I am sure that is a sting. Call her and I bet she is at a decent hotel like a Days Inn.
Printable View
I am sure that is a sting. Call her and I bet she is at a decent hotel like a Days Inn.
95% of those ads for new girls MIGHT be completely legit, but perhaps one of the best ways to avoid a sting is to simply stay away from such girls. A girl who has been advertising for some time (and under the same number) is much less likely to be a sting, because if she was guys would be on to her. I suppose it is always possible that a provider who has been arrested could be turned to be used as a decoy, but that is much less possible (lets not get TOO paranoid). The only way I'd ever see a new face would be if:
a) she had been reviewed as legit by a poster who had "legitimized" himself with posts over time, or
b) she was just so hot that I let my little head take over and do all the thinking.
In either case, if I were to see such a gal, my radar would be working overtime, suspicious looking vans or people hanging out in the area, "verification" procedures before any money exchanges hands ("I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours"), etc.
And you're right that hotel rooms out near the airport are particularly popular locations for such stings. Unfortunately, they are also popular locations for legitimate incalls by visiting providers, which means you might wrongly rule out some that are really very good.
[QUOTE=Jasper123][url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/super_hot_babe_w_smooth_tan_skin_and_fully_shaved_real_photos_used_21/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=2224758[/url]
Using the EXACT same language as a blonde who was posting here or in St. Pete a few days ago, and someone thought was a clue to a sting:
"I'm new to this area & industry but VERY novice in pleasing & companionship"
Novice?
I mean, WTF[/QUOTE]Unless a provider is reviewed or otherwise varified, I make it a point to NEVER answer an ad in wich the provider is fully clothed. A hooker advertising while fully dressed just does not seem "normal" to me. With so many to choose from, why take chances.
Bill Ho
Sometimes you just have to rely on your Monger Sense. You know, that feeling you get now and then that something "aint right." Ive walked more than once because of it. Follow your Monger Sense and you will be better off. No joke.
I called the girl with the same bullshit 'Novice' ad about a week ago and she answered the phone right away, was very well spoken and tried to talk me into coming to the Days Inn by the Clearwater Airport. I am positive that she was a cop. No bare boobage in the photo is another clue.
Has anybody seen Jantana lately? I can't get a response to text messages and voice mail messages to her since the 24th. On that day she also stopped posting on FaceBook. I wonder if she is sick, quitt, or went back to Thailand? If anybody has any info, please let me know.
Bill Ho
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/h_u_m_p_d_a_y_24/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1074508[/url]
Tessa is, as I initially suspected, Bambi Angel/Angel Minxx/Montage. All of the pics but the bottom one are fake.
Not sure why she feels the need for an alias. She is a terrific provider and my dream of her ranks as one of my favorites. She could work on being a more professional scheduler, though.
As her history shows, I don't think she was ever satisfied with any of her names. Bambi Angel is the one that has stuck. IIRC, she hates being called Bambi, just Angel.
Who knows what goes on in the minds of these gals?
[QUOTE=Bill Ho]Unless a provider is reviewed or otherwise varified, I make it a point to NEVER answer an ad in wich the provider is fully clothed. A hooker advertising while fully dressed just does not seem "normal" to me. With so many to choose from, why take chances.
Bill Ho[/QUOTE]Seems you could be right - the ad in question is down now. Perhaps they spotted the discussion here. Keep it safe, keep it real.
[QUOTE=G Money Cool]Seems you could be right - the ad in question is down now. Perhaps they spotted the discussion here. Keep it safe, keep it real.[/QUOTE]Or it could just be a coincidence that ad is down. Here is another ad for a fully clothed "very NOVICE" gal out by the airport that is still up: [url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/super_cute_sweet_and_petite_look_no_further_23/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=2464117[/url]
You guys are right though. Considering the stakes, it is better to mistakenly rule out a possible provider who might actually be for real and quite good at what she does rather than make a mistake the other way and wind up getting arrested. So you might miss out on a good time. Its not like there aren't plenty of OTHER providers out there who will show a little more about what they are promising and who have been around long enough to seem more legit or even have some hobbyist feedback on them.
[QUOTE=Chase Star]Or it could just be a coincidence that ad is down. Here is another ad for a fully clothed "very NOVICE" gal out by the airport that is still up: [url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/super_cute_sweet_and_petite_look_no_further_23/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=2464117[/url]
That's the Tampa version of the ad we have been talking about. I know enough about the local scene and I am certain it is a sting.
If a guy gets busted on a trap like that he could easily be labeled a sex offender and legally lumped in with child molesters. Just for trying to pay for a HJ, a guy with no previous record could have to do all of registered sex offender things like notify neighbors and not live within a certain distance of schools, etc. Serious bizniz, Bros.
My question is whether THIS little number is legit:
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/barely_legal_naughty_girl_needs_excitement_19/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=2309424[/url]
Nude photos? Check - probably the hottest pics I have seen on BP.
Google search on the phone and tineye on the pics yield no results.
The name in the photos include the phrase "tammyfillin" . Porn audition pics maybe?
Probably a scam or a sting, but who knows?
All I was saying if the cops took one ad down because they thought guys were on to it or because the sting operation had run its course, then why didn't they take down the "Tampa version"? Maybe it was a sting, but one ad's disappearance (while another one's remaining up) is not really evidence of anything. Actually, the fact that the alleged provider is moving between jurisdictions suggests that this is really not city or county LEO running a sting unless it is some wider-scale interagency cooperative effort, which doesn't seem as likely to me or we would have been hearing more about it by now with mass arrests.
As likely reason one ad was taken down was because the provider POSTING it was stung by an undercover cop responding to it and it was removed because of the illegal activity of the ADVERTISER rather than any other guys responding to it. Or it could be because she played out the business available on that side of the bridge (or did not get enough of it to begin with) and pulled her own ad so that she could run a new one for a new geographic area with hopefully more business.
As I've said before, there IS a lot of CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence that it MIGHT be a sting and it certainly COULD be, but how do you KNOW with such ABSOLUTE certainty that it really IS a sting? Have you seen any arrest reports of GUYS at the location that you know that ad is directing them to? Or did you go to the incall location and see some arrests going down or anything more than what LOOKED like "suspicious" activity to you?
There are OTHER explanations for ALL the things you see as "proof".
1) Some people actually take calls as they come in rather than screening everything and sending it over to voicemail, particularly if they think it might be a potential client who might not be so comfortable leaving a recorded message.
2) Providers can be well spoken. Not all come from trailer parks or the ghetto and some really are college students. Besides, whoever wrote that ad couldn't have been that well-spoken given the misuse of the word "novice".
3) Visiting providers often use hotels near the airport for their incalls when they fly into town from other cities. And sometimes local providers also use such locations as well.
4) Some providers use posting services to run their ads for them. Or it could be a common agency for a small group of girls that posts the ads for them. So sometimes ads will appear similar.
5) And some girls are more modest about posting ads with graphic photos, particularly when such ads already appear to be advertising illegal sexual activities.
All of the things that have been mentioned are certainly very suggestive that something might be up, but they are NOT absolute proof.
Lastly, most of us are already fully aware of the consequences of getting arrested in this "hobby", which are very serious. An arrest for prostitution is not something any of us would want on our record. It can be very embarassing because they often publicise photos of those arrested for prostitution on websites and in special flyers rather than make people have to dig for them like they would with similar level non-sexual offenses. And it can be very costly, not just for the legal fees involved but in some cases confiscation of vehicles or the loss of jobs or marriage when others find out about it. However, simple prostitution cases are NOT treated in the same class as registered sex offenders and child molesters. You DON'T have to register whenever you move and your name will NOT appear on those locator maps of registered sex offenders. So you really didn't need to dramatize it or overstate it like you did.
Of course, we should always be careful with whomever we're going to see the first time. And we should be particularly careful whenever there are extra warning signs out there. For many guys, the best defense would be to simply avoid all those situations where even a few of those warning signs are there and that would be understandable given the possible consequences if the smoke turned out to be fire. But SUSPICION of something being a LEO setup is not the same thing as CERTAINTY and those who forego seeing these questionable gals should understand that they could just as likely be passing up the opportunity to be with a provider who might actually be nice. Personally, that is something I can easily live with.
I stand corrected.
[QUOTE=Bill Ho]Has anybody seen Jantana lately? I can't get a response to text messages and voice mail messages to her since the 24th. On that day she also stopped posting on FaceBook. I wonder if she is sick, quitt, or went back to Thailand? If anybody has any info, please let me know.
Bill Ho[/QUOTE]
Bill,
I have not seen her in several months. I also noticed that she stopped posting ads in the therapeutic section on Craigslist.
I sure could go for some of her Thai cooking and some tasty muff pie dessert though. Makes my mouth water, just thinking about it. Let us know if you find out what's up. She's a little quirky, but she is a real sweetheart.
CB
divine pleasure and distinct honor of meeting Mykela (BP ad) recently. She is real, she is nice and DAM SHE IS REAL NICE. Photos are accurate and I just might have a new ATF!?!?
Down side, brother and kid hanging around. No issues.
Nemo