Printable View
[QUOTE=Cincy2015;5578621]Not going to put the name because it seemed weird & I'm a bit paranoid. Did anyone else get a random text from a well known Kentucky UTR. This person within the last year had a new 859 #. But the text I got was from the original 513 number. Something seems off to me. Just wondering if anyone had this happen.[/QUOTE]It would help to know the name so we can avoid. There has been several UTR in Ky.
[QUOTE=Cincy2015;5578621]Not going to put the name because it seemed weird & I'm a bit paranoid. Did anyone else get a random text from a well known Kentucky UTR. This person within the last year had a new 859 #. But the text I got was from the original 513 number. Something seems off to me. Just wondering if anyone had this happen.[/QUOTE]Not at all.
What's up gents, starting to post more often long time viewer of the board. Has anybody seen Chanel recently I know she has been on different sites for quite a while I just never pulled the trigger back in the day. Just wondering if anybody has any recent experience and if she is still legit.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-florence-911227[/URL]#erotic.
[QUOTE=Cincy2015;5578621]Not going to put the name because it seemed weird & I'm a bit paranoid. Did anyone else get a random text from a well known Kentucky UTR. This person within the last year had a new 859 #. But the text I got was from the original 513 number. Something seems off to me. Just wondering if anyone had this happen.[/QUOTE]No, I sure haven't.
Have seen this provider a few times. Based out of Columbus but travels to Cincy and will be here this weekend 10/8 - 10/10. I would recommend if you like tall, very very thin and a bit older types (north of 40). I'd compare her to CristenCremes (may she RIP) with teeth and without the substance abuse habit. Body type and menu is very similar or almost spot on. Really gets into the session with pretty much anything goes except Greek and BBFS. Finish how you want where you want!
Her ad is on Eros, but she's not a hot young Eros provider, nor are her rates Eros rates. She only provides hour rates in $$. 25 ad but will do hhr for $. 25. Ad also says verification required. Don't remember what I provided. Possibly a face pic.
I've also included a few pics she provided me when texting her. Which I believe are better than her Eros ad pics. So hopefully a few take up on this. I'm hoping she gets a set of regulars in Cincy so she visits more often. Let her know one of her Cincy friends recommended her.
[URL]https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/3895029.htm?cat=3859[/URL]
Jfh.
[QUOTE=TitsNAss1313;5579104]What's up gents, starting to post more often long time viewer of the board. Has anybody seen Chanel recently I know she has been on different sites for quite a while I just never pulled the trigger back in the day. Just wondering if anybody has any recent experience and if she is still legit.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-florence-911227[/URL]#erotic.[/QUOTE]All previous reports of encounters with her seem to have "dead fish" as a theme. She provides access to holes, with not much else in the way of participation. Along with her high rate, that has been keeping a lot of (all) potential clients away. If she offered more in the way of being more involved in the activities, more than just a pretty face, perhaps that would sway people to believe a session with her is worth her $$hr asking rate.
[QUOTE=TitsNAss1313;5579104]What's up gents, starting to post more often long time viewer of the board. Has anybody seen Chanel recently I know she has been on different sites for quite a while I just never pulled the trigger back in the day. Just wondering if anybody has any recent experience and if she is still legit.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-florence-911227[/URL]#erotic.[/QUOTE]Have not seen her in 2 years didn't have much of a personality but her body was something else watching her in CG and RCG.
I used to see Chanel frequently when a QV was only 60. She was a cool chick and we got along. She had the tightest kitty and body of anybody I've seen in Cincy but the session was nothing to brag about. Everything was covered and she did rush but that body had me coming back. Haven't heard from her in months and given my experience there's no way I would pay her current rates.
[QUOTE=TitsNAss1313;5579104]What's up gents, starting to post more often long time viewer of the board. Has anybody seen Chanel recently I know she has been on different sites for quite a while I just never pulled the trigger back in the day. Just wondering if anybody has any recent experience and if she is still legit.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-florence-911227[/URL]#erotic.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JustaFunHabit;5579496]Have seen this provider a few times. Based out of Columbus but travels to Cincy and will be here this weekend 10/8 - 10/10. I would recommend if you like tall, very very thin and a bit older types (north of 40). I'd compare her to CristenCremes (may she RIP) with teeth and without the substance abuse habit. Body type and menu is very similar or almost spot on. Really gets into the session with pretty much anything goes except Greek and BBFS. Finish how you want where you want!
Her ad is on Eros, but she's not a hot young Eros provider, nor are her rates Eros rates. She only provides hour rates in $$. 25 ad but will do hhr for $. 25. Ad also says verification required. Don't remember what I provided. Possibly a face pic.
I've also included a few pics she provided me when texting her. Which I believe are better than her Eros ad pics. So hopefully a few take up on this. I'm hoping she gets a set of regulars in Cincy so she visits more often. Let her know one of her Cincy friends recommended her.
[URL]https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/3895029.htm?cat=3859[/URL]
Jfh.[/QUOTE]North of 40? More like north of 60.
[QUOTE=Espartan;5580034]I used to see Chanel frequently when a QV was only 60. She was a cool chick and we got along. She had the tightest kitty and body of anybody I've seen in Cincy but the session was nothing to brag about. Everything was covered and she did rush but that body had me coming back. Haven't heard from her in months and given my experience there's no way I would pay her current rates.[/QUOTE]I saw her once several months back. If all you want is a tight body that seems to not be involved with serious drugs, she's not a bad choice. If you want someone who is actually engaged in the act, move along. She gets into sex about as much as a wife that is guilted into fucking her husband. You can tell she'd rather be watching Lifetime or some bull-shit like that. I'd rather have someone a little less hot that either really enjoys sex or at least fake sit well enough to fool me.
Hey guys, AnnieGirl asked me to pass along that she's in the Tri County area now and would love to see you all.
Has anyone seen her? I text a few messages to girls on rub ratings asking how much it is for a massage. This one text back she was in the 45226 area. Too far for me and I was just inquiring about a massage. So I told her it was too far. I did send out a lot of feelers. But that is in district 2 now I'm getting phone calls from Cincy police. Has anyone seen her or is she LEO.
[URL]https://cincinnati.rubratings.com/247088[/URL]
[QUOTE=TallyHo450;5580866]Hey guys, AnnieGirl asked me to pass along that she's in the Tri County area now and would love to see you all.[/QUOTE]Might as well be back in Middletown that's just about as far away.
[QUOTE=Espartan;5580034]I used to see Chanel frequently when a QV was only 60. She was a cool chick and we got along. She had the tightest kitty and body of anybody I've seen in Cincy but the session was nothing to brag about. Everything was covered and she did rush but that body had me coming back. Haven't heard from her in months and given my experience there's no way I would pay her current rates.[/QUOTE]Another one with GPS.
NEVER been worth her new rates.
Earlier this week I got together with Amber for the first time. I really wasn't sure what I'd be getting into, given that the reviews here have either been glowing or pretty bad.
Set up was relatively easy. As others have said, she requires a video chat as a very light form of identification, and I was actually happy about that, because I thought that it might give me a chance to see how she looked without filters. However, our schedules for doing a video chat kept not aligning, and finally she was just like "fuck it, just drive down to see me" (I'm about an hour north of her incall). I think we'd been texting enough that she'd kind of gotten a feel for me, and knew I wasn't LEO (I'd have been worried that she was if it hadn't been for all of the posts about her here).
We had some miscommunication about what time we were going to meet, and she was a long way away from her incall at the only time that evening that was going to work for me, so she had me meet her at a place in Westwood. I definitely had some trepidation about that, mostly because of the longer drive I had in store, but the little head was definitely the one in charge, so I headed further south than I'd planned.
The house itself was really nice. Amber met me at the door, and was *much* more attractive than I was expecting her to be. As I was driving down we'd talked on the phone some, and she'd said that she was going to get made up. I told her that if time was an issue I'd much prefer that she be freshly showered than made up, which she went along with, but she seemed to think I was going to be disappointed not to see the make up version of her face. I was not. Honestly, I have no idea why she uses the filters that she does on her ads; she's definitely attractive enough not to need them, and looks quite a bit better in person. I almost wouldn't think she was the same person.
She was upfront about past drug use, and there were signs of past use, but nothing that looked recent, and she wasn't high when I was there. She was talkative and friendly, with a tight, toned body, small breasts, and a freshly (and completely) shaved pussy. Her head game is really good, probably one of the best I've had from a provider in the hobby, and her pussy was tight. My only complaint was that I came a lot more quickly than I would liked, but that's not her fault.
Damage was $$50, as others have reported. I'm definitely going to be seeing her again.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/have-this-beautiful-funsized-platnium-blonde-today/39414120[/URL]#&gid=1&pid=2.