KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5942682]They also say San Jose & LA area fuckers are pussy destroyers. Usually, they consider the whole West Coast is fucked-up area. But, the low quality NK-girls love BBFS+msog pussy destroyers! The problem is, we have much more high standards Korean pussy lovers! They are usually quiet and don't participate in this discussion board, but they read and analyze the reviews of new girls to verify if they are pretty enough to spend their time and money. All the high class pretty girls love PNW, but those fucked-up girls spread bad rumors about us simply because they only had fucked-up guys in our area.[/QUOTE]You're explanation for the drought of quality kgirls are because of rumors that NK girls (which BTW, most of them are Yanbian, not NK) spread?

What I find ironic is that somehow you guys have misguidedly attributed BBFS to NK girls (which is incorrect BTW), but really, a good number of the girls that were long-termers here prior to the TRB raid did BBFS with clients. Not really sure why all of a sudden you guys are attributing BBFS to NK girls. It was probably about 3 years ago that kgirl agencies in SoCal started actively promoting BBFS upcharges on their websites.

Go to NYC and research about the difference between North Korean and South Korean working girls, I found majority of SK-girls prefer CFS only, and they say in unison that the West Cost market has been defiled by the NK-BBFS-girls. Just tell me which NK-girl in the states that doesn't do BBFS. None. On other hand, there're too many SK-girls express their horrible feeling that they have to work among the NK-BBFS-girls. On top of everything, there're increasing numbers of NK-BBFS-girls that allow mediterranean; I feel nauseous!

FYI, the wave of BBFS among K-girl community restarted when Sam-the-motgerfucking-angel was released and returned to this field, that was about three years ago, and we saw increasing numbers of NK-BBFS-girls at the same time.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;5943789]You're explanation for the drought of quality kgirls are because of rumors that NK girls (which BTW, most of them are Yanbian, not NK) spread?

What I find ironic is that somehow you guys have misguidedly attributed BBFS to NK girls (which is incorrect BTW), but really, a good number of the girls that were long-termers here prior to the TRB raid did BBFS with clients. Not really sure why all of a sudden you guys are attributing BBFS to NK girls. It was probably about 3 years ago that kgirl agencies in SoCal started actively promoting BBFS upcharges on their websites.[/QUOTE]

While the simps argue with the cucks in this thread... has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? This thread's starting to read like a Korean soap opera.

Just bang them then come here and tell us whether you think we'd also want to bang them.

Hey Aussie,

How would you rate Diana? Did you have "actual visit" to her?

Thanks!

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944065]While the simps argue with the cucks in this thread... has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? This thread's starting to read like a Korean soap opera.

Just bang them then come here and tell us whether you think we'd also want to bang them.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944065]While the simps argue with the cucks in this thread... has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? This thread's starting to read like a Korean soap opera.

Just bang them then come here and tell us whether you think we'd also want to bang them.[/QUOTE]I actually picked up some good intels from the k-soap here.

But you are right. We do need more reviews. Too many simps and pussies went to see the girls and don't report back. Many of them just come here to leech the intel.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944065]has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? [/QUOTE]Saw Rose. I found her attractive, except well, kinda droopy breasts. She's really soft all around though, but doesn't look chubby.

But great attitude. Playful and joking. Pretty much on script with most of the other K girls. But with a smile and giggles.

Would probably explore other options next time, but if scheduling limited options I wouldn't mind seeing her again.

Saw Emma. She was hot. All kinda hot looking.

Quiet, reserved, almost shy. Skipped a few parts of the script, and had a very unique technique of not bobbing her head but just licking while applying suction, different, not really better.

And while she was almost too reserved to tell me what to do, she still very much wanted to be in charge until she first mounted me. Was great watching her cute little ass bouncing up and down when she spun around.

A little smaller than the standard kgirl bolt ons, but still some enhancement. Slim, cute, young'ish looking, at least to me.

As the hour went on she loosened up and even made a few jokes that left us both laughing. Didn't seem to be much of a language issue, still hesitant to initiate a conversation but shared some interesting observations of the US.

Did see her again. Several times. Really liked her more than others I'd met. (of course, YMMV.).

(both from Kangels).

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5944116]Hey Islander,

Just calm down and breath, we will report the 'actual visits' soon, especially, more girls are coming! You just need to seat back and watch K-dramas and enjoy those low quality 'Thai Non-Kgirl Asian Providers'. Oh, how would you rate Diana? Did you have "actual visit" to her?

Thanks,

Fucking Sam.[/QUOTE]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5944116]Hey Islander,

Just calm down and breath, we will report the 'actual visits' soon, especially, more girls are coming! You just need to seat back and watch K-dramas and enjoy those low quality 'Thai Non-Kgirl Asian Providers'. Oh, how would you rate Diana? Did you have "actual visit" to her?

Thanks,

Fucking Sam.[/QUOTE]You're a trip, bro. Do you even live in Seattle? I have trouble understanding your motivation to post here. Maybe just to keep the spirit of Honestone alive.

To answer your question, I have no idea if the current Diana is actually the same Diana who visited previously. But if it is, yes I have seen her and got excellent service.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944894]You're a trip, bro. Do you even live in Seattle? I have trouble understanding your motivation to post here. Maybe just to keep the spirit of Honestone alive.

To answer your question, I have no idea if the current Diana is actually the same Diana who visited previously. But if it is, yes I have seen her and got excellent service.[/QUOTE]Hey Aussie,

Thanks for your honest response! I am a Washingtonian, I just hate simps and the bait-and-switch agencies! However, I love hot Korean girls, I mean "really" hot and sexy ones! I don't know why but I have this anger, probably due to Sam-the-angel ruined the quiet but nice K-girl community when he returned to Bellevue! What the hell, just enjoy yourself, and share some good info, man!

By the chance, is Diana pretty (if she's the one you saw)?

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]Appreciated, I saw Ivy few years ago, and I agree with you.

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]I really miss Jo's perky breast and sexy legs! But dfk with her wasn't impressive. She had bad breath.

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]I disagree that Diana and Ivy are the same person. I got confirmation from the booker about Angel and Jo. I've seen Ivy several times and seen Diana a lot when they were here. Diana is one of my favorites but I didn't have great chemistry with Ivy.

The person you described sounds like Ivy to me. Ivy was very willing to please and does rim when asked.

Diana, to me, has a prettier face, tighter box and has better boobs. Diana gives great service when she wants to but there are times it seems very transactional and service seems lackluster. She hasn't been here for over 6 months so I don't know if she's changed. I plan to see her Thursday or Friday. I'll report back.

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]Both of them used to be with KAngels last year. Jo is now an independent provider, but anyone has info about Angel? Liked her a lot.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=TheJoker1;5945331]I disagree that Diana and Ivy are the same person. I got confirmation from the booker about Angel and Jo. I've seen Ivy several times and seen Diana a lot when they were here. Diana is one of my favorites but I didn't have great chemistry with Ivy.

The person you described sounds like Ivy to me. Ivy was very willing to please and does rim when asked.

Diana, to me, has a prettier face, tighter box and has better boobs. Diana gives great service when she wants to but there are times it seems very transactional and service seems lackluster. She hasn't been here for over 6 months so I don't know if she's changed. I plan to see her Thursday or Friday. I'll report back.[/QUOTE]I hope you are right, I don't want to go fucking mad again. But who knows? Kangels has been practising bait-and-switch tactic without shame.