Massage Parlor Reports

Well, then, it's no sweat, amigo. If you and Bradley1 don't like the CCs, by all means don't patronize them. Let other members of this forum (MoonView, Sleazebum, me, and others) go to the CCs and live our fantasies, as you suggest, while you and Bradley venture elsewhere. We won't have to wait as long, and you two won't have to endure a therapist that offends your senses. Sounds like "Win-Win" to me. How 'bout you?

[QUOTE=Xsham]Actually he is quite right. Most of the time the "therapists" (haha, as if these places even give the pretense of being a "massage parlor"*) are older and worse than can be found in other locations nearby. When the "therapists" (LOL) are young and worthwhile they generally don't stay very long. "Catch them while you can" is the order of the day. I've been there twice and walked out once after seeing two very unattractive and older "therapists" (heh). The one time I stayed was an anomaly I believe as the girl was only there for less than a month (left for the Palm Desert area). I get the feeling that the good old boys club that actually visits these locations (I say this because most of the reviews of the CC are pure crap and those reporters never even went to the location in the first place) are generally older or less interested in appearances than the average user of the forums. Those same people are probably the ones that talked up BT in PG county and led people to believe the therapists there were 20-30 instead of 40-60 (and showing it).

* While most parlors are misclassified as "massage parlors" and not 'escort services' which they truly are, these locations are more often then not purely escort/sex related locations. Who the hell goes there for massages, seriously? If they weren't purely about sex then the locations wouldn't be so closely guarded.

As an aside, let's not pretend that a PO couldn't make a "senior member" account with no effort whatsoever. The CC "reviews" are a case in point. Hey check it out:

Look familiar? The simple reality of these forums is that getting intel on any location is a matter of BSing less than 30 posts and then asking another senior member for that information. There is a good chance that whether you're sending messages to newbies or to senior members that you are contributing to the downfall of your favorite locations. Is it a "safer" bet to just talk to seniors? Maybe. Maybe not. If someone bothers you, though, why not try and take it to PMs rather than clogging up the forums with unnecessary post count inflating and page spamming rants [yea, page spamming, because not only do we suffer through newbies asking for intel without providing any information of their own, but then we deal with a second, third or fourth post that replies to that post for no other reason than making someone seem "more senior"].[/QUOTE]

I won't spend a lot of time on this since the VA CCs are somewhat under the radar, and I would rather keep it that way. So I will just say hidden gems are everywhere, which is the reason for this site, even more so since the raids took place. Credible postings and networking yields good results, of course YMMV and so it seems...

My experience(s) has proven different than yours, therefore I would suggest you look and read elsewhere.

For me, VA, DC or MD, I don't discriminate! :D


MnV
PS; I do agree about the VA Spas, since the raids they have never fully recovered but I will also add neither have the DC spas risen to their once pinnacle performance heights of those glory years past.



[QUOTE=Bradley1]Why is it incorrect? Check the other review websites and you'll see the Chinese condos are rated on average several points lower than the alternatives. The only place where the CC's get a good rap seems to be here but then again I've been let down numerous times by the reviews of NOVA AMPs here many times![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Xsham]Actually he is quite right. Most of the time the "therapists" (haha, as if these places even give the pretense of being a "massage parlor"*) are older and worse than can be found in other locations nearby. When the "therapists" (LOL) are young and worthwhile they generally don't stay very long. "Catch them while you can" is the order of the day. I've been there twice and walked out once after seeing two very unattractive and older "therapists" (heh). The one time I stayed was an anomaly I believe as the girl was only there for less than a month (left for the Palm Desert area). I get the feeling that the good old boys club that actually visits these locations (I say this because most of the reviews of the CC are pure crap and those reporters never even went to the location in the first place) are generally older or less interested in appearances than the average user of the forums. Those same people are probably the ones that talked up BT in PG county and led people to believe the therapists there were 20-30 instead of 40-60 (and showing it).[/QUOTE]Thank you! The reports that are posted on this site of the CC girls rarely align with the reviews of the CC girls on other sites! And how is the CC under the radar? They advertise on Eros and in the Washington City Paper and on other review websites. That's hardly UTR.

Seniors, and Regulars with a [b]substantial[/b] and [b]solid[/b] posting history, can PM me for details.

All others must be patient and build up your "board cred."

[b]R::R[/b]

Approx. 5'-0", 130#, 27 y.o., 38D, dark brown hair

"Visiting" from Taiwan via NYC

$.6, all-inclusive

(Senior and solid Regular Members can PM for details.)

R::R

Well, let the Forum members be the judge. MoonView weighs in with 231 posts to his credit, Bradley1 is a distant second with 34 posts, and Xsham brings up the rear (so to speak) with 16 posts. A quick review of each of their posts, and the relative intel value that they provides, I know where I'm placing my chips.

Now, in fairness to the runners-up, I'll have to admit that their views may have been colored by a bad experience or an unusually sublime and supreme experience elsewhere. If that's the case, by all means don't patronize the CCs. The reduced customer base will mean more availability for the rest of us.

[b]R::R[/b]
[INDENT][QUOTE=Xsham]Actually he is quite right. Most of the time the "therapists" (haha, as if these places even give the pretense of being a "massage parlor"*) are older and worse than can be found in other locations nearby.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=MoonView]Your blanket statement is incorrect.

MnV[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Bradley1]For some reason I feel like the ratings are very subjective to the area. There is no way that the hags that work at the CC would be considered age appropriate in DC. Heck they don't even rate very well versus the other Asian girls in Northern Virginia according to another review website.[/QUOTE][/INDENT]

[QUOTE=MoonView]I won't spend a lot of time on this since the VA CCs are somewhat under the radar, and I would rather keep it that way. So I will just say hidden gems are everywhere, which is the reason for this site, even more so since the raids took place. Credible postings and networking yields good results, of course YMMV and so it seems...

My experience(s) has proven different than yours, therefore I would suggest you look and read elsewhere.

For me, VA, DC or MD, I don't discriminate! :D

MnV

PS; I do agree about the VA Spas, since the raids they have never fully recovered but I will also add neither have the DC spas risen to their once pinnacle performance heights of those glory years past.[/QUOTE]Moon,

I respect your view here. On occasion, a girl will show up who is very attractive relative to other locations/escort services within 50 miles. I saw one one time as I mentioned but she has since left (the other girl was awful), but the second time I visited and the time my associate visited were terrible. I would also not call the women "hags" per se, as the average age of therapists in the region has also risen over the past few years. The CCs are really "hidden gems" because they are not massage parlors at all and do not even hide under the guise of massage parlor to be raided by local authorities. We can all respect that as we don't want any location people might enjoy to close.

Also, RR, I don't want to argue with you. My post count will never be high because I don't care for it to be. I provide lengthy and indepth reports on numerous locations that I enjoy as a service to others. Whether that makes my opinion less valid or not is a silly and stupid argument to have as post count neither translates into 'taste in higher quality, ' nor honesty, nor is it more important than the poster's personal age, previous experiences, desired services etc. Many reports have been congruous with mine (I. E. Less than gold standard providers) and many more have talked about how exceptional they are. It's possible the better providers were "off" when I visited. I concede that. I concede that. My experience is that they are hit or miss and more often miss.

[QUOTE=Xsham]Actually he is quite right. Most of the time the "therapists" (haha, as if these places even give the pretense of being a "massage parlor"*) are older and worse than can be found in other locations nearby. When the "therapists" (LOL) are young and worthwhile they generally don't stay very long. "Catch them while you can" is the order of the day. I've been there twice and walked out once after seeing two very unattractive and older "therapists" (heh). The one time I stayed was an anomaly I believe as the girl was only there for less than a month (left for the Palm Desert area). I get the feeling that the good old boys club that actually visits these locations (I say this because most of the reviews of the CC are pure crap and those reporters never even went to the location in the first place) are generally older or less interested in appearances than the average user of the forums. Those same people are probably the ones that talked up BT in PG county and led people to believe the therapists there were 20-30 instead of 40-60 (and showing it).

* While most parlors are misclassified as "massage parlors" and not 'escort services' which they truly are, these locations are more often then not purely escort/sex related locations. Who the hell goes there for massages, seriously? If they weren't purely about sex then the locations wouldn't be so closely guarded.

As an aside, let's not pretend that a PO couldn't make a "senior member" account with no effort whatsoever. The CC "reviews" are a case in point. Hey check it out:

Look familiar? The simple reality of these forums is that getting intel on any location is a matter of BSing less than 30 posts and then asking another senior member for that information. There is a good chance that whether you're sending messages to newbies or to senior members that you are contributing to the downfall of your favorite locations. Is it a "safer" bet to just talk to seniors? Maybe. Maybe not. If someone bothers you, though, why not try and take it to PMs rather than clogging up the forums with unnecessary post count inflating and page spamming rants [yea, page spamming, because not only do we suffer through newbies asking for intel without providing any information of their own, but then we deal with a second, third or fourth post that replies to that post for no other reason than making someone seem "more senior"].[/QUOTE]

While ratings are always subjective, if you don't like them, you don't have to read them.

The chinese condos fit here bcause they are "Apartment AMP" style establishments. So, if you don't like that definition, there are quite a few more you probably would like to re-work too.

It's interesting how, in a matter of hours, you have posted messages (here and the DC board) that you are "oh, so wise" pop up and preach your distaste for not providing enough "useful" information.

If you don't like it, how about YOU contribute...better yet, go find a board you're happy with. We're seniors because we've been here contributing...and, more importantly, we now what will and will not fly here. We don't look at your post count alone to decide if we're going to share information with you.

If you are a civil servant doing your duty, maybe you should focus on more dangerous issues than women armed with nothing but a push-up bra.

Good call Roman, I concur!!

Just for the record I think I heard "Ming" but then again May in Spring has always been a favorite time of year for me too.

Oh yeah, if asked she will properly crack the back, it was heaven!

MnV


[QUOTE=Roamin Roman]Approx. 5'-0", 130#, 27 y.o., 38D, dark brown hair

"Visiting" from Taiwan via NYC

$.6, all-inclusive

(Senior and solid Regular Members can PM for details.)

R::R[/QUOTE]

Last bang before going under the knife in the AM. I would also concur, although she did not crack the back, it was heaven. Of course, what the hell do I know. Xsham would probably disagree with our assesment.

[QUOTE=MoonView]Good call Roman, I concur!!

Just for the record I think I heard "Ming" but then again May in Spring has always been a favorite time of year for me too.

Oh yeah, if asked she will properly crack the back, it was heaven!

MnV[/QUOTE]

Laddies -

Everyone was wearing green, and a quiet Irish afternoon found me with a favorite Leprechaun in the delightful form of a K-Lady at MO's (my favorite Irish ... OK - enough with the metaphors)

Genie provided me the finest massage, stretch, pretzel-twists, back-walks etc. I have ever experienced.

She's a solid 8.5 and I had a great 9.95 Leprechaun's massage today.

All the usuals at MO's (and the table for the TS is STILL MISSING)...but today I ended up not caring in the least.

Always be nice to the "lassies" -- and be especially nice to her.

Top of the day to you all

PA

Ahhh a dream of fun at MT. Seemed like a good idea at the time. Not an experience to treasure. TS has gone downhill since last visit over 8 months ago. Price up to. 6 entry. All amenities offered, but hostess was very ragged, very old. Settled for handshake and left. Massage not thorough, and place smelled funky. Probably will not repeat.

According to the Fairfax Police Dept.:

Illegal Massage Parlors Discovered: Four Arrested

Officers and zoning inspectors received information on Friday, March 13, about two locations operating massage parlors without proper permits. Authorities went to 4208 Evergreen Lane #231 and discovered that Sun Cocker, 61, of ---, was allegedly operating one of the establishments. She was charged with operating a massage parlor without a license and with not having a massage permit. Cocker was released on a summons.

The second massage parlor was discovered at 6201 Leesburg Pike #400. Several criminal violations were detected and three women were arrested.

The three suspects were taken to the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center. XXXXXXXXXXXX, 38, of Flushing, New York was charged with one count of prostitution, residing in or keeping a bawdy place and operating a massage parlor without a permit. XXXXXXXXXXXX, 39, of.-- and XXXXXXXXXXXX, 41, of Flushing, New York were both charged with one count of prostitution, residing in or keeping a bawdy place, operating a massage parlor without a permit and not concealing an erogenous area.

[QUOTE=Xsham]Moon,

I respect your view here. On occasion, a girl will show up who is very attractive relative to other locations/escort services within 50 miles. I saw one one time as I mentioned but she has since left (the other girl was awful), but the second time I visited and the time my associate visited were terrible. I would also not call the women "hags" per se, as the average age of therapists in the region has also risen over the past few years. The CCs are really "hidden gems" because they are not massage parlors at all and do not even hide under the guise of massage parlor to be raided by local authorities. We can all respect that as we don't want any location people might enjoy to close.

Also, RR, I don't want to argue with you. My post count will never be high because I don't care for it to be. I provide lengthy and indepth reports on numerous locations that I enjoy as a service to others. Whether that makes my opinion less valid or not is a silly and stupid argument to have as post count neither translates into 'taste in higher quality, ' nor honesty, nor is it more important than the poster's personal age, previous experiences, desired services etc. Many reports have been congruous with mine (I. E. Less than gold standard providers) and many more have talked about how exceptional they are. It's possible the better providers were "off" when I visited. I concede that. I concede that. My experience is that they are hit or miss and more often miss.[/QUOTE]What is truly amazing is he is counseling on both coasts on the same day. There's no x in this sham.

[QUOTE=Dr Bombay]What is truly amazing is he is counseling on both coasts on the same day. There's no x in this sham.[/QUOTE]Yes, it's clearly impossible that someone has lived on two coasts and/or visits two coasts frequently. There is no way that I received a few PMs about earlier posts I made from the winter (when I last visited the West Coast) asking for further information about locations I visited during that stay. Yes, I must be making up my visits as these things are clearly impossible. You know, some people on these forums have the nerve to post about locations in New York City AND Washington D. C. /Virginia/Maryland! It's as if there is some way to travel between these locations and they have taken advantage of this to be in two different places at two different times. What a sham indeed!

If you read the post I made, it was a reply to someone who directly referenced a message I left in December/January about a few locations in Redwood City/San Francisco and San Jose (which are, in fact, within 45 minutes of each other). I said "when I was last there [several months ago] I used the following locations to get the services you want. " The West Coast forums are largely dead because myredbook.com is an infinitely safer and generally more used resource for hobbyists on the west coast only. I'm sure the information I provided will help that individual (from the East Coast as a matter of fact) have a good, safe and affordable time.

I understand that you earn additional reputation points by supporting seniors no matter what the circumstances are, but if you have problems with me, please PM me or the moderators of the forums, instead of belittling someone who takes time to provide information to help seniors/non-seniors alike spend their money wisely.

[b]Important Edit for Real Seniors[/b]- Also, Bombay, you have 76 posts and more than 50 of them aren't even reports at all. Instead, they are garbage about "so and so" not posting good enough. [u]Your last 35 posts have NO REVIEWS at all or any worthwhile information. Your last actual report was in April 2008 and was pretty much garbage or fake.[/u] We won't even talk about how 80% of your reviews (all but a few were written in 2007) are about Rio and usually don't even provide useful information for anyone wanting to go there, or how you haven't posted about a new location ever on the forums. One of your posts was about (llegal?) drugs, as well, which I am sure doesn't set off any signals. If I were you I would lay low and not criticize people who actually post real reports on locations they have been to.