Printable View
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6610732]If only we could meet the gal below for real LOL.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/a12486/?hl=en[/URL][/QUOTE]Good catch B. It's both funny and sad to click on a IG link like hers, only to find out that I'm already following them.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6607560]Neither is particularly honest but the lolly booker is more pleasant to deal with.[/QUOTE]Can agree with this. Will post about experience with Maria, who I think is still available.
I have seen Stella twice and highly recommend her. She's really sexy and gives good service. Her pics are fairly accurate. Not the usual kgirl experience (she's actually Latina) but she aims to please. I often go to Hong Kong in TJ and she's your typical 8 or 9 in my book. I'd like her to do well in SD. Pay her a visit and treat her kindly before she leaves.
Lolly Pop.
This booker seems easier to deal with that the others. First time see this type of provider. Usually do AMPs. Arrived at address and parked where they said spots would be available. Got the info to enter place and headed to room. Maria opened door in nice set of lingerie. She slightly resembles the pics. Under 5 ft and less than 100 lbs for sure. She had mm Cs and a little tummy. She had a decent ass for her size. Round and firm. Asked her for bathroom to pee. While there she helped me do a mouth rinse and wash hands. Her English was ok, at times needed an app to translate for each other. Got undressed and left donation for her. She started with kissing all over and a HJ. Than a sloppy wet BBBJ. We moved into 69 and I decided to dine in. She then hopped on for RCW and CW then finished in mish. She let me CIM and slurped every last bit up. Came back with a warm towel for clean up. We laid together for a bit used a translator. Massaged each other and went another round. Cleaned up with a shower and got dressed. Good experience. Pricing was a bit more than AMP rates but I think well worth it. I don't think Maria is still in town though.
[QUOTE=Magnum44;6613240]I have seen Stella twice and highly recommend her. She's really sexy and gives good service. Her pics are fairly accurate. Not the usual kgirl experience (she's actually Latina) but she aims to please. I often go to Hong Kong in TJ and she's your typical 8 or 9 in my book. I'd like her to do well in SD. Pay her a visit and treat her kindly before she leaves.[/QUOTE]Some of you have pm'd me and I am sorry I didn't post the link to her ad. She is on HX [URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/13031.[/URL] She leaves the 28th.
[QUOTE=Magnum44;6613556]Some of you have pm'd me and I am sorry I didn't post the link to her ad. She is on HX [URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/13031.[/URL] She leaves the 28th.[/QUOTE]That classified has expired. Can you please post the link to her homepage, as that link will not expire. Thank you.
[QUOTE=Gbrand;6613878]That classified has expired. Can you please post the link to her homepage, as that link will not expire. Thank you.[/QUOTE]The listing is on the Wowclub profile or find her on the SDAG website.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/wowclub[/URL]
[URL]https://sdasiangirls.com[/URL]
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6609539]What's all this racket about Niko being no cip? Can someone vouch and report that's pure nonsense and that she's hurtin for a squirtin?[/QUOTE]Confirmed, it's a no. She is open to mutual ass play. Heads up for the heavy hitters out there, she's not that deep and I tried hard to find better angles to no avail. Other than those two items, she's cute and has no problem sucking for extended periods.
Then there's Rachel. God damn she was good. Like Kiko energetic. It takes a bit of effort for me to hit 2 in an hour and she wasn't taking no for an a answer. She is a definite repeat.
Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6614389]Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.[/QUOTE]Maybe it's the lack of McDonalds in Korea? LOL. I'm not worried, they are still HYA ladies.
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6614389]Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.[/QUOTE]Malnourished North Koreans.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6610732]If only we could meet the gal below for real LOL.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/a12486/?hl=en[/URL][/QUOTE]The Thai agencies like SweetCandies sometimes use real photos, for better or worse. Hit and miss but there's at least that.
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6614389]Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.[/QUOTE]Are you talking recently and from personal experience, because having gone for 9 years the vast majority were not.
[URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]How brazen of SDAG to advertise that on their website. SMH. Good thing SD has FEC and LG to turn to.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]Cancel Culture / Censorship, meets the San Diego AAMP scene; what a wonderful business model for your customer's. 1 which instills trust / honesty / satisfaction. Whether you're happy, or not. AYFKE!?
Copied & Pasted from your link, SDPP:
"ASK THE EXPERT.
We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.
Some ladies you are going to love.
Some ladies you are going to like.
Some ladies are just ok
Some ladies you aren't going to match with.
Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.
* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.
If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.
Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.
We will do our best to figure out who you are.
Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.
8 or higher.
If you don't then tell the assistant. "
SDAG, is the Private Delights, of the San Diego AAMP business market.
I'm just so very grateful, 1 for never having paid for an HX membership (3 years in quarantine), and secondly, for not being approved by SDAG. The stringent approval methods, have easily saved me $5-10 k over the past few years, which I've happily spent elsewhere. This self-serving AAMP isn't the only game in town. & if they keep this type of censorship BS up (along with their ridiculously higher prices). They'll eventually learn a very hard lesson in business 101, trickle down Economics.
FWIW: I've been doing just fine, having so much hot fun with some fucking amazing hot talent at so MANY of the awesome places, here in Disneyland AMP Central (SD County), USA!
[QUOTE=Yogurt2020;6614389]Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.[/QUOTE]I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.
Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.
BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.
She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.
She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]A while back another member had alerted me of being careful what I post for this exact reason. Its a bit unfortunate, but I guess it kind of makes sense with how review based this hobby is. Its just like restaurants with Yelp. A restaurant's business is definitely make or break based on reviews, and yelp runs a racket based on that. We luckily have the free speech and have no fear of removal / fake metrics, so it makes sense that the bookers themselves would probably purge who they feel is disadvantageous to their business.
Not sure what the right solution is, but I suppose its just the unfortunate reality. I'm usually willing to TOFTT with girls with little to no reviews, but have definitely been burned before by that, so I understand the reluctance from other mongers to see a girl with little / no reviews.
[QUOTE=FreeWally;6614538]The Thai agencies like SweetCandies sometimes use real photos, for better or worse. Hit and miss but there's at least that.[/QUOTE]Back in the day it was close to the same service, but now it is not even the same sport. Thai girls in SD offer terrible service meanwhile SDAG has some super stars. Worth every penny to me. They crush the FS massage spas, and as sad as it may be the popular FS spots in Kearny Mesa and UFS are better than the Thai agencies.
But nowhere close to the K groups. K groups are much safer too.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]This doesn't seem like it would work. It would likely just destroy business for their girls who have little to no reviews? Either people will just assume anyone not rated an 8 or better is a 1, and that anyone without reviews becomes an even bigger risk to TOFTT.
I agree with everybody it is a pretty stupid statement from SDAG regarding their review policy, but isn't that the very purpose of this forum to be able to provide reviews without giving a score? Scores are so hard to interpret since its subjective, but actual written reviews / reports on forums give so much more light on what kind of look & service a girl provides.
Scoring on TER is never really a good indicator. A girl I thought was average at best in looks would sometimes get a mid 8's on TER, which is pretty good for k-orgs. For example, I thought SDAG Dallas, though exotic and unique, was not exceptionally pretty. But TER has her at 8. 3, which is on the higher end of k-org looks. And same could be said other way around.
[QUOTE=Magnum44;6613240]I have seen Stella twice and highly recommend her. She's really sexy and gives good service. Her pics are fairly accurate. Not the usual kgirl experience (she's actually Latina) but she aims to please. I often go to Hong Kong in TJ and she's your typical 8 or 9 in my book. I'd like her to do well in SD. Pay her a visit and treat her kindly before she leaves.[/QUOTE]Saw Stella today and I wholeheartedly agree with Magnum's review. My experience with Kitten was a letdown, so this renewed my experience. Will be seeing her when she returns. Highly recommend seeing her before she leaves on Thursday!
[QUOTE=Magnum44;6613240]I have seen Stella twice and highly recommend her. She's really sexy and gives good service. Her pics are fairly accurate. Not the usual kgirl experience (she's actually Latina) but she aims to please. I often go to Hong Kong in TJ and she's your typical 8 or 9 in my book. I'd like her to do well in SD. Pay her a visit and treat her kindly before she leaves.[/QUOTE]Just saw her today and she's a 9 in my book in looks, GND type of girl and body which is banging. She speaks fluent English and her mains are a turn on. See while you can, she leaves on the 29th which I most likely will.
[QUOTE=TacoManVa;6615555]Back in the day it was close to the same service, but now it is not even the same sport. Thai girls in SD offer terrible service meanwhile SDAG has some super stars. Worth every penny to me. They crush the FS massage spas, and as sad as it may be the popular FS spots in Kearny Mesa and UFS are better than the Thai agencies.
But nowhere close to the K groups. K groups are much safer too.[/QUOTE]100% agree with this. I miss the Thai agencies of old.
Unfortunate. I read on the OC boards a while back that she previously did CIP.
[QUOTE=BigCoomer;6615311]I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.
Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.
BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.
She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.
She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.[/QUOTE]
I'm visiting east bay near San Ramon next week and I was hoping for any agency recommendations similar to sdag.
Thank you.
[QUOTE=MCHammerHang;6615923]Saw Stella today and I wholeheartedly agree with Magnum's review. My experience with Kitten was a letdown, so this renewed my experience. Will be seeing her when she returns. Highly recommend seeing her before she leaves on Thursday![/QUOTE]I also had the opportunity to see Stella this week and she is a sweetheart. Super pretty all natural type of girl. She's got a sexy devilish smile and her lips feel great when kissing.
I think I can say I've tried all the Latinas that have come through SDAG in the last year. I still have Cuban Ginger and Betty as my top best experience and service. I'd probably have Max at the bottom. And between Stella and Kitten it's a tough one for me. I had an amazing experience with Kitten. When it comes to looks and body I think Kitten has them beat. For service and experience I can see why some might be let down especially since she don't offer bare and BBJ was so so. Low key I got to fuck her bare. But that was only because when she was first advertised she had the (O). She was taken by surprised when I gave her the tip for bare and said she didn't do that. I was surprised too but said no worries b / c she was hot AF and because of that I would still enjoy it covered. But after she rode me for a little bit covered she said fuck it and said she'd let me in raw but only because she was really attracted to me. Felt so good to hit it without the cover. Probably the hottest chick I've ever got to fuck raw!
[QUOTE=BigCoomer;6615321]A while back another member had alerted me of being careful what I post for this exact reason. Its a bit unfortunate, but I guess it kind of makes sense with how review based this hobby is. Its just like restaurants with Yelp. A restaurant's business is definitely make or break based on reviews, and yelp runs a racket based on that. We luckily have the free speech and have no fear of removal / fake metrics, so it makes sense that the bookers themselves would probably purge who they feel is disadvantageous to their business.
Not sure what the right solution is, but I suppose its just the unfortunate reality. I'm usually willing to TOFTT with girls with little to no reviews, but have definitely been burned before by that, so I understand the reluctance from other mongers to see a girl with little / no reviews.[/QUOTE]Oh boo hoo their biz depends on the reviews. Well duh. They're gaining tons of biz from positive reviews too. Funny how they want to use reviews to only benefit them, but if they are detrimental they can't take it.
Guess what, freedom of expression your biz. Mongers have a right to evaluate a product publicly with bookers / girls taking a bad review like they can take a dick.
Imagine if instead of removing expired product from shelves, a store would implement a policy that you can't shop there anymore if you point out the said expired product.
This is a scumbag technique and it's not new for this shop. They included it in their introductory email back when they were called differently and for their OC branch too.
I'm visiting east bay and was hoping for an agency similar to sdag.
[QUOTE=SuchaDilf;6616761]I'm visiting east bay and was hoping for an agency similar to sdag.[/QUOTE]Without traffic it should take you around 45 minutes to get to north San Jose from San Ramon. That's the closest and best place for Kgirls in the bay area.
There's an aggregation site which tries to keep up with Korean agencies in the US.
Rentry. Co / Kgirls.
She may not tour SD like so many other missed opportunties. Worth the drive IMO at 320 bb + 40 msog in thru LG; CG has her at 340 all in. If you like that pic, she's your girl. Take my review below with a grain of salt, as that was over a year ago. And it's well documented that her headgame has improved since then.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6040339]First and last pics of her in the black lingerie with cat ears are good photos of her. She literally wore that outfit and heels. If you like her face there, then you'd like her irl. 34 C natty rack with some droop; you definitely hold a pencil underneath. Average fitness. Decent butt. If she toned her core she'd be a killer. Likes to use her tongue in her headgame. Can't DT but will try if it pleases you.
Enjoys daty and 69. I slurped up her juices and spit it back on her pussy which she enjoyed. Had to take the main event slow as she's tight. No blocking, but she did initially control my depth in mish with her hand on my thigh. Not ideal, but who doesn't enjoy DFKing a hot kgirl while they whimper and squeal as their pussy acclimates to being stretched out?
Once I opened her up, it was open season on her snatch. Do be mindful of wearing her out too quickly. I put her in K9, and her pussy progressively pointed to the sky, while her face lowered down on the bed. That sight alone is one for the spank bank. I mounted her in this bulldog k9 variation and jackhammered away mercilessly at her cervix. She's a pleaser so she never put up a fuss, but you could tell she was beat. I dismounted and had her suck off my freshly-glazed glizzy. The look on her face, staring down at my cock, trying to catch her breath and make sense of what happened. Simply priceless.
Having her mount me for a cg finish made it apparent she was nearing the end of her rope, despite the fact I was her first appointment. Either she lost interest in me, she was in physical pain, or some tragic combination of the two. Fortunately for both of us, she dug deep to withstand my final salacious salvo, and joined me in a mutual release.[/QUOTE]
Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6617393]She may not tour SD like so many other missed opportunties. Worth the drive IMO at 320 bb + 40 msog in thru LG; CG has her at 340 all in. If you like that pic, she's your girl. Take my review below with a grain of salt, as that was over a year ago. And it's well documented that her headgame has improved since then.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6617728]Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?[/QUOTE]Their HX is 'Candygirls,' but it's not active. Still, you can find their phone number on their profile page. With that, it's easy to find their website.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6617728]Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?[/QUOTE]They can be found in multiple areas:
[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/KStarGirls[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/IndyAzn[/URL] #orange_county.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/FarEastCuties[/URL] #san_diego.
Thank you gents.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Candygirls[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Kpussycat[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/[/URL]
The 20 bucks saving through CG could help cover in part the cost of gas in getting there and back LOL.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;6618143]They can be found in multiple areas:
[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/KStarGirls[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/IndyAzn[/URL] #orange_county.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/FarEastCuties[/URL] #san_diego.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6617793]Their HX is 'Candygirls,' but it's not active. Still, you can find their phone number on their profile page. With that, it's easy to find their website.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]
Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.
Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]Pro Tip: Get great service? Bang that review out while it's fresh in your mind and be king for a day next time you see her.
Get crappy service? Got a beef? Use a different screen name than you gave her. Wait a few days so if she's stiffed a few more folks, and the smoking gun isn't pointing back to you. It's called plausible deniability. If it's really bad, wait longer. But make the report. Reviews make this forum useful.
[QUOTE=Nick4;6618681]Pro Tip: Get great service? Bang that review out while it's fresh in your mind and be king for a day next time you see her.
Get crappy service? Got a beef? Use a different screen name than you gave her. Wait a few days so if she's stiffed a few more folks, and the smoking gun isn't pointing back to you. It's called plausible deniability. If it's really bad, wait longer. But make the report. Reviews make this forum useful.[/QUOTE]You're just attempting to circumvent the problem. The problem being that the booker / owner threatens and retaliates against honest negative reviews, which should be a customers right anywhere online no matter what he buys. He places $ and pr above customers.
And waiting a few days "so she stiffed a few more folks" is simply allowing your fellow mongers to get fucked too, and not in the bad way. Literally making her money. If a negative review is posted the very first day, it's a big deal because it will save many people $.
Waiting, using generic language in reviews using multiple aliases. This is just hiding from their threat. Why is there a threat at all? Let customers say what they're honest about without fear of being expelled from the org.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;6618830]You're just attempting to circumvent the problem. The problem being that the booker / owner threatens and retaliates against honest negative reviews, which should be a customers right anywhere online no matter what he buys. He places $ and pr above customers.
And waiting a few days "so she stiffed a few more folks" is simply allowing your fellow mongers to get fucked too, and not in the bad way. Literally making her money. If a negative review is posted the very first day, it's a big deal because it will save many people $.
Waiting, using generic language in reviews using multiple aliases. This is just hiding from their threat. Why is there a threat at all? Let customers say what they're honest about without fear of being expelled from the org.[/QUOTE]A k-org proverb to share:
A ocean without wind is calm and beautiful, with high wind brings turbulent watah.
Don't be the wind in a bookers ocean.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;6616660]Oh boo hoo their biz depends on the reviews. Well duh. They're gaining tons of biz from positive reviews too. Funny how they want to use reviews to only benefit them, but if they are detrimental they can't take it.
Guess what, freedom of expression your biz. Mongers have a right to evaluate a product publicly with bookers / girls taking a bad review like they can take a dick.
Imagine if instead of removing expired product from shelves, a store would implement a policy that you can't shop there anymore if you point out the said expired product.
This is a scumbag technique and it's not new for this shop. They included it in their introductory email back when they were called differently and for their OC branch too.[/QUOTE]Sorry just to clarify, not defending them doing this as it's definitely an affront to letting mongers discuss and I'm not cool with that. I guess it was just more of a comment about how this behavior is emergent from the review environment itself. I agree it sucks but I stick to the rules since I don't really want to be blacklisted LOL.
[QUOTE=BigCoomer;6619394]Sorry just to clarify, not defending them doing this as it's definitely an affront to letting mongers discuss and I'm not cool with that. I guess it was just more of a comment about how this behavior is emergent from the review environment itself. I agree it sucks but I stick to the rules since I don't really want to be blacklisted LOL.[/QUOTE]Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.