Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Lincoln54;5741085]I wouldn't visit her with her attitude no matter how good or how cheap. Fine if she has an age limit but to say-she has to live with herself as if those over 60 are disgusting to me speaks volumes.

Older men not only have the money but have the manners in most cases the young ones don't-just my opinion.[/QUOTE]So to clarify, for me I'm not offended by any woman that has an age limit to the services that she is going to provide for. Mckenna puts it in her AD, which is a concerning factor towards her attitude. When trying to book a session with a woman I would rather be told then that she only provides services to a particular demographic. To me this just shows a lack of professionalism. Sorry for the rant guy's. I think for us, younger or older gentlemen a session with her will not be satisfactory and a complete waste of time and money.

PL.

[QUOTE=ArchersTarget;5732515]She has been around for ever and her reviews were very good. My time with her was not so good and I wrote a review on TER and she was pissed and tried to make me take the review down which I did not.[/QUOTE]Nicolette has not been around a long time. She's hosted with RSG for 1 yr in 06', Independent for 1 yr and then left for several years. If you count her time in this business. It's approx 4 yrs. Just clarifying because some people like to not fully understand.

Sometimes it happens, not all sessions equal two people clicking and having an enjoyable time on both ends. She does try her best to accommodate, and this is why she's very particular on whom she hosts. But again, sometimes it just doesn't work out. The great thing is you won't book again and chances are you're on a not see again list. This is not a bad list to be on, it just wouldn't be polite to see someone you don't enjoy, merely to make an income.

Nicolette's fees are listed on an Ad site Tryst, her website and along with her Twitter page. She does not entertain any lower amount then what is provided. She is now accepting hh sessions, due to the increase requests. She will never not screen you either, she won't fall for any tricks that men try to share with each other.

She does have a family and it's not a prerequisite to the business, just as you have a family. This is her legitimate business, it's registered, she pays her taxes, she makes a good living. Not fancy but she's happy where she is in life. She's not into drugs, but doesn't shun those that do. As long as it's not brought to a session. She doesn't smoke but appreciates if those that do use mouthwash before a session. She's a social drinker only, all alcohol that is brought as a gift must be new and unopened for personal safety.

If you ever have questions, please reach out to her by email or text! Thanks for listening, hope this has helped.

Cheers, Nicolette.

[QUOTE=PinayLuver;5741290]So to clarify, for me I'm not offended by any woman that has an age limit to the services that she is going to provide for. Mckenna puts it in her AD, which is a concerning factor towards her attitude. When trying to book a session with a woman I would rather be told then that she only provides services to a particular demographic. To me this just shows a lack of professionalism. Sorry for the rant guy's. I think for us, younger or older gentlemen a session with her will not be satisfactory and a complete waste of time and money.

PL.[/QUOTE]Everybody just chill on the age thing. She just doesn't want some dude who look like a dried up old prune that's ancient. If you don't like that, move on. Every one of these girls has their likes and dislikes just like you do. Some guys don't like big fat ass chicks but some do. If you don't like it, don't see ger. Pretty simple.

[QUOTE=LustyB;5741665]Everybody just chill on the age thing. She just doesn't want some dude who look like a dried up old prune that's ancient. If you don't like that, move on. Every one of these girls has their likes and dislikes just like you do. Some guys don't like big fat ass chicks but some do. If you don't like it, don't see ger. Pretty simple.[/QUOTE]I would agree with LustyB. This providers preference here is no different than another provider posting that they won't see non Whites, AA, or Asians.

[QUOTE=GianniVersace;5741696]I would agree with LustyB. This providers preference here is no different than another provider posting that they won't see non Whites, AA, or Asians.[/QUOTE]Plus there are providers with age minimums of 35, sometimes 40+ among other requirements. If I don't meet a providers requirements it saves me the hassle and she'll probably provide better service to people that meet her requirements if she has any. It's usually the high volume SWs posting as escorts that take all customers for better or worse which is alright but then you may end up paying more than what you would if you picked her up instead.

Has anyone tried Daisy?

[QUOTE=Matty1169;5741287]If they're in to make that Cold Hard Cash, then it doesn't matter if I'm 31,41,51, or even 61/71. They shouldn't be in the Hobby if that's the Case. That's JMHO! This coming from a 41 yr old guy.[/QUOTE]Given it feels like a majority of providers in MA don't see black men, I don't really feel like that line of thought really applies.

There are plenty of women who turn me down based on my skin color, despite me never having an issue with any girl I've ever seen.

It's seems pretty standard to discriminate based on age / race in the game.

[QUOTE=GianniVersace;5741696]I would agree with LustyB. This providers preference here is no different than another provider posting that they won't see non Whites, AA, or Asians.[/QUOTE]Yes I understand what you are saying but I don't recall any of those other providers listing anything beyond their simple preferences. She could simply put "no one over the age of 65 " instead of.

I prefer to NOT hangout with guys that look over 65 ish. EXAMPLE: Herbert from family guy or Anna Nicole Smith's husband.

Look no offense, but I still have to sleep at night, right? Hanging out with someone who falls into that very specific criteria definitely keeps me up at night.

Sorry but YuUuuCKY.

Five finger salute to all the sugar babies taken one for the team. Why'all are the REAL MVPS.

Pours liquor onto floor and has a moment of silence.

This was a couple months ago, but I saw Stella.

After stalking her Snapchat for a while, I finally saw her post that she was in town and doing outcalls. I've always liked the look of her cheeks, so I hit her up with the swiftness and got her to come over my place.

She showed up around the time she said she would and she does look like her photos, but you can tell the pictures are bit brushed up. She was in shape though, and didn't catch a surprise 40+ pounds that a lot of providers seem to forget to take updated photos for.

She was polite and friendly, and I didn't have any issues with service or anything. CBJ and CFS the usual. The booty has a nice jiggle to it if you hit it from behind.

I think it was $$ for a half? It could have been a QV, I don't actually remember. I just know it was $$.

I would (have) repeated, but she never seems to be active when I am looking so I never have.

Link Here: [URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3235461[/URL].

[QUOTE=PinayLuver;5741879]Yes I understand what you are saying but I don't recall any of those other providers listing anything beyond their simple preferences. She could simply put "no one over the age of 65 " instead of.

I prefer to NOT hangout with guys that look over 65 ish. EXAMPLE: Herbert from family guy or Anna Nicole Smith's husband.

Look no offense, but I still have to sleep at night, right? Hanging out with someone who falls into that very specific criteria definitely keeps me up at night.

Sorry but YuUuuCKY.

Five finger salute to all the sugar babies taken one for the team. Why'all are the REAL MVPS.

Pours liquor onto floor and has a moment of silence.[/QUOTE]True I get your point. What she said was excessive and unnecessary.

[QUOTE=Attwater;5741876]Has anyone tried Daisy?[/QUOTE]Daisy is one of the most discussed providers in the last 4 weeks, on this and the Seeking Arrangements thread.

[QUOTE=Mercury12;5741737]Plus there are providers with age minimums of 35, sometimes 40+ among other requirements. If I don't meet a providers requirements it saves me the hassle and she'll probably provide better service to people that meet her requirements if she has any. It's usually the high volume SWs posting as escorts that take all customers for better or worse which is alright but then you may end up paying more than what you would if you picked her up instead.[/QUOTE]I don't like seeing providers over 40's and up. Something about their body not hot enough for my taste.

[QUOTE=JClearMan1;5741991]Daisy is one of the most discussed providers in the last 4 weeks, on this and the Seeking Arrangements thread.[/QUOTE]Everyone should relax on daisy, she's a lesbian and not a former drug addicted crackhead. If you know her real name and google her you can find a picture of what she really looks like years back when she was working the streets of michigan looking for crack, that will change all your minds once you see those pics.

[QUOTE=Attwater;5741876]Has anyone tried Daisy?[/QUOTE]Saw her last week, she's real and the pics are pretty recent, I had a OK time but I feel as she wasn't into it.

I didn't mean that in a bad or negative way. Providers have the right to have Age.

Preferences, I guess. I was just saying the last time I tried to get with this 22 year old gal, turned me down because she don't like guys over 30 yrs old. And I was like 37 at the time. So I thought she was rather ignorant and stupid. But just because of her being that way, I shouldn't assume that ladies shouldn't get to have a Age Preference Limit. Example this McKenna provider sounds way way more mature than her. And sure ya guys are indeed right, she should get to turn down guys who are like Ancient looking. I agree. Sorry last Post I admit, I sounded like a dumbass.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting any discussion regarding [u]racial issues[/u]. This action is in no way a reflection of the merits of the author's comments.

I am aware that the vast majority of references to racial issues are legitimate attempts to advise other fellow members about local racial issues and prejudices. However, past discussions in the Forum has repeatedly demonstrated that the subject simply cannot be discussed intelligently, in any form or for any reason, without being misinterpreted and without starting flame wars.

Please do not engage in discussions about race in the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

[i]Thanks![/i][/blue]