"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

[QUOTE=Jcn1965;5816306]Do even with the face somewhat hidden she identified the guy in picture? Dude she is a looking for easy prey. Now not sure when you say face was cropped but google image without complete face is nearly impossible right? Hopefully shd don't come looking for you because that shit is some deep dive crazy. Be safe.[/QUOTE]Well, my opsec is good, I don't think she has an easy way to identify me IRL. And our interactions were very pleasant, like I said, she was interested in dating me. I was just concerned that she could do more digging into who I am if we were seeing each other regularly, and that would not be a good thing.

I have no idea about the powers of google reverse image search, but from what she said, she was able to figure out the pictures weren't of me. I guess I could test it out, but really, what difference does it make. Mostly, girls won't go to this trouble. The risk is getting my profile banned on seeking. This happened with one of my backup profiles a while ago, and the only way to resurrect it is to send seeking a selfie of you holding your drivers license. Yeah, right, like that's going to happen.

Surprisingly little action with Spring Break in the air.

Love her look -- assuming her face is symmetrical, but can't get anywhere with her [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1fa2c5f2-5dff-4ad0-8475-5851d3526c0d[/URL].

Recent additions to gallery are great, but also very uncommunicative - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/852f06f7-2392-455a-a20e-21cc17684807[/URL].

Real, fun, great bod. Ask was a bit much for me -- [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e32174cd-615c-41f0-a7c6-68f6f79dd1d5[/URL].

She's been around, but not in a long while. Tends to look a little different in every pic, but sh'es real. DTF, no GPS, good fun. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7f7b0fa9-cb01-4f50-9222-0e09e96a42b5[/URL].

No car, looking for virtual. Pretty annoying / demanding trying to sell content - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/13432fd1-1eb7-4c61-a28d-8130f2188592[/URL].

Another low on comms but very appealing [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9fde3480-e363-4c69-8449-ee691dfa3377[/URL].

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5816469]Well, my opsec is good, I don't think she has an easy way to identify me IRL. And our interactions were very pleasant, like I said, she was interested in dating me. I was just concerned that she could do more digging into who I am if we were seeing each other regularly, and that would not be a good thing.

I have no idea about the powers of google reverse image search, but from what she said, she was able to figure out the pictures weren't of me. I guess I could test it out, but really, what difference does it make. Mostly, girls won't go to this trouble. The risk is getting my profile banned on seeking. This happened with one of my backup profiles a while ago, and the only way to resurrect it is to send seeking a selfie of you holding your drivers license. Yeah, right, like that's going to happen.[/QUOTE]One other thing about the situation. If she ever came after me, I have her full name and could likely mess her up. I have a screenshot of her profile from SA as well. This is how I got her name. I did something everyone says never to do. Give a girl $ before the meet. I spoke w / her by phone and did extensive texting, though, and I know a lot of her life story (and it seems real). I didn't think she would ghost on me for that small a $, she was hoping for more. Anyway, we had a meet planned and she could not get there because no gas. I offered to send $20 by PayPal, and she eventually agreed to that.

I have a PayPal account from a number of years ago. IDK if you can still get what I have. It is under my sugar identity, and it does not involve my SSN. I can take a OneVanilla prepaid debit card, add it to the account, and then use that to send $ to girls. To receive the $, they provide their PayPal username. However, what I get is that "x $ was transferred to <girl's real name." To 'verify' a card in this account, PayPal charges $1. 95 to it and gives you a code on the OneVanilla charge list that you then have to enter into their website. Lots of nickel and diming to stay under the radar in the sugar world.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5817531]I have a PayPal account from a number of years ago. IDK if you can still get what I have. It is under my sugar identity, and it does not involve my SSN. I can take a OneVanilla prepaid debit card, add it to the account, and then use that to send $ to girls. To receive the $, they provide their PayPal username. However, what I get is that "x $ was transferred to <girl's real name." To 'verify' a card in this account, PayPal charges $1. 95 to it and gives you a code on the OneVanilla charge list that you then have to enter into their website. Lots of nickel and diming to stay under the radar in the sugar world.[/QUOTE]This is one of the best ways. Its been a couple of years, but Paypal now requires you to verify your identity. For those of us with old accounts with our sugar names, they just don't let you keep money in the PayPal system if you aren't verified and use an alias. You have to move the money to a bank account.

I'd rather spend $20 up front to be able to verify a serious contender than risk meeting a whack job.

Another good way is to get them on snap chat. They often don't creat a sugar snapchat account or they might use their real cell # for texting, but it is tied to their real snap account. If you allow Snapchat to access your contacts, it not only scans your iPhone address book -- Those say FOUND IN CONTACTS -- but it also searches your Google Voice address book and those carry no comment. So I never add anyone from my Contacts, but add everyone that comes up as added without comment. So even if I haven't texted them in months or they are off SA, I can connect / reconnect with them and sometimes get their IRL name. Usually the screen name is a fake, but the username is some variation of their real name.

Has anyone had the pleasure of meeting her? She's been around a while and seems legit, but can't find anything whatsoever about her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d23015ae-7979-4279-bd94-9ff766977404[/URL]

[QUOTE=AsssManKramer;5819139]Has anyone had the pleasure of meeting her? She's been around a while and seems legit, but can't find anything whatsoever about her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d23015ae-7979-4279-bd94-9ff766977404[/URL][/QUOTE]Talks a good game, but now of at least 2 others that she ghosted day of meeting.

[QUOTE=BobLobLa;5817163]Surprisingly little action with Spring Break in the air.

Love her look -- assuming her face is symmetrical, but can't get anywhere with her [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1fa2c5f2-5dff-4ad0-8475-5851d3526c0d[/URL].

Recent additions to gallery are great, but also very uncommunicative - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/852f06f7-2392-455a-a20e-21cc17684807[/URL].

Real, fun, great bod. Ask was a bit much for me -- [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e32174cd-615c-41f0-a7c6-68f6f79dd1d5[/URL].

She's been around, but not in a long while. Tends to look a little different in every pic, but sh'es real. DTF, no GPS, good fun. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7f7b0fa9-cb01-4f50-9222-0e09e96a42b5[/URL].

No car, looking for virtual. Pretty annoying / demanding trying to sell content - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/13432fd1-1eb7-4c61-a28d-8130f2188592[/URL].

Another low on comms but very appealing [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9fde3480-e363-4c69-8449-ee691dfa3377[/URL].[/QUOTE]The "no car" virtual girl is playing you. She hosts in the Fan and can be nailed for $100 per meeting. She keeps trying to level up but she needs cash so hang tough. The pics are accurate: flat ass but otherwise great spinner body. She can be really annoying but otherwise good lay.

[QUOTE=BobLobLa;5789933]Looks TGTBT. Doesn't reply [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/209c39b2-f4c5-4cd3-af55-2dbb4d9c2125[/URL].[/QUOTE]She's using Instagram pics form a Texas A&M student that's from Dallas (reverse imaged the blue bikini pic on Yandex).

[QUOTE=AsssManKramer;5819139]Has anyone had the pleasure of meeting her? She's been around a while and seems legit, but can't find anything whatsoever about her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d23015ae-7979-4279-bd94-9ff766977404[/URL][/QUOTE]Talked to her quite a bit last fall. Decided on the details and she ended up ghosting me. Gave me some excuse about not having a ride. I offered to pick her up since her place was supposedly down the street from the FC; but she declined. Oh well.

Anyone have any intel on this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a8088b91-f927-43e7-aae0-2272b33572f3[/URL]

Thanks,

Bobby.

[QUOTE=Tidad;5819702]The "no car" virtual girl is playing you. She hosts in the Fan and can be nailed for $100 per meeting. She keeps trying to level up but she needs cash so hang tough. The pics are accurate: flat ass but otherwise great spinner body. She can be really annoying but otherwise good lay.[/QUOTE]I paid to much last week 150 got bb no CIP but swallowed to completion no a quitter.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3eddde8a-caa6-49a1-88e2-06582485b888[/URL] anyone seen this one. Found her by accident on FB she is real wondering if anyone has sampled.

[QUOTE=BobLobLa;5817163]Surprisingly little action with Spring Break in the air.

Love her look -- assuming her face is symmetrical, but can't get anywhere with her [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1fa2c5f2-5dff-4ad0-8475-5851d3526c0d[/URL].

Recent additions to gallery are great, but also very uncommunicative - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/852f06f7-2392-455a-a20e-21cc17684807[/URL].

Real, fun, great bod. Ask was a bit much for me -- [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e32174cd-615c-41f0-a7c6-68f6f79dd1d5[/URL].

She's been around, but not in a long while. Tends to look a little different in every pic, but sh'es real. DTF, no GPS, good fun. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7f7b0fa9-cb01-4f50-9222-0e09e96a42b5[/URL].

No car, looking for virtual. Pretty annoying / demanding trying to sell content - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/13432fd1-1eb7-4c61-a28d-8130f2188592[/URL].

Another low on comms but very appealing [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9fde3480-e363-4c69-8449-ee691dfa3377[/URL].[/QUOTE]I'm pretty sure I've seen #3 through [URL]SirensVA.com[/URL] A lot of the RVA girls on SA also work through them. They won't always be honest about it though.

[QUOTE=TheArcher;5826283]I'm pretty sure I've seen #3 through [URL]SirensVA.com[/URL] A lot of the RVA girls on SA also work through them. They won't always be honest about it though.[/QUOTE]She's been around a while and changes profiles constantly. I actually saw her a few times last Summer. Not sure what happened but she ended up blocking me after lunch date. She is currently running two profiles, one here and another one in Norfolk for some reason [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6efa9691-ee0f-4904-bbef-8942751aa0b3[/URL].

I am trying to decide whether my regular cell phone should be on or off when I am seeing a SB. I guess I am sensitized by watching too many FBI TV shows, where they can locate any cell phone anywhere. I definitely don't want my SO to have any reason to think I am exactly where I am expect to be. I can avoid that by turning off the phone before I go off my beaten track to see the SB. However, if there were a reason she really did need to contact me while I was out of pocket, perhaps I should have the phone on. I was meeting a POT once, we were chatting in my car, and a call same in from the warden. I didn't answer of course, just excused myself from the POT and went to where I was supposed to be before replying.

I have an Android phone that does not have location services enabled. If you were unlucky enough to have an iPhone with the tracking feature, I think your career in the bowl would be done for.