Sugarbabies?

Nudity is still allowed on there. Content containing sexually-explicit conduct is not.

[QUOTE=RegulatorD;5506586]So at least three of my babies make good money on * so with the banning of nudes on there, it will force a lot more attractive talent to SA in the short term! The one has already told me, that her friend reached out to her about what to do next and she is of course directing her to SA. Now I am sure some company will come along and fill the void, since * made 1.2 Billion last year![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BamBam;5506364]I believe she is a real UK coed. Has not even tried to hide her social media. Contributing seniors can DM if they want me to share it.

BAM.[/QUOTE]Definitely looks like the area around the UK central halls that were built around 2017.

I've spent way too much time on that campus in the last few years.
Ask her for a pic of her fav "Caturday" outfit.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5507600]Definitely looks like the area around the UK central halls that were built around 2017.

I've spent way too much time on that campus in the last few years.
Ask her for a pic of her fav "Caturday" outfit.[/QUOTE]I have gone sledding on that hill by the UK library. 7 fast seconds later, I crashed at the bottom of hill when the sled hit a rock covered by the snow. That hill and I are old friends.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5507600]Definitely looks like the area around the UK central halls that were built around 2017.

I've spent way too much time on that campus in the last few years.
Ask her for a pic of her fav "Caturday" outfit.[/QUOTE]I had lunch with her and she's 100% legit. Student at UK and travels a ton. Probably the most beautiful girl I've ever seen in person. Just stunning. And very sweet and fun. I hope to see her again.

Destiny_faithxo asking 350 ppm. Open minded.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/fa050cc1-4d6f-4353-9a5a-650eee61a351[/URL]

CottonCandyyBabyy is also on WYP. 300 ppm but wants gifts sent to her. Seems to lean platonic.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/dffd6e90-9f0f-486d-b57f-1b2afebc05a4[/URL]

Prettybaby says she has no idea what she wants in the way of arrangement or funds. If you don't know why are you on SA? Waste of time.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8a9adb73-1a28-4cf7-a22a-8db2bd1e10b5[/URL]

Sugarlipzz asking 400 ppm. Open minded.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/9eff0556-11a1-4f65-b595-6a84d1f91f06[/URL]

Goddessmae. Wants 500 ppm. 1500 a month. Well known SB is back. If you recognize her you know her background. Can go from good to WTF in nanoseconds.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0e6dde86-0835-4ce1-947c-7b403e9ed73d[/URL]

OfficialElleLovely. Another well known Pro SB is back. Yada yada yada about this one. Pass.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/043b3108-8efc-4bc6-a9ec-c48a4683231f[/URL]
[URL]https://thedirty.com/cincinnati/[/URL]#post-2626482.

KoriKalypso is still looking for some reason. Reached out to her. 500 ppm. Agreed to meet then constant delays on her part.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/5c76ae6c-8f44-45ce-ad71-b34f696122a7[/URL]

OHprincess is well known GPS. She is back on SA. Wants dinner and at least 700 ppm. Her OF has pics of her doing an at l with a wine bottle.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/397e3106-6676-42dc-948a-579fb911a6ae[/URL]

Ladygamer is also back on SA. 400 ppm.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/a0ba037b-8f09-59f7-d561-bf8e6e7b2575[/URL]

AshBlondie 400 ppm and in time things might get intimate.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1acb8da2-7be6-427d-9a04-0bc5c229aa80[/URL]

Brooklynfinest19 300 ppm FWB
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3a86ed8b-332a-419a-b628-65aae7d51d65[/URL]

Any info on this one? Says $500 per meet.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/bb174a2e-2de2-4092-ad82-2cb5a55f4178[/URL]

[QUOTE=Jerryb1234;5512748]Any info on this one? Says $500 per meet.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/bb174a2e-2de2-4092-ad82-2cb5a55f4178[/URL][/QUOTE]Key phrase in the profile is "a connection to develop naturally. " This is usually code for pay my while we take a long time to get to know each other without putting out.

Just a word of caution.

CFG.

Very similar experience with Kori Kalypso. Indicated a willingness to meet. Then one delay after another.

"KoriKalypso is still looking for some reason. Reached out to her. 500 ppm. Agreed to meet then constant delays on her part. ".

One thing I've found is that even with SBs, there is almost always a point of diminishing returns that sets in after a few sessions.

I don't mean that I'm strictly "one and done". But I would say that I have seldom adhered to the ideal presented on Seeking, of an ongoing, long-term arrangement.

I've seldom wanted to go beyond 4 or 5 times with the same one, in fact.

Am I the oddball? Or do the rest of you similarly crave variety, even with SBs?

Depends upon the sugar baby. I have had a few unicorns over the years that I wish I I was still seeing. The financial arrangement was right, they were stunning, and they fucked like banshees.

Others, I am one and done. I love variety which is one reason I hobby, but I will see the great ones many many times and never tire of them. Most of them have ended due to a move or occasionally when they fall in love.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5514329]One thing I've found is that even with SBs, there is almost always a point of diminishing returns that sets in after a few sessions.

I don't mean that I'm strictly "one and done". But I would say that I have seldom adhered to the ideal presented on Seeking, of an ongoing, long-term arrangement.

I've seldom wanted to go beyond 4 or 5 times with the same one, in fact.

Am I the oddball? Or do the rest of you similarly crave variety, even with SBs?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5514329]One thing I've found is that even with SBs, there is almost always a point of diminishing returns that sets in after a few sessions.

I don't mean that I'm strictly "one and done". But I would say that I have seldom adhered to the ideal presented on Seeking, of an ongoing, long-term arrangement.

I've seldom wanted to go beyond 4 or 5 times with the same one, in fact.

Am I the oddball? Or do the rest of you similarly crave variety, even with SBs?[/QUOTE]I'm the same way. I always thought I was the oddball too. I think I like the excitement of someone new. The pursuit, having a great first meeting, then getting chemistry the 2nd and 3rd time, but then it kind of fades away. Rinse and repeat.

This one I know well. We hit it off pretty well pre-Covid. Got drunk the first time and had fun with no donation. Def cute and voluptuous, short and a great smile. Out of college a few years ago, local girl. Nepalese. Did dinner a good number of times, again with no donation. More as friends, really. Eventually drifted apart. A bit quirky and fun. The lack of connection was the killer for me. Haven't chatted for about a year. She may have gotten more mercenary but agree, knowing her as I do, that she is unlikely to put out. I think I got lucky there.

[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;5513128]Key phrase in the profile is "a connection to develop naturally. " This is usually code for pay my while we take a long time to get to know each other without putting out.

Just a word of caution.

CFG.[/QUOTE]

I agree with TP here. Most of the time it has been one and done. The variety, the chase, can it happen with no donation, blah, blah, bah.

But there have been a few that have lasted a good while. My current girl has lasted 2. 5 years so far and I've only been helping her out here and there for the last 6 months. Def a unicorn. Smart and surprisingly wise for a 24 year old; we have a great time. Took almost 3 years to find her, though.

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;5514501]Depends upon the sugar baby. I have had a few unicorns over the years that I wish I I was still seeing. The financial arrangement was right, they were stunning, and they fucked like banshees.

Others, I am one and done. I love variety which is one reason I hobby, but I will see the great ones many many times and never tire of them. Most of them have ended due to a move or occasionally when they fall in love.[/QUOTE]

I have one sugar baby I have been seeing for over four years. Amazingly, the sex has gotten better over time. We have a bond but we can also sometimes go a month or more without seeing each other. Over time, we have also discovered a weird number of Jungian synchronicities. Which probably helps. While seeing her I have cycled through a number of other SB's. Too many for an accurate count. Right now, I have one other keeper who I have only seen three times but I can see as a long term situation. Both of these women host. I can also call on several other ex-SB's who graduated or otherwise moved on but are available for a booty call from time. I am getting all the sex I can handle but I still find myself sampling new options from time-to-time. I am drawn back to the site for the thrill of the chase and my love of solving puzzles. I used to love cross-words. Now, I spend that time unearthing real identities. It's all good, LOL!

BAM.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5514329]One thing I've found is that even with SBs, there is almost always a point of diminishing returns that sets in after a few sessions.

I don't mean that I'm strictly "one and done". But I would say that I have seldom adhered to the ideal presented on Seeking, of an ongoing, long-term arrangement.

I've seldom wanted to go beyond 4 or 5 times with the same one, in fact.

Am I the oddball? Or do the rest of you similarly crave variety, even with SBs?[/QUOTE]

Having a similar experience. One long term going on 3 years. One going on six months. One see 3 x a year. One when she visits town from Miami. One when she pass thru area on modeling gigs. Three past SBs who gave up SB life and in friend zone for occasional dinners, events, and other friend type to do stuff. Yet, have desire to meet others if they look interesting just to see what happens. Why not. YOLO.

[QUOTE=BamBam;5515872]I have one sugar baby I have been seeing for over four years. Amazingly, the sex has gotten better over time. We have a bond but we can also sometimes go a month or more without seeing each other. Over time, we have also discovered a weird number of Jungian synchronicities. Which probably helps. While seeing her I have cycled through a number of other SB's. Too many for an accurate count. Right now, I have one other keeper who I have only seen three times but I can see as a long term situation. Both of these women host. I can also call on several other ex-SB's who graduated or otherwise moved on but are available for a booty call from time. I am getting all the sex I can handle but I still find myself sampling new options from time-to-time. I am drawn back to the site for the thrill of the chase and my love of solving puzzles. I used to love cross-words. Now, I spend that time unearthing real identities. It's all good, LOL! BAM.[/QUOTE]

CottonCandyyBabyy 300 ppm platonic. Talked to before on WYP. Open to intimacy one day but will take time she says.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/dffd6e90-9f0f-486d-b57f-1b2afebc05a4[/URL]

Bettybeauty98 in Franklin. 400 ppm. Says open to lots of things. Waiting for scam to start. Suspicious. YMMV.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b6963d22-a3eb-417a-94b1-79e31f1f7432[/URL]

Paris Wanted to go to text right away. Wouldn't provide and info about arrangement or her. Declined and moved on. You may have a different experience.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49523476-3afb-46be-96f5-f5d273f1e520[/URL]

YzzidDaydream 400 ppm. Need to prove to her you are worthy. Let things naturally happen. And then maybe.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/494d130e-071f-4b26-9873-25428d4fe2ff[/URL]

Fran Baby Waste of time. YMMV. Getting info from her is difficult. Basically wants you to give her money for no honey.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/50e2c9cf-6bd4-43c6-a644-146f83eb53e1[/URL]

Number gets her name but no easy PII. I quit looking after initial exchange. Profile says Cincinnati but number says Beavercreek via Georgia. She / they want an allowance at the MnG. Naaaah.

BAM.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/abaab326-334d-4bc3-a622-8faf4f4ace13[/URL]

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/7f0541ff-c31b-4ecc-af75-91666b0f4bc0[/URL]

I figured out who she is and her past criminal record gives me pause. Seems hot and DTF, but don't a headache. Anyone hit it?

[QUOTE=JerseyYankee19;5518696][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/7f0541ff-c31b-4ecc-af75-91666b0f4bc0[/URL]

I figured out who she is and her past criminal record gives me pause. Seems hot and DTF, but don't a headache. Anyone hit it?[/QUOTE]Couldn't get her to actually commit to an amount she expected, just "whatever we decide on".

In a way it kind of reminded me of talking to a hooker in a hotel bar, careful she didn't say anything that could get her busted for soliciting.

Wants $600 upfront, just to talk on the phone occasionally. Will meet after trust is built.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0aaed784-de61-45e7-a0f4-6108e99e2aa2[/URL]

Another lets build trust first profile. 500 ppm from day one. Nothing she could talk about is worth 500 an hour. Hell indian hill attorney is 350 an hour and he is always of value for the money.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c6e84ee8-dd64-44c8-8815-0fd60571b72f[/URL]

I cannot post a link or picture. I think her profile may have been deleted. She blocked me when I called her out as a scammer. However when I tried to use my backup profile to copy her profile link, I could not find it. She claims to be touring with the Grateful Dead and only in Cinti 9-10 thru 9-12. Took me to SC and tried multiple ways to get a picture of me. Refused to use text saying it was unsafe. Even after I suggested GV or TN. Offered PPM at 400 if I would share a pic. I been down the ExposingJohns and PredatorsAlert route once long ago. I never give anyone all three of my name, number and picture. I do not know if she can get a number using SC. In any case, the number and name are hobby only. My likeness is my last line of defense. I will drop a POT if she insists on seeing me unaltered.

BAM.

$150 ppm to have dinners, shop, talk.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49c135eb-d268-416f-b9d7-1c0fc49ce5b4[/URL]

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5524890]$150 ppm to have dinners, shop, talk.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49c135eb-d268-416f-b9d7-1c0fc49ce5b4[/URL][/QUOTE]What on earth makes some tattooed, smoking, skank think anyone wants to pay her $150 to eat dinner and talk while you "teach her stuff. " I seriously doubt she's ever seen the inside of anything nicer than a Olive Garden and wouldn't have a clue with fork to grab for the salad.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5524924]What on earth makes some tattooed, smoking, skank think anyone wants to pay her $150 to eat dinner and talk while you "teach her stuff. " I seriously doubt she's ever seen the inside of anything nicer than a Olive Garden and wouldn't have a clue with fork to grab for the salad.[/QUOTE]Not sure why that was necessary, but ok.

[QUOTE=CooperTown;5525064]Not sure why that was necessary, but ok.[/QUOTE]I wasn't being opaque. I'm simply critiquing her expectations against my perception of value. From my perspective, if all she wants to do is eat while someone "teaches her stuff," then she should be paying, not the other way around.

Don't we have colleges that sort of do what she's looking for, minus her being paid for it? LOL.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5524924]What on earth makes some tattooed, smoking, skank think anyone wants to pay her $150 to eat dinner and talk while you "teach her stuff. " I seriously doubt she's ever seen the inside of anything nicer than a Olive Garden and wouldn't have a clue with fork to grab for the salad.[/QUOTE]I was thinking the same thing. Dumb hUNT.

Asking 350 ppm. Says open-minded. Travels to Cincy. Took a little while but finally got to the scam. Goes like this. Really don't want to ask. Don't want to come off as a scammer. Could use gas money so can come visit. Blah blah.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/652b7dd4-a984-4f31-a4b8-f11c455fef93[/URL]

Wants 600 ppm. NSA FWB. Wants money immediately upon meeting. Got pro-like and cash and dash vibes. Could be wrong. YMMV.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e4002c74-4939-4ce4-b09b-d8fddf3d92a2[/URL]

Anyone met this one. Spoke to her a couple months ago and got busy with a couple others.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/560f4421-d926-4a66-97c5-c2a562ef3267[/URL]

Thanks TB.

I just joined SA for the first time and thought I'd give sugarbabies a try. So far I haven't had much luck and thought I'd ask some advice how to get started.

I've had a few send me messages that consist mostly of "hey" and nothing else. When I reply to them I usually still only get only a few words in response. I've initiated contact and messaged a few girls but it's mostly been just smalltalk. Even when I ask they don't come out and say what they're REALLY looking for.

So, how blunt do I need to be? Do I just openly ask how much $ they charge to meet and what their rules are for being physical? Or do I have to continue to dance around the subject and try to woo them until they bring up their rules?

[QUOTE=Nob72;5535053]I just joined SA for the first time and thought I'd give sugarbabies a try. So far I haven't had much luck and thought I'd ask some advice how to get started.

I've had a few send me messages that consist mostly of "hey" and nothing else. When I reply to them I usually still only get only a few words in response. I've initiated contact and messaged a few girls but it's mostly been just smalltalk. Even when I ask they don't come out and say what they're REALLY looking for.

So, how blunt do I need to be? Do I just openly ask how much $ they charge to meet and what their rules are for being physical? Or do I have to continue to dance around the subject and try to woo them until they bring up their rules?[/QUOTE]Start here.

[POST=2479728]Sugarbaby Thread Highlights, Index, and FAQ[/POST]

She is now down to 500 ppm. I suspect she has bloomed to BBW. I would have offered 400 if she could host or 300 if I get a room. If she was not a whale at the MnG. I suspect I dodged a bullet. I have text pics and more info for contributing seniors.

Bam.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5526698]Wants 600 ppm. NSA FWB. Wants money immediately upon meeting. Got pro-like and cash and dash vibes. Could be wrong. YMMV.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e4002c74-4939-4ce4-b09b-d8fddf3d92a2[/URL][/QUOTE]

No hard and fast rule for landing a sugarbaby except you have to keep trying. Takes time.

Hey is a typical intro message from a SB to a SD. Doesn't mean they are not real. Just a common starting point.

The profiles that give you one, two, three word responses consistently and never engage in a real conversation are generally a waste of time.

Try this: Add a different market to your profile that you will never travel too. Like Dallas. Then message the hell out of the profiles in Dallas. Try different approaches and see which gets a response. If the Dallas SBs reply and ask why you are listed in two markets say Dallas is your home town but you come to Cincinnati for work. When you find an approach that works try it in Cincinnati with your real prospects. Reason not to do this message testing in Cincinnati is its your SB pool. Don't crap in your own pool with approaches that are sheeeet.

[QUOTE=Nob72;5535053]I just joined SA for the first time and thought I'd give sugarbabies a try. So far I haven't had much luck and thought I'd ask some advice how to get started.

I've had a few send me messages that consist mostly of "hey" and nothing else. When I reply to them I usually still only get only a few words in response. I've initiated contact and messaged a few girls but it's mostly been just smalltalk. Even when I ask they don't come out and say what they're REALLY looking for.

So, how blunt do I need to be? Do I just openly ask how much $ they charge to meet and what their rules are for being physical? Or do I have to continue to dance around the subject and try to woo them until they bring up their rules?[/QUOTE]

SCAMMER! His number is 773 (Cicero, IL) and 7 six2- 9378. Sends you to a scheduling site. Number shows all over the country linked to escort sites likely asking for deposits, etc.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/46ce6279-fc97-4da0-a3c5-17d4a080221a[/URL]

Bam.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5536055]No hard and fast rule for landing a sugarbaby except you have to keep trying. Takes time.

Hey is a typical intro message from a SB to a SD. Doesn't mean they are not real. Just a common starting point.

The profiles that give you one, two, three word responses consistently and never engage in a real conversation are generally a waste of time.

Try this: Add a different market to your profile that you will never travel too. Like Dallas. Then message the hell out of the profiles in Dallas. Try different approaches and see which gets a response. If the Dallas SBs reply and ask why you are listed in two markets say Dallas is your home town but you come to Cincinnati for work. When you find an approach that works try it in Cincinnati with your real prospects. Reason not to do this message testing in Cincinnati is its your SB pool. Don't crap in your own pool with approaches that are sheeeet.[/QUOTE]This isn't the method I'd recommend using, but I'm a different person. I send a few sentences saying something about their profile and I'd like to get to know them better. There's usually some back and forth. Some will get right down to business. Others want to feel out the situation. Generally everyone knows who's there and why and are pretty open with what they're looking for and (maybe more important) what they're NOT looking for.

I'm honest with them, especially after I am confident they're real.

Took me straight to text. Strike 1. Number gets a name, which she / he shares, but no reliable PII. Catfish?? Sent me to a fundraiser site I had never seen before. Apparently a Nando1. Strike 2. Finally hit with a tale of woe about a heart condition, being hospitalized and needing a small amount for medicine before she can get out: 82.84 and will not let me bring the money to her in the hospital. Strike 3. Closed with a bitter text accusing me of treating her like she was a low down scammer. I am so ashamed!

Bam.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/85e5b11c-7633-4119-a117-5c24db41d3fa[/URL]

[QUOTE=BamBam;5538101]Took me straight to text. Strike 1. Number gets a name, which she / he shares, but no reliable PII. Catfish?? Sent me to a fundraiser site I had never seen before. Apparently a Nando1. Strike 2. Finally hit with a tale of woe about a heart condition, being hospitalized and needing a small amount for medicine before she can get out: 82.84 and will not let me bring the money to her in the hospital. Strike 3. Closed with a bitter text accusing me of treating her like she was a low down scammer. I am so ashamed!

Bam.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/85e5b11c-7633-4119-a117-5c24db41d3fa[/URL][/QUOTE]I got the sob story online and stopped it right there. Her comment was that it probably wasn't the right place for it and I replied NOPE!

I have been chatting with this one. Seems friendly and legit, though a bit scattered. Any info would be appreciated. Feel free to PM me.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/a82175f7-e4cc-4ca9-ad30-f726ef0c6792[/URL]

This one seems to be a time-waster, though I'm not entirely certain what her game is. When you ask her to meet, or what she's looking for in an arrangement, she'll immediately reply that she's "not a hooker".

And I am always extremely circumspect when messaging on Seeking, I should note.

May be a rinser. Not sure.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/bfedb50f-21d8-4dce-806f-867ec10bbe92[/URL]