Printable View
[QUOTE=SuperMan333;5350139]Anyone saw the new girl Mew from topgirls? I probably will try her out today if I can't get the time I like with my regular.[/QUOTE]Prepare to be bait & switch and greet by a girl who looks like nothing like her photos with a mediocre service.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5350174]I don't know about curvier girls giving better service but older ones certainly do as a rule. They are certainly more experienced in most cases and around 30 ish puts them at their sexual peak whether it's a job or not. Whether looks are considered cute, pretty or average if you combine that with a smile and personality which only adds to their looks and superlative service you have a hot girl and the kind of time most of us are looking for. Point in case is Ava a few years back with M. She was one of the prettiest girls you would ever meet in the business or out and her service was just good but not great. If you're happy fucking a pretty face without the hunger and passion then so be it but for me nothing beats a great fuck with a nice looking girl.[/QUOTE]I also find 30-35 year olds the sweet spot. Enough experience to know what they're doing and hopefully not burnt out.
I'm still looking for a new regular rotation but it's been very hard this past year. I wish we had a new Megan, Suri, Sugar, Rain, Stella, Yoco. I know the last two are still here but I need some new talent. I hope M is able to mount a comeback and doesn't go the way of Souplantation and closes shop.
Really great service with pleasing attitude but below avg face and body (for me YMMV).
Guess those are her real pics but damn photoshop does some miracle work.
Would not recommend.
M. Cona.
Sunny. Niya, Yumi, Choi.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Min.
Pink Angels. Sarah, Jool Gina.
Sexy Angels. Sophia, Jool Gina.
SFK.
PKL. Saki, Pink, Eunji.
Sesang. Hana.
Angelsinwla. Hana.
KGLA. Saki, Pink, Eunji.
Saying that looks are YMMV is a cop out or that there's a separate rating scale for kgirls. It is irrelevant whether real 9's and 10's work for one of the Kgirl agencies or as a provider. It is irrelevant whether one has seen 100 Kgirls or 1 Kgirl. How do you judge looks based only on kgirls one has personally seen? Then, how would one judge looks of non-kgirls or independent providers? A much more objective measure is to compare against all women, not just Kgirls who you've seen, not just Kgirls who are providers, not just Asians who are providers, but all women. So, car show models aren't going to work for M? Well, there are Asian American car show models who have provided. Also, there are tons of civvies (e. G. , instagram models, "party" girls who go to clubs) who are much better looking than the so-called hot girls cited. Just because one hasn't seen hotter girls doesn't mean a young Kgirl should be rated a 9. But, those that do are just misleading other hobbyists into thinking that these girls are model quality. They are not.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5350195]If most girls are a 5 whether I agree or not then a 7 on those standards is certainly very hot and that's what we're looking for. That would make a 9 or 10 unavailable in K-land.[/QUOTE]A size M in Asia is comparable to a size 8 or maybe 10 which looks pretty good to me. Not a spinner but hot.
[URL]https://www.pinterest.com/pin/220817187963325122/[/URL]
I had a reliable number to reach out to M. I didn't want to use older ads that had numbers and have it be a wrong number.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5350177]You can also text M and let her know that you have been seeing Viki and ask her to check with her to verify it. I'm sure if you've been seeing Viki that should get you in. No one is refusing business in the current environment.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=AverageGuy82;5350611]I had a reliable number to reach out to M. I didn't want to use older ads that had numbers and have it be a wrong number.[/QUOTE]I'm pretty sure M's number is listed in Viki's new review page; it only has one review from 6 days ago.
FYI — Cona is "fully booked" today. M is taking pre books for Cona and Viki tomorrow, Saturday.
Also, M was very fast to respond this morning. She's been sending me mass texts the past few Saturday, as well!
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5349697]Some of you guys really are ungrateful bastards hahaha. Eunji is very pretty and not chubby at all. Chubby is half of the other girls in LA. She is young she has great tits and you guys might have some wrong conception of what chubby is. She isn't a spinner but not chubby.
Also please enlighten me who is so much hotter because I would love to see these girls. Name them please if you dare.[/QUOTE]Not wrong, just different perception is all. We are all entitled to our own opinion! .
I was about to comment when I saw yours. I saw that review and took a shot and texted. She actually responded to it and after a bit of back and forth she cleared me. Told me Viki is off and Cona booked. She gave me the all clear to try next week when my schedule allows.
[QUOTE=NObserver;5350666]I'm pretty sure M's number is listed in Viki's new review page; it only has one review from 6 days ago.
FYI Cona is "fully booked" today. M is taking pre books for Cona and Viki tomorrow, Saturday.
Also, M was very fast to respond this morning. She's been sending me mass texts the past few Saturday, as well![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=AverageGuy82;5350714]I was about to comment when I saw yours. I saw that review and took a shot and texted. She actually responded to it and after a bit of back and forth she cleared me. Told me Viki is off and Cona booked. She gave me the all clear to try next week when my schedule allows.[/QUOTE]Messaged her about 30 minutes ago so here's to hoping that I can get in as well. Been trying for awhile!
I will provide details on Pink's body so hopefully someone will do the same with Eunji's. All these vague descriptions like "chubby" "gymnast" "not like photos". WTF guys? Especially the "gymnast" thing. The only gymnasts I know of are the Olympic girls with bulging biceps and He-Man thighs. No thank you.
Pink is my expected standard of "average". She has a flat stomach, no love handles. Her thighs are thick for a k-girl but not BBW thick or body-positive-movement-bullshit thick. Most importantly, no cottage cheese on her thighs. She has a nice handful of butt but looks slightly squarish from behind. Her hips are a petite, hourglass curvy but not BBW curvy or body-positivity-movement-bullshit curvy. The hips do ride slightly high due to the slightly squarish butt. But again: No love handles, no flab, no cottage cheese. Accepted descriptions would be average, average-skinny, petite-hourglass, petite-curvy.
Can someone please provide similar details on Eunji?
Additional info on Pink: Her boobs are decent, natural B cups. Not particularly firm or perky but still nice. With makeup, she looks 30 or younger. I'd lean towards younger. I'd describe her face as cute or pretty but others may say GND. Chill, relaxed personality but she's trying to learn English so may want to practice with you.
Her BBBJ was okay, nothing special. She makes the effort but doesn't go particularly deep and doesn't use her tongue. Her massage was okay. She makes the effort but nowhere near masseuse level. She didn't offer rimming / catbath and I didn't ask for rimming / catbath. She wasn't into DFK but I personally don't go down on women I pay for so maybe YMMV.
M might be wishing she had allowed more supplicants passed her pearly gates while times were flush.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5350378]Prepare to be bait & switch and greet by a girl who looks like nothing like her photos with a mediocre service.[/QUOTE]Yeah I think this one is not that good, even the PO is trying to steer me away. Have you saw her personally?
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5350547]Saying that looks are YMMV is a cop out or that there's a separate rating scale for kgirls. It is irrelevant whether real 9's and 10's work for one of the Kgirl agencies or as a provider. It is irrelevant whether one has seen 100 Kgirls or 1 Kgirl. How do you judge looks based only on kgirls one has personally seen? Then, how would one judge looks of non-kgirls or independent providers? A much more objective measure is to compare against all women, not just Kgirls who you've seen, not just Kgirls who are providers, not just Asians who are providers, but all women. So, car show models aren't going to work for M? Well, there are Asian American car show models who have provided. Also, there are tons of civvies (e. G. , instagram models, "party" girls who go to clubs) who are much better looking than the so-called hot girls cited. Just because one hasn't seen hotter girls doesn't mean a young Kgirl should be rated a 9. But, those that do are just misleading other hobbyists into thinking that these girls are model quality. They are not.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure what world you're living in but you and we don't have access to the instagram models, "party girls", etc. We are here in the world of Kgirls and regardless of how they compare (in your mind) there are others who may have a different perspective. That is the meaning of YMMV. How they look to you and if you are basing it on comparisons then let's stick to the world where they belong and we partake and that is the world of the Kgirl. Some love blondes and others brunettes. Some like spinners and some like BWW. Some short and some tall. You have your preferences and opinions but they are not universal and we deal with the current talent pool and not some aspiration list of other girls who would laugh at the offer of 250-300 for an hour including BBFS and MSOG. Maybe laugh so hard that they would pass out. That's why we're all here.