Escort Reports

[QUOTE=IsThataSw;4594642]There is no actus reas with words. You must have the guilty act (actus reas) coupled with the guilty conscious (mens rea) for there to be a chargeable offense of soliciting. That's why prostitution arrests are always done when the John shows up to the providers place. They need you to be physically there, completing the crime. Otherwise, they can't charge you with anything. You can barter prices and services all day over the phone with a *****, until you show up in person, it's all just words. A defense lawyer would simply say you had an addiction to texting ****** for the thrill of it, but, you never actually acted on it. No harm done in making false offers for a mental thrill.

I agree however, it usually never greases the skids with a provider if you start getting graphic.[/QUOTE]No need to leave a trail of text messages to incriminate yourself with. I will always try and avoid discussing any details or money for specific acts when meeting a new provider, most of them are keen to this as well and will not mention any specifics. If someone asks tell them you'd like a massage, no harm in that.

Cream, IsThataSw, and Skank you all make great points. And all of ya's have great reasoning. Keep in mind too with a lot of these providers. That if you don't make it clear, what you want for services. They can use us not being specific about stuff, as leverage. Leverage to NOT perform. And do what we want. For services. Not that we have to mention services through texts. But just to make sure we make it clear to them. In person. Before forking over the donation. To make sure she's willing to do that / those specific acts. I just thought that was a bit odd. That she was naming off all those services. Before I even told her. Cause usually providers don't go about it. In that manner. But everyone is dif, I guess. Me personally would rather tell the provider what I'm looking for. From talking voice to voice. Or better yet, in person. I hope the Worcester area gets better guys, provider wise! For the coming year of 2020. And even if your someone who I haven't always seen eye to eye on. On here. I DON'T want any of you guys getting scammed. Happy New Year folks.

Yes, happy new year Matt. I was ranting earlier and skank is actually correct after doing some research. Any agreement in text or voice is criminal. It makes sense LOL. I suppose I'm distracted by the veil we have between us when it's anonymous messaging. Which keeps us safe for sure. However, if they want to, they can get a warrant to reveal who the texter is. This just usually doesn't happen because there's not enough gravity to a text solicitation.

Once again. Happy new year ha!

[QUOTE=Matty1169;4595325]Cream, IsThataSw, and Skank you all make great points. And all of ya's have great reasoning. Keep in mind too with a lot of these providers. That if you don't make it clear, what you want for services. They can use us not being specific about stuff, as leverage. Leverage to NOT perform. And do what we want. For services. Not that we have to mention services through texts. But just to make sure we make it clear to them. In person. Before forking over the donation. To make sure she's willing to do that / those specific acts. I just thought that was a bit odd. That she was naming off all those services. Before I even told her. Cause usually providers don't go about it. In that manner. But everyone is dif, I guess. Me personally would rather tell the provider what I'm looking for. From talking voice to voice. Or better yet, in person. I hope the Worcester area gets better guys, provider wise! For the coming year of 2020. And even if your someone who I haven't always seen eye to eye on. On here. I DON'T want any of you guys getting scammed. Happy New Year folks.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=IsThataSw;4594852]Not a big fan of hotel room providers. You think she'd be willing to do a car date BBBJCIM?[/QUOTE]Only way to know would be to ask. She had a good head game.

[QUOTE=RawBart;4595709]Only way to know would be to ask. She had a good head game.[/QUOTE]I doubt that would be a problem. She's also a SW.

With several decades of experience that includes SW's, incalls, outcalls, CD's (no more) and being detained and questioned by LE on more than a couple occasions, I only discuss specific acts or even general terms like a reference to FS, in person. Using txt or phone I ask only about "money for your time". Even If a provider offers or suggests acts in the context of donations or money in txt or phone calls, I don't agree or confirm what was offered. Instead, I reiterate that I am only interested in her time and don't want to discuss or agree to anything that might be illegal. Anyhow, that rarely happens. Typically I inquire about how much does an hour of her time cost and go from there. Discussing acts is dumb unless you know who you are talking to. Sure, I might meet with someone that doesn't offer what I'm looking for, so be it, it's a small price to pay for safety.

Maybe a bit overly cautious but it works for me.

ARG.

[QUOTE=ARegularGuy;4597315]With several decades of experience that includes SW's, incalls, outcalls, CD's (no more) and being detained and questioned by LE on more than a couple occasions, I only discuss specific acts or even general terms like a reference to FS, in person. Using txt or phone I ask only about "money for your time". Even If a provider offers or suggests acts in the context of donations or money in txt or phone calls, I don't agree or confirm what was offered. Instead, I reiterate that I am only interested in her time and don't want to discuss or agree to anything that might be illegal. Anyhow, that rarely happens. Typically I inquire about how much does an hour of her time cost and go from there. Discussing acts is dumb unless you know who you are talking to. Sure, I might meet with someone that doesn't offer what I'm looking for, so be it, it's a small price to pay for safety.

Maybe a bit overly cautious but it works for me.

ARG.[/QUOTE]Safe rather than sorry is a good modus operandi.

So I guess the BP site is back up?

Usually I'd like to play it safe myself. When I don't get a good sense of being familiar, with that particular provider. So I won't mention details until in person. Cause I don't know much about that provider. But when I do have a good sense that the provider ain't no LE setup. I will stupidly mention a couple details. Over the phone. Of what I'm looking for. Just the typical stuff. LOL. BJ and foreplay. Leading up to the FS. I am not one of those guys who wants to go straight to sex. I like to ease into it. To me the people who like to go straight to fucking, are the ones who are just easily satisfied. But everybody has their own way of doing things. Yes you do sound overly cautious ARG. But it's a GOOD thing my friend. I need to be like that myself. I should be that way too all the time. Rather than half the time. Haha. Happy New Year. I appreciate you saying that to me.

[[URL]http://backpage.com/[/URL].

You sure about that?

[QUOTE=Hcat113;4597642][[URL]http://backpage.com/[/URL].

You sure about that?[/QUOTE][URL]https://backpage.co/search-results/?city=warwick&search=Boston&cat=female-escorts[/URL]

[QUOTE=TinType;4597753][URL]https://backpage.co/search-results/?city=warwick&search=Boston&cat=female-escorts[/URL][/QUOTE]Cool. Thanks bro.

[QUOTE=Hcat113;4597763]Cool. Thanks bro.[/QUOTE]No idea what the deal is. You get that blocked front page when you type it in. I grabbed a link from the RI group. Boston & RI seem to know what is going on. I don't know? Someone crack into BP, or something?

[QUOTE=TinType;4597753][URL]https://backpage.co/search-results/?city=warwick&search=Boston&cat=female-escorts[/URL][/QUOTE]Might be nothing but McAfee protection put up a warning page for suspicious site with virus warnings. It allows me to go anyway but since the only time I've seen it before was when I accidentally clicked a link in a spam email, I'll heed the warning.

[QUOTE=SecretSquirell;4597795]Might be nothing but McAfee protection put up a warning page for suspicious site with virus warnings. It allows me to go anyway but since the only time I've seen it before was when I accidentally clicked a link in a spam email, I'll heed the warning.[/QUOTE]The. Com website is the US based site that was shutdown and still is. The one that can be reached is a. Co.

The. Co websites are hosted in Colombia not the US. No idea if there is any connection to the original backpage.