She's an interesting one.
[QUOTE=RazorGator22;5508188]This one that you gave intel on.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/663b9c25-8491-4c4c-b25b-cc1feba2efb9[/URL]
Anyone have more? She told me she has a BF so I would have to be ok with that. Then she said she prefers PPM and she usually gets 1 k. I said highest I've gone is 4. Then I said 5 for her (I am a sucker for those pearly whites) and she declined and wished me luck.[/QUOTE]Her BF is a married guy who won't leave his wife. She left her husband for him — and he gives her $3 k a month sees her a couple of times a month — sometimes for full weekends. He's into being a cuck, so she bangs other guys and he sometimes watches as she facetimes her blowjobs to him. So she is looking for more sugar to make him her side piece, probably to remind him what that's like. She is pretty, a total freak, but that is a lot for RVA.
Easy answer -- the POT. NEVER SA or any other site
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5505058]The question is, who is the bigger threat? SA, or the POT? I want to keep the girl from having my photo. I also should want SA to not have it either.
Some of the girl's profile pictures I've seen lately have been very obscure, if I can get something like that that is really me to work, I'll be OK.[/QUOTE]This is easy answer. The POT -- at some point ya have to give her pictures --and they should be pictures UNIQUE that you ONLY have available for mongering. NEVER online anywhere else inc FB.
Second -- you TXT or E-mail the picture from from a google account or txt. So there is a break in the connection (sort of).
With SA -- they have your real name, E-mail information and CC information -- think a hack cannot put that together. Just E-mail on the site was enough for the Ashley Maddison data breach, and caused some suicides!
Imaging a hack and data dump with you City, Town, E-mail and PICTURE!!
SA is the new AM waiting to happen. We all are used to using google and google voice TXT -- but a picture will get your balls fried by a divorce attorney!