The Prickyard

[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;3411867]Disgruntled just factual and I know this because I experienced it. Since she wants to make good with Rusty, why don't you ask her if you can see her for free a couple of times and then buy me a beer and give me the money she stole? I bet that won't work will it, LOL.[/QUOTE]Above as you know are our previous discussions. As you suu in mine I simply asked a question and you replied with what I thought was a fair answer. I originally questioned you because your statements was different than my experience with her and I would expect you to do the same if you were looking out for this board as you say you do. As far as me making it personal. Well in the past I asked you in a pm about a provider and you gave me what I still believe to be true but then I contacted you again telling you we had a mutual acquaintance and proceeded to tell you about her and you replied short and in my opinion rude (basically telling me what I knew was wrong when I knew and still know it to be true) I blew that off thinking ok he's having a bad day. Then you come off this time telling me to go ask for some freebies. Which to me sounded like once again you were insulting me. So I responded with what I've been told. NOWHERE did I say I knew for a fact you took freebies. In order for me to know that I would have to be in the same room and that would just be odd. But coming from 3 separate providers is a little odd. 2 of them have since retired. Disappeared stays with uncle LEO. I don't know. Now if I took your comment about asking for a freebie wrong and it was actually meant as a joke well I apologize. More than one provider has praised you. More than one has complaints about you, amor than one hasn't mentioned you when I ask about their reviews before seeing them. And I'm sure the same can be said about me.

How do they all go through their money? Not my business. Not your business. Yes they all go through a lot most with nothing to show for it. Hell I went through over $700 today but I have stuff to show for most of it. I can say hotels aren't cheap. Even cheap hotels aren't cheap. They also have to eat, usually carryout. The ones who choose to eat. And yes some (a lot) buy substance. One provider used to pay me $40 per run I would take her to.

I will reiterate do I believe what these girls tell me. Mostly no. I knew there were 2 sides to her story and THAT is why I asked about your original comment. At one point you said kat was a keeper, then through time that changed. So yes I wanted to know before I made repeat visits if yours was a bash or truth. You have a lot of posts. Some are spot on. Some like this one contradicts others experiences and should be questioned so we know what we might be getting into unless others have the same experience. And that goes for anyone's reviews. I could have posted several reviews of Leslie that were positive while everyone else was being robbed, but I didn't because that would have 1 made me look like a liar or 2 made it look like I was setting people up. Either way had I posted them I would have expected to be questioned. Instead I just told her she was causing herself issues and would end up hurt possibly dead. Which BTW what you guys did was fucking great. Also I've never known her Leslie to do anal but then again I've never asked. Why go through the back door when the front works just fine.

Are we all addicts in one way or the other? Maybe. When I turned 21 I started bartending and decided then that I wanted to fuck as many women in my life as I could.

Last note for now please forgive me for my spelling and punctuation.

[QUOTE=IndianaMan;3415042]Above as you know are our previous discussions. As you suu in mine I simply asked a question and you replied with what I thought was a fair answer. I originally questioned you because your statements was different than my experience with her and I would expect you to do the same if you were looking out for this board as you say you do. As far as me making it personal. Well in the past I asked you in a pm about a provider and you gave me what I still believe to be true but then I contacted you again telling you we had a mutual acquaintance and proceeded to tell you about her and you replied short and in my opinion rude (basically telling me what I knew was wrong when I knew and still know it to be true) I blew that off thinking ok he's having a bad day. Then you come off this time telling me to go ask for some freebies. Which to me sounded like once again you were insulting me. So I responded with what I've been told. NOWHERE did I say I knew for a fact you took freebies. In order for me to know that I would have to be in the same room and that would just be odd. But coming from 3 separate providers is a little odd. 2 of them have since retired. Disappeared stays with uncle LEO. I don't know. Now if I took your comment about asking for a freebie wrong and it was actually meant as a joke well I apologize. More than one provider has praised you. More than one has complaints about you, amor than one hasn't mentioned you when I ask about their reviews before seeing them. And I'm sure the same can be said about me.

How do they all go through their money? Not my business. Not your business. Yes they all go through a lot most with nothing to show for it. Hell I went through over $700 today but I have stuff to show for most of it. I can say hotels aren't cheap. Even cheap hotels aren't cheap. They also have to eat, usually carryout. The ones who choose to eat. And yes some (a lot) buy substance. One provider used to pay me $40 per run I would take her to.

I will reiterate do I believe what these girls tell me. Mostly no. I knew there were 2 sides to her story and THAT is why I asked about your original comment. At one point you said kat was a keeper, then through time that changed. So yes I wanted to know before I made repeat visits if yours was a bash or truth. You have a lot of posts. Some are spot on. Some like this one contradicts others experiences and should be questioned so we know what we might be getting into unless others have the same experience. And that goes for anyone's reviews. I could have posted several reviews of Leslie that were positive while everyone else was being robbed, but I didn't because that would have 1 made me look like a liar or 2 made it look like I was setting people up. Either way had I posted them I would have expected to be questioned. Instead I just told her she was causing herself issues and would end up hurt possibly dead. Which BTW what you guys did was fucking great. Also I've never known her Leslie to do anal but then again I've never asked. Why go through the back door when the front works just fine.

Are we all addicts in one way or the other? Maybe. When I turned 21 I started bartending and decided then that I wanted to fuck as many women in my life as I could.

Last note for now please forgive me for my spelling and punctuation.[/QUOTE]I just want to insert one thing:

YMMV.

Even with the most consistent provider, YMMV. There are so many factors that affect a session, it's not going to always be the same. If the provider has substance issues, it's more unlikely your session will match someone else's.

Which makes reviews difficult. Reviews are even more complicated when you add in monger personalities. Some guys only notice the worst, some only the best. That's why you should stick with the facts.

Perhaps it's just in your wording, but it appears you knew Leslie was robbing people, before action was taken to change her ways. You might want to explain that, because there are probably a few mongers who don't appreciate being robbed when someone could have warned them.

[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3415154]I just want to insert one thing:

YMMV.

Even with the most consistent provider, YMMV. There are so many factors that affect a session, it's not going to always be the same. If the provider has substance issues, it's more unlikely your session will match someone else's.

Which makes reviews difficult. Reviews are even more complicated when you add in monger personalities. Some guys only notice the worst, some only the best. That's why you should stick with the facts.

Perhaps it's just in your wording, but it appears you knew Leslie was robbing people, before action was taken to change her ways. You might want to explain that, because there are probably a few mongers who don't appreciate being robbed when someone could have warned them.[/QUOTE]Everyone who reads these forums was warned. I'm didn't spell it out so a 4 year old could understand, but rip off reports were being posted on Leslie while he was seeing her without issue, everyone should "take the gloves off".

[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3415154]I just want to insert one thing:

YMMV.

Even with the most consistent provider, YMMV. There are so many factors that affect a session, it's not going to always be the same. If the provider has substance issues, it's more unlikely your session will match someone else's.

Which makes reviews difficult. Reviews are even more complicated when you add in monger personalities. Some guys only notice the worst, some only the best. That's why you should stick with the facts.

Perhaps it's just in your wording, but it appears you knew Leslie was robbing people, before action was taken to change her ways. You might want to explain that, because there are probably a few mongers who don't appreciate being robbed when someone could have warned them.[/QUOTE]No I found out through here. When I read it I called her out on it. Yes I worded it wrong. I took her to a few of her outcalls and nothing at that time appeared like she was robbing people. Thank you for pointing that out.

[QUOTE=IndianaMan;3415042]I originally questioned you because your statements was different than my experience with her and I would expect you to do the same if you were looking out for this board as you say you do. As far as me making it personal. Then you come off this time telling me to go ask for some freebies. Which to me sounded like once again you were insulting me. But coming from 3 separate providers is a little odd. Now if I took your comment about asking for a freebie wrong and it was actually meant as a joke well I apologize. More than one provider has praised you. More than one has complaints about you,

How do they all go through their money? Not my business. Not your business.

I will reiterate do I believe what these girls tell me. Mostly no. I knew there were 2 sides to her story and THAT is why I asked about your original comment. At one point you said kat was a keeper, then through time that changed.[/QUOTE]There are enough wars in this yard and I don't wish or have the desire to start another one. Your response, in my opinion, was respectful and about as accurate as it can be within the confines and reality of this site. I did feel you made it personal with your comments that could have been handled through PM's not in open forum. If I was butt hurt by your comments, because of recent posts by mongers who prefer to attack with hearsay and refuse to think with their big heads, then I apologize to you! My comments about getting a freebie was cast in sarcasm but in reality if Rusty is going to get his past due payment from Kat then why can't someone else get mine because I have no interest in making amends with her. So I was not trying to be insulting and if you took it that way, I again apologize.

When I meet a new provider that provides good service I give them the "Benefit of the Doubt" and believe their story. This is true with many providers that I have posted about. My problem is I introduce them based on giving them the benefit of the doubt and then over time if I learn that they are liars and active addicts, I report it and no longer see them. When I do this I certainly don't make them my friends and I know for sure they talk bad about me as I have been told by many mongers that continue to see them. I hear their stories about me and shrug it off as typical self protective addictive behavior. Active addicts know what they are but they seldom if ever will admit it to their customers because they live a life of denial. So should I wait to introduce them until any and all suspicions of active addiction are quashed? Maybe so and that is my fault. I do it at the beginning because if they are clean then their life can be greatly improved by helping them get the business. Most I have met wanted reviews and wanted my help to find additional business. I have only had a couple that I have met that didn't want me to post about them for other reasons, mainly because they are very low volume or non pros and don't want to be. So I guess my point is if I meet a good service provider I post and help based on the "Benefit of the Doubt" and then if I determine they are active addicts I report it. If I am criticized or my motives are questioned in open forum about my knowledge of their addiction or my experience (s) with them, then I take it to this forum and return the favor.

Kat is only one of the good providers that I trusted and gave the benefit of the doubt in regards to her addiction. She originally told me she was in recovery. Over time and through personal experience with her I learned that she was an active addict. I learned this through what I call putting the pieces of the puzzle together. This includes following the money. You and I will disagree on what they do with their money is nobody's business. Having been involved with addicts who are in recovery as well as active addicts, I know that the money is a key part of the puzzle of active addiction. It is however only one part as described in my post below. There are mongers on this board who prefer not to see addicts for a variety of reasons. I sent some to see Kat at the beginning and later when I learned the truth these mongers were not happy with my referral. If anyone wants to continue to see Kat, then have at it and I have said this in the past if you search my posts on this thread. I would prefer that mongers don't see her because in my opinion you are just enabling her addiction which A2 and many others will disagree with, but again it's my opinion. I would also prefer that mongers don't see her because she stole from me and ripped off others, but again I have no control over how others think and can only give my opinion.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?3390-General-Reports&p=3351265&viewfull=1#post3351265[/URL]

I have searched for your PM's but I don't keep many past ones because of the limitations of the number of PM's allowed. I found one under a previous handle. I will forward you a copy. I appreciate your sincerity and response to my post (s). You have earned my respect, if that means anything and I do thank you for a good post.

[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;3415562]There are enough wars in this yard and I don't wish or have the desire to start another one. Your response, in my opinion, was respectful and about as accurate as it can be within the confines and reality of this site. I did feel you made it personal with your comments that could have been handled through PM's not in open forum. If I was butt hurt by your comments, because of recent posts by mongers who prefer to attack with hearsay and refuse to think with their big heads, then I apologize to you! My comments about getting a freebie was cast in sarcasm So I was not trying to be insulting and if you took it that way, I again apologize

I have searched for your PM's but I don't keep many past ones because of the limitations of the number of PM's allowed. I found one under a previous handle. I will forward you a copy. I appreciate your sincerity and response to my post (s). You have earned my respect, if that means anything and I do thank you for a good post.[/QUOTE]I have nothing to gain by creating a war on here especially with you. My intentions were not to be disrespectful until I was butt hurt by my misunderstanding of your comment. And again I apologize for that. It was immature and unprofessional, but human nature to attack when being attacked. For almost a year I did nothing on here but read and learn from many of our fellow mongers including and especially you. I don't like to use hearsay except to question and learn. Again I questioned you because your comment not only contradicted what she told me but also what I experienced. If I hear something from multiple sources that's usually when I will question or comment a fellow monger. It takes only one from a monger for me to question a provider. I as the majority of us want to remain safe and have a good time.

As for others comments during our discussion. How does a mongers name get brought up during a session? VERY simple. You state before a meeting that they have certain varying reviews and usually the provider will rebuttal with oh that freckle freak or that Indiana man such and such blah blah blah. I try to do investigating before investing.

Yes to some extent our opinions on their money (because once we pay them it's theirs) are different. You and I both have enabled Leslie in the past. They are going to get it no matter what we say. And I have asked where their $ goes. And I tell them I don't really care I'm just curious. I'm one that's still going to meet SOME of them. I'll never stop caring for Leslie in particular. If they truly want recovery help by any means available to me I will. Women are good at acting and lying. I knew Kat wasn't a completely honest person when she said I had a big dick and I wouldn't have a problem getting her off. LOL.

I appreciate the fact that I gained your respect. IT does mean something to me. You never lost mine, you just upset me. Be forewarned though this probably won't be the only time I question you. Or any other monger for that matter. I also expect to be questioned. Some will be In pm some will be in posts. IT just depends on weather it's something we all need to know or just for personal info.

In closing I have 2 more things to say for now.

1) again please overlook my spelling and punctuation. Although I consider myself to be intelligent I suck at grammar.

2) freckle freak when and where do you want to meet for that drink. I'll buy😀.

[QUOTE=Playwithme483;3413407]I didn't read all the squabbling, but if someone is offering freebies, I'm going to take her up on it. I wouldn't coerce or negotiate for it, but if she is just so charmed by my winning personality that she's offering? Why wouldn't I go for that? I thought the goal here was to get some pussy. Seem ridiculous to criticize a guy for getting some.[/QUOTE]I agree and perhaps should add to my comment. I don't ask for freebies, but most likely wouldn't turn one down either. Depending on the provider that is. I did joke with one I helped out voluntarily and told her if what I did worked she would owe me one then told her I wouldn't do that to her, that I would take a 90 minute for the price of a 60 minute. Unfortunately what I did for her didn't work so I didn't get the discount. LOL.

The Ville has a gang bang thread. It's kind of wild. Check it out when you have a chance.

BFDeal.

Just in case anyone knows anyone.

[URL]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/unrelated-hobby-question/25576763[/URL]

Sincerely Signed,
The Biggest Prick in the Yard.

[QUOTE=BFDeal;3420928]The Ville has a gang bang thread. It's kind of wild. Check it out when you have a chance.

BFDeal.[/QUOTE]Chicago has discussions about that as well. I know two guys who find these girls almost on a weekly basis and they post about them frequently.

[QUOTE=IndyGuy123;3421951]Just in case anyone knows anyone.

[URL]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/unrelated-hobby-question/25576763[/URL]

Sincerely Signed,
The Biggest Prick in the Yard.[/QUOTE]Thinking of buying a house just for that reason.

[QUOTE=ItsMyMrp;3429996]Under the radar??[/QUOTE]As long as you have been around you should know the definitions by now. She is UTR because she doesn't advertise on any "escort" sites and her contact info is not published nor readily available over the internet. Contact info has to be received via back channels I. E. On this board through PM's. All of this puts her in the classification as a UTR escort. Maybe you should read the UTR blog from the beginning where it was discussed, because you still have some things to learn about the hobby.

Does anyone know of a reliable reverse lookup or verifIcation database that has solid info? Something along the lines of verifyhim but more accessible to men. Any help is appreciated.

[QUOTE=Playwithme483;3430263]Does anyone know of a reliable reverse lookup or verifI cation database that has solid info? Something along the lines of verifyhim but more accessible to men. Any help is aplreciated.[/QUOTE]Tried sending you a PM in regards to what you are asking for and it is full sweets!

[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;3430067]As long as you have been around you should know the definitions by now. She is UTR because she doesn't advertise on any "escort" sites and her contact info is not published nor readily available over the internet. Contact info has to be received via back channels I. E. On this board through PM's. All of this puts her in the classification as a UTR escort. Maybe you should read the UTR blog from the beginning where it was discussed, because you still have some things to learn about the hobby.[/QUOTE]Thank you for the advice!! I'll read up in my spare time, maybe I'll get the hang of it like you.

She's more than available publicly and she's easy to contact. Our private SA group, of which you are not a member, has been banging her for almost 2 years. Plus, she's got a manager, has been on BP and may even qualify for your "dirty" list. Great discovery!

She's sweet, smart and sexy as fuck, takes it anywhere like a champ. We've gone out to lunch, dinner and strip clubs. So just because YOU didn't know about her doesn't mean she's an secret.