Printable View
Anyone know if the latina in Allston got busted? She advertised prostate massages (but more was available if you asked). Slightly chubby and very busty girl. Her number ends in 4384. Haven't heard from her in a while so I figure she got busted but some confirmation would be nice. She was great and seemed to be fairly new / amateurish.
CL-CE is such a pain in the ass but sometimes it worth it to find these "amateurish" gems.
BROOKLINE, Mass. —Brookline police conducting an ongoing investigation of prostitution on Craigslist arrested four men this week, including one man who allegedly brought Viagra to a date with what he thought was a juvenile.
Xxxxxx xxxxxx, 39, of Natick, was arrested Sunday and charged with enticing a child, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of a Class E drug, Viagra, Wicked Local reported.
Xxxxxx answered a Craigslist ad posted by undercover detectives titled Shoulder to cry on, that read, "all the advise I've gotten has been bad. All. School or not to stay in school? Yes that is my simple question.".
Following a number of email exchanges, xxxxxx reportedly gave an officer his cellphone number.
According to the police report, the officer asked xxxxxx a number of questions, including whether he had a problem with the poster's age, what he wanted to do and if he was nervous about "hanging out.".
The two arranged to meet, at which time Hughes was arrested.
Inside his truck, police found multiple baggies of pot and three Viagra pills.
Police also arrested xxxxx xxxxx, 26, of Billerica, Thursday and charged him with sexual conduct for a fee, after xxxxx allegedly responded to a Craigslist ad police placed titled "Trying this –w4 m- 19 Boston.".
Xxxxx and an officer had an email exchange, followed by a phone conversation in which xxxxx told her "it normally costs $180 but not to worry about the money and that they could work something out," according to the police report.
Police redacted what "normally costs $180" in the report.
Police reportedly found drug paraphernalia in xxxxx' vehicle, but no drugs.
Two other men were arrested after undercover officers responded to Craigslist ads they allegedly posted. Xxxxx xxxxxxx, 50, of Billerica, and xxxxxxxx xxxx, 22, of Boston, were each arrested Thursday and charged with sexual conduct for a fee. Xxxxx was additionally charged with possession of a Class see drug Xanax with intent to distribute. Xxxxx was charged with possession of a Class be drug and huffing.
Xxxxx allegedly posted an ad under the Casual Encounters section titled "very cute guy for trade. Redacted -- m4 w (north of boston)." Posted with the ad was a photo of an erect penis, and an alleged description of the poster, who claimed to be attractive and well-endowed.
Xxxxxs alleged ad was redacted from the police report, but police describe the ad as referring to the drug Molly and seeking a woman. He showed up to the agreed-upon meeting place in an Uber cab and was arrested.
[QUOTE=JimMack;2012608]BROOKLINE, Mass. —Brookline police conducting an ongoing investigation of prostitution on Craigslist arrested four men this week, including one man who allegedly brought Viagra to a date with what he thought was a juvenile.
Xxxxxx xxxxxx, 39, of Natick, was arrested Sunday and charged with enticing a child, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of a Class E drug, Viagra, Wicked Local reported.
Xxxxxx answered a Craigslist ad posted by undercover detectives titled Shoulder to cry on, that read, "all the advise I've gotten has been bad. All. School or not to stay in school? Yes that is my simple question.".
Following a number of email exchanges, xxxxxx reportedly gave an officer his cellphone number.
According to the police report, the officer asked xxxxxx a number of questions, including whether he had a problem with the poster's age, what he wanted to do and if he was nervous about "hanging out.".
The two arranged to meet, at which time Hughes was arrested.
Inside his truck, police found multiple baggies of pot and three Viagra pills.
Police also arrested xxxxx xxxxx, 26, of Billerica, Thursday and charged him with sexual conduct for a fee, after xxxxx allegedly responded to a Craigslist ad police placed titled "Trying this –w4 m- 19 Boston.".
Xxxxx and an officer had an email exchange, followed by a phone conversation in which xxxxx told her "it normally costs $180 but not to worry about the money and that they could work something out," according to the police report.
Police redacted what "normally costs $180" in the report.
Police reportedly found drug paraphernalia in xxxxx' vehicle, but no drugs.
Two other men were arrested after undercover officers responded to Craigslist ads they allegedly posted. Xxxxx xxxxxxx, 50, of Billerica, and xxxxxxxx xxxx, 22, of Boston, were each arrested Thursday and charged with sexual conduct for a fee. Xxxxx was additionally charged with possession of a Class see drug Xanax with intent to distribute. Xxxxx was charged with possession of a Class be drug and huffing.
Xxxxx allegedly posted an ad under the Casual Encounters section titled "very cute guy for trade. Redacted -- m4 w (north of boston)." Posted with the ad was a photo of an erect penis, and an alleged description of the poster, who claimed to be attractive and well-endowed.
Xxxxxs alleged ad was redacted from the police report, but police describe the ad as referring to the drug Molly and seeking a woman. He showed up to the agreed-upon meeting place in an Uber cab and was arrested.[/QUOTE]That sucks for these individuals, but most of them aren't the brightest bulbs on the planet. Anything with drug slang, cops pick up on and they are merely enforcing the drug laws. Any ad that says bring party favors for a f-fest obviously is uncle LEO. Drug's are illegal. I would say craigs, unless reviewed here is a no go, and even if reviewed here you never know. Uncle LEO has ways of arresting a legit provider and using that person's phone #. With the drug slang now they have probable cause from the advertisement listing, so they can search the vehicle or individual. Ultimately what craigs should do is eliminate the personals section all together. It's either fat, disgusting women, cops, or spam.
I see an ad pop up on CL from time to time that is in Peabody, 38 years old and usually says something about lolipops or popsicles. I think I know who this is name begins with an L. She used to advertise a lot more but went UTR recently, just want to know if anyone has seen her lately to xetermine if things are still safe with her. Usually advertises to suck your lolipop etc.
She sent me a response with a pic that I have seen a few times in another add on CL. Tried to find the add for you but it's not up now. Pic is a girl in worn jeans and shirt under a tree in warm weather. No smile and very average looks at best. Don't recall any more.
[QUOTE=Spambox138;2014913]I see an ad pop up on CL from time to time that is in Peabody, 38 years old and usually says something about lolipops or popsicles. I think I know who this is name begins with an L. She used to advertise a lot more but went UTR recently, just want to know if anyone has seen her lately to xetermine if things are still safe with her. Usually advertises to suck your lolipop etc.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MongerExpert;2012718]Ultimately what craigs should do is eliminate the personals section all together. It's either fat, disgusting women, cops, or spam.[/QUOTE]I have met a handful of very attractive girls from CLCE, but they are definitely a rarity. Because of their flagging system, you simply need to be very lucky, or keep checking it all day, every day. The attractive legit girls get flagged very quickly, in under 10 minutes usually. Other girls flag them to remove competition, and pimps flag them to remove competition. Even other guys who have already contacted them also flag them to remove competition in hopes of a better negotiating position on rates.
It's really a horrible site, and not set up well. But most people, especially girls just starting out, only know about CL and BP. BP requires a credit card, so most go to CL. Guys generally don't tell them about other options, because they don't want the competition, and are afraid they'll raise their rates if they find out what others are getting.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
[QUOTE=HoHunter328;2015702]I have met a handful of very attractive girls from CLCE, but they are definitely a rarity. Because of their flagging system, you simply need to be very lucky, or keep checking it all day, every day. The attractive legit girls get flagged very quickly, in under 10 minutes usually. Other girls flag them to remove competition, and pimps flag them to remove competition. Even other guys who have already contacted them also flag them to remove competition in hopes of a better negotiating position on rates.
It's really a horrible site, and not set up well. But most people, especially girls just starting out, only know about CL and BP. BP requires a credit card, so most go to CL. Guys generally don't tell them about other options, because they don't want the competition, and are afraid they'll raise their rates if they find out what others are getting.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.[/QUOTE]I've done ok there myself. Met 3 UTR young chicks there the past few months. All between 20 and 25 needing rent money. Met another just looking to get laid, but that certainly is truly rare if they aren't BBW pigs. Had one that would let me do everything outside of anal for 60 bucks. And she was 5'2 120 and cute 22 why / o. Not into drugs, either. Made a regular thing out of that one. Lucked out there until she found out she could make a lot more. Another one got heavy into drugs and I dropped that one.
I may respond to an ad once or twice a week as 95% of it is truly shit. You have to know what to look for I guess.
There is one on there recently that posts and she says she is selling her underwear. I don't give a crap about that, but am curious if that is her way of getting around the possible problems with LEO answering an ad for 'flowers'. I suppose there are actual dudes that pay for women's dirty / worn underwear? LOL Whatever.
Dh1610 is referring to Bri aka Brianna, who has posted all over, while Spambox is asking about another woman (Lisa?) Who never posts her pic and is out of Peabody. Bri is full service and posts on BP and CL. She has profile and reviews on the oThER place. Bri's ads on CL often includes "petite and discreet". Not sure, but don't think I have ever run across the Peabody lolipop / popsicle lover posting on BP, only on CL.
I think that Brianna is 5'1" while the other lady is taller, perhaps 5'4" or more.
Bri's ad on BP:
[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/lets-get-this-weekend-started-call-or-text-me-at-781-558-7353-39/22834199[/URL]
Pics:
[QUOTE=Dh1610;2015591]She sent me a response with a pic that I have seen a few times in another add on CL. Tried to find the add for you but it's not up now. Pic is a girl in worn jeans and shirt under a tree in warm weather. No smile and very average looks at best. Don't recall any more.
"Quote Originally Posted by Spambox138
I see an ad pop up on CL from time to time that is in Peabody, 38 years old and usually says something about lolipops or popsicles. I think I know who this is name begins with an L. She used to advertise a lot more but went UTR recently, just want to know if anyone has seen her lately to xetermine if things are still safe with her. Usually advertises to suck your lolipop etc."
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2015725]Dh1610 is referring to Bri aka Brianna, who has posted all over, while Spambox is asking about another woman (Lisa?) Who never posts her pic and is out of Peabody. Bri is full service and posts on BP and CL. She has profile and reviews on the oThER place. Bri's ads on CL often includes "petite and discreet". Not sure, but don't think I have ever run across the Peabody lolipop / popsicle lover posting on BP, only on CL.
I think that Brianna is 5'1" while the other lady is taller, perhaps 5'4" or more.
Bri's ad on BP:
[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/lets-get-this-weekend-started-call-or-text-me-at-781-558-7353-39/22834199[/URL]
Pics:[/QUOTE]I've known Brianna for a very long time... Like 15 years... Nice girl, but she is showing her age. She has a younger sister who used to work as well, but I hear she's out of the game now. Her sister is 4'10,90 lbs, and really cute.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2015725]Dh1610 is referring to Bri aka Brianna, who has posted all over, while Spambox is asking about another woman (Lisa?) Who never posts her pic and is out of Peabody. Bri is full service and posts on BP and CL. She has profile and reviews on the oThER place. Bri's ads on CL often includes "petite and discreet". Not sure, but don't think I have ever run across the Peabody lolipop / popsicle lover posting on BP, only on CL.
I think that Brianna is 5'1" while the other lady is taller, perhaps 5'4" or more.
Bri's ad on BP:
[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/lets-get-this-weekend-started-call-or-text-me-at-781-558-7353-39/22834199[/URL]
Pics:[/QUOTE]Yes, you got it. I was asking about a different woman. The woman I am asking about advertises as 38 BBW with "incredible oral skills" out of Peabody. She's been reviewed but I was more asking if anyone has seen her recently. Still curious if anyone has.
[QUOTE=MongerExpert;2012718]Ultimately what craigs should do is eliminate the personals section all together. It's either fat, disgusting women, cops, or spam.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HoHunter328;2015702]I have met a handful of very attractive girls from CLCE, but they are definitely a rarity.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Werm2011;2015713]I've done ok there myself. Met 3 UTR young chicks there the past few months. All between 20 and 25 needing rent money.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't disagree with anyone's comments & assessment of CLCE or any of the other sources used to help find women, including each other.
There is a definite lag time between when a ad is posted & when it gets released to the board on CLCE, just look at when an ad is posted as compared to the time you spent on CLCE, (Posted: 2 hrs ago hell I been here for 3 hrs WTF how did that get by me!) It don't make sense & I try like hell to click on prohibited for the posts that are spam.
I have no idea who on CLCE uses what criteria to determine what gets flagged from the get go & what is let though to be posted on the board, or why obvious spam gets through & is posted. Makes one wonder WTF craigslist is up to.
But whatever your cup of tea & sources are, it will always require your time & effort, be it Tagged, POF, AFF, Swingers clubs, Gangbanging, SWers, MPs, EROS, TER, BP, CLCE, or any other venue & souce.
Then again every once in awhile you just get lucky & stumblebum into a girl like this, each time was better than the last (she's gone dark now) & last time I was with her I was sucking down a brew as she's smacking my dick against her face with the biggest shit eatin grin you ever did see & I'm thinking to myself life is soooo damn good!
Have fun stay safe.
[QUOTE=Spambox138;2016714]Yes, you got it. I was asking about a different woman. The woman I am asking about advertises as 38 BBW with "incredible oral skills" out of Peabody. She's been reviewed but I was more asking if anyone has seen her recently. Still curious if anyone has.[/QUOTE]Unfortunately I saw Lisa, though happily not recently, another one I'm trying to get the image out of my head, some were very happy with her oral skills but I was not one of them, she can't suck or fuck, was suppose to toss my salad but she backed out on that, I would never repeat.
I've been emailing a gal from Peabody, that I suspect is Lisa, says her name is Cindy with her details & ad listed below, she sent a picture & it isn't the Lisa that I saw but I wouldn't put it passed her to use a fake picture.
I'd go & TOFTT except I haven't faired well going to the north shore area & it's a long haul to get disappointed.
Anyone know if Cindy & Lisa are one in the same?
Age: 37 body: curvy eye color: Hazel / green hair: Blonde height: 5'7" (170 cm) status: single.
What's your poison? Could it be my sweet smell? Let's work out some detail $ and have you over right now!! I'll be waiting!! No jokes or games please, this is the real deal so you be too! So if your not $erious about setting up something please don't reply, thanks.
Probably should've posted this on backpage, but I contacted her through CLCE, though I no longer have the posted ad of her's.
However there are plenty of BP ads.
[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/badd-petite-barbie-100-roses-specials-19/25485191[/URL]
[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/badd-petite-barbie-100-roses-specials-19/25543681[/URL]
[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/badd-petite-barbie-100-roses-specials-19/25478478[/URL]
[URL]http://www.myproviderguide.com/escorts/worcester/free-posts/w4m/5673604_badd-petite-b-a-r-b-i-e-roses-.html[/URL]
[URL]http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/boston/120-366-1722/10/173524/ff[/URL]
Been texting with her off & on & schedules just never seem to work, or she is too far away when timing does work, she travels here there & every where it seems.
Says she lives with her parents Lynn area, but can travel.
Lots of post just can't find a review, may have to TOFTT on this one.
Anyone have any intel on her skills & talents?
I have communicated with Cindy, and have been tempted. However, based on photo not sure if she is compatible with what I like. She is convenient to me. Her posts and emails are entirely different writing style than Lisa. Also, Cindy is very cautious. I think that she has a couple of kids.
I met Lisa when she was in Lowell st. Area, but backed out when I saw her. Lisa's posts and emails were very direct and the same. They may be around the same ages and in the Peabody area, but Lisa is not 5'7". Plus, she has never sent a face pic to my knowledge.
[QUOTE=Skatar018;2018392]Unfortunately I saw Lisa, though happily not recently, another one I'm trying to get the image out of my head, some were very happy with her oral skills but I was not one of them, she can't suck or fuck, was suppose to toss my salad but she backed out on that, I would never repeat.
I've been emailing a gal from Peabody, that I suspect is Lisa, says her name is Cindy with her details & ad listed below, she sent a picture & it isn't the Lisa that I saw but I wouldn't put it passed her to use a fake picture.
I'd go & TOFTT except I haven't faired well going to the north shore area & it's a long haul to get disappointed.
Anyone know if Cindy & Lisa are one in the same?
Age: 37 body: curvy eye color: Hazel / green hair: Blonde height: 5'7" (170 cm) status: single.
What's your poison? Could it be my sweet smell? Let's work out some detail $ and have you over right now!! I'll be waiting!! No jokes or games please, this is the real deal so you be too! So if your not $erious about setting up something please don't reply, thanks.[/QUOTE]
Skatar and Kilmer: That's what I'm talking about! Very nice.
I did get a hit a few nights ago, and after texting back and forth she sent me her pic and number. I don't think she quite matches up to what I was hoping for, so I'll leave her to you guys. She's PlymCo area. Pic is below. Have at it!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]304947[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=Werm2011;2021125]Skatar and Kilmer: That's what I'm talking about! Very nice.
I did get a hit a few nights ago, and after texting back and forth she sent me her pic and number. I don't think she quite matches up to what I was hoping for, so I'll leave her to you guys. She's PlymCo area. Pic is below. Have at it!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]304947[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]her you fuck her, or you can just go [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssC77hapv0g[/URL].
[QUOTE=Skatar018;2023100]her you fuck her, or you can just go [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssC77hapv0g[/URL].[/QUOTE]See if I share any more hot leads with you guys any more.
Surprisingly, I did not get one request for her number? My box must be full? I'll clear it out and if anyone has a hot young UTR to trade... :D
Anyone else go see the MILF on the South Shore off Rt44. Interesting set up with hubby there to greet you but she has beautiful face and really nice body. My guess is that she is Mid-40's. Massage done in the living room on a blow up bed / mattress. I am not sure if they are staying UTR or not so I won't blow them up out here. Hubby says she is available for GB's and parties too. Strange situation.
Saw this ad on CLCE the other day. Does anyone have any information about this one?
Chocolate Naughty massage. W4 m - 24 (Plymouth).
Age: 24.
Hello, beautiful chocolate skinned girl offering satisfying, relaxing partially naughty massages. I am available to travel to you or can host in Plymouth tomorrow. Talk to you soon. Not offering sex or oral sex.
[QUOTE=Natebost;2023329]Anyone else go see the MILF on the South Shore off Rt44. Interesting set up with hubby there to greet you but she has beautiful face and really nice body. My guess is that she is Mid-40's. Massage done in the living room on a blow up bed / mattress. I am not sure if they are staying UTR or not so I won't blow them up out here. Hubby says she is available for GB's and parties too. Strange situation.[/QUOTE]You have any details on this MILF?
Got two hits there where the girls send me a pic holding a papper with my name written on it! Then they go on to ask.
Me to get verified threw some siite. Is this a scam. They say once I join I can get all there info there. If it is a scam. How do they get my name on that paper in the pic?
[QUOTE=Catnibbler;2034579]Got two hits there where the girls send me a pic holding a papper with my name written on it! Then they go on to ask.
Me to get verified threw some siite. Is this a scam. They say once I join I can get all there info there. If it is a scam. How do they get my name on that paper in the pic?[/QUOTE]Basically anything you see on CL that says you need to sign up for a site and get info there is a scam.
As for how? With computers. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. ( [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws[/URL]).
We emailed a couple of times, and set up a tentative appointment.
She never responded with location or number to contact her.
Too bad, because not many options on the South Shore.
[QUOTE=Eligrn101;2028644]Saw this ad on CLCE the other day. Does anyone have any information about this one?
Chocolate Naughty massage. W4 m - 24 (Plymouth).
Age: 24.
Hello, beautiful chocolate skinned girl offering satisfying, relaxing partially naughty massages. I am available to travel to you or can host in Plymouth tomorrow. Talk to you soon. Not offering sex or oral sex.[/QUOTE]
Hard to find REAL postings on CL nowadays, too much spam.
[QUOTE=RagingBull;2036873]Hard to find REAL postings on CL nowadays, too much spam.[/QUOTE]If you're looking on CE 99.9% is spam. I have had no luck finding a real person or one that wasn't Uncle and Aunt LEO advertising.
Lots of scammers and ripoff scams. Watch the ones that advertise using a cheap motel if you think they are real they aren't!
How about the girls that give phone number! Do you think the are LEO? I have meet one anyways. She was a dirty girl, quick BJ and I was out.
I would always recommend to anyone to trust their instincts and intuitions.
However, I have to take you to task about LE on CL, particularly posting ads. I trust that you have never confirmed that you answered an ad posted by police, since that would indicate that you were arrested.
Please indicate why you think that LE is posting on CL-CE. To suggest that I am skeptical of your statement, is a very large understatement. I am interested in your "proof".
The Police departments don't have the time or inclination to bother with CL-CE when BP-Escorts is staring them in the face and street prostitution is ever present in some city areas.
I would agree that CL-CE is mostly scammers & time wasters, but LE / Police, that is totally far-fetched IMVHO. I have never, ever got a whiff of LE/Police in my experience on CL-CE.
[QUOTE=SpermSac;2036910]If you're looking on CE 99.9% is spam. I have had no luck finding a real person or one that wasn't Uncle and Aunt LEO advertising.
Lots of scammers and ripoff scams. Watch the ones that advertise using a cheap motel if you think they are real they aren't![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2037800]I would always recommend to anyone to trust their instincts and intuitions.
However, I have to take you to task about LE on CL, particularly posting ads. I trust that you have never confirmed that you answered an ad posted by police, since that would indicate that you were arrested.
Please indicate why you think that LE is posting on CL-CE. To suggest that I am skeptical of your statement, is a very large understatement. I am interested in your "proof".
The Police departments don't have the time or inclination to bother with CL-CE when BP-Escorts is staring them in the face and street prostitution is ever present in some city areas.
I would agree that CL-CE is mostly scammers & time wasters, but LE / Police, that is totally far-fetched IMVHO. I have never, ever got a whiff of LE/Police in my experience on CL-CE.[/QUOTE]You really should invest a little time reading some of the news articles on the various stings and busts LEO has conducted. The one common thing they mention in their news releases is the advertsiement on specific online sites in which BP and CL have been mentioned.
A case in Burlington they actually reported using an officer to take calls from clients to book sessions and as they arrived were arrested.
[URL]http://www.wickedlocal.com/x1783718338/Seven-johns-charged-in-Burlington-reverse-prostitution-sting[/URL]
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=521708914517549&id=337402239614885[/URL]
"Worcester Police Vice Squad conducted a prostitution / john sting by posting an ad on the internet along with deploying male and female officers posing as decoys".
What did they report? Posting an ad on the internet? OMG tell me they can't use my tax dollar that way! They do.
Another similar case in Rockland where a female officer answered calls.
Danvers case: [URL]http://www.salemnews.com/local/x1690072606/Online-ads-selling-sex-sting-shows[/URL].
Since it is their intention to expose clients / johns more than get a conviction you really think they don't have the resources to do a reverse sting? Or that they wouldn't do their own advertising to do a sting?
[URL]http://www.golocalworcester.com/news/worcester-task-force-targets-citys-prostitution/[/URL]
[URL]http://braintree.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/braintree-man-among-14-wouldbe-johns-nabbed-in-online-sting[/URL]
Read my friend and believe what you desire and think it isn't so. Cities and towns do have access to state resources, Homeland Security, FBI, DEA, ATF and various other task force agencies to do the job.
While the primary focus might be on drug related activity don't be fooled that they don't have the capability and ability to gather info on someone.
You really think they couldn't create their own ad to gather info? Or that LEO wouldn't lie to get the John's exposure? You really think that LEO can't use the powers of a court order to gain info from any online site or phone?
Proof? Contact any of the ones that were arrested if you know any and ask questions. You can learn.
I have yet to hear or read any confirmation that any provider has assisted LEO in any stings so how would one conduct a reverse sting?
How would one get a "whiff" of LEO activity?
If they want you, they got you.
Be SAFE.
Be AWARE.
The Burlington and Woburn police have set up stings in hotels from time to time. It has been implied that they posted on CL. I can't prove it but either way I agree that although far and few between there are real girls behind some adds on CL CE postings. As was noted recently the posting often but not always are flagged and removed quickly by competing girls or pimps most likely.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2037800]I would always recommend to anyone to trust their instincts and intuitions.
However, I have to take you to task about LE on CL, particularly posting ads. I trust that you have never confirmed that you answered an ad posted by police, since that would indicate that you were arrested.
Please indicate why you think that LE is posting on CL-CE. To suggest that I am skeptical of your statement, is a very large understatement. I am interested in your "proof".
The Police departments don't have the time or inclination to bother with CL-CE when BP-Escorts is staring them in the face and street prostitution is ever present in some city areas.
I would agree that CL-CE is mostly scammers & time wasters, but LE / Police, that is totally far-fetched IMVHO. I have never, ever got a whiff of LE/Police in my experience on CL-CE.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SpermSac;2037861]You really should invest a little time reading some of the news articles on the various stings and busts LEO has conducted. The one common thing they mention in their news releases is the advertsiement on specific online sites in which BP and CL have been mentioned.
A case in Burlington they actually reported using an officer to take calls from clients to book sessions and as they arrived were arrested.
[URL]http://www.wickedlocal.com/x1783718338/Seven-johns-charged-in-Burlington-reverse-prostitution-sting[/URL]
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=521708914517549&id=337402239614885[/URL]
"Worcester Police Vice Squad conducted a prostitution / john sting by posting an ad on the internet along with deploying male and female officers posing as decoys".
What did they report? Posting an ad on the internet? OMG tell me they can't use my tax dollar that way! They do.
Another similar case in Rockland where a female officer answered calls.
Danvers case: [URL]http://www.salemnews.com/local/x1690072606/Online-ads-selling-sex-sting-shows[/URL].
Since it is their intention to expose clients / johns more than get a conviction you really think they don't have the resources to do a reverse sting? Or that they wouldn't do their own advertising to do a sting?
[URL]http://www.golocalworcester.com/news/worcester-task-force-targets-citys-prostitution/[/URL]
[URL]http://braintree.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/braintree-man-among-14-wouldbe-johns-nabbed-in-online-sting[/URL]
Read my friend and believe what you desire and think it isn't so. Cities and towns do have access to state resources, Homeland Security, FBI, DEA, ATF and various other task force agencies to do the job.
While the primary focus might be on drug related activity don't be fooled that they don't have the capability and ability to gather info on someone.
You really think they couldn't create their own ad to gather info? Or that LEO wouldn't lie to get the John's exposure? You really think that LEO can't use the powers of a court order to gain info from any online site or phone?
Proof? Contact any of the ones that were arrested if you know any and ask questions. You can learn.
I have yet to hear or read any confirmation that any provider has assisted LEO in any stings so how would one conduct a reverse sting?
How would one get a "whiff" of LEO activity?
If they want you, they got you.
Be SAFE.
Be AWARE.[/QUOTE]You are 100% correct and not just at the local level, its done at the state and federal level as well. Be safe, do your homework.
[QUOTE=Ccup2;2037868]You are 100% correct and not just at the local level, its done at the state and federal level as well. Be safe, do your homework.[/QUOTE]I wonder whatever happens to those one shot ads that we respond to with a text or even a voice message that we never hear back from? You know the type HOT bodies, big tits, young looks. Do they fall into the deep black hole or the information bank of some black operation?
I was told by an escort that if LEO uses a picture they have to provide the ID # of the officer on the picture. Any one know if that is fact? Or do they lie?
I took a few minuet out form a busy work day last week to visit the masseuse in Mansfield. She is set up in a discreet quiet and clean apartment complex on a side road. I was greeted by a young attractive Asian girl and her boyfriend after entering the buildings foyer. After the greetings, I was taken into their apartment where I discussed my muscle soreness and what I would like worked on with the Masseuse. After a short discussion, her boyfriend left us alone to get to work.
The massage was great, she know her business working out a number sore areas on my body. She used enough oil to get the job done, I did not go home sliding around in my close.
For a small little thing, she had powerful hands and fingers to work out the knots. She also showed me was the tricks to keep yourself loose.
Massage lasted over 1 hour and there was no extra charge.
I paid .6 plus tip.
And YES I will repeat.
[QUOTE=SpermSac;2037875]I wonder whatever happens to those one shot ads that we respond to with a text or even a voice message that we never hear back from? You know the type HOT bodies, big tits, young looks. Do they fall into the deep black hole or the information bank of some black operation?
I was told by an escort that if LEO uses a picture they have to provide the ID # of the officer on the picture. Any one know if that is fact? Or do they lie?[/QUOTE]Escorts know nothing about the law in most cases. Half these girls think cops 'can't lie' and they can't be arrested as long as they put 'You cannot contact me if you're in Law Enforcement or it is entrapment' in their ads.
[url]http://www.snopes.com/risque/hookers/cop.asp[/url]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2037800]I would always recommend to anyone to trust their instincts and intuitions.
However, I have to take you to task about LE on CL, particularly posting ads. I trust that you have never confirmed that you answered an ad posted by police, since that would indicate that you were arrested.
Please indicate why you think that LE is posting on CL-CE. To suggest that I am skeptical of your statement, is a very large understatement. I am interested in your "proof".
The Police departments don't have the time or inclination to bother with CL-CE when BP-Escorts is staring them in the face and street prostitution is ever present in some city areas.
I would agree that CL-CE is mostly scammers & time wasters, but LE / Police, that is totally far-fetched IMVHO. I have never, ever got a whiff of LE/Police in my experience on CL-CE.[/QUOTE]There is no doubt that LEO posts ads on CLCE. Maybe the link has been posted, but only a few weeks ago it was admitted to by LEO. They posted ads looking to trade sex for drugs. It's done all the time. There was discussion here about it.
[QUOTE=Werm2011;2038063]Escorts know nothing about the law in most cases. Half these girls think cops 'can't lie' and they can't be arrested as long as they put 'You cannot contact me if you're in Law Enforcement or it is entrapment' in their ads.
[url]http://www.snopes.com/risque/hookers/cop.asp[/url][/QUOTE]Werm.
I'm glad you posted that link as all providers should read it. Can a cop lie? Oh yes they can! And they do to get the job done.
One reason I think we should be more protective of those resources we depend on.
The idea that LE can't lie is ridiculous, that would mean an undercover officer has to tell a drugdealer with a gun to his head "yes, I'm a cop". The rules are the same, regardless of the crime being investigated. I do just have to laugh when calling an ad and she asks if I'm affiliated with the law.
And as far as LE posting ads, that's just the modern version of an undercover decoy streetwalker.
[QUOTE=SpermSac;2038081]Werm.
I'm glad you posted that link as all providers should read it. Can a cop lie? Oh yes they can! And they do to get the job done.
One reason I think we should be more protective of those resources we depend on.[/QUOTE]
I have seen the reports and read the published reports that you cited. None of the reports stated that LE is posting ads on CL-CE. The internet is not just CL-CE. Your post was specific to CL.
Yes, certain specific police forces, such as Burlington & Woburn, have reverse stings by posting ads on BP-Escorts or perhaps other locations, but you posted that you knew that a certain ad on CL-CE was LE. It simply was not true.
If you do have personal knowledge of a LE reverse sting on CL-CE, fine. I don't believe that you do. I am just calling "bullshit" relative to your specific post, my friend.
[QUOTE=SpermSac;2037861]You really should invest a little time reading some of the news articles on the various stings and busts LEO has conducted. The one common thing they mention in their news releases is the advertsiement on specific online sites in which BP and CL have been mentioned.
A case in Burlington they actually reported using an officer to take calls from clients to book sessions and as they arrived were arrested.
[URL]http://www.wickedlocal.com/x1783718338/Seven-johns-charged-in-Burlington-reverse-prostitution-sting[/URL]
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=521708914517549&id=337402239614885[/URL]
"Worcester Police Vice Squad conducted a prostitution / john sting by posting an ad on the internet along with deploying male and female officers posing as decoys".
What did they report? Posting an ad on the internet? OMG tell me they can't use my tax dollar that way! They do.
Another similar case in Rockland where a female officer answered calls.
Danvers case: [URL]http://www.salemnews.com/local/x1690072606/Online-ads-selling-sex-sting-shows[/URL].
Since it is their intention to expose clients / johns more than get a conviction you really think they don't have the resources to do a reverse sting? Or that they wouldn't do their own advertising to do a sting?
[URL]http://www.golocalworcester.com/news/worcester-task-force-targets-citys-prostitution/[/URL]
[URL]http://braintree.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/braintree-man-among-14-wouldbe-johns-nabbed-in-online-sting[/URL]
Read my friend and believe what you desire and think it isn't so. Cities and towns do have access to state resources, Homeland Security, FBI, DEA, ATF and various other task force agencies to do the job.
While the primary focus might be on drug related activity don't be fooled that they don't have the capability and ability to gather info on someone.
You really think they couldn't create their own ad to gather info? Or that LEO wouldn't lie to get the John's exposure? You really think that LEO can't use the powers of a court order to gain info from any online site or phone?
Proof? Contact any of the ones that were arrested if you know any and ask questions. You can learn.
I have yet to hear or read any confirmation that any provider has assisted LEO in any stings so how would one conduct a reverse sting?
How would one get a "whiff" of LEO activity?
If they want you, they got you.
Be SAFE.
Be AWARE.[/QUOTE]
Real, LE, or Fake? I don't doubt that she is real, though may be an upseller or scammer.
[URL]http://boston.craigslist.org/nos/cas/4382178836.html[/URL]
Tall beautiful blonde Russian looking for a good time. W4 m - 23 (peabody).
Posted: 2014-03-19 12:00 pm.
I have blue 7 blue eyes I'm tall with an ama8 zing body I have d1 one modeli4 ng in the pa7st I have very long bl9 onde hair thirtyfour see toungue ring a=f6 ull lips and9 I'm very fun... I love to please makin1 g you ha9 ppy makes me happy, lets fulfil one of your wildest fantasys (: I'm in my apartmemt bored and horny.
(23, thin body, height - 5'8", 34C, tongue ring).
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2038138]I have seen the reports and read the published reports that you cited. None of the reports stated that LE is posting ads on CL-CE. The internet is not just CL-CE. Your post was specific to CL.
Yes, certain specific police forces, such as Burlington & Woburn, have reverse stings by posting ads on BP-Escorts or perhaps other locations, but you posted that you knew that a certain ad on CL-CE was LE. It simply was not true.
If you do have personal knowledge of a LE reverse sting on CL-CE, fine. I don't believe that you do. I am just calling "bullshit" relative to your specific post, my friend.[/QUOTE]I find it interestnig that you agree that ads can be potentially posted to BP but not CL CE. I guess there is an exemption?
If ads didn't have a way of disappearing you would have your proof.
Call it whatever you wish and believe what you want. Paranoia? Not hardly. Tomorrows news? NOPE!
If you are convinced that no posting on CL is ever Uncle LEO then why don't you pursue them all. I hope your identity isn't revealed some day in a mug shot.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;2038138]I have seen the reports and read the published reports that you cited. None of the reports stated that LE is posting ads on CL-CE. The internet is not just CL-CE. Your post was specific to CL.
Yes, certain specific police forces, such as Burlington & Woburn, have reverse stings by posting ads on BP-Escorts or perhaps other locations, but you posted that you knew that a certain ad on CL-CE was LE. It simply was not true.
If you do have personal knowledge of a LE reverse sting on CL-CE, fine. I don't believe that you do. I am just calling "bullshit" relative to your specific post, my friend.[/QUOTE]