[QUOTE=Ghost626;5368072]Does Chanel do rim? After getting verify by m today, I'm planning see Chanel this week.[/QUOTE]Yes, Chanel does nice rimming.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Ghost626;5368072]Does Chanel do rim? After getting verify by m today, I'm planning see Chanel this week.[/QUOTE]Yes, Chanel does nice rimming.
[QUOTE=MisterO;5368079]
Glow is active in SD now as Kiko. Got to love that body![/QUOTE]
IMHO
Glow is quirky but that bod is smoking hot and she loves to cum.
Cona, is many things but lean? Thick, skillful, professional, a pleaser -check, check and check.
Unless she lost 8 lbs. Or more since I saw her a few years ago.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5368476]IMHO
Glow is quirky but that bod is smoking hot and she loves to cum.
Cona, is many things but lean? Thick, skillful, professional, a pleaser -check, check and check.
Unless she lost 8 lbs. Or more since I saw her a few years ago.[/QUOTE]Glow / Kiko will be in SD for a while. She has a big following in SD. However, she is NOT BBFS.
[QUOTE=JohnHada;5368555]Glow / Kiko will be in SD for a while. She has a big following in SD. However, she is NOT BBFS.[/QUOTE]Not BBFS anymore? She most certainly was before.
It seems that more and more of the Kgirls that are available are of the "fuller" body type than of the thin spinner types. Reading reviews doesn't always provide a clear answer since hobbyists have their own preferences. I do have a question on a specific gal. Jool Gina. How would you guys who have seen her and the legendary Nana compare their body types? I have seen Nana, but not Jool Gina.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5368599]Not BBFS anymore? She most certainly was before.[/QUOTE]She was BBFS a long time ago and hasn't been so for a long time. Once she stopped it would only anger her if even brought up.
[QUOTE=LoveAsianGirls;5368410]Yes, Chanel does nice rimming.[/QUOTE]How is Chanel compared to Cona? Big tits? I'm a tit man. Saw Cona and loved her body and service.
Scaarlett. 5'3" 34 D BBFS Anal.
[URL]https://sexyangels.site/scarlet-1[/URL]
New BBFS girl at Top's. Anyone try? Photos look hot.
[QUOTE=Member#2210;5368841]How is Chanel compared to Cona? Big tits? I'm a tit man. Saw Cona and loved her body and service.[/QUOTE]Chanel has a perfect body. Could be a Sports Illustrated bathing suit model or even in Playboy with that body. Great ass. Great medium size tits and perfectly proportioned. Cona on the other hand is more of a full figured woman. Huge tits and a lot to hold on to. Can't go wrong with either.
Finally got pink early the morning the other day. I think the review on her are a little overrated. Her looks are decent, I found Eunji a lot more hotter looking. I can't say anything about Hana yet. Service was good though! She looks mid to late 20's. She sorta reminds me of Andrea Bang the actress but pink has a bigger fore head. She seemed nervous and notice she was shaking a little. Her body is small and petite. She gives me nice BBBJ and rimming after the shower but still inside. Gives me an excellent preview and sucks my finger to shower me her skills, she does use a little too much teeth in her BBBJ. 2 pops cip. Sorry to the next dude she just rinsed the outside and that was it. I unleashed a 3 week load inside her and I was her first of the day but she still smelled of jizz in doggy, just like the lovely DonnaBentley69 from Hx when I fucked her doggy. Anyways back to kgirls! Overall Great time with Pink!
M. Chanel, Viki.
Sunny. Niya.
Newtopasian. Min.
Pink Angels. Sarah, Jool Gina.
Sexy Angels. Sophia, Jool Gina, Scarlet.
SFK. Jina, Megan, Viki.
PKL Saki, Pink.
Sesang.
Angelsinwla.
KGLA. Saki, Pink.
I have been reading around and am noticing that LA has better girls AND the rates are better. Is that true? I've only been to OC so I don't know if I am missing out on the LA scene or not. Driving is not an issue for me as well if the rates are worth it. Any experienced LA individuals enlighten me?
[QUOTE=Member#2210;5368841]How is Chanel compared to Cona? Big tits? I'm a tit man. Saw Cona and loved her body and service.[/QUOTE]If you're a tit man, go with Cona. Chanel's tits aren't anywhere near Cona's.
While Sophia P2 P is good but she's not great. I will probably start looking at CFS girls. I remember one CFS girl who was able to make me cum just from P2 P.
[QUOTE=Charley1004;5365881]I have not seen every bb girl that's currently available. But my recommendations would be Sophia (sweetasian) or Cona (M). However there are some really good ones as well from non bb girls who will tease the F out of you and drive you nuts. Cami is up there (CA-Kdolls), she can be hit and miss on the service portion but if you DATY and get her engines going, she can get quite aggressive in P2 P. She's younger and prettier than Sophia & Cona but you will probably have to try harder with her to get her going.
If you're willing to make the drive, Cari down in OC is probably the best out of the girls I've seen but she's CFS according to everything you read here.
Just my 2 cents, I think BB girls are not good at P2 P because they just stick it in. Best P2 P I've gotten is usually from CFS girls or a bb girl on the first visit when she's not sure if you want to stick it in or not. Something about the unknown that just AMPs up the anticipation and makes it better.[/QUOTE]