Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=SnowMaus;5379398]Hi, Anyone has information about Love or Mia at losangelesasian or CandyGirl?[/QUOTE]I saw Love back in December. She is about 5"1' and the pics are accurate. It's her but with P.S. She is not as skinny as the pics but not fat at all, at least back then. I loved her natural tits and I think I reviewed her back then. There are other reviews on her. I would fall back on her if Kimi was not available back then. I preferred Kimi because she reminded me of a girl I hooked up with back in college LOL. I would still recommend Love, specially if you love titties.

On a separate note. Does anyone know what happened to Kimi? I realize she is not posted anywhere anymore and I never got her number. I was distracted by Hana and Pink LOL. Could Mia be Kimi? Since Love used to do duos with Kimi. Thanks!

[QUOTE=Humyiy;5379734]Exactly how I thought about Jessica at Kbliss net.

By the photos, I would swear that I was going to see an all-time favorite, top 10 Elsa of vegasasian. But walked in and face was different. Maybe 50% match to photos. Just look up photos for Viki that's who said she was "Jessica" although she seemed to forget what name to say.

She was incredible service, nice perky nips but soooo skinny. About 5'1" and the listed 85 lbs is probably correct! I prefer sfk Lina, Rika, MistressX, Cona, Heri style. The 85-100 lbs. Ladies I'll leave for the horndogs ot there that love them super thin.[/QUOTE]Damn. I precooked Jessica today out of curiosity. Should've listened to the warnings. Oh well. I've never seen Viki but she has been extensively reviewed. Thanks for the heads up!

[QUOTE=GardenBae;5378701]Does anyone know where she went? I checked all 33 of my k-agency websites and I didn't see her. Gone home?[/QUOTE]She's gone for good. I have her number and been texting every so often.

Not a huge loss IMO. She's high energy, genuinely young (25) but no CIP really takes the joy out of BBFS for me.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5380472]What a crock of shit.

Lets face it, many people's job here (I won't point fingers but we all know who they are. And if you don't know, ask me) is to promote girls. And any semblance of negativity they and other lackeys here try to "negate". Because their goal is to give business to these girls. Not to provide truthful and accurate information. Not worry about other mongers well-being and awareness or money, but to make $ so business thrives and other pussy comes in.

This is why when a new girl gets a negative review, dozens of damage control clowns jump out of the bushes with the "rebuttal" reviews.

No matter how truthful or correct a review or experience is, certain people will always defend girls and will try to make girls better than they are. They will attempt to discredit the mongers by saying it was their fault, trying to suppress information and shift blame. Here are some of the most commont trick in the org lackey books:

1. say the guy was too rough.

2. say the guy wanted to force something.

3. the guy is out for revenge.

Blame the guy, basically, so others are not scared off. This is so pathetic and anti-monger, it's ostenisbly disgusting.

Bookers already do it by threatening to BL people who write negative reviews in public. Fucking cowards. Along with trying to hush every negative experience via money or threats.

If orgs / bookers cared about customers, theyd focus on making the product better, not the perception of product in peoples eyes and word of mouth.

Don't believe me? You want to see some people's posts after some truthful negative experiences are posted? The ones who scramble the fastest to try and 'counter' are the ones who care about girls more than they ever about monger brothers.

These same people that frame all their posts about girls in such a way that makes the girls ALWAYS look better than they really are. Their purpose is to ADVERTISE, not provide TRUTHFUL or HELPFUL feedback.

This is not the purpose of this forum, I'm pretty sure. You see, it is always mongers fault, and never the girls fault in their framed and carefully constructed posts.

Of course these people are going to get mad when someone puts up a truthful, negative review. These truthful shares of information are taking money or future promise of pussy off these peoples plate. GOOD. Bad product should be getting bad reviews. And advertisers who care about business only should fuck off.

Eat a fat dick with a. Ids on the tip if you are willing to lie to fellow mongers in exchange for pussy / money.[/QUOTE]Well said!

[blue][Forum Complaint deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]The general posting sections of the Forum are not the place to voice your personal complaints about the Forum's rules or operating procedures. In the future, please send any complaints about the Forum to me personally by email or PM, or post them in the Comment on Forum Rules section. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=Canon88;5378475]I've read all the posts debating on the model qualities of all of these girls. The true fact is. No, you're not going to get true model quality. No, it's not subjective at all. Everyone here on this forum looks at plenty of girls and watches porn, and I think we can all agree what a model should look like.

If you want model quality. You're going to have to donate for much more than is typically being donated to the girls on this forum...[/QUOTE]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).

He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.

Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.

[QUOTE=Jeff1976;5380702]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).

He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.

Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.[/QUOTE]I'm planning to go to Phuket in July when the quarantine is lifted. Sick of these dead fish LA porkchops.

[QUOTE=Stgermaine;5380394]She's gone for good. I have her number and been texting every so often.

Not a huge loss IMO. She's high energy, genuinely young (25) but no CIP really takes the joy out of BBFS for me.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the update.

[QUOTE=Jeff1976;5380702]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).

He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.

Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.[/QUOTE]So when you're referencing se Asia, you're taking about Manila and Bangkok, or somewhere else? Asking for a friend.

Since this is the BB forum, you're going to want to go to The Philippines. It's incredible, for this in particular. I'll be back the very day things are back to normal there.

On topic: Sarah is hot and skinny. Pink is hot and fun. And what's with all these Kgirls having a hard time taking an extra large? I've been with a hundred 85 lb Philippinas who take it and love it and want more.

[QUOTE=Jack926;5378331]From CA-kdoll mentioning Vivian, Jazmine, Cami. Then add Ena, Linda (Currently at OC), Scarlett (OC), Venus (My Kupcake), Ravi, Allison (Northern CA), Flynn (OC) and that is just top of my head. Chanel is body will be worst body among all those nominee.



Also Vivian is really athletic and swim suit type-toned abs, nice shoulder line and toned and feminine arms and legs.[/QUOTE]Are you talking about Scarlett from mykupcake? I need to see if she's worth.

[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5378538]Betraying my own preferences, memory, sensibilities, YMMV, Old-Timers, Yadda-D-Dadda! List comprised of girls I either actually saw, or contemplated seeing again. Placement possibly affected by how the session went down!

1. Niya.

2. Allie.

3. Moni.

4 Love.

5. Hazel.

6. Sophia.

7. MistressX.

8. Pepsi.

9. Viki.

10. Dahee.

Honorable mention, but I never tried to see her again:

Hana.[/QUOTE]Which k-org are they from?

[QUOTE=JackMiles;5380862]So when you're referencing se Asia, you're taking about Manila and Bangkok, or somewhere else? Asking for a friend.[/QUOTE]Manila is cheaper than Bangkok and the girls speak English. Lookswise they are similar. Bangkok has been ruined by over touristing.

[QUOTE=Jeff1976;5380702]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).

He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.

Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.[/QUOTE]SE Asia will not open until after 2022 to monger.