Well known provider got popped
I'll start this post with the following disclaimer. (This is all I know at this point, more details coming when I get them).
A fairly well-known provider, and one with a pretty good reputation that advertises primarily on NR-although I saw a BP ad that she had run a few days ago-got busted yesterday. I do know her well enough to know that she is not a silly girl, who will work with the cops. She's mature and has been around the block enough to know the ins and outs, which is why I was surprised to see her on BP. Be VERY careful ladies and gents. I'm wondering if the stings come in a bit more steadily at the end of or just at the beginning of a given month. Perhaps the need to pay the rent might cause people to let their guard down just a bit too much.
I will eventually be able to provide the name and the number of the uncle that made the appointment. I'm not sure if I should post it out in the open or not. Suggestions from seniors?
Nice guy 52 my appologies
I want to start by saying I have since talked to nice guy 52 and we have worked out the situation and everything is cool it was a communication problem and a door man at a well known strip club who wouldn't let me in without my I'd but I have since appoligized to him and who ever has met me know I dnt do a nc / ns and I will make it upto him and on the other note of the well known provider who got busted she emailed me all of the uncles info this is why I personally don't see any new clients I stick to the ones I know. If you don't get greedy and treat people with respect they will return to see you and you don't have to see any new clients I stick to this rule and this is why I stay safe and any client who comes to see me feels safe and know I'm a very discreet lady so with this being said everyone be safe and stick to your providers who you know and trust. If any provider or senior member who want the info on this uncle Pm me or call or email me.
Once again I'm srry nice guy 52 and I will see you next week
Happy hunting and be safe.
Melissa
Well known provider got popped
[QUOTE=EarlyCuyler;1441111]I'm not sure if I should post it out in the open or not. Suggestions from seniors?[/QUOTE]Isn't that the purpose of this forum?
Let's take care of our dates
[QUOTE=EarlyCuyler;1441623]If I remember correctly, you are the one who gave me shit once before, when I posted about LEO activity and who / what to watch out for, which by the way, eventually resulted in the removal of fake provider profiles on NR.[/QUOTE]I think that was me. Because I understood you, or misunderstood you, to be extrapolating from rumor and the fact that the women in question had only one review apiece. You were right, but just as often that sort of thing has been wrong. Paranoia benefits Uncle, not us.
That has nothing to do with whether busts and stings should be publicized. Of course they should. Keeping people in the dark is another weapon in Uncle's arsenal (unless he wants the headlines). And some of us know women who are UTR, or partly so, and we'd like to be able to give them a head's up. But it's the problem of wartime espionage, isn't it? You get the information, but then do you believe it? In the end the best advice is for everyone to know the law, to know his rights, and to never cut corners. And for hobbyists, in addition, to recognize that it is providers who run the real risks, and deserve our respect and cooperation.
Seems to me that what's of value to the hobbyist is where this activity occurs, and what board or website it went through. An officer doing his job is doing his job, whether we like it, whether he takes pleasure in it or not. Revealing his screen name is a legitimate activity, though one most providers would probably rather get from another provider. Revealing his identity is an invitation to trouble. On the other hand, you don't have to be in the hobby very long to hear tales of individual leos stepping way, way over the line. A cop who's abusive, who steals, or who takes sexual advantage has forfeited his right to use the shield. Where the internets and the camera phone help police the police they're doing us all a service.
One other thing, EC; you say the woman in question is an experienced provider, but she fails to check refs and takes the fact that the guy mails her *dick photos* as conferring some sort of legitimacy? I hope she realizes better now. If that sort of thing ain't a red flag it sure is a serious yellow.
Don't know her, wish I did now
[QUOTE=Jimxxx123;1442028]I for one would like as much info as I can get. One of the benefits of this site is that collectively we have many eyes and ears. Why not take advantage of that? Of course it is "heresay" but what is this a courtroom! What we read on this site of course must be filtered by who is reporting it, the details that are given, and the possible motivations that are behind the reporting. But I grant that most of us on this board are intelligent enough to do this. To only report things that have been reported by the media is ludicrous, of little value, and totally defeats the purpose of a site such as this. If I see a provider being led away in handcuffs, I am not supposed to report this to my fellow hobbyists unless and until it is reported in the media? How silly is that? If I know first hand that one of our fellow hobbyists was caught in a sting involving another a certain provider, I am supposed to not report this and possibly help others here avoid the same fate? That is exactly the "purpose of this board". Now I'm not sure why EC would not simply just give us the name of this provider. He tried to give us her telephone number but admin deleted that. Why not just give us her name? With the name we can get the other details. Unless I'm missing something, don't think that giving the names of providers is against the rules![/QUOTE]She has outted herself on another review forum and is putting all the info out in a number of other ways, so no need to do anything else here. She apparently is a tough and spunky little woman, makes me wish now I had made her acquaintance. It's a funny coincidence she was referenced here just prior to her troubles, but only briefly and in passing
A final word on this. I hope.
This bust just happened within the past four or five days. The provider on NR that mentioned her issues is a different person.
BF Deal: I don't care whether you care what others care about you caring about their caring of your viewpoint. I once met a three year old, who gave me his opinion about the sun being out one day. That opinion made more sense than your thoughts about not providing legal information that affects the members and readers of this board. So keep your opinion. I have no desire to change it or give it another thought. You might as well let us know whether you prefer regular cut or french cut green beans. Same significance. Continue to get your information from the Indianpolis Star, and you will miss 90 percent of all busts. If that's what makes you happy, I wish you joy, peace, and love.
B Beal: sorry, that was my mistake. You're right about an officer doing his job. He's got his job to do, and we have ours, and hopefully, never the twain shall meet. I have only offered the officers info to providers who have asked. Also, prior to posting anything about the situation, I asked the provider what she wanted "out there" and what she didn't. She really didn't put any restrictions on anything, and the fact that I asked for advice about how far to go with the post was my decision and my opinion of what discretion should be used. And yes, although experienced, she got lazy and equated the fact that she was sent a "dikpik" with the relative safety of checking references.
Any senior who has PMd me asking for information on who the provider was has been given that info. I will not out the provider here-even though she said it was okay-and I will not out the "client", (who apparently has a huge schlong, even thought that has absolutely nothing to do with anything). I will reiterate though that the "anonymous" provider on the NR forums is not the one that I have referred to in my posts.
One other thought, I'm pretty sure I didn't post any specifics about the super bowl eve bust that I actually saw go down. If I were one to enjoy sensationalism, I would have. There were others that could have been drastically negatively affected by the info, so I didn't go into anything there. That situation has long since blown over, and to the best of my knowledge, no issues arose from that, other than the girl that went through some shite for a few hours.