Escort Reviews

I think the lesson to be learned here may be that we need to be more honest in our reports. We have an obligation to each other to be open and honest in our assessment of the providers. If we do not communicate our actual experiences how are the other hobbyist supposed to make informed decisions on where to spend their hobby dollars and receive quality service.

I for one am going to make an effort to keep my personal feeling (i.e. sick baby) out of my reports. If it is good I am going to say that if it is not good I am going to say it and why. No more sugar coating things because of personal issues or perceived hardships.

I know this may seem harsh but the providers have no problems taking our money by deception or sub standard service. Why should we protect them and leave our board members here open to rip-offs or just sub par service.

I am sure if many of the hobbyists had known about Pretty Kitty in this light they would have passed and spent their money elsewhere. I know I would have.

So maybe we need to improve our reporting to save everyone here time and money.


KG

Thanks for the info Naam,

I am guilty of not reading the hobby's and quotes of likes and dislikes because I know it is mostly fluff and crap. You have taught me a lesson my friend. RTFA LOL! I should have read the complete ad before scheduling an appointment. Guilty as charged! I won't make that mistake again.

Thanks Again for the good work Naam.

KG


[QUOTE=Naam456]Based on the past couple of posts I have read about Kitty, I thought I would share this with everyone. Pasted below is a direct quote from her profile on escort.com. It said it was updated on 9/17/10. Hobbyists on here have made mention of her conflicting stories about the kid with cancer. She has mentioned that a couple of times to me as well when I've seen her. In the third line below note the comment "I have no kids". Further, I'm no doctor, but something I think is odd if she does have a kid is that she has zero stretch marks. I've seen more escorts than I can count and it's usually pretty easy to tell which ones have been pregnant. I know it's not true in all cases, but for someone as tiny as her, it seems strange to me that she could have had a kid and have zero stretch marks. Just my two cents.

Quote in Kitty's escort.com profile:

* What I'm Like *

I model Lingeri and Adult work. (Not Porn) I write poetry & have been published 8 times, I won The NYT Editors Choice Award in 2007 in honor of a poem I wrote about Individuallity. I have no kids, I live on Donuts(Mmmm) I'm a girly girl in a tom boy kinda way, I do not beleive in being better than someone else, I think jealousy is a terrible sickness & hope you jealous girls get well soon! I'm obsessed with my cat Layne, I love rock music, don't like much rap, I have one best friend instead of a group of two faced fake friends, I play alot of BINGO scratch offs, Yes I fart, burp & pig out when I get the chance. If you want to know more send me a message![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Nkykinkyguy]
So maybe we need to improve our reporting to save everyone here time and money.


[/QUOTE]

Hey friends,

Lookee here. Excellent posting you and you and you! I REALLY am hopeful that we all can retain a certain amount of objectivity when these things occur, to avoid the flaming wars that ensue. For example, if Kitty were my ATF, and she is not, but if she were, and I were to try to come to her rescue, the worst thing I would want to post might be something like, "you are certainly entitled to your opinion, we appreciate you sharing it, but it was nothing like that for me..." Like you say KG, it is when we are not sharing our experiences that we run into trouble!


Lookee

That's great insight by Nkykinkyguy and Lookee. I'm not here to keep bashing Kitty; it appears she has enough issues to fill a week's worth of Oprah shows. As hobbyists, we have a duty or an obligation to be truthful in our reports. And, yes, I'm guilty of it, too. Kitty is very pretty and her rates are very reasonable, but we need to look past that to maintain an honest board. We can't be blinded by someone's beauty. I don't know anything about the cancer/child thing. I just got tired of reading about the "jaw" story (again). If we stop hanging out with these "liars," maybe they will recalibrate the way they do business. I saw Kitty more than once -- the first time I saw her I had driven down to see Dawn (sassy refreshing), but Dawn blew me off and I had Kitty's cell number so I called her. The second time is when I picked up on a few things, like her jaw theory because I had gotten her something to eat (it looked like she hadn't eaten in days), and it was the second time she told me about her "wired" jaw. A lot of the theories these providers come up with have to do with control. Kitty kept talking about a demanding female roommate who once threw all of her stuff out on the front porch because she was late with rent. I chalked that up to a controlling boyfriend/male pimp who was addicted to crack or meth or some $hit). But all the lies (no kissing/BJ because of broken jaw; hurry up with the DATY because I'm too sensitive) boils down to hurrying through the sessions so they can get back to these "controllers" and provide them with the "medicine" they need, which is fine but I wish they wouldn't lie about it. They would be better off if they just didn't bring it up at all. If we let these providers manipulate us, we have no one else to blame but ourselves. It's like Dawn. The first time she blew me off was on her. The second time was on me because I should've known better than to gas up the car and head down there. And, Dawn, I know you're reading this, too; you're also a liar. That's why cell numbers belonging to Kitty and Dawn don't exist on my phone anymore. But, as members of this board, the least we can do is be truthful about our reports so fellow hobbyists can weed through all the crap and make a better decision on who they want to hang out with. This is a business relationship and business is conducted better when people are honest about their work and leave their drama at home

UC
[QUOTE=Lookee]Hey friends,

Lookee here. Excellent posting you and you and you! I REALLY am hopeful that we all can retain a certain amount of objectivity when these things occur, to avoid the flaming wars that ensue. For example, if Kitty were my ATF, and she is not, but if she were, and I were to try to come to her rescue, the worst thing I would want to post might be something like, "you are certainly entitled to your opinion, we appreciate you sharing it, but it was nothing like that for me..." Like you say KG, it is when we are not sharing our experiences that we run into trouble!


Lookee[/QUOTE]

I have known Kitty for several years. I knew her when she was only modeling and have never had a session with her. She does not have a child

Have been reading the Kitty comments posted over the last couple of days. My guess is that she has been reading them too since she is now using a new phone and a new picture and no mention of her name in the new ad:

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/AdultJobs/saturday-100-dollar-special/5844821[/url]

From the comments already posted I can see how her reviews could have gotten a bit sugar coated. You've got an attractive girl, sweet personality, and then throw in a story about a sick child. Easy to walk away thinking that this nice girl who happens to be going through a tough time at the moment doesn't need me making any harsh comments that might hurt her business when she needs it the most - even though her idea of "fu11 serv" did not include any kissing or BJ. So then you rationalize that although there were some items that were missing from her menu that somehow the extra tight p@ssy made up for it all. With the info that is coming out now though it would seem that the "stories" about the accident to her jaw and the sick kid are all part of her MO.

Maybe the phone number change and the new picture is just coincidence, but I think not. Just another sub par provider and/or false advertiser that once exposed runs to hide behind new contact information. Unfortunately the hobby does not have any Truth in Advertising laws so we have to rely on accurate accounts found here to assist us in where it is worthwhile to spend our time and dollars. Okay.... we understand that those that have seen her think Kitty is a nice girl, but to report that her full service did not include certain important elements is not an attack on the nice girl - it is a critique on the role that she played as a service provider. There is a difference and we need to think about that when we post our reports.

Kitty should consider that not everyone is cut out for the role of a full service escort and that perhaps she is better suited to the niche of happy ending dance/massage service and should consider advertising her services as such.

I am sitting here chuckling to myself. First, I have never seen Kitty although I have often thought about it. What is making me chuckle is when I read the reviews about how terrible her jaw was and the medical intervention that would be necessary, I felt really bad and sent her a text(I knew she wouldn't answer her phone) indicating how I hoped that she would improve and that if she wanted I knew some practitioners that would help her and allow her to make minimal payments. I bought the whole story and never even met her, that is why I am chuckling. I am such a schmo sometimes that if she told me about the jaw and the baby I would have broken down and probably gave her a large donation. God, you would think I at least would have learned, but I would rather be a little naive than calloused. The bottom line for all of us is that our reviews should be as objective and accurate as possible, not emotion driven and what we wished they had been. I do not hesitate to admit that within a month, I will screw up a review because of my desire not to hurt anyone. As always, this is just my opinion.

[QUOTE=Ceenote]Have been reading the Kitty comments posted over the last couple of days. My guess is that she has been reading them too since she is now using a new phone and a new picture and no mention of her name in the new ad:

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/AdultJobs/Saturday-100-dollar-special/5844821[/url]

From the comments already posted I can see how her reviews could have gotten a bit sugar coated. You've got an attractive girl, sweet personality, and then throw in a story about a sick child. Easy to walk away thinking that this nice girl who happens to be going through a tough time at the moment doesn't need me making any harsh comments that might hurt her business when she needs it the most. Even though her idea of "fu11 serv" did not include any kissing or BJ. So then you rationalize that although there were some items that were missing from her menu that somehow the extra tight patssy made up for it all. With the info that is coming out now though it would seem that the "stories" about the accident to her jaw and the sick kid are all part of her MO.

Maybe the phone number change and the new picture is just coincidence, but I think not. Just another sub par provider and/or false advertiser that once exposed runs to hide behind new contact information. Unfortunately the hobby does not have any Truth in Advertising laws so we have to rely on accurate accounts found here to assist us in where it is worthwhile to spend our time and dollars. Okay. We understand that those that have seen her think Kitty is a nice girl, but to report that her full service did not include certain important elements is not an attack on the nice girl. It is a critique on the role that she played as a service provider. There is a difference and we need to think about that when we post our reports.

Kitty should consider that not everyone is cut out for the role of a full service escort and that perhaps she is better suited to the niche of happy ending dance/massage service and should consider advertising her services as such.[/QUOTE]

Thought I'd share the fact that the drama still runs deep with Ms. Chase. Doing my nightly research last night I came across one of ehr ads, and sent her a small note stating that I thought she should differentiate her pics a smidge more between e.com and BP, and that it'd probably help her. Now.. I know that she'd been discussed here before, but, I'd totally forgotten the context of those discussions. Considering the real meat of the last one appears on page #87 in this thread, I can see why. LOL Anyway, I sent her a small note to offer her a small bit of advice... and she sent me this vitriole laced statement back that if it had fangs it would've bit me! Ugh. If she doesn't want suggestions, then fine with it. After refreshing my memory here, I'm glad that that was the only interaction I've had with the lass, and shall ever have again. :)

Oh well... I guess I'll just look forward to my ultra-fabulous Stormy Special coming up the beginning of the week to take my mind off snake-lady. *grin*

Jay

Here is my opinion on her if anyone wants to hear it. Nice kitty, bad mouth. I have read review after review on here about this woman. She should be put in the ripoff section. If I don't get what I pay for then I consider it a rip off. I almost went to see her cause someone who posts here said he had a "good time". Just so happened I talked to another who posts here who was more honest about it. (Kudos to kyjellyguy) Her jaw is wired shut or isn't it. She has a kid or don't she. We need to put this drama queen to rest in the ripoff section and be done with her. If you don't get what you pay for then it is a ripoff, plain and simple. If she has come up with the jaw deal to keep from doing something she doesn't like, then she should just be honest and say it up front. I don't know if people aren't reading posts, or doing their homework or what the deal is. My point is this, there should have been one, maybe 2 bad reviews on this broad and that's it. If you have questions about a provider ask for intel, or research it. If I would have seen her I would have been pissed off, not only at her, but at the one who gave me bad intel. Just my opinoion of course but I am sure most would agree.

[QUOTE=Uncle Cletus]"Truth" is she's a liar about the "jaw" thing. I've been with her and it's just an excuse so she doesn't have to kiss or give a BJ. I've seen her suck on a lolly-pop (incidentally, one of her pics on her e.com site has her sucking on a lolly-pop) and eat a cheeseburger with fries. Think about it. If you can stick a third of a McDonald's double-cheeseburger down your throat and wolf down a half-dozen fries while slurping on a coke without blinking an eye, what kind of adjustment(s) do you have to make to perform the aforementioned tasks? Let's just cut through her "dramatic" crap and be truthful about it. I'd had more respect for her if she just simply would've said "no kissing and no BJ." Now as far as her little "kitty," I can't argue with her freshness and tightness. Just sick of reading/hearing about her "jaw" incident over and over and over again. Just my .02.

UC[/QUOTE]

Have had my eye on this young black women and seen she was going to be in dayton so i did a little road trip. She is 22, black, very sweet and very tight. Was easy to set up an appointment cuz she seen i was vouched for many times from the sex board we both use. Basic menu (lfk, bbbj, daty, mpops). Check out some of the other boards and you should see a pic somewhere. Very petite, sexy, pretty. Out of Columbus but travels to Dayton once a month. I know that is too far for some of you to travel but that tight black box of hers will be worth the trip. Her hr rate is about average compared to the other local providers.

Saw an ad for Sophie "milkywhites4u" and was hoping a fewllow senior could give me the 411? I'll be your way very soon and need some evening company. So thanks in advance. Daz

Daz, she's been reviewed here several times over the last month or so. Just do a search for 'Sophie' and you should find plenty. From what I recall all reviews were very favorable, with I think the only negative was 1 client suggesting that she was a little pricey. Hope this helps.

Jay

[QUOTE=Dazhiba]Saw an ad for Sophie "milkywhites4u" and was hoping a fewllow senior could give me the 411? I'll be your way very soon and need some evening company. So thanks in advance. Daz[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Dazhiba]Saw an ad for Sophie "milkywhites4u" and was hoping a fewllow senior could give me the 411? I'll be your way very soon and need some evening company. So thanks in advance. Daz[/QUOTE]She is very accommodating, nice and attractive young lady. She has a slender build and aims to please.

I read few girl's sites and posts on here and now they are requiring some validation from us, such as referrals and reviews. I'm a noob here and wondering what I can do to 'pass' their tests?

The key for this is to walk into the hobby, not run full tilt. Patience is your greatest ally. Some providers are new-guy friendly, so they'll see the newbs, but might require a few more hoops to jump through. Visit with them, get in their good graces, and if you want to pass full escort validation, then having the providers be full-website toting, & well-reviewed already will help free up the entry to the more discriminating. That's the entry through other providers, if you know specifically which provider you want to see, another way to go about it is to get to know and earn the respect of some of their clients. If a specific provider can verify the legitimacy of a new client through the utilization of her current clients, it often can offer even more protection to them than another provider's reference can be. After all, she'd have a greater connection with her client than some website having name in the ether.

Hope this helps..

Jay


[QUOTE=Lrc Metalhead]I read few girl's sites and posts on here and now they are requiring some validation from us, such as referrals and reviews. I'm a noob here and wondering what I can do to 'pass' their tests?[/QUOTE]