If not Seeking, then where?
You're welcome, TechSticles. And thanks for seconding. I think many guys here feel the same way.
Lest I seem like I'm being mean:
Lilone (Lilsexyme) was probably cute at one time. As in, when Ronald Reagan was last in the White House and there was a USSR. She admits to being 50 years old. Seriously, guys?
Nikole Taylor was really cute back in 2009 when she debuted as Delicious Dawn. She's a nice person. But she's extremely rough nowadays. My guess is substance abuse. And she smokes like a chimney. Pass!
Cristen Cremes looks like a late-stage junkie, and (sadly) that's probably not too far from the truth.
I met Cameron once, and literally walked away. I felt bad, and I apologized. But I just couldn't do it. Obese and mannish.
To bring this back on topic: We're all mad at Seeking. Between 2011 and 2015, Seeking was the candy store in which we were all eager children. Now the consensus seems to be (and this is one time when I agree with the consensus) that it's become more trouble than it's worth.
So, what else is there? Let's see.
Tryst is pushing overpriced girls from ten years ago. Not just the low-end lineup mentioned above, but girls like Tobi Telford, Natane Marie, Mary Ann Summers, Sheridan Spencer (Alex Cole).
Ryann (who meets the minimal (and I emphasis "minimal") quality standards in my book) is back. But she seems to have jacked her rate up:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/ryannxoxo[/URL]
(Someone please explain to me how seeing a few hundred of you guys while in the employ of Steve at EE justifies a $100 rate hike.).
Escort Alligator is a virtual house of horrors. Ditto for Escort Bablyon. They're like that old game show, 'Fear Factor'.
Eros is filled with moderately attractive girls who want between $500 and $1,200. Most of them have no reviews.
My point, then, isn't just to be negative, about either Seeking or the current lineup. But I'm honestly asking: What good choices do we have now? I would ditch Seeking in a minute, if there was a wide selection of reasonably priced escorts who weren't fat / old / rough, or obvious junkies. If there's a gold mine that I've been too lazy to identify, someone please call me out on the carpet. I would love to be contradicted here.
[QUOTE=TechSticles;4987796]My bolding on the original post. Thank for that completely accurate info. When I see recommendations for those chicks pop up, I vomit in my mouth a little, but they still have their followers.[/QUOTE]
Seeking Founder and History
[QUOTE=DarkNet;4984404]I know because I dated an employee and she told me. It was actually founded by a man in Cincinnati. I don't care to go into the company history.[/QUOTE]For your reference.
Founder of Seeking: [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Wade[/URL].
Company History: [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeekingArrangement[/URL].
Curious who in Cincinnati was involved with the founding of Seeking?
No argument from me on your comments.
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4987974]You're welcome, TechSticles. And thanks for seconding. I think many guys here feel the same way.
Lest I seem like I'm being mean:
Lilone (Lilsexyme) was probably cute at one time. As in, when Ronald Reagan was last in the White House and there was a USSR. She admits to being 50 years old. Seriously, guys?
Nikole Taylor was really cute back in 2009 when she debuted as Delicious Dawn. She's a nice person. But she's extremely rough nowadays. My guess is substance abuse. And she smokes like a chimney. Pass!
Cristen Cremes looks like a late-stage junkie, and (sadly) that's probably not too far from the truth.
I met Cameron once, and literally walked away. I felt bad, and I apologized. But I just couldn't do it. Obese and mannish.
To bring this back on topic: We're all mad at Seeking. Between 2011 and 2015, Seeking was the candy store in which we were all eager children. Now the consensus seems to be (and this is one time when I agree with the consensus) that it's become more trouble than it's worth.
So, what else is there? Let's see.
Tryst is pushing overpriced girls from ten years ago. Not just the low-end lineup mentioned above, but girls like Tobi Telford, Natane Marie, Mary Ann Summers, Sheridan Spencer (Alex Cole).
Ryann (who meets the minimal (and I emphasis "minimal") quality standards in my book) is back. But she seems to have jacked her rate up:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/ryannxoxo[/URL]
(Someone please explain to me how seeing a few hundred of you guys while in the employ of Steve at EE justifies a $100 rate hike.).
Escort Alligator is a virtual house of horrors. Ditto for Escort Bablyon. They're like that old game show, 'Fear Factor'.
Eros is filled with moderately attractive girls who want between $500 and $1,200. Most of them have no reviews.
My point, then, isn't just to be negative, about either Seeking or the current lineup. But I'm honestly asking: What good choices do we have now? I would ditch Seeking in a minute, if there was a wide selection of reasonably priced escorts who weren't fat / old / rough, or obvious junkies. If there's a gold mine that I've been too lazy to identify, someone please call me out on the carpet. I would love to be contradicted here.[/QUOTE]Just my 2 cents, but would agree with the post – our choices are very limited these days. I guess what you are saying is an average SB today is better than most of the pros in the market. And I agree with that. But in fairness, I am not in the market much for pros these days, really for the past 4 years I have been a SD. Before SA – I used to travel on business and do pros – with the help of some reviews from a site we all know that has recently been reinstated. Had great success with that and traveled to a few larger markets where the pickings were a lot better in the escort world and tended to see ladies that I had seen before and liked.
Then I stumbled on to SA in 2016 and the world changed for me. I had good luck early on and stayed with it. Everyone is looking for something different. I am usually just looking for a couple hours of fun, maybe drinks and a bite to eat before the FC – no overnights or anything like that. I find I don't have a lot in common with most of these ladies – with the exception of the 40 something MILF's.
You have got to believe that COVID has had an effect, not big news. You would think that the poor job market and other issues would bring more SB's to the site, but the flip side is the health scare and the thought for them of constantly seeing strangers. I know this was a deterrent early on with Covid for me as well. I have seen a couple new SB's since March, but like most of us, I am trying to be careful. And I clearly don't drink all the Kool-Aid on this disease put out by the media. But I am in the older supposedly vulnerable age range just north of 60 – but am also a very healthy person with no co-morbidities.
Moving forward I am sticking to SA. I do one month on and 3 months off membership – just looking for a few reliable SB's that I enjoy being with. Is the quality the same as 4-6 years ago, no but that can change from day to day and week to week. You just never know when you will find the right fit, but as others have said, it takes a ton of work and I believe some good luck as well. I think if you are looking for a constant high volume / variety on the SB site, that might be gone for a while but might return after the "pandemic". In the meantime, I plan on hunkering down with a few SB's for now, winter is coming!128522;.
What I ditched Seeking for
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4987974]
My point, then, isn't just to be negative, about either Seeking or the current lineup. But I'm honestly asking: What good choices do we have now? I would ditch Seeking in a minute, if there was a wide selection of reasonably priced escorts who weren't fat / old / rough, or obvious junkies. If there's a gold mine that I've been too lazy to identify, someone please call me out on the carpet. I would love to be contradicted here.[/QUOTE]My most recent sugar baby actually came from Tinder, and I've met one from OK Cupid, too. Although there are some girls, generally ones with Golden Pussy Syndrome, who directly state on those sites that they are looking for a sugar daddy, the ones I actually made arrangements with were not openly saying they were seeking a daddy, but after a few message exchanges they broached the subject. Obviously there are trade offs when it comes to using a free dating app instead of a SBSD website, but after putting in the time, it is possible to find a young, attractive companion who doesn't show signs of hard drug use, and who has reasonable expectations regarding the mutually beneficial aspect of the arrangement.
Sugar babies on Tinder, etc.
[QUOTE=AdamP469;4990808]My most recent sugar baby actually came from Tinder, and I've met one from OK Cupid, too. Although there are some girls, generally ones with Golden Pussy Syndrome, who directly state on those sites that they are looking for a sugar daddy, the ones I actually made arrangements with were not openly saying they were seeking a daddy, but after a few message exchanges they broached the subject. Obviously there are trade offs when it comes to using a free dating app instead of a SBSD website, but after putting in the time, it is possible to find a young, attractive companion who doesn't show signs of hard drug use, and who has reasonable expectations regarding the mutually beneficial aspect of the arrangement.[/QUOTE]Thanks Adam. I'm sure that could work for some guys. Here is my problem. (And I think many are going to encounter the same thing.).
I know how the doubles-swipe matching works on Tinder. I'm fit and decent-looking, but I'm in my early 50's. I'm not a young studmuffin.
So if I'm looking for college babes, my Tinder matches are going to be limited to coed age girls who are on a dating site looking for 50-something men. I'm guessing that's not a huge number.
Tinder is intriguing, but my impression has always been: Guys who do well on Tinder mostly don't need to pay, anyway. Therefore, it isn't going to be a viable Seeking replacement for most of us.
If I've misinterpreted this, someone feel free to set me straight.
