a half hour to test the waters. I'll say this. She's a mid 30's mother who has a decent look to her face and still maintains a skinny-er appearance, was not nearly as curvy as the reviews and fake pics suggest. Time has not worked well for her, parts are sagging more than I'd hoped. She would still be considered attractive by some but for me the non-repeat comes from the performance.
From the moment I walked in I felt rushed. Rushed to the BT, rushed in the shower, rushed back to the bed, etc. Everything she did felt frantic and unengaged. Short decent BBBJ followed by a couple positions and based on what I read in the reviews, wanted to finish CIM. She wasn't having it. She said next time book an hour even though we had like 10 minuets left and her phone alarm started going off after like 15 minutes which she didn't bother to attend to.
The rushing made it unenjoyable and it's hard to finish when I feel like I'm being pushed out the door. Ended up calling it with no release after the jackhammer like HJ she tried to get me over the finish line. She could tell I was frustrated with her and I asked her to stop. She gave me another shower to rinse off where she could tell I was still upset with the experience and I managed to self-assist my way to the end with some encouragement from her. HARD NO on a repeat from me.
Face 7.
Body 6.
Performance 5.
[QUOTE=Cascadia210;7436988]Yes, it seems Dia has taken up residency here since the "short visit" has been like 3 weeks. After reading her reviews which seem to be all over the place she does have a plethora of a 8-9 rating so SO I took the plunge against my best judgement. I opted for a half hour to test the waters. I'll say this. She's a mid 30's mother who has a decent look to her face and still maintains a skinny-er appearance, was not nearly as curvy as the reviews and fake pics suggest. Time has not worked well for her, parts are sagging more than I'd hoped. She would still be considered attractive by some but for me the non-repeat comes from the performance.
From the moment I walked in I felt rushed. Rushed to the BT, rushed in the shower, rushed back to the bed, etc. Everything she did felt frantic and unengaged. Short decent BBBJ followed by a couple positions and based on what I read in the reviews, wanted to finish CIM. She wasn't having it. She said next time book an hour even though we had like 10 minuets left and her phone alarm started going off after like 15 minutes which she didn't bother to attend to.
The rushing made it unenjoyable and it's hard to finish when I feel like I'm being pushed out the door. Ended up calling it with no release after the jackhammer like HJ she tried to get me over the finish line. She could tell I was frustrated with her and I asked her to stop. She gave me another shower to rinse off where she could tell I was still upset with the experience and I managed to self-assist my way to the end with some encouragement from her. HARD NO on a repeat from me.
Face 7.
Body 6.
Performance 5.[/QUOTE]Sorry about your experience. Your session seems like about 50% of the reviews of her on TER. Kgfe has been frustrating with their lack of rotation, and even the ones the come through have terrible service. I don't get it.