1 photos
A2 - President of the Apathy Coalition
[QUOTE=Admin2;2197628][BLUE]and one apathetic down here. (I'm the Apathetic, it's a new political party I'm starting)[/BLUE][/QUOTE]Your official slogan.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]340241[/ATTACH]
[blue]A2 makes you campaign manager.
A2[/blue]
Here it is, sorry for the book
[BLUE]There is an inherent inequity on this forum. I understand and agree with the reason but at heart I'm a fair guy and it bugs me. I'm talking about the fact that chicks by and large can't defend on the forum. We can't allow it because if we did every time some guy posted a bad review or said some chick ripped him off, then the next thing you know she's going to respond, then he has to argue and it fucking goes one forever. Nobody wants to read that, we lose membership, our sponsors leave, I make less money, then I get less pussy. That is all bad.
I can continue to do this though because due to the miracle of crowd sourcing at the end of the day the truth usually wins out. False negative and false positives are identified and discounted. It pretty much happens on a sub conscious level. Some chick has 30 reviews, 23 of them are great to fucking stellar, 5 guys say, eh she was good but nothing special, one guy says she redefines pussy, and one guy says her pussy stinks and she ripped him off.
From that 99% of guys are going to figure, 23 guys liked her, most a lot and some a whole lot. Five guys say she tried hard but it didn't happen (YMMV) The one guy that said sunshine comes out of her pussy was probably management trying to get her a start, and the guy who really hated her probably wanted to watch her fuck a goat but she wouldn't let him so he lied. Without thinking about it we throw out the highs and lows, and see a chick that 3 out of 4 times it's going to be worth the money and if we think the pics are hot and we have the coin, we will pick up the phone. That's how crowd sourcing works. You get to average the intel and make a more informed choice.
Savannah would be a great example of this in action. Most of the guys that have fucked her say "Holy shit, that chick can fuck!" Almost all the guys that have dealt with her also say, "Holy Shit that chick is fucking psycho!" If she ever came to Argentina I would probably fuck her at Argentina hot chick rates. But; I wouldn't fuck her at my house. I would take her to a telo. I would make the INFORMED choice, (because of all the info on her) to pin her knees to her ears like a Christmas Turkey but I sure as fuck wouldn't let her know where I live or what I drove.
PM's; PM's are private. No question about that, but that are not sacrosanct. Since nobody that can read and has access to the internet (everyone of you fucks here) knows that there is no expectation of privacy online. We usually don't talk about it, but you guys that aren't idiots know we have access to our own servers. It's not like Hedwig (Harry Potters owl) is sitting outside your car waiting to carry that PM to whoever you're sending it to. You guys know we have them. They are safe from locally prying eyes because our servers are offshore, but we have them. Lucky for you guys we don't do much about them for two reasons. First and most important, all of us are big privacy fans. Second, we just generally don't give a fuck what you say to each other. They are private, I thought about this for a day, in the end, I'm not releasing a PM, I'm putting out two sentences only.
Where these two worlds collide?
If some guy, a respected senior, sees some chick and writes that she ripped him off. Not gave him a bad time, but I mean strait up cash and fucking dash. That's what this forum is about. Guys exchanging info about a chick so they can make informed decisions. The chick writes me and says, "hey A2, I didn't rip him off, he's lying. I want you to take that post down right away." (This only happens 10 times a day) My response is the same. "Sorry, I don't take down bad reviews because you don't like that. Guys often lie on this forum. That's one of the hazards of a free forum. " If she doesn't rip guys off, her steadies are going to write and say, "hey, she didn't rip me off. " Then you guys get to decide who you want to believe. The one guy who said she ripped him off or the five who said she didn't.
BUT; what if she said to me "hey that guy who said I ripped him off sent me a PM saying, 'I told you if you didn't cut your rate in half for me I would write a bad review, next time you might be smarter. ' this isn't fair. I want you to take that post down. " Is she right? Is it ok for a member to deliberately lie about a session and I do nothing about it when I have his words as proof of what happened? Saying some chick has a big pimp that rips you off is kind of the kiss of death on this forum. It's not like 10 guys are going to go in behind you after you say that and say you were great.
What this is all about is Jag saying he fucked this chick Jema bareback. Bareback is a big deal. It's probably one of the most polarizing issues on the forum. Guys that want BB services are hounds about it. If some chick did it once, they think they should do it for everybody. But for guys like me who are "wrap it up every fucking time" guys we put chicks that provide those services on the don't fly list, and they aren't ever fucking getting off of it. So, if it isn't true, her phones going to blow up from guys she DOESN'T want to be seeing, and NONE of the guys she want's to see will call her. For most other stuff they can remedy it. Normally there's nothing I can do about it except say, "sorry sugar, the guys write what the guys write. " but there is still stuff she can do. If he says she's fat, she can post a pic of her gut holding todays paper. If he says her tits are down at her knees, she can post a pic of her boobies. If he says, she hates sucking cock, she can invite another senior to swing by for a pitstop and do some cock worshiping. She has remedies.
For BBFS there really isn't a way to remedy that except she puts up a post where he's saying it didn't happen.
Hmmmmm. What to do?
The member in question has a history of lying. I've never commented on it before, but I know it to be true. Guys have sent me PM's where he was RELENTLESSLY bugging them to "Hey man, A2 gave me my own thread because he said I'm one of the best posters on the forum. I would appreciate it if you gave me a shout out in my thread. " After I had explained to him when I started the sandbox that it wasn't an honor [Distinguished members that get their own threads have sticky threads (they are on the top half of the city pages) and can still post wherever they want]. What I told him specifically when I created that thread was "I'm sick of dealing with your shit, I'm sticking you in a fucking hole and if you fucking post one fucking time outside of it I'm banning you. " Somehow that got morphed into "hey man, A2 gave me my own thread because I'm awesome. " Let there be no mistake about this, it is not his thread, it is his cage.
On another occasion some chick he reviewed meant to send him a PM and instead of sending the PM, she clicked the report post button which goes to me. In the comments section, which I guess she thought was a going to him she wrote; "Thank you for the review it should help get me started, [B]If you ever get down here[/B] look me up and I'll take good care of you. " Not, "when I see you again. " Not I had a good time" but "if you ever get down here. " She was dumb enough to report the post when she thought she was sending a PM so maybe she just fucked up, but that was the beginning of the slide that ended up seeing him [B]restricted[/B] to that thread.
Jema told me I can look at her PM's this is what I saw in two of them. These are direct quotes from two PM's she received;.
[QUOTE]I wish you and I had made love bareback.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]You and I had a totally covered session.[/QUOTE]Does this chick fuck guys bareback. I don't know, I don't really care, I don't know shit about her. Does he have a history of lying? Without question. Does he fuck a lot of chicks? I don't know but I think so. Are most of his reports embellished to the point where they have little resemblance to truth, again I don't know but if you don't think so I hope I can play poker with you some day. Is he scrambling like a madman trying to get in front of this with damage control? Oh my fucking god yes. A couple guys that have posted in here today have put up stuff that was nearly word for word what I deleted from his thread BEFORE this chick had even put anything out there. Remember in my initial post I didn't mention names, or anything about what had happened. Why can't he post about it in his sandbox? Because part of his restriction is he's only allowed to post about his DIRECT experience with chicks.
AncientOne, if you got to make a stand on principle and go, I understand and respect that because that's what I'm doing here. I'm not going to let a douchebag say something when in his own words [B]by his own hand[/B] he says it didn't happen. I didn't release the whole series of PM's but I'm a pretty smart guy, the story about "trying to protect my identity" doesn't fit the narrative about the exchange between them in any way. That's just another lie.
A2[/BLUE]
Nooooo A2 now you have done it!!
The sheep who can't see past the flock will be shitting themselves. Of course when I said this stuff, which was quite obvious to me, I became under attack. We were just the jealous ones and don't have Jag coin.The Jag is still good entertainment with his musings. I assume he means well, sure he's banged a few girls and I sure as hell know he has not. I have no hate for him. I have not went public on the main forum with what I know. It was so obvious it was astounding that so many could not see it. So I wish for him to continue, hopefully in more of a REALISTIC manner.
A2 it looks like you need to get that poker game going, your going to clean
Public response to "the Book by A2"
USAG is your playground and your job and it appears to me to be a difficult job at that. So many mitigating factors involved in your actions of squaring away this dispute that quite frankly I had not considered. What really strikes me about "your book" is your stated "management" of the Jag (own thread / cage including severe RESTRICTIONS). As usual in life, things are not always what they appear to be! When The Tooth Fairy and Santa turned out to be total SHAMS yet they each still maintain redeeming qualities, as does the Jag. Perhaps now his embellishments and overzealousness will be toned down? I will still be a big fan of Jag's Sandbox as his INTEL is valuable stuff for MY PARTICULAR HOBBY needs, and apparently a host of other mongers as well. I will not resign from USAG but I will certainly curtail my activities here drastically. Play Safe All. AncientOne.
This is for all the "I told you so" guys that are going to post
[BLUE]For anybody that's saying this;[/BLUE]
[QUOTE=KingCasanova;2198179]When I started posting on here I called out the Jag and his false reports, lies, embellishments etc.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PharmaGuy;2198126]Of course when I said this stuff, which was quite obvious to me, I became under attack.[/QUOTE][BLUE]And thinking, "see now I was justified in calling him out"
Remember I did this for a year;
[QUOTE=Admin2;2198077]I've never commented on it before,[/QUOTE]
Just saying,
A2[/BLUE]
I'm confused what this means.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2198321][BLUE]For anybody that's saying this;[/BLUE]
[BLUE]And thinking, "see now I was justified in calling him out"
Remember I did this for a year;
Just saying,
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]You did what for a year? Held your tongue?
One of the best books I've read just ended.
I've been sitting on the sideline of the anti-jag team just reading these posts and watching the story unfold and sadly the story is over (albeit with a happy ending). Good job A2 on your post. I enjoyed reading your thought process and glad to see you use your big head as much as your smaller head hahah.
Now to find something new to read, I guess I'll jump back to the BP reviews page or something.
'Pyth.
