Printable View
Met Hannah. She was wonderful. She started out as a fake, but we stopped that. Then she gave a tremendous therapy session. However, the shower was inop! Did not like the hygene status, but the little head told the big head that the sink was adequate if used a lot. Of course all this was all in line with PWC LE and health codes. Hope they stay open. But the Yorkshire session was better, and the facility was nicer.
I've been reading up and may decide to pay one of these places a visit. My body's been aching and I need a good massage.
Where's (or what's) HWC? Any other good spots highly recommended?
And what's TS? (I'm a newbie)
Thanks!
TW
You might start off with the abbreviations section.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?t=1897[/url]
than I would suggest after you're familiar with that RTFF again.
Happy Hunting
AJ
[QUOTE=The Web]I've been reading up and may decide to pay one of these places a visit. My body's been aching and I need a good massage.
Where's (or what's) HWC? Any other good spots highly recommended?
And what's TS? (I'm a newbie)
Thanks!
TW[/QUOTE]
I just read the abbreviations dictionary linked to via: [url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?t=1897[/url]
and found that TS means Transexual.
So as to reduce confusion, I think we all need to know that it ALSO means TABLE SHOWER where you lie on a table and the provider shampoos your body. If done correctly this can be the best part of the whole MP experience!
I believe that the majority of the time TS is seen in this forum that it means just that: TABLE SHOWER.
That is also NOT to say that a TS - Transexual experience would be a bad thing! I have never tried it, if anyone else has, please PM me and tell me all about it.
JJ
HWC is Health & Wellness Center (I think). A forum search will give you the address.
[QUOTE=The Web]I've been reading up and may decide to pay one of these places a visit. My body's been aching and I need a good massage.
Where's (or what's) HWC? Any other good spots highly recommended?
And what's TS? (I'm a newbie)
Thanks!
TW[/QUOTE]
I've read through a bunch of posts and could not find the locations.
I tried Googling them, but I'd need to know the zip code or town names.
Any help is greatly appreciated. [blue][Email address deleted by Admin][/blue]
Thanks!
[size=-2][u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove email addresses in the text[/u]. Please do not post email addresses in the Forum. Instead, please invite other Forum Members to contact you directly via the Forum's Private Messaging system. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size]
Visited *** today and met a new girl K****, only 4 days. She is a cute little spinner and although she says she is new to the buisness, she left me satisfied completely. Seniors and trusted can PM for details. Also found out today is Gina's last day.
Is it "illegal" for me to show up at one of these places for a massage or whatever happens next? Let's say I wanted to stop by, get my massage and ONLY the massage that I paid for. And if LE was to bust in, would they be able to charge me for anything?
[QUOTE=The Web]Is it "illegal" for me to show up at one of these places for a massage or whatever happens next? Let's say I wanted to stop by, get my massage and ONLY the massage that I paid for. And if LE was to bust in, would they be able to charge me for anything?[/QUOTE]I'm not a lawyer, but your question comes at an ironic time. The nine or so guys that were busted during the LE investigation and raid of the "old" HWC in December are scheduled to be in court this Friday, March 9th, according to the published article in the Potomac News that appeared after the December 2006 raid.
I don't know if those cases are still on the docket or it has been slipped to a later date, but I believe all of those guys were charged with "Frequenting a Bawdy House." I don't know how the prosecutor intends to try to prove this, but essentially that means that allegedly the guys went there knowing that they could get more than a massage. With all the reports about it on this board and others, combined with TV and print news about the raid, the "old" HWC certainly had quite a reputation. It will be interesting if the prosecutor tries to introduce USG reports about it into evidence to establish that the place had a reputation for giving more than massages. I'm not an attorney so I don't know what the precedents are for blog posts as evidence.
Of course, one guy who was pulled over for a "traffic stop" allegedly told LE everything, so maybe the prosecution will try to base everything on his testimony. There's a good chance he cut a deal with the prosecutor for them to go easy on him if he cooperated in the investigation. Perhaps at least one or more other guys were caught in the act during the raid. If LE found lots of used and unused condoms on the premises, that would certainly be damning evidence.
If you read my previous posts of the PWC code, even having your private parts exposed in a massage establishment (provider or customer) is a crime, so even if LE busts in and they don't catch you in the act, keep a towel close by, cover up quick, and hope the girl can flush a used condom down the toilet if there is time to do so.
Since HWC has now reopened, presumably under new management and ownership, I'm sure all of the services now offered there are totally legal and ethical. Any reports here to the contrary should be regarded as hearsay, misstatements, fabrications, and/or exagerrations unless proven otherwise.
If any of you guys have information about the court hearing scheduled for this week, please PM me.
Take care and be safe out there,
JR
[QUOTE=Jake Jj 1492]I dozed off in traffic today and saw the weirdest thing in my dream. It was an eight-legged sea creature holding a neon sign above his head that said "OPEN".[/QUOTE]
Haha. I have to give you props for that one.
Zhuxi
[QUOTE=Jet Ranger]I'm not a lawyer, but your question comes at an ironic time. The nine or so guys that were busted during the LE investigation and raid of the "old" HWC in December are scheduled to be in court this Friday, March 9th, according to the published article in the Potomac News that appeared after the December 2006 raid.[/QUOTE]
Well, JR, why not take the day off and hang around the Prince William Court house. See who shows up and see what happens in court. Could be interesting and probably beats anything else you might have going on that day ;^)
You can check this web site, do a search for PWC and then the date in question and it gives the names of all involved.
[url]http://208.210.219.132/vadistrict/select.jsp?court=[/url]
§ 18.2-347. Keeping, residing in or frequenting a bawdy place; "bawdy place" defined.
It shall be unlawful for any person to keep any bawdy place, or to reside in or at or visit, for immoral purposes, any such bawdy place. Each and every day such bawdy place shall be kept, resided in or visited, shall constitute a separate offense. In a prosecution under this section the general reputation of the place may be proved.
As used in this Code, "bawdy place" shall mean any place within or without any building or structure which is used or is to be used for lewdness, assignation or prostitution.
(Code 1950, §§ 18.1-195, 18.1-196; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)
[QUOTE=Ride00]You can cehck this web site, do a search for PWC and then the date in question and it gives the names of all involved.
[url]http://208.210.219.132/vadistrict/select.jsp?court=[/url][/QUOTE]
§ 18.2-350. Confinement of convicted prostitutes and persons violating §§ 18.2-347 through 18.2-349.
Every person convicted of being a prostitute and every person convicted of violating any of the provisions of §§ 18.2-347 through 18.2-349 shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor; provided, however, that in any case in which a city or county farm or hospital is available for the confinement of persons so convicted, confinement may be in such farm or hospital, in the discretion of the court or judge.
(Code 1950, § 18.1-199; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)
[QUOTE=Sleazebum]§ 18.2-347. Keeping, residing in or frequenting a bawdy place; "bawdy place" defined.
It shall be unlawful for any person to keep any bawdy place, or to reside in or at or visit, for immoral purposes, any such bawdy place. Each and every day such bawdy place shall be kept, resided in or visited, shall constitute a separate offense. In a prosecution under this section the general reputation of the place may be proved.
As used in this Code, "bawdy place" shall mean any place within or without any building or structure which is used or is to be used for lewdness, assignation or prostitution.
(Code 1950, §§ 18.1-195, 18.1-196; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)[/QUOTE]
§ 18.2-11. Punishment for conviction of misdemeanor.
The authorized punishments for conviction of a misdemeanor are:
(a) For Class 1 misdemeanors, confinement in jail for not more than twelve months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both.
(b) For Class 2 misdemeanors, confinement in jail for not more than six months and a fine of not more than $1,000, either or both.
(c) For Class 3 misdemeanors, a fine of not more than $500.
(d) For Class 4 misdemeanors, a fine of not more than $250.
For a misdemeanor offense prohibiting proximity to children as described in subsection A of § 18.2-370.2, the sentencing court is authorized to impose the punishment set forth in subsection B of that section in addition to any other penalty provided by law.
(1975, cc. 14, 15; 1990, c. 788; 2000, c. 770.)
[QUOTE=Sleazebum]§ 18.2-350. Confinement of convicted prostitutes and persons violating §§ 18.2-347 through 18.2-349.
Every person convicted of being a prostitute and every person convicted of violating any of the provisions of §§ 18.2-347 through 18.2-349 shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor; provided, however, that in any case in which a city or county farm or hospital is available for the confinement of persons so convicted, confinement may be in such farm or hospital, in the discretion of the court or judge.
(Code 1950, § 18.1-199; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)[/QUOTE]