Escort Reports

I went applied to two a couple days and they ghosted after my reply. The first three were cool. LSC and KGA with silence so my assumption that currency trumps ethnicity went up in flames. Mongered in AMP's and AAMP's in other states and never had an issues. Pay your fee, have fun and behave. Hopefully they're just taking their time screening but on didn't even ask for references so, perhaps not.

RJ.

[QUOTE=GooseHollow;5342485]Curious question, why do they ask for ethnicity? Are their some ethnicities they prefer and refuse others?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=GooseHollow;5342485]Curious question, why do they ask for ethnicity? Are their some ethnicities they prefer and refuse others?[/QUOTE]AA is a no for most, that's mostly the reason.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5339756]The problem with boycotting over not getting in:

If you can't get in, you are already "boycotting" them.

Those who did get in, obviously have no such issues so they don't have anything to boycott for.

There may be plenty of reasons to do a boycott, but getting in isn't one of them imo.[/QUOTE]Agree with you. I'd rather avoid k-org, comparing to expose my info like driver license number, age, and home address etc. Just don't quite understand why some ppl doing that -- little head takes control :-)

Any like white full services places? Can be AMPs or just massage parlors either one works. I've been recently looking for a place where it's run by caucasians but it's near impossible to find.

[QUOTE=BBPornoGeek;5336225]Thanks for all the info. So far no dice for me as far as getting in without ID or pic except for klovers whose ladies are older and not so good with service. The rest won't even accept them as a reference. Oh well.[/QUOTE]You could try Peach Café? I found their screening to be on the more lax side (although I do think that they did ask me to take a picture of myself holding up a I love mrs. Alpaca or smth long ago).

But then Peach Café isn't the greatest with their selections / service either usually. Their pictures are known to be super photoshopped and they even sometimes just switch up the providers even though you asked for a specific one. But sometimes they have decent gems but you'd have to check the other reviews to see who might be worth the time.

[QUOTE=GooseHollow;5342485]Curious question, why do they ask for ethnicity? Are their some ethnicities they prefer and refuse others?[/QUOTE]Not 100% sure but I do think they have some that they do prefer / refuse. I know that in Korea t they refuse African Americans / Africans / etc. Because sometimes they're too big or smth (at least that's what I heard) so maybe its a similar thing? Don't quote me on this though LOL its just what I'm assuming is the case. I also know that sometimes they tell the provider the details of the person coming so maybe it has something to do with that too.

A few late reviews of some providers I've seen in the past few months. Feel free to msg me if you have any questions. I usually log on like once a month though.

(face / body / service / experience / comments).

Bunny girls: May.

Had decent appearance. Body wasn't really tight so she doesn't really work out. She's definitely on the younger side. Late 20's maybe? Early 30's?. Experience was terrible though. She texted for the first 10 minutes. Then showered me (and when she did she was really rubbing the soap around and even got the soap inside the urethra which really stung). Then we started and I tried to get into it and also pleasure her a little but she didn't really seem to respond much. Then when we actually put it in and started she asked if she could go on top and at first I said I want to do missionary (since I tend to go a little too fast when the girls on top). At first she just let it be and then after a few minutes she asked again if she can go on top and if I didn't want it because I thought I would go too fast. I truthfully answered yes and then she started to "fake slap me" – where she would put one of her hand where she would slap and then slap. I was very confused at the time and thought of it as a joke in the beginning but she did that like 8 or 9 times – at which point I was a little weirded out. Anyway, she basically went on top and went super quickly which made me go within a few minutes like I feared. After which she basically cleaned up and rested. This was like 20 min in (for which 5 10 min was her just texting). Then I was hoping for at least a round 2 since there was so much time (I probably should've just left and asked for half of it back because I definitely was already a bit annoyed here) But nothing. We just laied on the bed until around 45 min, showered and I was out by 50 min. IT was definitely the worst experience and wouldn't recommend to anyone. Also complained to the PO as usually Bunny girls was always at least an average experience. Anyway since then I haven't really been because I think I was a little scarred from that experience and don't want to pay so much for such disappointment.

F / b / s / e / c - 7. 5/7/3/1/ definitely don't recommend. My worst experience.

LSC: Tina, Serina.

Tina – Tina is definitely a go to for me. She always hits the mark and satisfies me. With all the lackluster talent in the bay area nowadays and the high prices, you can't go wrong with Tina he gives a BBBJ which is just heavenly. After a while I had to stop her because I thought I was going to go. Then I slowed the pace down a little and teased her. She enjoyed it and got wet. After a while, we did some LFK and started with missionary. We went to a few other positions and then ended with doggie. Then we rested a little, and in the shower we went at it one more time and finished again. Definitely a must try and a go to for me. Sessions with Tina are never disappointing. (and I almost never repeat unless it was really really good) Idk if I can say she's in my top 3 but definitely in my top 5.

F / b / s / e / c – 7. 5/7. 5/8. 5/8. 5/ My go-to in this area. Never disappointed with her and know I'll have a good time at least worth my time. Especially the shower action – I think definitely a should-try.

Serina – Serina was actually super average. Nothing bad / nothing good – I actually don't remember too much about meeting her because it was so average.

F / b / s / e / c – 7/7/6/6/ just an average experience. Nothing special.

Gfeinvestments: Rachel, Gia, Amber.

Rachel – Overall experience was fairly average. Lacked chemistry though. Her pictures are fairly accurate. She's not chubby or anything. She had a nice body and a round face (not from weight). Her body is "glamorous" or curvy but not from a belly. Her face is probably just average. She's probably around early / mid 30's so fairly young as well. Had a regular session where she showered me and got the service but there was just nothing special about our meet. It was just an average experience for me. YMMV.

F / b / s / e / c – 7/8/6/6/ Fairly average experience. Lacked chemistry but YMMV and I can definitely see some people might enjoy it. We just didn't really hit it off.

Gia – Gia was probably an early 30's girl (doesn't show any sign of age and looks really young. I can tell just from itneractions and stuff because I'm korean too.

Anyways, she has a hot body and we got started right away after a blue toast and hand washing (I came showered since I came from home) We started with some DFK and then she gave me a heavenly BBBJ, then I turned on her and gave her some tease myself (I'm the type that likes to make the girl enjoy herself too. Doesn't feel the same when I feel like they're not enjoying it). We started slowly with missionay and then went to the edge of the bed for some sitting positions and then ended with doggie. Throughout the action she was really into it and things got pretty intense with both of us finishing.

She is definitely a repeat for me and would go into my ATF top 3.

FYI. She does have MM breasts, which usually isn't my type but she's still definitely worth seeing regardless.

F / b / s / e / c – 7/8/8. 5/9/ Definitely top 3 or 4 experiences I've had. Highly recommend although she might need prebooking with GFE (which they only let people whove booked more than 3 times the past 3 months or smth do).

Alisha – Alisha is definitely a provider who looks fairly pretty (nice body, average face, great skin tone, etc.) and also gets into the act and is willing to adjust to what you want. She greeted me in, we showered and then the action started. She started off with a light French kiss, and then pleasured me with her tongue for a while. Then I decided to pleasure her for a bit DATY for a while. She seemed to enjoy it and also allowed FIV (YMMV here though). Then we put the cover on and put it in. We started Missionary style, then switched to sideways, then doggy, and then ended with missionary style. She seemed to enjoy it and she was definitely pretty wet near the end. Not 100% sure she actually also came but with how wet she was and her voice she seemed to have as well. (or it was good acting. Regardless it was a great experience). Then we talked for a bit and then she gave me a shower and I left. It was definitely an above average experience (maybe not the best I've ever had) but a good one nevertheless. I even went back another time the next week and she definitely worth the trip.

F / b / s / e / c –7/8/8/8/ Better than average. Decent face. Very white but a little squarish? Nice slim / toned body. Slightly better than average experience. Definitely good but nothing I would say was AMAZING but definitely worth trying.

On the list / looking to try: Angela at Lsc.

So if you guys have any info / input on them or any other recs please lmk! .

Posted a while ago but didn't get a response. Anybody try Lisu? Saw her listed on Peach Cafe. Haven't found any info on her. Or, if anyone has any other PSE favorites listed on peach cafe, I'd love to hear.

What do you fellas consider to be the best K-Org in the Bay Area? What are your reasons you feel your pic is the best one (based on quality, professionalism and recent experiences and / or consistency over time)?

RJ.

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5344310]What do you fellas consider to be the best K-Org in the Bay Area? What are your reasons you feel your pic is the best one (based on quality, professionalism and recent experiences and / or consistency over time)?

RJ.[/QUOTE]LSC with consistency.

GFEI as they have some variety from time to time.

KGA has been solid but only 2 girls.

Bgc I'm not sure if the new girls live up to what they've been, but they've been good previously.

Fantastic has been solid but aside from Aqua not extraordinary.

Late or not, your reports are most welcome. Still trying to get my foot through the GFEI door but must go through another or to do itGia is tops on my bucketlist. LSC doesn't seem like its going to happen for me. Thanks!

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;5344012]A few late reviews of some providers I've seen in the past few months. Feel free to msg me if you have any questions. I usually log on like once a month though.

(face / body / service / experience / comments).

Bunny girls: May.

Had decent appearance. Body wasn't really tight so she doesn't really work out. She's definitely on the younger side. Late 20's maybe? Early 30's?. Experience was terrible though. She texted for the first 10 minutes. Then showered me (and when she did she was really rubbing the soap around and even got the soap inside the urethra which really stung). Then we started and I tried to get into it and also pleasure her a little but she didn't really seem to respond much. Then when we actually put it in and started she asked if she could go on top and at first I said I want to do missionary (since I tend to go a little too fast when the girls on top). At first she just let it be and then after a few minutes she asked again if she can go on top and if I didn't want it because I thought I would go too fast. I truthfully answered yes and then she started to "fake slap me" where she would put one of her hand where she would slap and then slap. I was very confused at the time and thought of it as a joke in the beginning but she did that like 8 or 9 times at which point I was a little weirded out. Anyway, she basically went on top and went super quickly which made me go within a few minutes like I feared. After which she basically cleaned up and rested. This was like 20 min in (for which 5 10 min was her just texting). Then I was hoping for at least a round 2 since there was so much time (I probably should've just left and asked for half of it back because I definitely was already a bit annoyed here) But nothing. We just laied on the bed until around 45 min, showered and I was out by 50 min. IT was definitely the worst experience and wouldn't recommend to anyone. Also complained to the PO as usually Bunny girls was always at least an average experience. Anyway since then I haven't really been because I think I was a little scarred from that experience and don't want to pay so much for such disappointment[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the input. Still holding out hope for LSC but loving the milfy GFEI lineup.

[QUOTE=StraightOmar;5344885]LSC with consistency.

GFEI as they have some variety from time to time.

KGA has been solid but only 2 girls.

Bgc I'm not sure if the new girls live up to what they've been, but they've been good previously.

Fantastic has been solid but aside from Aqua not extraordinary.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5344310]What do you fellas consider to be the best K-Org in the Bay Area? What are your reasons you feel your pic is the best one (based on quality, professionalism and recent experiences and / or consistency over time)?

RJ.[/QUOTE]LSC is the gold standard by which all other korgs in California and the rest of the country should be judged. If only they'd let me pre-book far in advance like my favorite houses of hedonism in SoCal.

[QUOTE=Gegewu;5343013]I'd rather avoid k-org, comparing to expose my info like driver license number, age, and home address etc. Just don't quite understand why some ppl doing that -- little head takes control :-)[/QUOTE]An analogous explanation can be found in 'The Wolf of Wall Street,' when Matthew McConaughey's character is explaining how it all works.

Brokers = Bookers.

Clients = Hobbyists.

"A Special Idea" = A New Girl.

(Cue chest thumping and humming).

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5345361]LSC is the gold standard by which all other korgs in California and the rest of the country should be judged. If only they'd let me pre-book far in advance like my favorite houses of hedonism in SoCal.[/QUOTE]I had one of my better experiences with Lia from Sweet Angels last Aug. I'm only in the Bay Area about twice a year, so my experience is pretty limited. The only orgs I've dealt with over the past 4 years or so as been Sweet Angels and Asian Angels. Was able to get vetted by them and despite me not being a regular, they've been good about getting me appointments when I'm in the area.

I would love to try LSC, but not sure if they would acknowledge a mention of those 2 orgs, or if those 2 orgs would bother to give me a reference in my efforts to get into LSC or any other org.