Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5319229]Fortunately of unfortunately we aren't comparing with car show models or Kpop idols. Would you compare a Volkswagen with a Mercedes? Even with a Mercedes is a fully loaded one the same as one with only the standard options. We're talking about Kgirls and in that world Hana is definitely in that 9 category as evidenced by all the reviews that have been posted. Let's not compare apples to oranges. The bookers are not offering us any car show models or Kpop girls. At least that has been my experience. Maybe Kpop girls looks run the gamut as well. Hana is what I would call the fully loaded Kgirl.[/QUOTE]We're not talking about cars. Bad analogy. If you have a standard of 30's /40's women, then you obviously have low standards of looks. It is irrelevant whether bookers offer car show models, as it doesn't change how most guys judge looks. If a non-hobbyist looked at Hana, he wouldn't give her a 9. Even her average TER score is 8. 39, certainly not a "9" category. Only fanboys and shills keep putting her on a pedestal.

Okay gents, I saw Lisha from SA this past Wed after some mix reviews.

I have no idea what others are saying that she is thick or a bit chub. Just not true.

In women's size, she would consider S size, no where to large or heavy anything, for Hana? She is extra S or 00 as double O, the smallest you can go.

Now the truth.

Pictures: It is 100% her with very light or glamed photo shop, she remind me a lot of Mini from M a while back, her attitude and youth, she is no where 30, I would put mid 20's, college girl age.

Body: she is slim thick, meaning not bone dry skinny spinner like Hana, she had that college chick look of it, healthy fit to be exact, nice curve all around. Nice full cup of C and soft, nice ass to grab with some meat, I did not see any tummy fold or tummy at all, seem very fit.

5'2 ish, 110 lbs and fit, well balanced meat around body, if you are looking for 90 lbs and 5', that's hana, to be realistic, 20 lbs is not much to consider thick nor heavy.

Truth be told, I turned on the light when I was in the room waiting for her to be back from restroom, LOL, she only had a red lamp so I turn on main light, I saw her everything clear and I was very very happy, she laughed and went to turn off the bright light.

Service: I guess everyone have their preference, for instance on BBBJ, I like it at the top half, go up and down and suck it hard instead of trying to DP and hold there, the part that I feel the most is up top so I like her style of BBBJ a lot, similar to Allie.

Somewhat vocal with your pounding, the harder you go, the louder it gets. DATY is very responsive, clean, fresh, lots water work, LOL.

Went in mish, dg, cg than back to mish, pop it there with 10 min to spare to hr. She kept it inside for a good time and keeps on kissing.

I showered and shaved before I went, so I skipped shower at the beginning, just blue toast and hand wash, she was ok with it, she can tell I'm very clean.

Saw a few reviews said barley DFK, for me was DFK from the get go, she likes me I guess, service always YMMV as you all know.

Overall, I will for sure return, we just click. She is young, act young, smiles a lot and playful, good service and well worth the 280 compare to any upcharge.

Oh and thanks for all who gave suggestion on Jay and Scarlette at 2 pop, 100 up just too much for what I can get for 280, LOL.

Are they the same person? Or different? Pictures seems different though.

This new Susan's stats looks very good but she doesn't look asian, I wonder have anyone met her?

I don't know how anyone can see the first 2 as model material. The last girl with the high cheek bone and slender longer neck qualifies.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5319318]It ain't always what you think it is. YMMV.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5319605]This new Susan's stats looks very good but she doesn't look asian, I wonder have anyone met her?[/QUOTE]The caption under her used to say Latina.

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/susan[/URL]

So here is the thing, she seem like a good 280 BBFS, short, fit, not bone dry.

But somehow I did a search and only about 3 or 4 reviews about her since last year to now, not popular at all but she is still around, she must got business.

Has anyone see her besides ones here that did the reviews? She seems nice for the price to be honest.

I'm doing homework trying to plan my next weekly date, debating if this new Chanel from candy girl with some good reviews or Kimi also with some good reviews.

OR just go and see Lisha again, what do you vets say?

Sad now days you have to do homework to get the good ones for under 300, easy way is just fork up 100 extra. Well. I'm poor! But my dick don't think so.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5319581]Okay gents, I saw Lisha from SA this past Wed after some mix reviews.

I have no idea what others are saying that she is thick or a bit chub. Just not true.

In women's size, she would consider S size, no where to large or heavy anything, for Hana? She is extra S or 00 as double O, the smallest you can go.

Now the truth.[/QUOTE]Bruhh if Lisha fits the smallest dress size a girl can go, then pocket girl must be cut from a different cloth.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5319634]So here is the thing, she seem like a good 280 BBFS, short, fit, not bone dry.

But somehow I did a search and only about 3 or 4 reviews about her since last year to now, not popular at all but she is still around, she must got business.

Has anyone see her besides ones here that did the reviews? She seems nice for the price to be honest.

I'm doing homework trying to plan my next weekly date, debating if this new Chanel from candy girl with some good reviews or Kimi also with some good reviews.

OR just go and see Lisha again, what do you vets say?

Sad now days you have to do homework to get the good ones for under 300, easy way is just fork up 100 extra. Well. I'm poor! But my dick don't think so.[/QUOTE]I haven't seen Lisha but from all intel imo Kimi will have much better service. Kimi was also Nabi of KPC. Lisha barely lasted in Bay Area at a popular org so that says something to me about service. I'm still hesitant to see Lisha based on intel I've gotten from my trusted Bay Area crew.

Kimi worked at 2-3 three orgs in the past in Bay Area. I believe Alpaca and KGA. I saw Kimi couple months ago as well I saw her when she was Karen of M in early 2020. She cut her hair shorter but likely grown longer by now. Her face is very cute as as pics shown but body is not going to be tone. I wouldn't call her fit but I wouldn't call her small. She is fine if you do not mind a little extra padding but not rolls. Her service is good. However I don't see her listed currently or maybe on a break.

[QUOTE=EasyPeasyDong;5319276]I agree with you BuddaHead.[/QUOTE]For future reference on look, these are what I call model materials.

What's fun is you can mish with Jool Gina and her breasts will bounce at a resonant frequency. Then she'll grab your hands and use them to to hold her boobs in place.

[QUOTE=Jack926;5319747]For future reference on look, these are what I call model materials.[/QUOTE]Hmmm. I haven't noticed any of them being available at the Kgirl agencies. As I said before don't compare apples to oranges. A top of the line Mercedes is better than one with only the standard options but in the end they're still both a Mercedes. A world champ welterweight boxer is the top of the line but wouldn't stand a chance against the heavyweight champ. Let's stick to Kgirl comparisons and stay in the realm of reality.

[QUOTE=Jack926;5319747]For future reference on look, these are what I call model materials.[/QUOTE]Yes, all of these girls look like models except for maybe the naked girl. Usually top models don't have to show their pussies because their face is DDG.

Guys like you and I and man others must have wised up and are going to the 280 all inclusive ladies more and more instead of the 100 upcharge ones.

I used to see Kimi anytime no problem but now she's busier and busier.

I think it was Thursday and I texted at 1 pm she was full booked except for 1 time at 9 pm.

I went to see jool Gina instead who is also no upcharge.

Then the next day I saw Lisha and she was fantastic too.

Add Chanel from losangelesasian and I got myself a hot rotation on repeat and never 100 up charge again.

But yeah Kimi is great because she is magnum approved and enjoys it, and she gives a great 25 minute massage.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5319634]So here is the thing, she seem like a good 280 BBFS, short, fit, not bone dry.

But somehow I did a search and only about 3 or 4 reviews about her since last year to now, not popular at all but she is still around, she must got business.

Has anyone see her besides ones here that did the reviews? She seems nice for the price to be honest.

I'm doing homework trying to plan my next weekly date, debating if this new Chanel from candy girl with some good reviews or Kimi also with some good reviews.

OR just go and see Lisha again, what do you vets say?

Sad now days you have to do homework to get the good ones for under 300, easy way is just fork up 100 extra. Well. I'm poor! But my dick don't think so.[/QUOTE]

Very useful! Thank you.

[QUOTE=GG1234;5311225]I've made a list of strictly no-upcharge k-girl agencies in Los Angeles.

[URL]https://rentry.co/la_bbfs[/URL]

M.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/aKndu2KCPapj[/URL]

LAVixens.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/LAVixens[/URL]

Sexy Fun K-girls (SFK).

[URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/kdolls.socal[/URL]

Los Angeles Asian.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Losangelesasian[/URL]

Pepsi Club.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/pepsiclub[/URL]

Precious K-love (PKL).

[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Preciousklove[/URL]

K-girls in LA (Booker Jane).

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/kgirlsinla[/URL]

Angels in West LA.

[URL]https://angelsinwla.wordpress.com/[/URL]

Sesang Girls.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SesangGirls[/URL][/QUOTE]