[URL]https://eukgirl.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free[/URL]
Can anyone give reviews of any of the available girls at eukgirl? I've seen one on Scarlett that indicated pics were fake. Another's pics look comically edited. Anyone?
Printable View
[URL]https://eukgirl.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free[/URL]
Can anyone give reviews of any of the available girls at eukgirl? I've seen one on Scarlett that indicated pics were fake. Another's pics look comically edited. Anyone?
If these agencies ever let us pick a duo. I would definitely go with the duo of Cindy and Belle at Candygirl.
On another note all the Jamie fans out there. Anyone know where she is going to end up next after her Seattle area rounds. Love to see come back to LA or OC to fill her up again.
[QUOTE=RedDragon;5411246][URL]https://eukgirl.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free[/URL]
Can anyone give reviews of any of the available girls at eukgirl? I've seen one on Scarlett that indicated pics were fake. Another's pics look comically edited. Anyone?[/QUOTE]Just avoid, I was b&s the last visit, booker response was ooops, try our other flowers.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5410567]To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.[/QUOTE]I am also skeptical of anyone who implies that they are God's gift to providers. A lot of blanks can be filled in if you read between the lines of many reviews. Also, I get the impression that everyone has different standards, and that's perfectly fine. But I do have to step in to share that Viki is fantastic and at the top of my list, anyway, just in case all of these recent negative reviews prevent anyone who hasn't seen her yet from trying her. I've always gotten incredible, passionate service from her, and the only thing stopping me from her being my ATF is just the fact that while I think she's cute, she's not DDG and older than I prefer. But I've always said I prefer her to Hana, though making that statement causes an uproar in her legions of fans, even though I say Hana is great too.
M. Viki, Nicole.
Sunny.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, .
Pink Angels. [URL]https://pinkangels.site/...[/URL].
Sexy Angels. . [URL]https://sexyangels.site/.[/URL].
SFK. Viki, [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models.........[/URL].
PKL Saki, Pink, Eunji. [URL]http://preciousklove.com/.........[/URL].
Sesang.
Angelsinwla.
KGLA. Saki, Pink, Eunji. [URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/.........[/URL].
Any feedback or review on Hanna?
[QUOTE=RedDragon;5411246][URL]https://eukgirl.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free[/URL]
Can anyone give reviews of any of the available girls at eukgirl? I've seen one on Scarlett that indicated pics were fake. Another's pics look comically edited. Anyone?[/QUOTE]Scarlett=Jina and Scarlett / Jina were great 4 years ago; great body and great fuck. I saw her two years ago and she has gained an easy 20 lbs.
Eye is Good or very good but she never works.
Grace / Gracee is popular and I have not heard anything negative about her but I have never seen her personally.
[QUOTE=TittyBoy247;5410214]Appreciate you and Boner for the intel. Would you recommend her, Jool Gina, love or anyone else for some nice natural big tits right now?[/QUOTE]Never had Jool Gina or Love. Just based off the pics did not interest me.
Purported stats:
Age:23.
Height:5'2".
Breast size:34.
Breast cup: C-cup (natural).
Weight:110-115 lbs.
Weight is a bit chubs for that height but what do you guys think? Real photo or not?
Any reviews on these girls?
Nina looks cute.
[QUOTE=Ramen25;5411871]Purported stats:
Age:23.
Height:5'2".
Breast size:34.
Breast cup: C-cup (natural).
Weight:110-115 lbs.
Weight is a bit chubs for that height but what do you guys think? Real photo or not?[/QUOTE]Csection scar. No boobs. Queefs.
Did not want to repeat at sexyangels with no upcharge.
Reviewed by me on ter as Hanhee.
How many times do we hear she's too old, short, tall, fat, skinny, in relation to the girls we want to pay for sex? Yes we all have different tastes and one man's meat is certainly another's poison but let us not forget we are not shopping the $1,000+/ hour providers who may fall into that near perfect category. This is the bargain basement of sex workers and believe me it really is a bargain. We get the kind of service that the high price girls won't even offer and we get it at a very reasonable price and that would even include the upsell girls. BBFS, MSOG, RIMMING, BBBJCIM and sometimes NQNS. Now tell me where you can get all of that at the paltry price of 260 to maybe as much as 350. Don't try because you can't unless you want to pay for the plane fare to Thailand. What we get is literally the best deal in town and if some don't meet our aesthetic requirements there are plenty more who will. There is a bottomless pit of choices and we should and I guess we do take advantage of it. Remember everyone found the beast to be hideous but Beauty found something that didn't repel her. The moral of the story is and always will be YMMV.
[QUOTE=Frala;5411474]I am also skeptical of anyone who implies that they are God's gift to providers. A lot of blanks can be filled in if you read between the lines of many reviews. Also, I get the impression that everyone has different standards, and that's perfectly fine. But I do have to step in to share that Viki is fantastic and at the top of my list, anyway, just in case all of these recent negative reviews prevent anyone who hasn't seen her yet from trying her. I've always gotten incredible, passionate service from her, and the only thing stopping me from her being my ATF is just the fact that while I think she's cute, she's not DDG and older than I prefer. But I've always said I prefer her to Hana, though making that statement causes an uproar in her legions of fans, even though I say Hana is great too.[/QUOTE]I agree with every point you made.
[QUOTE=VegasMongRoll;5411961]Csection scar. No boobs. Queefs.
Did not want to repeat at sexyangels with no upcharge.
Reviewed by me on ter as Hanhee.[/QUOTE]Ahh, daaadgammit! =/.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]