Printable View
[QUOTE=Zat1190;6460723]Her service and enthusiasm are a 10/10 but for me I'm just not that attracted to her, really wish I was. I'd give her a 5. 5/10. I am mid 30's, kind of prefer my girls to be the around the same or younger. Just my preference.[/QUOTE]Appreciate it, that's not too too bad I suppose may give it a shot then.
[QUOTE=Scorpio1981;6457368]Anyone see this one? I see her posts frequently.
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/warwick/female-escorts/other/100qv-full-service-come-enjoy-/427287026426[/URL][/QUOTE]When I saw her I paid 1. 2 so if she offering lower specials she must be getting no repeats.
She was alright when I saw her kitty looked nice and ass was definitely fat with some jiggle action. Issue was on 2nd visit she kinda said we got to finish up which always annoys me.
Would I repeat? Maybe if I'm bored and desperate but otherwise not likely she a 5/10 looks wise I'm sure at one point she was a 7. 5/10 but idk looked malnourished in a way. But if you're on a budget for a quick finish worth a shot for sure.
But ain't not way I'm paying $300 for an hour LOL.
Might as well see Sidney or AMP but best of luck.
Anyone seen her? Think her name is Nicole in Fall River.
Let's have fun 🤩.
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/south-coast/female-escorts/black_caribbean/lets-have-fun--/785778472023[/URL]
[QUOTE=JohnV500;6455979]Michelle on EM. Anyone ever see her?
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/michelle-escort-pawtucket-546672[/URL][/QUOTE]She had been around a while. Goes by Northside Babieee also on STG. All covered, no kissing.
[QUOTE=SirPSchlong69;6445966]Hi, Joelle is an utter delight in conversation and insatiable in the sack. She loves sex. She is elegant, sexy, has a lovely, curvy body with moderate-size breast implants; V is clean and tasty and orgasmic. She is open to everything. I have done BBFSCIP, BBFSCIA, BBBJCIM numerous times with her. She is choosy as she's dealt with a lot of assholes in her career, so gentlemanliness goes a long way with her. I've enjoyed time with her for years now, price is 1. 5 to 2. 0 for 30-60 minutes, hasn't changed. Utterly worth it.
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/providence/female-escorts/caucasian_w/mature-sexy-fun-6ft-tall-blond/975256442350[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jarred;6460924]I totally agree with this assessment. I have had only 1 encounter with a P-area SW. And as luck would have it, Joelle answer the call. She cam to my downtown hotel room the same day at an agreed upon time. Her conversation was on point, her look was exactly what I expected from the pics, she is sexy as all 'get out'. And can fuk like a super star. If I lived in the Providence area, I'd see her on a VERY regular basis. Enjoy gents. She a classic and a keeper.[/QUOTE]I agree that Joelle, in my experience, was surely a world class 3 hole cumdumpter. However, there is a lot of info on here with the negatives about her current looks, like the saggy malfunctioning bolt ons, missing teeth, etc.
Anyway, when I heard that she was no longer chasing the dragon, and has been free of it for several years, I was all set to go and inseminate her again (after 10 years! ). But then I saw this new review today. Here is the relevant comment from that review below:
" . . she goes on and tells me that she's going through chemo so no hair pulling involved. . . ".
I wish her well, but I'm a bit leery of seeing her now because of this report. Mainly because I'm not a big fan at all of bald women. Of course, wigs can help. But also, I'm leery because I'm familiar, through my observations of civilians, that chemotherapy can really fuck up a woman's body in other ways, too, not to mention their mental and emotional health. Also, Chemo DEFINITELY makes them immunocompromised and, just as with recreational immunosuppressive drugs like opiates and methamphetamines, they are indeed more susceptible to acquiring and spreading infectious diseases when on chemo. Indeed, susceptibility to infection is one of the major problems suffered by cancer patients on chemo.
She got a 4 in looks and a 4 in performance in that new review, and the dude used a condom to fuck her (maybe his choice?) But that dude was not at all pleased with either her looks or performance.
Now, the dude did admit that Joelle was his very first ever escort. But maybe that's a good thing, in a review, as it might be more honest? Because he apparently had no frame of reference for how abysmal some of these hoes can look in these fucked up, current times.
For easier comparison, I attached my decade-old pictures from her glory days, when I used to leave copius cum deposits in her talented ass and cunnt in many visits.
So, maybe some of you guys who've seen her recently can comment on this new revelation?
I've really never been a huge fan of bolt-ons, and in fact, over the decades I've become even less and less enamored of them because no matter how they look, they virtually never jiggle properly, and they just never FEEL right! But I do think that they looked pretty good on Joelle, 10 years ago. She wore them well, anyway, LOL! So I'd like to know if they look any different now, than in my now decade-old, and admitedly suboptimal flip top phone pics, below?
[QUOTE=Addickted;6464590]She had been around a while. Goes by Northside Babieee also on STG. All covered, no kissing.[/QUOTE]You are responding to wrong girl bro. Nicole and Michelle are 2 different girl.
[URL]https://www.eros.com/rhode_island/providence/files/5041977.htm?cat=1[/URL]
Any info? I can't seem to find anything.
Well said. Despise them as a rule. The only good man-mades I can recall are Tiffy in northwestern New England. I couldn't even tell that they were man-made.
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6464713]I've really never been a huge fan of bolt-ons, and in fact, over the decades I've become even less and less enamored of them because no matter how they look, they virtually never jiggle properly, and they just never FEEL right! But I do think that they looked pretty good on Joelle, 10 years ago. She wore them well, anyway, LOL! So I'd like to know if they look any different now, than in my now decade-old, and admitedly suboptimal flip top phone pics, below?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6464713]I've really never been a huge fan of bolt-ons, and in fact, over the decades I've become even less and less enamored of them because no matter how they look, they virtually never jiggle properly, and they just never FEEL right! But I do think that they looked pretty good on Joelle, 10 years ago. She wore them well, anyway, LOL! So I'd like to know if they look any different now, than in my now decade-old, and admitedly suboptimal flip top phone pics, below?[/QUOTE]Their best days are long behind them, her sexual prowess cougar attitude carries her but even that is starting to fade.
[QUOTE=SwimSays;6465149]Their best days are long behind them, her sexual prowess cougar attitude carries her but even that is starting to fade.[/QUOTE]Saggy, oddly shaped.
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6465045]Well said. Despise them as a rule. The only good man-mades I can recall are Tiffy in northwestern New England. I couldn't even tell that they were man-made.[/QUOTE]For the most part, I despise bolt ons as well! However, there have been a few situations where I thought they were natural only to find out they were fake. All the girls were strippers and wish they never even mentioned they were fake!
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6464649]I agree that Joelle, in my experience, was surely a world class 3 hole cumdumpter. However, there is a lot of info on here with the negatives about her current looks, like the saggy malfunctioning bolt ons, missing teeth, etc.
Anyway, when I heard that she was no longer chasing the dragon, and has been free of it for several years, I was all set to go and inseminate her again (after 10 years! ). But then I saw this new review today. Here is the relevant comment from that review below:
" . . she goes on and tells me that she's going through chemo so no hair pulling involved. . . ".
I wish her well, but I'm a bit leery of seeing her now because of this report. Mainly because I'm not a big fan at all of bald women. Of course, wigs can help. But also, I'm leery because I'm familiar, through my observations of civilians, that chemotherapy can really fuck up a woman's body in other ways, too, not to mention their mental and emotional health. Also, Chemo DEFINITELY makes them immunocompromised and, just as with recreational immunosuppressive drugs like opiates and methamphetamines, they are indeed more susceptible to acquiring and spreading infectious diseases when on chemo. Indeed, susceptibility to infection is one of the major problems suffered by cancer patients on chemo.
She got a 4 in looks and a 4 in performance in that new review, and the dude used a condom to fuck her (maybe his choice?) But that dude was not at all pleased with either her looks or performance.[/QUOTE]Chemo also secretes out of every body orifice for days after treatment I'd be very careful, if not avoid her, bc chemo can transfer through unprotected sex.
[QUOTE=WillyO;6465281]For the most part, I despise bolt ons as well! However, there have been a few situations where I thought they were natural only to find out they were fake. All the girls were strippers and wish they never even mentioned they were fake![/QUOTE]
Coco at apple spa 1021 broad st prov ri.
She has implants seen by the scar under her boob.
But I could not tell and can't. I told her you have nice natural dd's.
Till I went down on her and seen the small scar.
[QUOTE=WillyO;6465281]For the most part, I despise bolt ons as well! However, there have been a few situations where I thought they were natural only to find out they were fake. All the girls were strippers and wish they never even mentioned they were fake![/QUOTE]I agree, there have been a precious few where I could not tell, but I can literally count those on the fingers of one hand, out of the probably hundreds and hundreds that I've handled, LOL! I will try and dig up pics of those few examples. . . Be aware, though, that some women have "lifters", which I don't really consider bolt-ons.
But if you want to see some of my favorite types of low-hangiing and dangling natural cows udders, which I consider WAY more fun, take a look at my last post on the Big Boobs of New England forum:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?20086-Big-boobs-of-New-England&p=6403004&viewfull=1[/URL]#post6403004.