Los Angeles County Asian Providers

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4283546]From J's crew.

Photos: Not her. I will say that it a good representation of how her body looks.

Looks: Very pretty face with a dazzling smile. Tanned skin, 5'6" with enhanced C's, Early 30's. Great body, she likes to exercise and her efforts are apparent on her body. Decent ass. Bald kitty.

English: Better than most but don't expect a conversation.

Attitude: Friendly and Playful. Very GFE, good amount of giggly / laughter, lots of touching, caressing, and active engagement in bed.

Service: No preview in bathroom but BBBJ in bed was solid. Slow and sensual CG riding and quite flexible in mish. Prolly a little biased in service due to her looks compared to other kgirls.

Expense: $270.

Repeat: Yes, definitely one of the better kgirl experiences you can get. She also likes to vape, not during session but after. Smelled it faintly when in the room and was wondering what it was.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the review, always wondered about her and the forum seemed to be relatively quiet about her.

When you say tanned, do you mean tanned like Cami? Or less?

[QUOTE=BurtBackarat;4282351]Hear hear!

I felt the same way until I was with someone I really clicked with. Since then, I've been lucky enough have some sessions with nice DFK.[/QUOTE]It is YMMV after all.

Is Yoco's booker hard to get a response from? I'm in with all the LA and OC bookers but can't get a response. I've texted at 11 am and at 3 pm.

I'm not on HX tho if that's the way to do it.

[QUOTE=Jodandayo;4284066]Thanks for the review, always wondered about her and the forum seemed to be relatively quiet about her.

When you say tanned, do you mean tanned like Cami? Or less?[/QUOTE]I would say similar, maybe a shade darker.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4284852]I would say similar, maybe a shade darker.[/QUOTE]Interesting how tan she is. I thought koreans were obsessed with having white skin.

[QUOTE=DanJanson;4284729]Is Yoco's booker hard to get a response from? I'm in with all the LA and OC bookers but can't get a response. I've texted at 11 am and at 3 pm.

I'm not on HX tho if that's the way to do it.[/QUOTE]If the girl is on vacay don't expect to get a reply. Yes, sometimes if you're a VIP or reg client.

If your in, your in. If your not, keep trying. Just because one booker approves you doesn't mean all will. Yoco is out until June anyway. Unless you looking for someone else on the roster.

[QUOTE=DanJanson;4284729]Is Yoco's booker hard to get a response from? I'm in with all the LA and OC bookers but can't get a response. I've texted at 11 am and at 3 pm.

I'm not on HX tho if that's the way to do it.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NintyNine;4285149]Interesting how tan she is. I thought koreans were obsessed with having white skin.[/QUOTE]So did I, but have since met a few kgirls that like tanned skin. Cami with J and Allison with M.

Going to add to the reviews on Luna with EuKDolls / Tom. A few members have reviewed already but thought I'd add some concurrence.

Pictures are not her, not even close. Face is nowhere nearly as pretty. Compared to the photos, her features are more angular and her eyes are smaller and not as round. She is ok looking, and grew on me during the session, but I was a touch disappointed when the door opened. Maybe late 20's or early 30's looking. Her body is decent, firm tits with minimal ass, not really comparable to the photos either.

Face 7/10 body 8/10. Good meaty nipples.

Shower was very long and thorough (as was the case with the one after the session too). I guess she's a huge stickler for hygiene / cleanliness LOL.

After the shower, very long cat bath as others have noted. She does a decent job at it at least, but that was 15 minutes long and longer than it needed to be. No rim or anything, just a tease. I didn't like that the oil kind of remained on her skin for the rest of the session and had this sort of ickiness to it.

Good BBBJ after after catbath. Then she covered me up for some CG which was pretty good. She is a decent rider. Things started heating up once I was inside her and she'd make all the right sounds. Pushed her over for some mish and she playfully yelped as she fell onto the bed. She was affectionate and would actually touch and caress me as we went on, moaning throughout (most likely fake tbh LOL). Flipped her over some doggy and rammed her hard. She took it like a champ.

Aside from her appearance not being up to expectations and that long catbath, it was a pretty hot session. She is nice, friendly, welcoming, and makes it at least seem like she is enjoying herself. She doesn't seem big on kissing otherwise it would have been a pretty good GFE.

I most likely won't repeat. I do find her a bit overhyped with all those reviews on the site though.

I posted this in the sgv forum but it doesn't see much activity.

Anyone been able to contact the Booker ending in 7758? Based out of Alhambra. I haven't been able to contact in weeks. I'm assuming they got shut down.

Hey boys, I'm heading to SD in a few weeks and I'm wondering if you'd recommend any agencies or gals that are close or of the LA caliber? I've poked around and can't find much solid info on the Asian provider scene down there. Thanks in advance for any info!

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4285555]So did I, but have since met a few kgirls that like tanned skin. Cami with J and Allison with M.[/QUOTE]JennyO with the palace is tanned.

Got a text that Moli is back in town but that she's relocated from MDR to Mid-Wilshire. Anyone else get a similar notification? Has anyone checked out her new incall yet?

[QUOTE=Jodandayo;4285598]Going to add to the reviews on Luna with EuKDolls / Tom. A few members have reviewed already but thought I'd add some concurrence.

Pictures are not her, not even close. Face is nowhere nearly as pretty. Compared to the photos, her features are more angular and her eyes are smaller and not as round. She is ok looking, and grew on me during the session, but I was a touch disappointed when the door opened. Maybe late 20's or early 30's looking. Her body is decent, firm tits with minimal ass, not really comparable to the photos either.

Face 7/10 body 8/10. Good meaty nipples.

Shower was very long and thorough (as was the case with the one after the session too). I guess she's a huge stickler for hygiene / cleanliness LOL.

After the shower, very long cat bath as others have noted. She does a decent job at it at least, but that was 15 minutes long and longer than it needed to be. No rim or anything, just a tease. I didn't like that the oil kind of remained on her skin for the rest of the session and had this sort of ickiness to it.

Good BBBJ after after catbath. Then she covered me up for some CG which was pretty good. She is a decent rider. Things started heating up once I was inside her and she'd make all the right sounds. Pushed her over for some mish and she playfully yelped as she fell onto the bed. She was affectionate and would actually touch and caress me as we went on, moaning throughout (most likely fake tbh LOL). Flipped her over some doggy and rammed her hard. She took it like a champ.

Aside from her appearance not being up to expectations and that long catbath, it was a pretty hot session. She is nice, friendly, welcoming, and makes it at least seem like she is enjoying herself. She doesn't seem big on kissing otherwise it would have been a pretty good GFE.

I most likely won't repeat. I do find her a bit overhyped with all those reviews on the site though.[/QUOTE]Booker Tom is with -.

[URL]http://eukgirl.com[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/sweetgem[/URL]

Luna's pictures are obviously fake.

A reverse image search is your friend.

[URL]https://www.sex.com/pin/55901253-ugirls/[/URL]

Booker Tom at [URL]Eukgirl.com[/URL] has many fake pictures.

[QUOTE=LonerRanger;4286953]Booker Tom is with -.

[URL]http://eukgirl.com[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/sweetgem[/URL]

Luna's pictures are obviously fake.

A reverse image search is your friend.

[URL]https://www.sex.com/pin/55901253-ugirls/[/URL]

Booker Tom at [URL]Eukgirl.com[/URL] has many fake pictures.[/QUOTE]I went in there knowing the pictures weren't her, as was mentioned before by other reviewers. Was expecting something a bit closer than what I was greeted with though.

I did run the reverse image search. Interestingly the two that I tried (last two) don't turn up any results.

I will also add that the Booker was a nice guy to work with.