Printable View
Totally agree with your post title.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=HornyToad007;6619534]Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.[/QUOTE]Just want to point out from a leverage standpoint that if a business is providing a product that customers consider to be subpar and the business claims it hurts revinues and that you need to stop sharing that their product is subpar otherwise your money is no longer good. Got to ask yourself if said business can really afford to say no to already paying customers? As paying customers don't forget that your spending power is worth.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.
Here it is, I saved it in archive:
[URL]https://archive.ph/VfFlw[/URL]
I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.
Always wait a few days before posting anything. Either positive or negative. I learnt the hard way.
[QUOTE=DRaj123;6619852]I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jstwntlvn1;6624225]I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.[/QUOTE]TER has been blocking the SDAG site as a link for quite some time. Too many fake reviews, all in the 9's and 10's, were being posted, or so I was told.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;6624879]TER has been blocking the SDAG site as a link for quite some time. Too many fake reviews, all in the 9's and 10's, were being posted, or so I was told.[/QUOTE]I submitted one on 9-25 using SDAG URL and it was approved so not sure how that happened then if you're saying SDAG has been blocked for a while now. I'm not saying your info is wrong, just stating that I wasn't aware of all of this conflict between TER and SDAG. Kinda weird that my recent reviews went through no problem. I just went back to TER and all the girls from SDAG have been delisted cause I can't find any of them. That's a bummer cause I kinda got it down to where I knew which members were shills and which were legit reviews.
Ter requires an active ad, and a lot of times sdag wouldn't have direct ads.
Now, in the light of this proof of threats against clients (thank you Alex for publishing it) TER removed all profiles that relate to sdag.
And I'll say, Good. All clients should be able to post honest, truthful negative feedback they want without any fear of repercussions. Doesn't matter what happens to your business. It's clients right to post what they think a girl deserved.
The booker will wear this on his sleeve.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;6625357]Ter requires an active ad, and a lot of times sdag wouldn't have direct ads.
Now, in the light of this proof of threats against clients (thank you Alex for publishing it) TER removed all profiles that relate to sdag.
And I'll say, Good. All clients should be able to post honest, truthful negative feedback they want without any fear of repercussions. Doesn't matter what happens to your business. It's clients right to post what they think a girl deserved.
The booker will wear this on his sleeve.[/QUOTE]Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.
So despite all the cross talk regarding SDAG business practices, has anyone TOFTT with Jupiter and care to report back?
I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.
But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?
This could have been prevented too.
If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.
If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.
What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?
[QUOTE=SirBishop;6625925]Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.[/QUOTE]How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]"Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic. " < ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY! These types of blatant mandated censorship threats by sdag, is far more egregious IMO, than the shilling that cost 2 AMP's permanent banishment over in the AMP thread; the fact that these arrogant pricks feel emboldened and made no attempt at discretion in doing so. There's no doubt in my mind, that sdag and their shills, were 100% behind the constant attacks / sabotage / vandalism, which drove their main competition, VIP, out of business and ultimately out of San Diego.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;6626017]I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.
But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?
This could have been prevented too.
If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.
If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.
What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?[/QUOTE]This is 100% percent sdag own doing. Do you really expect TER to read every single fucking review written for sdag, then spend countless hundreds of man hours trying to figure out and determine, fact from shill? GMAFB!
TER made the right call, just like Admin would be here, banning this type of BS business model which basically mandates that every single member here to write a BS shill review for every single 1 of their ladies, regardless of whether they provide horrible service, or not. < Somebody here please explain to me why this fucking BS should be tolerated!?
Once again, SDAG policy mandate, quote:
"ASK THE EXPERT.
We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.
Some ladies you are going to love.
Some ladies you are going to like.
Some ladies are just ok.
Some ladies you aren't going to match with.
Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.
* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.
If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.
Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.
We will do our best to figure out who you are.
Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.
8 or higher.
If you don't then tell the assistant. ".
Could you imagine, had an AMP had the audacity to mandate this type of threatening mandate / policy against it's customers!? It's a direct order from the business, to shill. Period.
[QUOTE=Jstwntlvn1;6625307]I submitted one on 9-25 using SDAG URL and it was approved so not sure how that happened then if you're saying SDAG has been blocked for a while now. I'm not saying your info is wrong, just stating that I wasn't aware of all of this conflict between TER and SDAG. Kinda weird that my recent reviews went through no problem. I just went back to TER and all the girls from SDAG have been delisted cause I can't find any of them. That's a bummer cause I kinda got it down to where I knew which members were shills and which were legit reviews.[/QUOTE]A lot of good info is gone. For the most part, you can read between the lines and tell what is exaggerated and what is actual review.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6626126]How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.[/QUOTE]My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.
I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!
[QUOTE=Laf85;6626411]understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all![/QUOTE]I just want to add some thoughts I didn't see mentioned here. I'm a happy customer of many bookers, FEC, SDAG, SweetCandies, etc. And some freelancers and girls in COI (I used to post mostly there). I've never had a bad experience, just maybe one girl I wasn't into out of 30. She still did her job right. So if I gave an honest review, the other 29 girls really would be 7 through 10. She'd get a 4 or 5. And just to give an idea I've been to TJ a lot and 90% of the girls in TJ I'd rate 5 to 7 so I'm not just inflating things, the services by these girls are objectively a whole league better.
And I'm not the only one, just today on HX Lollygirls sent out their mass spam ad and even posted TER ids for their two girls. I looked them up and Jessica literally has 30 reviews, 29 of them 7 through 10. Mimi only has 3 reviews and they're 8's. Even accounting for shills there aren't any big complaints. She wouldn't be working if it was common.
All I'm saying is even if half the reviews are fake shills, it is not unbelievable to me that girls would get 90%-95% 7 to 10 ratings. Because I personally would have rated 29 out of 30 girls the same. I also don't pay much attention to review numbers anyways, other than to read the reviews and get a general idea of the basic facts. I do think people should be free to post honest reviews of course. Wait a few days to post if you have concerns.
I want to close by saying even in countries where this is completely open and legal, the service is usually not as good. Sometimes cheaper. They are importing the right girls.
Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.
SDAG is trying to do damage control (based on their club post) but is it too late. My advice to them is to acknowledge a mistake was made, start over with a new domain, stop pressing people for good reviews, have Alex (if still there) work on his soft skills. I would hate to see them fold.
[QUOTE=SoapieFreek;6626957]Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SoapieFreek;6626957]Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.[/QUOTE]I care less about their TER reviews, and more about their business ethics. Because let's face it, TER reviews already have a reputation for being inflated, and many think they are useless. But if they're tryna re-invent themselves, I recommend offering rates that can compete with LG (aka the new kids on the block).
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6627100]I care less about their TER reviews, and more about their business ethics. Because let's face it, TER reviews already have a reputation for being inflated, and many think they are useless. But if they're tryna re-invent themselves, I recommend offering rates that can compete with LG (aka the new kids on the block).[/QUOTE]It's pretty common for the non-sdag groups popping up in sd that a flat-rate, all-inclusive of 320 is to be found. True, the turnaround on girls is quick yet that is determined by the girls, not the bookers. Reviews are fine when filtered through the bull shit lens. I want better value for my money. I'll donate 320 all-inclusive over the 280+100 option any day. The new kids on the block are bringing in younger girls, more accurate pics, better service, low rates.
Rank.
Jessica.
Mimi.
Jupiter.
Cheri.
Fec girl.
Rate 1 -5.
The order you would grab them.
[QUOTE=M4473;6625932]So despite all the cross talk regarding SDAG business practices, has anyone TOFTT with Jupiter and care to report back?[/QUOTE]Yes please let me know too. LOL.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;6627488]It's pretty common for the non-sdag groups popping up in sd that a flat-rate, all-inclusive of 320 is to be found. True, the turnaround on girls is quick yet that is determined by the girls, not the bookers. Reviews are fine when filtered through the bull shit lens. I want better value for my money. I'll donate 320 all-inclusive over the 280+100 option any day. The new kids on the block are bringing in younger girls, more accurate pics, better service, low rates.[/QUOTE]Don't know how much this helps but I've rarely had accurate pics from any Korean bookers. Occasionally it's the actual girl in the photo. Whereas the Thai bookers SweetCandies, Sandra, Diamond seem to use real photos. I can confirm SweetCandies was 2 for 2 the actual girl with clear photos. But I will say the girls I've tried were both amateur (just started) and didn't offer the full range of services the Korean bookers offer (it hasn't mattered which one to me). On the plus I could preview and select by photo and so far the girls have been younger, early 20's.
Visited Chichi recently, she is curvy with big boobs for an Asian, English not too good (even compared to the Korean girls), loves having her tits sucked. Seems new. So pros and cons. Also it's in MV not UTC if that's a factor. But much simpler parking situation (lots of free 1 hour parking outside) and a straightforward gate unlike FEC. I was even thinking to go FEC but I guess I'm getting lazy when I think I'll have to try three ways just to get in.
Hope this helps.
In the long term, maybe the booker apologizes and stops harassing and threatening customers. At the very least I'd hope he learned his lesson. And this debacle can be used to deter other orgs from doing the same.
And I disagree. You are saying "do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time."
No! They messed up when they instituted the policy, not when they got caught posting it publicly. I've canvassed many people throughout the years and many have told me the same thing about this place. If they (the agency) are proud of their policy and really believe in it, why hide it? Wear it proudly. Post it publicly.
The agency wants to have their cake and eat it too.
If the only thing they're sorry about is them accidentally posting it publicly, then they haven't learned their lesson. Which is. Let customers write any reviews they'd like to write provided they are honest and truthful. How hard is that? If they are so good as people say they are why do they need to silence people?
[QUOTE=Laf85;6626411]My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.
I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all![/QUOTE]
It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.
For example, Rachel has great sensual service. But admittedly she does not look like the pictures provided and she even is older. Which is honestly not a problem, but SDAG has been operating on shady principles to draw up business.
* Posting up photoshopped or completely fake pictures.
* Falsifying details (let's be real, most of those girls are NOT in their 20's).
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
* Sending shills to post on these boards (pretty sure one of them was the booker too).
And now they're hitting all new lows by threatening retaliation against customers for posting low scores. That is just unacceptable.
I admire the fact that the booker is on the side of the provider, but he should only do so if the provider can provide the right level of service. Like Yoji, Dallas, Jaine, etc. Are all fantastic girls. But stop upselling garbage girls or less attractive girls. If they don't have what it takes, lower their rates so they can make more on volume. Don't inflate these provider's egos, if they're not hot enough, they shouldn't be pampered.
Here is a list of known K-Girl Agencies that will occasionally have girls in San Diego or are known to cycle girls here. The same girl may pop up on different agencies, as we have recently seen. So pick your fave booker if she's on multiple listings. This listing is provided as your starting point and the usual warnings about pics applies. Some websites show rates, ages, more info. This is not an endorsement of any agency.
[URL]https://www.yourlollygirls.com/sandiego[/URL]
[URL]https://topangels.ch/all-angels/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.thetopgirls.com[/URL]
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/san-diego[/URL]
[URL]https://get9irl.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=2[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com[/URL]
[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/sd/[/URL]
[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6627665]It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.
For example, Rachel has great sensual service. But admittedly she does not look like the pictures provided and she even is older. Which is honestly not a problem, but SDAG has been operating on shady principles to draw up business.
* Posting up photoshopped or completely fake pictures.
* Falsifying details (let's be real, most of those girls are NOT in their 20's).
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
* Sending shills to post on these boards (pretty sure one of them was the booker too).
And now they're hitting all new lows by threatening retaliation against customers for posting low scores. That is just unacceptable.
I admire the fact that the booker is on the side of the provider, but he should only do so if the provider can provide the right level of service. Like Yoji, Dallas, Jaine, etc. Are all fantastic girls. But stop upselling garbage girls or less attractive girls. If they don't have what it takes, lower their rates so they can make more on volume. Don't inflate these provider's egos, if they're not hot enough, they shouldn't be pampered.[/QUOTE]I've never went to SDAG. When I tried to verify, who ever it was I was texting was an ass. So I guess they didn't need my money. Plenty happy to see other organizations and sure am not missing out on anything.
Its a pity because they used to be the premier AAMP in SD and really outshone their rivals. I've had awesome experiences there over the years, and even in more recent times. But I pick and choose very carefully. The penchant for SoCal AAMPS to use fake picks is almost universal, at least for K-girls. Lets face it, today it takes just a few seconds to shoot and upload a real pic. They could all do it if they wanted, but they don't. And as for the objection that these girls' identities need to be protected. That's nonsense too. You can hide tattoos and not show faces. They are simply hiding the fact that these girls are probably in their 30's at least. Very few 20-somethings for sure, especially in the post-Covid era. And if you want to know which ones are less attractive, just assume that's the case with anyone who offers BBFS. The hotter ones don't need to go that route. Think of the amazing Petra. Don't get me wrong. Ash has a great reputation for service, but lets face it, she's way older than the website stated and also facially quite plain. But she fucks like a dynamo and is great.
The booker, whoever that is. And I think there's more than one person. Has always had attitude. I think they've changed over the years, just observing their style of communicating. But all have been less than friendly and basically interested in getting as much money out of patrons as they can. Never once was an underwhelming session compensated for with a discount, money back or a genuine promise of better service next time.
And they are not above banning guys who dare to write honest reviews.
So the lesson is, make sure you and your handle on this site and others are not connectable. Don't sit in the parking lot and write a review straight after a session. Wait at least a day or so. And if you have been rejected, there are a number of other good options in town to choose from.
[QUOTE=Will008;6627819]I've never went to SDAG. When I tried to verify, who ever it was I was texting was an ass. So I guess they didn't need my money. Plenty happy to see other organizations and sure am not missing out on anything.[/QUOTE]
SDAG should've just kept their mouth shut and keep doing business as usual. There's been good providers this year and they seemed to expanded their incall apartments. I assumed business was going well, so to sour that with a strict review policy was a bad move on them.
But some of you are also ignorant to believe that photos and stats in ads need to be real. This is rarely ever the case with Asian establishments, and the SW industry as a whole. Of course they are going to be older than they say. Of course they aren't going to look like the super model fake picture they pick off of Instagram. It's called upselling, Marketing 101.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;6627777]Here is a list of known K-Girl Agencies that will occasionally have girls in San Diego or are known to cycle girls here. The same girl may pop up on different agencies, as we have recently seen. So pick your fave booker if she's on multiple listings. This listing is provided as your starting point and the usual warnings about pics applies. Some websites show rates, ages, more info. This is not an endorsement of any agency.
[URL]https://www.yourlollygirls.com/sandiego[/URL]
[URL]https://topangels.ch/all-angels/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.thetopgirls.com[/URL]
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/san-diego[/URL]
[URL]https://get9irl.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=2[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com[/URL]
[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/sd/[/URL][/QUOTE]SDAG was my intro to K girls and I have given them most of my hobbying business since. Some great, some OK, some outstanding and a few no repeats. And that's with reviews. As biased as the policy made them, I've been able to read between the lines and have not had a bad experience with an SDAG girl with good reviews. Too many good times with SDAG to give up on them, scheduling and service has been solid for me. The calendar is looking a little light right now though. I'm verified with most of the above so we'll see how things go.
I'm just going to play devils advocate here and say that I can see where they are coming from. I 've seen many sdag girls and have had great experiences with some that had a terrible review and and terrible experiences from some that had great reviews. Everyone clicks differently and if you leave a bad review, the girls rep is ruined and they have to leave and find a new name. Most reviews don't differentiate between 'didn't click' and 'service was terrible' and sometimes its hard to categorize the experience either way. With all that said, sdag has been bitching and whining about bad reviews for a long time and hey made a big mistake by making this threat. You can't control what anonymous people post online so they just have to get over it. FEC and others dont behave that way.
[QUOTE=BillyIsTheOne;6629284]I'm just going to play devils advocate here and say that I can see where they are coming from. I 've seen many sdag girls and have had great experiences with some that had a terrible review and and terrible experiences from some that had great reviews. Everyone clicks differently and if you leave a bad review, the girls rep is ruined and they have to leave and find a new name. Most reviews don't differentiate between 'didn't click' and 'service was terrible' and sometimes its hard to categorize the experience either way. With all that said, sdag has been bitching and whining about bad reviews for a long time and hey made a big mistake by making this threat. You can't control what anonymous people post online so they just have to get over it. FEC and others dont behave that way.[/QUOTE]How 'about nobody behaves this way? And here's the ironic part: They equate a '7' with negative reviews that "kill business. " When in actuality, a '7' on TER literally means "Hot time. ".
To put things in perspective, Dami (TER: 367565) is the 4th most popular girl in SJ -AKA the largest kgirl market in the US- with an average of 7. 95 for Looks and 7. 96 for Performance. And to further drive home my point, it looks like all SDAG girls have been removed from TER. Well, except for Cuban Ginger who has -wait for it- 7. 82 for looks.
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6628544]
But some of you are also ignorant to believe that photos and stats in ads need to be real. This is rarely ever the case with Asian establishments, and the SW industry as a whole. Of course they are going to be older than they say. Of course they aren't going to look like the super model fake picture they pick off of Instagram. It's called upselling, Marketing 101.[/QUOTE]That's not ignorance, that's simply just an unrealistic expectation. No one here is naive enough to believe that the photos are accurate, they simply wish the photos were representative.
To accept that we're not being given the real deal, they agencies have to bear the burden of dealing with negative reviews. It goes both ways, if the product is shitty, the customers won't buy. But if the customers don't buy, the agencies don't bring more girls.
But here's the thing, LA is a MUCH harsher market, but all the girls are okay with that because it has significantly more volume. That's it. It doesn't matter what kind of reviews they get, they want volume. They'd be okay with people shitting on the girls if they had the volume that the girls in LA get.
[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6630223]That's not ignorance, that's simply just an unrealistic expectation. No one here is naive enough to believe that the photos are accurate, they simply wish the photos were representative.
To accept that we're not being given the real deal, they agencies have to bear the burden of dealing with negative reviews. It goes both ways, if the product is shitty, the customers won't buy. But if the customers don't buy, the agencies don't bring more girls.
But here's the thing, LA is a MUCH harsher market, but all the girls are okay with that because it has significantly more volume. That's it. It doesn't matter what kind of reviews they get, they want volume. They'd be okay with people shitting on the girls if they had the volume that the girls in LA get.[/QUOTE]That explains why certain agencies that handles both west and east coast has the attitude of: "doesn't care about bad reviews, its better than the girls leaving". Thanks man.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6476613]Hear me now, believe me later: Do Not see her. I've posted about her too many times to count, covering the LA KBB thread and the SJ one, including her real pic.[/QUOTE]I should have taken heed to this post.
I decided to see her recently since there were reviews of her being slender or slim on TER. Mimi is definitely petite, but slender or slim is not the correct way to describe her body build.
It was only until I got back to my car did I realize Mimi is a rebrand from SDAG earlier this year. I can not remember her SDAG name. She has a medium length tattoo on the side of her left thigh. Her personality can be a bit annoying with a lot of baby-talking. The only thing that shines is that she DFKs like no other and her CIM is great. Otherwise not much else.
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6631269]I should have taken heed to this post.
I decided to see her recently since there were reviews of her being slender or slim on TER. Mimi is definitely petite, but slender or slim is not the correct way to describe her body build.
It was only until I got back to my car did I realize Mimi is a rebrand from SDAG earlier this year. I can not remember her SDAG name. She has a medium length tattoo on the side of her left thigh. Her personality can be a bit annoying with a lot of baby-talking. The only thing that shines is that she DFKs like no other and her CIM is great. Otherwise not much else.[/QUOTE]Interesting. If you wouldn't describe her as slim or slender what would she be? She for sure isn't fat. My experience with her was pretty much the same as BigCoomer's.
[QUOTE=BigCoomer;6615311]I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.
Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.
BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.
She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.
She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.[/QUOTE]I went to SstuntCock's post of her real pic and that is definitely not the Mimi I saw. I've attached the pic below as a reference. The girl in the pic looks to have large bolt-ons and a tatoo on her stomach. The current Mimi at SAG has small A's with the tattoo on the left side of her leg as you mentioned.
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6631269]I should have taken heed to this post.
I decided to see her recently since there were reviews of her being slender or slim on TER. Mimi is definitely petite, but slender or slim is not the correct way to describe her body build.
It was only until I got back to my car did I realize Mimi is a rebrand from SDAG earlier this year. I can not remember her SDAG name. She has a medium length tattoo on the side of her left thigh. Her personality can be a bit annoying with a lot of baby-talking. The only thing that shines is that she DFKs like no other and her CIM is great. Otherwise not much else.[/QUOTE]Truth be told, they are two different Mimi's. The one I referenced (and you quoted) is an absolute wildebeest, as seen in her REAL pic below, mixed in with the various levels of P.S. Pics that were used to advertise her. Be lucky you dodged that bullet. I made my therapist filthy fkn rich with the countless hours of therapy we put into healing from that trauma.
The one currently at LG is different; and yes she has that medium length script-tattoo going down her thigh. And yes she's fkn annoying. As far as her "baby-talking" goes, she needs to shut tf up. Super annoying. Kept asking me if I was "OK. " Super awkward. Insisted on showering, even tho I pre-showered and don't smell like gawd damn goat curry. Asked me to cum outside. Booo! Decent suction BBBJ but she didn't go deep enough to pop her throat. CIM finish but sadly no swallow. Seemed like she preferred to stick to her own routine including an excessively lengthy cat bath. (Eye roll). Your money is better spent on well-reviewed all-in girls in WLA. Just make sure to stop by Costa Mesa to see Gisella. Next!
[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6627665]
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
[/QUOTE]Agreed. All the fun is gone when you have to withdraw. Reminds me of the high school days. Better to deposit than withdraw, my bank also likes that.
[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6627665]It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=AllCock;6631474]Agreed. All the fun is gone when you have to withdraw. Reminds me of the high school days. Better to deposit than withdraw, my bank also likes that.[/QUOTE]I would encourage telling us the girls name / agency when this happens. We can take our notes and information of this sort, no matter how small, helps everyone on this board.