2 photos
Breebianchi was breedoll; Candy was xpeachesncreamx
I have updates for both of these people. Stay away. More details available to contributing seniors.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/29fb48a8-7d53-422b-ad7b-868d30ab489c;[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0998e46e-011e-4279-a3f6-46b916693761;[/URL]
Bam.
Why Answers To Seniors Only
I see you are a senior with a modest message count. You also bounce around to a lot of boards but it appears your home location is in St. Louis. My info is specific to profiles in this location and would be of only voyeuristic benefit to you. On all boards there are always some simps who think they can get themselves attention by rushing to share any comments, negative or otherwise, with the woman in question. In the past, sharing details publicly have allowed women to tie my profile here back to my hobby identity. I prefer to avoid that. My rules are now: 1) Post any safety / scammer concerns immediately and openly. Damn the consequences. 2) Respond to info requests privately for seniors who are regular contributors. 3) Offer perspectives openly on profiles that have been around a long time and are no longer of interest to me. 4) Never offer PII to people who are new, who rarely contribute or who have been a bit shady in their presence on the forum. I think most experienced seniors, at least on this forum, are following similar rules. Since the number of regular, senior contributors here is relatively low, answering them is no big deal. I use copy-paste where needed. However, if a person wants to to have high levels of success in the sugar bowl, it helps to have very efficient work processes and adequate time to invest in it.
BAM.
[QUOTE=ChrisHansen92;5482177]You must have more free time than me to respond privately to emails from every person why I should not see these two rather than just post a brief report to warn us. Bottom line you said stay away. Also neither profile is active. Good enough for me and thanks (probably will be back again with a new free profile tomorrow). Why it has to be a secret for seniors only don't know or care. But thanks.[/QUOTE]
I use Seeking as I travel as many do
But I will keep that in perspective when I see girls in "your" defined market area and decide to share with this group sir. Thanks for the friendly welcome.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5482761]I see you are a senior with a modest message count. You also bounce around to a lot of boards but it appears your home location is in St. Louis. My info is specific to profiles in this location and would be of only voyeuristic benefit to you. On all boards there are always some simps who think they can get themselves attention by rushing to share any comments, negative or otherwise, with the woman in question. In the past, sharing details publicly have allowed women to tie my profile here back to my hobby identity. I prefer to avoid that. My rules are now: 1) Post any safety / scammer concerns immediately and openly. Damn the consequences. 2) Respond to info requests privately for seniors who are regular contributors. 3) Offer perspectives openly on profiles that have been around a long time and are no longer of interest to me. 4) Never offer PII to people who are new, who rarely contribute or who have been a bit shady in their presence on the forum. I think most experienced seniors, at least on this forum, are following similar rules. Since the number of regular, senior contributors here is relatively low, answering them is no big deal. I use copy-paste where needed. However, if a person wants to to have high levels of success in the sugar bowl, it helps to have very efficient work processes and adequate time to invest in it.[/QUOTE]