Peach3 - avoid at all costs
The one hour I spent today with Peach3 was the worst I've ever had mongering. I guess I should have read her bad reviews before taking the plunge. She is on a couple of sites but the one on TomatoKTown says DFK and CIM. I got neither, not even a smile. Just a frozen grimace from start to finish and very mechanical sex. She has a wonderful body and perfect boobs, but the experience was awful. No matter how warm and friendly I was, she just wouldn't thaw out. Before this Nuri was the undisputed Queen of bad attitude, but Peach3 has just taken her crowd. Avoid at all costs.
Donation-to-Service Ratio
[QUOTE=CharlieMonger3;5382459]The one hour I spent today with Peach3 was the worst I've ever had mongering. I guess I should have read her bad reviews before taking the plunge. She is on a couple of sites but the one on TomatoKTown says DFK and CIM. I got neither, not even a smile. Just a frozen grimace from start to finish and very mechanical sex. She has a wonderful body and perfect boobs, but the experience was awful. No matter how warm and friendly I was, she just wouldn't thaw out. Before this Nuri was the undisputed Queen of bad attitude, but Peach3 has just taken her crowd. Avoid at all costs.[/QUOTE]Expect the D / S Ratio to continue to climb. Hobbyists keep paying for sub-par service and we all know it is slim pickings right now with the choices we have. This behaviour won't change because there is no reason for them to do so, monetarily speaking, which to the bookers and providers is the only feedback that matters. I don't understand why you guys keep going to see well known commodities as terrible service and, sometimes, looks.
There's two different Chanel
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5377982]No room for MILFs in Playboy? If you think Chanel isn't toned then you haven't seen her. Do you really think your perception of reality is everyone's? Who made you the arbiter of body perfection? You still haven't named a better body.[/QUOTE]Perhaps there is some confusion because there are two chanels. I seen both, one with Candygirl and one with M. Had great time with both, but they are very different.
Chanel (Candygirl) MILF, curvy body, has the breast enhancement or reduction scars from bottom of nipples to bottom of breast DD, loved the session.
Chanel (M) maybe late 20's early 30's slim figure, gorgeous face, full enhanced C's no scaring, very girlfriend session. Fantastic time.
Recent Eunji Reviews / Comments
In regards to the latest reviews of Eunji, including my own, I'm of the mindset the latest negatives are due to her being burnt out. Like I commented earlier, the attitude she had was from someone that was just done with the situation. For those that saw her early on and had amazing experiences were lucky to enjoy her at her potential best. Likely due to those glowing reviews, it hyped her up for many, and with the ravenous need for newer talent, made her appointments blow up. Not many ladies can deal with the onslaught of back to back to back to back visits and maintain a healthy attitude throughout. The Hanas or Pinkys that shine even with the high demand are the rare gems that make the hobby fun. You also have to include that there are those mongers that are just ruining it with their negative, trying to secretly film, or have demanding attitudes. And yes, it is common and accepted that YMMV will always be a thing but that still doesn't negate the fact that her potential state of mind have led to an increase of similar reports where she is either disinterested or trying to rush them out. Like someone commented, it's not fun to throwaway money in any arena. So, we have to encourage more honest reviews, whether good or bad, and not take them as an assault on us personally if someone didn't enjoy a lady that we did. More honest reviews only helps our fellow hobbyist enjoy their hard earned money on ladies that are worth it. Viva la Pinky, Hana (I need to finally see her stop it you guys are killing the rest of us) and Viki.
