3 photos
Desire Pheromone is looking for you.
Found her on Craigs last month. She can host in Clinton, Md. In a house. Not a room.
Also does out call. See post on 7/8. Hot part girl and clean. Seems everything is on the menu and willing to spend some time with you.
I have email address. Always looking for UTR in Fairfax.
It would have taken you far less time to image search
[QUOTE=Quriusmrk;3028100]Not sure I'll get a chance to TOFTT this one as I am headed out of the area soon but wanted to post and ask if anyone had already pulled the trigger. I can't imagine the picture is real but have done no research to check that out. That said, it can't be real. ?
[URL]http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/thp/5725392703.html[/URL]
Thanks,
Q.[/QUOTE]Than to log in and write the post asking if anyone had already pulled the trigger.
You can add Google image search to your browser as a plug-in or extension, so all you have to do is right-click on the image. It literally takes two seconds to do the research.
[URL]https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-similar-images/[/URL]
[URL]https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/search-by-image-by-google/dajedkncpodkggklbegccjpmnglmnflm?hl=en[/URL]
[URL]https://addons.opera.com/en/extensions/details/google-reverse-image-search-2/[/URL]
Patty: not real pic, but close, and worth a visit (IMHO)
[QUOTE=RoaminRoman;3028351]After a while, Q, one tends to develop a sixth sense about these ads. As you've indicated, this one looks TGTBT, especially since there's just this one photo. If I were to see that ad in my searches, I would immediately discount it and move on.
One's time is worth something; hence, my statement that mongers expend both their hard-earned money [B][u]and[/u][/B] their limited time finding good providers. So, just like a newbie who asks for a handout as to where to find the best girls, etc. , these BP ads also impose on a monger of his valuable resources (in this case, our time).
So, to answer your question: No, I haven't pulled the trigger on this gal and doubt that I ever would. My advice would be to put her ad in the discard pile and not even waste your time (and, later, perhaps your money, as well). Just my two shekels' worth, for whatever it's worth.
[B]Roman[/B][/QUOTE]Patty is a cute, busty Thai woman (20's? 30?) who gives a decent massage and nice finish. Not her real pic in the ad but it's actually not far off and she's quite attractive in person. I had no problem getting extras but I was referred by another Thai masseuse. Don't be surprised if she's cautious at first but, if you make her feel safe and comfortable, you should be ok. When I saw her a standard finish was included in the base rate with no upsell. So that makes her a good value and comparable (better, IMHO) to an AMP. Her menu might open up with further visits but, as with all things, YMMV.
FWIW, it seems to me the current Thai massage scene can be viewed as consisting of two main groups. One group is made up of local girls who actually care about building a base of regular clients and the other is made up of visiting girls who are more focused on making quick $.
Patty is part of the first group as are (off the top of my head) KK, Tara, Nikki, Lina and Nicole. The second group consists of the visiting Fairfax Circle and Centreville girls who mostly overprice and underdeliver.
P.S. Seeing fake pics in either the CL or BP therapeutic section really doesn't set off alarm bells for me. In fact, it seems to be the rule rather than the exception but that doesn't mean there aren't great values to be found. For my $, getting a good, reasonably priced massage and being pleasantly surprised at the end is quite often more satisfying than seeing a FS escort.