The volgarity continues Lakers02
[QUOTE=Lakers02]Saw Lily again tonight (Thursday) @ TA starting at 8:20 pm.
Process of the visit
Paid old gook lady $50
Waited in the room with the door closed for 30 seconds before Lily comes in
Lily greets me warmly, undresses me, exits, and returns with some towels
Lily gives me a great massage, licking almost every inch of skin from my back down to my calves
Licks my asshole for at least 3 minutes. I've never liked this but tonight it felt exceptionally good
Turned me over and repeated the process, tried to tongue kiss me but I turned my head away. I do not want to taste my own ass.
BBBJ, tried to finger my ass but I reacted avoidantly when I felt her sharp nail poke my anal tissue.
Hopped on reverse CG
Told me to stand up and put it in her ass, which I did, to completion. Didn't mean to finish in her ass...I wanted to pull out and shoot all over her plastic face but I wouldn't have made it once I got to the orgasmic "point of no return".
She talked about some stuff while she wiped me down, most of which I couldn't understand. I can't believe what I'll settle for when I'm horny..this ***** is ugly.
10/10 service[/QUOTE]
Lakers, I got a question for which many of us are very interested in your answer. You go back to see Lilly, who I admit gives exceptional service, and others think so too, but you constantly say she is ungly. Now I know that I have been the biggest advocate on this board for service over looks when it comes to these ladies, but I would never in my life screw girl that I thought was ugly. As I said, even with 10/10 service as you put it, I would not even take a freebie from a girl I found "ugly." I would maybe go with an LA 7.5 at worst if the girl f'ed me good.
Now, with that said, you actually pay to screw a girl you think is ungly?
Again, I think 90% of the dudes on here, including the ones waiting 2 hours to see her, would agree that Lilly is by no means "ungly." Maybe not as good looking as some of the other selections at TA, which I have commented in the past, but not ugly. I bet she is better than the civian ladies that you can get. I take it that might be the real issue here.
Lilly, in my book, is a hot looking mature provider.
Your "gook" comment says it all. Obviously, you don't like asian people, which I take it includes the asian ladies. Again I ask, why pay for something you don't like?
-Shark-
Chanel has dropped below the radar
If you send me a PM I'll help you locate her.
She has asked to stay off this board for the time being.
Re: Chanel in Santa Monica (different Chanel)
Has anyone seen Chanel in Santa Monica?
(Oriental Shiatsu)
Pretty good service.
We have exhausted the STD debate 2 years ago
[QUOTE=B Malibu]Are you speaking of the "late" Shadow from Le Sun?
Quick question: Does anybody truly believe that any of these woman are disease free? Just curious?[/QUOTE]
Malibu,
If you look in the archives, you can see long stings of debate back and forth on the topic of STDs, and these girls. I am not saying that it is an invalid subject for these forms, but the discussion at that time was wholely useless, and even turned to guys accusing some individual girls of giving them diseases, only to be caught in lies because they were not even working at the time they supposedly caught the STD from them.
There continues to be warnings on discussion boards, such as craigs list, puportedly informing of girls who know they have HIV, and continue to offer BBFS despite that. The warnings are not varified, and there is know way to trust the information either way. Needless to say, however you feel about the issue, the girl's means of support is affected, if not totally gone.
I think the senior memebers and frequent contributers resolved that rather than tarnishing a girl's reputation, we should varify that somebody actually did catch a disease from a girl, and then we can post a warning that can be verified by one or two other members of the board.
Yes, on a topic NOT related to STDs, I was referring to the late Shadow. Talk about one of my, and other's, ATFs. May she rest in peace, and be in heaven for all the joy she brought to us.
-Shark-
Okay, we appreciate the reminder
[QUOTE=B Malibu]Shark,
I wasn't trying to pass any sort of moral judgement on anyone. I was just curious what other's thought. I was unaware of the previous discussion(s) on this topic as I was not a member two years ago. WSG is my prme posting ground.
I've seen the phony posts on CL and other sites claiming that certain providers are STD'ed up, but like you said, you can't believe everything you read.
I've been at the game a long time and have had my share of BB services (never anal). Nowadays though, my life means much more to me and although people can make all the excuses they want about transmission risks and such...any provider who will pop your member in her arse uncovered (Tammy) w/o even making an attempt to put on a rubber, has to be suicidal.
I realize you guys have all gone over this, but pretending like a provider is not infected is just plain stupid! I say this because I used to use that same rationale for years. I still struggle at times not wanting to wear a rubber. However, the older I get, the more I realize I want to live. The healthier I am, the more chicks I can bang.
I'm usually a day-by-day thinker, but when it comes to your health, preventative maintenance is the best defense. Have fun and be safe![/QUOTE]
I was not critisizing you Malibu. Even those who BB anal Tammy/Lilly and Chanel/coco in the ass know what you are saying, and either have that don't care attitude that you yourself used to have, or understand the risks and take them anyway.
Your comments are well taken, but so repetitious in the media, and well debated on this forum and others, that I just would rather we reminde ourselves of this, and end it there. I am sure there will be others who will respond to our posts, and recreate the same debate that we had in the archives. So I am sure my efforts to prevent it are self-defeating.
Now that we are reminded, let's get back to banging hot chicks.
-Shark-
Sex probe targets Inglewood officers
[url]http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-me-inglewood10feb10,1,3184001.story?ctrack=1&cset=true[/url]
The department is looking into allegations of massage parlor visits.
By Ashley Surdin and Greg Krikorian, Times Staff Writers
February 10, 2007
At least six current or former Inglewood police officers are under investigation for allegedly having sex with female employees of massage parlors and other adult businesses that have been the target of a high-profile law enforcement crackdown.
The internal affairs investigation by the Inglewood Police Department began after federal authorities launched an investigation of money laundering and prostitution involving women smuggled into Los Angeles from Asia.
That probe, which resulted in charges against more than two dozen people, led to allegations that Inglewood officers engaged in the sexual liaisons — sometimes in uniform — during work hours and off duty, according to several local and federal sources familiar with the case.
Evidence seized by federal agents and local investigators included "very detailed ledgers" that suggested Inglewood officers were receiving sexual favors at the businesses without paying, according to one source close to the investigation.
The ledgers, the source said, had the names of customers and the amounts they paid except when the customers were police officers. In those cases the women allegedly entered a symbol.
Word of the inquiry comes less than two months after the FBI confirmed that it was investigating two Inglewood police officers in the alleged rape of a woman they stopped on suspicion of prostitution. The woman's attorney said this week that he has filed a claim against the city and is awaiting an answer from authorities on whether the two officers have been arrested or charged.
Though he and other city officials would not disclose details about the new inquiry, Inglewood Councilman Ralph L. Franklin said it was aimed at determining whether the alleged sexual misconduct involved a large number of officers over an extended period of time. He said the FBI was assisting police in the investigation.
Franklin also said the department was trying to determine if any ranking officers in the department were involved in collusion with the officers suspected of misconduct.
Numerous law enforcement officials and city leaders said the Inglewood Police Department's internal affairs unit will ultimately recommend whether any officers should face criminal charges.
To date, sources say, none of the officers has been fired, though some have retired or left the city for other departments.
The internal affairs investigation began more than a year ago when several Inglewood massage parlors and tanning salons were the focus of federal allegations of money laundering and prostitution. To date, 18 people have pleaded guilty in that investigation, and four others — including the alleged owner of the brothels, Kimberly Mao — are awaiting trial.
Mao has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and has repeatedly denied involvement in prostitution or money laundering.
But last week, in a group interview organized by Mao, a dozen women who worked for her at the businesses told The Times that they had seen or heard of officers coming into the massage parlors and sometimes demanding sexual services.
The women, who denied they were prostitutes, recalled several specific incidents, including one in which officers donned masks to hide their identities and pointed guns at employees. Another employee told The Times that an older officer exposed himself in an unsuccessful effort to have her engage in sex with him.
Sources familiar with the misconduct allegations said that federal authorities, including the U.S. attorney's office and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, began hearing about the alleged involvement of police officers last year.
But Assistant U.S. Atty. Carmen Luege, who is prosecuting Mao and her co-defendants, said she was not aware of any federal probe of the Inglewood officers.
Customs agency spokeswoman Virginia Kice declined to comment other than to say that if the agency uncovered evidence of misconduct or criminal activity by other law enforcement officers, it would refer the matter to the appropriate law enforcement agency for investigation. Given the nature of the allegations, that agency would probably be the FBI. An FBI spokeswoman said she could not confirm nor deny that an expanded investigation was underway.
Inglewood Mayor Roosevelt Dorn would not address specific questions about the investigation other than to say no officers have been fired and that he was confident the department would do a thorough job investigating the alleged misconduct.
"They are on top of it and doing their due diligence," Dorn said. "They are doing what you would expect our police force to do. You have to be very careful when you're doing this type of investigation. You don't want to ruin anyone's career or create problems with families without having actual proof and proof that would stand up in a court of law."
Inglewood interim Police Chief J. I. Davis, who took over the department after the investigation was underway, would only say that his agency was actively pursuing a "difficult and sensitive" inquiry.
nglewood, a working-class city of 112,000, has long struggled with prostitution problems. Because of its proximity to Los Angeles International Airport, Inglewood has numerous hotels lining its main commercial streets.
The investigation comes as the department, the seventh-largest police agency in the county, struggles to fill two dozen vacancies in its 213-officer force.
At a town hall meeting Thursday night, police commanders said they were doing everything possible to fill the positions, and many citizens applauded the efforts to increase the size of the force.
During the meeting, police officials said a top priority has been to combat prostitution in the city by dramatically reducing the number of massage parlors that could serve as fronts for sexual encounters. Since 2004, the department's efforts have cut the number of massage parlors from 23 to seven, a police official told the town hall meeting. There was no mention of the internal investigation.
Since that investigation began, Inglewood police as well as the FBI have begun a separate inquiry into the alleged rape of a Florida woman who was stopped by two patrol officers on suspicion of prostitution.
In that incident, which is also under investigation by the Los Angeles County district attorney's office, a 23-year-old woman alleged that the officers confronted her on Century Boulevard on a Sunday night as she left her hotel to have dinner at a fast-food restaurant. The thoroughfare has pockets that have long been known for prostitution.
The woman, who has said she was in town with her boyfriend to visit her mother for the holidays, alleged that the officers accused her of being a prostitute and demanded that she take them back to her hotel to prove she was not a streetwalker.
At the hotel, according to her attorney, the night manager verified that the woman was from Florida and a registered guest at the hotel. But one officer insisted that she take him to her room while the other officer waited by the patrol car, attorney Dylan Pollard said.
It was there, the woman has said, that she was raped.
[email]ashley.surdin@latimes.com[/email]
[email]greg.krikorian@latimes.com[/email]
Times staff writers Andrew Blankstein and Stuart Silverstein contributed to this report.
Sex probe targets Inglewood officers
"The internal affairs investigation by the Inglewood Police Department began after federal authorities launched an investigation of money laundering and prostitution involving women smuggled into Los Angeles from Asia."
I wish it was easier to find previous post of My and Others allegations of this very same topic. I high fived myself this morning when I read it, Many of us called it years ago.
Funny thing is when we started observing LE activity we assumed it was local cops trying to bust mongers, not Fed's trying to bust people.
When LE went through the place and cleared it out, many thought they were lucky to get off with a warning, but in reality they were just getting rid of the customers to get a piece of ass for themselves in private.
Wow glad to see our tax dollars bought all that pussy.
This story just lends credibility to the allegations we made that the s/w's get fucked then dumped outside the city by the cops.
It was mentioned on Prime Time News
[QUOTE=Asain_Ucker]Sign me up too Shark, sounds like my kind of job,lol.[/QUOTE]Like it is really news. MMS and several providers told me that the cops are paid off in Ingelwood, for at least the time until the Feds step in did their INS/ICE party on Black Thursday a year and 1/2 ago. Just like the movie, the Feds are untouchable. But local 5-0 is a different story. I just did not know that payment to them sometimes comes in favors. NICE! I am in the wrong line of work.
I work with a lady who is married to a cop who could retire today with 95% of his salary. She wonders why he does not retire. Now I know why.
I am curious and I will ask Tammy/Lilly and Chanel/Coco if they ever did a cop for free. I guess that is their way of TOFTT if they are forced to do a cop as a freebie.
-Shark-
