Not sure where that number came from
[QUOTE=FirstHalf;2439830]I pay for the international site under the same handle. It's interesting, but it hasn't helped me yet, to the point that I don't even bother logging in lately. This site, on the other hand, provides nearly daily / weekly value. Realtime chat is much more worthwhile.
Also, I dunno that whole money thing. I don't behave myself just because I'm paying. If I'm going to be a dick, then that's what I'll be whether you have my whopping $15 per year or not. I'm sure it's not hard to see who's trying to chip in and who isn't.[/QUOTE]It wouldn't be 15 bucks a year, it would be more than that.
Since there are over 400,000 registered members on the forum it's not what one guy would do it's what 1000's would do, and 1000's need less moderation when it costs money.
Will this pay option be complete and open fairly to the ladies as well as men
[QUOTE=Admin2;2440029]It wouldn't be 15 bucks a year, it would be more than that.
Since there are over 400,000 registered members on the forum it's not what one guy would do it's what 1000's would do, and 1000's need less moderation when it costs money.[/QUOTE]As of now, ladies who honestly list themself as providers, evn as senior members must get approval before post hits the feed, if this pay site makes it, do providers as well as mongers finally get to post openly and it post just as senior mongers go without approval first?
Thanks!
With the rash of current events I must break silence
[QUOTE=UOnlyLiveOnce;2439584]FWIW, I've made my share of mistakes too. For example, I once saw a provider at the biggest shit hole on Dream Street with laptop and other work stuff in my vehicle. Fortunately, nothing bad happened. I lucked out.
I've never given my real first name to a provider before. But I have come close to breaking that rule. Why? Probably for the same reasons many mongers have broken mongering rules. We start to get attached. I know I have started to get attached if I've seen them at least a few times.
Of course, the advice in that case is to know that it's happening and to allow the big head to prevail over the little one. But as always, this is easier said than done. Hope this all works out for you in the end.[/QUOTE]What I cannot understand is when guys are married and have much to lose, why would you let yourself get into this situation? Date and move on. Stop looking for so much convenience. Makes no sense. Some have nothing to lose and can get along saying or doing as they chose. Nevertheless, it is wise to be cautious because you cannot be certain whom is crossing the line. There is usually more trouble from this kind of drama. This is why I always try to ask someone if they have a BF or are married, or try to get that VERY important info because that brings ANOTHER person into your encounter that you did not bargain for and may bring UN-needed drama into the picture. With all due respect to the ladies that are married and have BF's that say this is not the case, I respect your opinion, please respect mine. Sorry. People should have standards. I will NOT date ANYONE whom is married. My personal preference. Please respect that as I respect yours. I will NOT date anyone whom I know has a boy friend either. These are usually unstable men whom are clueless and can get themselves into troubles as well. They will NEVER accept what their CURRENT partner is doing and it will lead to trouble. EVERY time. You never know with whom you are speaking and they tend to always let the little head do the thinking much to their dismay. I could carry on, but I think it is a subject that needs to be looked at seriously if this is the life you choose to follow. In other countries it is not illegal and the drama is MUCH less because they are not busy trying to control everyone and control the oldest profession in the history of modern civilization. IF you make it illegal, it is easy to blackmail. Just ask everyone in DC! LOL! In this free country. Right?
4 photos
Pregnant Non-Pregnant Comparison
[QUOTE=Cartog;2441445]I liked the before and after side by side comparison of pregnant Chrissy. If available, I'd like to see the same of Mimi, the redhead. Enjoy your photos. Thanks for posting them.[/QUOTE]I went back to the original photoshoot with Chrissy and Mimi and could not find a shot with Chrissy behind Mimi. Mimi was much more aggressive than Chrissy and pretty much overwhelmed her. Chrissy is much more experienced now. Both like to eat pussy though. I am enclosing a before-after of Chrissy and Mimi standing up from the two sessions. The first session was taken in June of 2013. Keep in mind that Mimi just a little over four months along. She is also about 10 pounds heavier than the 2013 photo. I am posting a preggo photo of Chrissy behind Mimi and a similar photo of a non-preggo Mimi with her friend Stacy taken in August of 2014.
Thanks again for the nice photos!
[QUOTE=Glockman;2441532]I went back to the original photoshoot with Chrissy and Mimi and could not find a shot with Chrissy behind Mimi. Mimi was much more aggressive than Chrissy and pretty much overwhelmed her. Chrissy is much more experienced now. Both like to eat pussy though. I am enclosing a before-after of Chrissy and Mimi standing up from the two sessions. The first session was taken in June of 2013. Keep in mind that Mimi just a little over four months along. She is also about 10 pounds heavier than the 2013 photo. I am posting a preggo photo of Chrissy behind Mimi and a similar photo of a non-preggo Mimi with her friend Stacy taken in August of 2014.[/QUOTE]Thanks for taking the time to go back to your old photoshoot. Stacy looks like a wild one. Would love to see her beaver.
Reviewing Reviews Are We?
[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;2440559]My thoughts. Not sure what value does that review of PD bring to the table. Nadia is not new, has been discussed million times (mostly negative I remember) and still this guy takes the time to write a long review and ends with a 'recommendation with caveat'.
My recommendation. Move along, plenty others out there with no drama and baggage! Enuf said!![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Selective69;2440366]There is a valuable lessen to be learned here. How to avoid being ripped off by someone who has clearly taking a liking to ripping men off. While the approach taken here was correct, newer guys are not likely to do the same. This POS has proven beyond all doubt that she will rob you in the blink of an eye if she knows she can. Any and all newer guys should stay clear of this POS, for it you who she preys on the most. There are far too many reputable providers who do not rip men off (one is too many) and who do not have raisin breast, so look elsewhere to spend your hard earned $. The guys who do have a working relationship with this POS should keep in mind, that for all the good things said about her, there is harm being done by people who read and believe she is someone to see, only to get jacked when seeing an illusion of a trustworthy provider.[/QUOTE]I am not discounting the recent reports. I do however wonder, given the vehemence of you two if you have actually seen her or is this some type of pack mentality? If you haven't, then really you are just reviewing my review when you call a provider a POS, or hint that this was a shill review or whatever your agendas are. I still haven't seen any actionable intelligence that proves she ripped somebody off. I have seen gossip. I have seen innuendo. I have not seen anything solid beyond drive-by comments.
Like I said, I was just glad she was back in the hobby. I saw the "reports" suggesting there was something foul afoot, and rather than speculate like some of these assholes, I went out, spent my money and found out for myself.
With that said, the session (and then sessions) I had with with her were as fantastic as always. Yes, I did suggest the caveat at the end, mostly because she did seem a bit squirrely initially about the money. Is she really looking for a way to rip guys off? I don't know, but I know she won't steal from me and probably anyone else that does not approach the hobby like a horny teenager with no impulse control.
Look, ANY WOMAN in this business is capable of turning 180 degrees. Baggage, drama, drugs, theft, blackmail etc. , can hinge on one life problem or another. With that said, I mentioned that in my review as a reminder to you youngsters to be smart, safe, and never let your guard down regardless of how well you think you know the lady. For those of you that are fool enough that you believe you are now trusted friends, wake the fuck up. There is a huge difference between being friendly and friends.
We have seen it many times before. There are always three sides to every story in the hobby: her side, his side, and what really happened. Cash and dashes are a real thing. Do this long enough and you will understand there is a difference between a new chick running a scam on a few guys then moving to the next town. When a previously dependable provider gets these reports it usually means one of a few things: drug problem, new pimp / boyfriend, sudden catastrophic finances, and my personal favorite, the sour grapes report.
The sour grapes report is usually where some dude gave a gal money in advance, made a loan, bought her gifts, did favors, or whatever and when the relationship doesn't match there perception, suddenly she stole from him and his hurt feelings manifest in a questionable rip-off report.
So, since there seemed to be mostly gray information on Nadia, rather than trust speculation, I went and kept an open mind and I thought I wrote a balanced review. Yet Chickie here, who often spends more times worrying about dudes than the women on this board, decides he should review a review.
Chickie, this board is about exchanging information for dudes that want to fuck women, not dudes jealous or hating other dudes for whatever grudge they seem to have. To sit here and rag on a review and by extension a gal based on your personal feelings on the reviewer rather than actual experience is just juvenile if not disruptive to the mandate of the board. Did I sense anything spurious from her, not really. So until I see some hard proof beyond "I knew a guy that knew a guy that said she ripped him off," I am going to keep seeing her, but I'll be extra careful.
To me, so far any risk was worth the reward. I get we all like different things with regards to looks etc, but for my money, she is a real hot time in the sack. My tune might change if I get suckered, but thankfully that is happening a little less these days, but no one is immune to pussy intoxication.
1 photos
SKY - All Natural Black Beauty
Tried a google pic search on this one. Not sure if I should take this is an ominous warning or the return pics are just coincidence.
[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/skyall-natural-black-beauty937668-2253/22155262[/URL]
Pic in the ad that I google-searched... BUT you'll want to search it from the ad itself (pic below yields different results, b/c of size I think)...
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375382[/ATTACH]
Stay SAFE!
TGM.
I think I asked the question wrong
[QUOTE=Admin2;2440257]. So our policy is actually good business for you.
We are fair guys though and one of the things we are planning is a chicks only forum that will only be open to providers that have paid advertising at the USA Adult Classifieds, men will not be able to either post, nor read the information that is there. It's not a question of wanting to shut you ladies up, it's a business decision based on what we see as a perceived need by our members. I'm sure there will never be a single woman that will ever complain about the exclusivity of the provider forum once it's operating.[/QUOTE]I was referring to the open chat, I seen a post where a guy said it's late at night an he knows someone else is awake out here, he said it be nice to have an "open Chat". You responded to him saying you are considering this but it would be a pay feature, I understand the rules of engagement on responding to "reviews" , but if it's a "chat room", there would be no reviews I thought? Just people in the forum talking back and forth to eachother, when I picture OPN chat rooms I picture like FB or something I guess. So are you saying the paid version of the open chat rooms will include reviews as well? An that's why ladies will always need approval?
[blue]Good question, don't know, if it's live chat I'm pretty sure it would have to be. Members would have the ability to report behavior that happens in chat I would think, most rooms are set up like that.
This is off the cuff and not a firm answer but most likely. If it had to be moderated that would take away the chicks ability to say "I'm not fucking anybody right now, who wants to come fuck me?" That would be a bad thing.
A2[/blue]
Will USASG consider open chat between members in a group forum?
I read about the pay forum coming, I'm asking will this site ever have a room that is for NO REVIEWS just open dialog between monger and provider, I have issues sleeping when the whole house is in bed, you try to make coffee without waking the kids who have school, FB gets dead at night, I'm not interested in going to some stupid party line, I'm not suggesting a room for everyone to go to late at night and argue either, an open forum, for fun an flirting and getting through the insomnia nights or the nights when you want to "roll over and rape him but you know it's a felony " nights.
Just a suggestion of course, however what fun could that be if we as providers can't play with the mongers until our response gets the all mighty "approval" you know?
No fights no octagon, no reviews or disputed reviews, just monger and provider having a good time for those after hours nights when you can't exactly set up your room an he can't exactly grab his keys at 3 am, then if there is 10 mongers an a few ladies all going back and forth, you could really get to know eachother and eachother's likes and dislikes. I'll say this if and when I have a friend with benefits it's going to have to be off the clock, being able to see how someone is with open forum would be so very nice! Just my thoughts. But I do understand the need for a approval on provider postings, just think if it's not in response to a review or debate, is the approval still needed?