Printable View
[QUOTE=WilliamsJJ703;5064854]Any of you gents met with this one? [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1411278d-f8c5-4715-9c4c-7ed9d846cc4e?&locale=en_US[/URL].
I like my SB's young but if I tried something different this would be it.[/QUOTE]Her private pics are great and I've exchanged some messages with her but she's not willing to share a face pic and not willing to communicate off the SA messaging so something seems off with her and I stopped pursuing.
What some advise. Can I use a vanilla card to register on SD site or it has to be your personal card. Don't like to use my real details on the site. Any advise from seniors.
Thanks.
[QUOTE=Vince2000;5066331]What some advise. Can I use a vanilla card to register on SD site or it has to be your personal card. Don't like to use my real details on the site. Any advise from seniors.
Thanks.[/QUOTE]Buy a One Vanilla card. Call the number on the back to register a zip code. Use the same zip on SA. Works great.
Thought of renewing my SA after some time and did what I'd done in the past.
Got OneVanilla visa card. Went to onevanilla site but this time they didn't any way to register a zip code. Didn't pay much attention.
Went to SA and used the card with a proper address (not mine) and account has been suspended. Should I ask SA to look at this.
Card has not been charged.
[QUOTE=AS111;5067108]Thought of renewing my SA after some time and did what I'd done in the past.
Got OneVanilla visa card. Went to onevanilla site but this time they didn't any way to register a zip code. Didn't pay much attention.
Went to SA and used the card with a proper address (not mine) and account has been suspended. Should I ask SA to look at this.
Card has not been charged.[/QUOTE]So, is it you have to register with your personal details and can't fake it anymore.
[QUOTE=Lobsid;5064663]She still a hooker, if she was looking to get any financial benefit. Just means the John was causing problems. Which isn't cool with me. Anything that can lead to LE focusing on us is a negative for the whole community. Don't want LE to setup a SA account. Like they do on craigslist and other escort sites.[/QUOTE]I do not do the SB stuff anymore. If it works for you more power. I found out it was more of a hassle for me. Investing the time and money when I could just pay an escort. The last SB I was with took offense to something I said one time and said what do you think I am a hooker? LOL Well yeah but with that being said if you are chasing tail, taking them to dinners, movies, gas for the car, flowers, etc. Your still paying, with a hooker its just up front and you don't have to listen to them wine and complain, well some you do LOL. Relationships are hard and sometime I just want to pound out a cute girl with fake tits and a nice ass and go home and sleep.
It's all base off preference. I been with $20 SW to $1,500 pornstars. We all have different preferences if your not interested in SBs there are a lot of different options out there. I just don't see the point of you coming to this thread, if your not interested. Its like going to the escort thread, and complaining why the guys there aren't on SA. This site has lots of subsections for a reason. Not everyone has the same needs and wants, and our taste changes. I 1st came on here years ago to help plan a trip to Bangkok. Now I come here to get information on SBs.
[QUOTE=Ibtreborz;5068420]I do not do the SB stuff anymore. If it works for you more power. I found out it was more of a hassle for me. Investing the time and money when I could just pay an escort. The last SB I was with took offense to something I said one time and said what do you think I am a hooker? LOL Well yeah but with that being said if you are chasing tail, taking them to dinners, movies, gas for the car, flowers, etc. Your still paying, with a hooker its just up front and you don't have to listen to them wine and complain, well some you do LOL. Relationships are hard and sometime I just want to pound out a cute girl with fake tits and a nice ass and go home and sleep.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Lobsid;5068484]I 1st came on here years ago to help plan a trip to Bangkok. Now I come here to get information on SBs.[/QUOTE]God, I miss Thailand. I spent a week, three separate times, in Pattaya Beach. Cheap rooms that would be out of my budget in the States, and beautiful little brown women who would spend the night with me for $20 a night. Granted, it was back in the 90's, but still. <Sigh .
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5065835]Anyway, I am all in favor of keeping (not LE) but legislators, etc. , out of the hair or Mr. Brandon Dude who started SA.[/QUOTE]I'm all in favor of new legislation that would simply legalize sex work.
My time there was during the 2000's. 4 trips to Thailand, then I started going through half of asia. I spend 10 days in Thailand one trip, and did 22 girls, plus a 5 girls reverse gang bang. I spend $40-$200 for a girl to visit for a few hours back then. Pattaya was cheaper and more girls, but all the really hot girls are in Bangkok. My military friends still argue Thailand vs Philippines to this day. I personally prefer Philippines girls, but there are more things to do in Thailand.
[QUOTE=CoolPix;5068680]God, I miss Thailand. I spent a week, three separate times, in Pattaya Beach. Cheap rooms that would be out of my budget in the States, and beautiful little brown women who would spend the night with me for $20 a night. Granted, it was back in the 90's, but still. <Sigh .[/QUOTE]
Princess1334.
19, a little thick but nice body in the pictures I saw. Definitely leans on the pro side, she was ready to have me come over to her apartment within an hour of talking. Said BB was on the menu and was willing to take 1. 0, probably less. Thing is I got the address to her east end apartment and arrived early to scope it out. It's not crack town sketch but it was sketchy enough that I bailed and cancelled. She might be worth the plunge for one of you but I wasn't up for it.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/af4acd99-31ae-426c-b799-3bb84f4d0a5e[/URL]
Joyinsorrow.
21, thick with an alt look. Not the prettiest girl out there but pretty enough and very very kinky. If you finesse her a little she really comes through. She did just recently start a new job that makes her availability less but this girl will request trips to Greece of any size over any other vacation destination. Not a pro and accepts reasonable donations.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c03fa14d-48f9-4937-bfcd-d5593996f177[/URL]
Anybody had any interaction with this one?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/03ef0df1-7277-4eb5-b330-789265686767[/URL]
She go by Sandra. Started asking cashapp after decided to meetup at a public place.
[QUOTE=BobbyRichmond;5069228]Anybody had any interaction with this one?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/03ef0df1-7277-4eb5-b330-789265686767[/URL][/QUOTE]
She is making to come her way and then act silent when you are reached to rundown sketchy area.
[QUOTE=Hungre1234;5069135]Princess1334.
19, a little thick but nice body in the pictures I saw. Definitely leans on the pro side, she was ready to have me come over to her apartment within an hour of talking. Said BB was on the menu and was willing to take 1. 0, probably less. Thing is I got the address to her east end apartment and arrived early to scope it out. It's not crack town sketch but it was sketchy enough that I bailed and cancelled. She might be worth the plunge for one of you but I wasn't up for it.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/af4acd99-31ae-426c-b799-3bb84f4d0a5e[/URL]
Joyinsorrow.
21, thick with an alt look. Not the prettiest girl out there but pretty enough and very very kinky. If you finesse her a little she really comes through. She did just recently start a new job that makes her availability less but this girl will request trips to Greece of any size over any other vacation destination. Not a pro and accepts reasonable donations.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/c03fa14d-48f9-4937-bfcd-d5593996f177[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5065835]
Anyway, I am all in favor of keeping (not LE) but legislators, etc. , out of the hair or Mr. Brandon Dude who started SA. We don't want it to go the way of back page and CL. That was because those were too blatant about being sites for connecting with hookers you'd otherwise find walking streets. I am NOT interested in anything like that, I have found several SBs from the site that weren't seeing others and truly were interested in (some) relationship elements, without the commitment of a real BF. I've also run into a few who needed their daddy kinks fulfilled. All great. If SA were to go away, there likely would be some replacement for it, but it is still far superior to the other sites out there now.
[/QUOTE]No, I believe you have the history of the demise of BP a bit muddled. [B]What got BP in hot water was trafficking and the trafficking of under-aged girls.[/B] There were numerous efforts to try to get BP to make changes to avoid trafficking, but BP hid behind the liability protections of Section 230; the Online Providers Immunity Act; the Communications Decency Act. Several NGO's tried to work with BP to help them change in ways that would thwart trafficking, but BP arrogantly ignored them.
Backpage was editing adverts to strip out references that indicated an under-aged girls, which did nothing to stop the practice. In fact, BP limited the number of reports to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children as it would give no positive PR value.
It got so bad that some Sheriff in IL got the CC companies to stop processing payments to BP, so they went around that restriction illegally and also laundered money through Bit Coin. There were numerous lawsuits against BP by under-aged victims of sex trafficking that all failed due to Section 230. In the end, the only way to stop the blatant under-aged sex trafficking on BP was to pass a law that shut them down. Unfortunately, you can't pass a law for one individual or company, so there is blow back that effects others.
So BackPage through its in actions lead to its own demise. Read the details, as they appeared in the indictment. (The case is still open).
[URL]https://www.justice.gov/file/1050276/download[/URL]
So Mr. Brandon Wade is walking a tight rope with SA and WYP. His sites need to make sure that no under-aged girls appear on the site and any attempts are sent to authorities. I think a few months after the BP take down, he adjusted the site. This is the reason that guys get banned, when they treat the site like an open air market for prostitution. SA needs plausible deniability and with the ability to demonstrate they are banning obvious prostitution, they stay on the tight rope. In the past Wade was quite visible in promoting the sites, which is / was unwise. I believe he has toned things down since BP fell. So while everyone 'knows' what SA is about, they can claim it isn't because overt cases are banned. So the dance continues.
Legislatures respond to crises and are often not very good at forward thinking of proactive policies. Don't hold your breath looking for changes to the laws. Maybe when those who grew up during the Jerry Falwell phase dwindle and those raised on internet porn emerge, then perhaps society changes?