As a birthday present to yourself maybe.
[QUOTE=ThatGuy23;1901954]Ummmm. Gulp.
[URL]http://adrianaleah.escortbook.com/[/URL]
Is this girl...real? And she's in Boston? And I somehow am only finding her now??
Anyone here seen this girl?? Cause wow.[/QUOTE]Because at her rates, she needs to be gift wrapped.
Spot on with the doppleganger for Zoe / Sydney
I hadn't realized it until you pointed it out, but you're right about Zoe looking like Famke Janssen. I've seen her (Zoe, not Famke) and had a good time. She has some good moves, nice body, and is intelligent. Nice combination. Worth seeing when she's back in town.
[QUOTE=RoadStar01;1899658]TG, She is a traveling provider. Comes and goes with the winds of change. In New York right now, according to BP. (under her other name: Sydney)
[url]http://manhattan.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/two-beautiful-blondes-too-hot-to-handle-28/42622683[/url]
Also here: {edit: looks like this link is not allowed}
[url]http://gentlemanschoice-nyc.********.nl/2013/07/sydney.html?zx=e6c831da9096ba24[/url]
And here:
[url]http://www.gfeangels.com/companion/12775/Zoe.html[/url]
Direct link for RSG still works, for what it's worth.
[url]http://roomservicegirls.com/models/all/12420/Zoe.html[/url]
She's gorgeous. Reminds me of Famke Janssen.[/QUOTE]
Maybe you don't always get what you pay for, but. . .
[QUOTE=Yardape08;1908060]Checked out her website and her 1 hour incall is $400? Ouch! And for mediocre service at that and even a condom for the blowjob. Some here have espoused the theory that the higher priced the girl is the better the service or caliber of girl. The old "you get what you pay for" adage. I couldn't disagree more. It seems that there are varying tiers of websites to advertise on and the rates escalate accordingly with each but there is really no basis or justification for the graduated price system.
Craigslist CLCE would be at the bottom rung for relatively short $ with plenty of negotiation leverage for mainly UTR girls, Backpage would come next with the standard $200 an hour, and then there is Eros where many of the girls charge $300 per hour and up. In my personal experience no matter where they advertise or what they charge has little bearing on the quality of the girl or the session. There is no guarantee that the alleged higher end escort say does not have a drug habit or is less than GFE. There may be exceptions where agencies have a reputation for stellar service and will fire girls who don't live up to their standard.
I have always been wary of the girls who advertise on Eros myself. Some of the best GFE sessions with very sweet and hot bodied women I have ever had including overnights have been with girls who have not commanded the premium rates.[/QUOTE]Hey, Yardape. I partly agree with you: You don't always get what you pay for, and those who think $ is a guarantee of poontangy-quality are searching for a kind of sexistential certainty that just isn't there. A halfway decent-looking provider who hooks up with a halfway decent photographer and website designer will shell out a couple of grand, tops, and she can paste whatever admission price she wants on her glitter-fancy website and if you build it (as the Voice said in "Field of Dreams") they will come. Oh, yes. . . They will come. There's one born every two minutes, and half of those (that's us) will be sniffing low and lower for the perfect tsunami punami, and in hope and desperation and under the command of Little Head No-Think, a man will pony up his hard-earned do-re-mi sure that his hard-earned will earn him hard in front of the pretty pricey lady he goes to see.
And then what? Then he's at the door and the gloss and fuzziness of those flattering photos. . . Well, in person there's only so much a fair-looking lass can do with so much, and suddenly the girl-next-door is just another fit MILF-next-door, and the client is lighter by 400 (700 for 2 hours with Steph) simoleons, and even with the lights dimmed to dusk levels you realize that the gal polishing your stick shift, the lady who stealthily produced the cover she used to blanket you beneath a latex layer. You realize she's attractive enough for a woman in her late 40's but Holy Smokes, Batman, did you just withdraw 400 greenbacks for a CBJ performed by a woman whose skills are good enough to get the job done but how many hours of your job do you have to get done to recover the after-tax dough you just handed over for your 15 minutes of covered pleasure (and that second pop will run you another see-note, see?
No, you don't always get what you pay for, and since there's one of us born every two minutes that's plenty good enough to find enough suckers to suck a couple of times a day at 8 centuries a day for 250 days a year that a pretty pricey Penny you just rented, and the landlady's going to walk away with 190,000 simoleons a year, give or take a simoleon.
No, you don't always get what you pay for, so you better vet the vag before you pay for it (that's why the boards exist after all), but there's the other side to Pretty Pricey Penny and that's that you almost never get what you don't pay for. So if the chef's expensive prix fixe dinner price is no guarantee of good food at Chez Punami, the cheap prices charged at the Do-Me Diner are even less of a guarantee. You go cheap you usually get cheap, and the occasional Jenny Gem is the exception that proves the miracle.
No, you don't always get what you pay for, but you almost always pay for what you pay to get, so maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle, virtually smack dab in the glistening gash of reason and common sense, and if you do your research and you keep a firm grip on yourself, you're not going to be in a position where you ask yourself, "Did I really just deliver an envelope full of 4 Grants for no better reason than that a 2 D Cutie on a website convinced me to?
And before someone says it's not just about the looks and that you're paying for class, you're paying for skills, you're paying for atmosphere, you're paying for intelligence, let's all concede that the lady who takes the time to cleverly design her website is certainly intelligent, but for every ten ladies who think the honeypot between her legs contains is as full of gold as the Pot O'Gold at the end of the rainbow, it's only the one o'them who isn't deluding herself and trying to delude us all that her punami is slicker, sweeter, and snuggier than the punami of the younger, less ridick-ulously expensive lady advertising right there on the first page of ladies listed in your typical online classified adult entertainment section.
Just saying.
It was 350 but still high and a waste
[QUOTE=Yardape08;1908060]Checked out her website and her 1 hour incall is $400? Ouch! And for mediocre service at that and even a condom for the blowjob. Some here have espoused the theory that the higher priced the girl is the better the service or caliber of girl. The old "you get what you pay for" adage. I couldn't disagree more. It seems that there are varying tiers of websites to advertise on and the rates escalate accordingly with each but there is really no basis or justification for the graduated price system.
Craigslist CLCE would be at the bottom rung for relatively short $ with plenty of negotiation leverage for mainly UTR girls, Backpage would come next with the standard $200 an hour, and then there is Eros where many of the girls charge $300 per hour and up. In my personal experience no matter where they advertise or what they charge has little bearing on the quality of the girl or the session. There is no guarantee that the alleged higher end escort say does not have a drug habit or is less than GFE. There may be exceptions where agencies have a reputation for stellar service and will fire girls who don't live up to their standard.
I have always been wary of the girls who advertise on Eros myself. Some of the best GFE sessions with very sweet and hot bodied women I have ever had including overnights have been with girls who have not commanded the premium rates.[/QUOTE]This was my really only bad exper and it was the worst by far...I find eros girls feel they can get more be / see they are reaching a guy with a bigger pocketbook, so you are likley correct. Many also adv on both eros and BP, that's why they ask where you see my ad be / see they have two prices. I always try to find them on BP as well so I can get the lower quote. Some have 2 phones connected to the 2 ads as well. They are not as dumb biz people as you would expect.
Two Girls With No Reviews
Guys,
I've been texting with these two girls. They sound good, available and friendly enough. However, I'm skeptical because I can't find reviews or info on them anywhere other than these postings. I even asked them both point blank if they have reviews anywhere and they both said no.
[URL]http://305-842-6436.escortsincollege.com/v-incredible-hot-blonde-barbie-v-1357637.html[/URL]
[URL]http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege.com/m-a-k-e-i-t-n-a-s-t-y-petite-hottie-1357239.html[/URL]
Both look amazing, but I'm hesitant to see them without at least some info in case they're LE. Anyone have any experience with either of them?
Thanks!
HE.
More than likely Fake Pictures
[QUOTE=Harderik;1927918]Guys,
I've been texting with these two girls. They sound good, available and friendly enough. However, I'm skeptical because I can't find reviews or info on them anywhere other than these postings. I even asked them both point blank if they have reviews anywhere and they both said no.
[URL]http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege.com/m-a-k-e-i-t-n-a-s-t-y-petite-hottie-1357239.html[/URL]
Both look amazing, but I'm hesitant to see them without at least some info in case they're LE. Anyone have any experience with either of them?
Thanks!
HE.[/QUOTE]I did a quick search on the following ads:
Ad [URL]http://305-842-6436.escortsincollege.com/v-incredible-hot-blonde-barbie-v-1357637.html[/URL], the number search comes back with adds all in the same area Boston north shore to Maine and the picture area similar in the adds so this girl is definitely safer then the other ad, could find not reviews on her either.
The other ad is more sketchy for the picture and the numbers for this ad [URL]http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege.com/m-a-k-e-i-t-n-a-s-t-y-petite-hottie-1357239.html[/URL] and the number comes up with all kind of ads with different pictures and the picture comes up with all kind phone numbers across the country. IMHO I'd stay away from this one.
Not starting anything but.
[QUOTE=HoHunter328;1928842]Most quality agencies use real pics...
Stay safe, and happy hunting.[/QUOTE]Agree with you but if pics are airbrushed and etc... Are they really using real pics. Also some agencies use pics of girls that are similiar to get pics from the rear with no faces...many tricks they all use.
Infringement Damages Collection?
Just out of curiousity, how many times have you successfully sued for damages and collected damages of any significance? Significance being defined as in excess of the cost of litigation. Collection being actually receiving the money damages in hand.
[QUOTE=HoHunter328;1930121]My feelings on "airbrushing" are that it's acceptable so long as it's about equal to what can be accomplished with good quality makeup. That's what I do in photo shoots anyway. Otherwise I'd have to be rescheduling all the time just because a girl happened to have a pimple or two on the day of the shoot. Then there's also concealing tattoos to preserve the girl's anonymity if so desired. Good escorts will mention if they have tattoos airbrushed in their pics, but that part isn't my responsibility, and it's beyond my control. Now more "creative" forms of digital manipulation (eg breast enlargements, waist slimming, etc) I'm opposed to, and in my opinion is just as bad as using fake pics.
As for using "representative" pics. So long as they tell you that's the case, and aren't trying to say they're really them, I suppose it's ok. But I can pretty much guarantee that they're violating someones copyright in using the images. I know I've had my images stolen before, and I'm very quick to initiate legal action when I find out. Statutory damages for copyright infringement can be $750 to $30,000 per image in a pre-trial agreement, or up to $150,000 per image if it goes to trial. I can also file suit against any websites which post the images on behalf of anyone if they ignore my DMCA Infringement Notification.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.[/QUOTE]
