[QUOTE=VegasMongRoll;5310258]Sarah is great.[/QUOTE]The last great quality chick I saw from sexyangels is Luna. Look like Luna got worn out. Change name and bounce around agency.
Printable View
[QUOTE=VegasMongRoll;5310258]Sarah is great.[/QUOTE]The last great quality chick I saw from sexyangels is Luna. Look like Luna got worn out. Change name and bounce around agency.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5310211]I got it straight from the horses mouth. A monger who I trust implicitly told l me that she was a very good time and good looking with a nice body to boot. If there is anyone I would trust it's him and he definitely recommends her and I will be seeing her soon based on that feedback.[/QUOTE]Not sure what you're talking about, the discussion was about couple of new posters posting "rebuttal reviews" after a negative review. My comment was strictly about that.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5302490]I had her real pics. She was an ATF and would go straight into my HYA thread if she comes back.[/QUOTE]There is another girl called Gold under Gray booker (Tom), is that the same Gold?
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5310324]Not sure what you're talking about, the discussion was about couple of new posters posting "rebuttal reviews" after a negative review. My comment was strictly about that.[/QUOTE]What I'm talking about is that what I heard about Sarah is that she's pretty damn good. Pretty, good body, BBFS, CIP and no upcharge from a reliable source.
Well, after almost 1. 5 years of not traveling, I'm finally hitting the road again. I looked back 10+ pages and could not determine what agencies upsell bb. Is there a list that shows who does and doesn't? I always hated places that upsell. Would love to do a no holds bar threesome. I had one wayyy back with pepsi. Any good recomendations?
Face wise, she could be JAV star Honoka Mihara's little sister. Slim spinner, but not too thin where the ribs and pelvic bones are fighting to get out. I'm guessing mid 20's.
Guys that need nothing less than service-queens may be underwhelmed. She's not new to the biz, but still has a ways to go compete with others service-wise. DTBBJ was too shallow and brief for me to speak on it favorably. While she takes it long-dick style, certain angles of K9 were too much for her handle. Still, it's clear her GFE agenda is to get you off, preferably inside of her so it seems. I personally would rather see a girl like Sarah, than an older girl with better service but more mileage on their body. Sarah's body is not a 10, but it's pretty fkn good enough for me.
Hearing her utter favorite Korean words was music to my ears as they illustrated how she welcomed getting her pussy stretched out. Otherwise, I agree that her vocals seem forced at times. And, the only English I heard her speak was "I love you," after having her pussy beat for a greater part of the session. Me: "Bruhh you don't even know my name. But go off."
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5310451]What I'm talking about is that what I heard about Sarah is that she's pretty damn good. Pretty, good body, BBFS, CIP and no upcharge from a reliable source.[/QUOTE]Ok took the plunge based on reviews and she was a let down imo. I think we are just desperate for new which I am thankful still. Nice body but wish she has larger boobs. Face is just GND. Some might not like the rounder face. She is kind of distant and I'm not sure if it's inexperience or just doesn't care about the job. This is not her first time in the job do not let it fool you. No shower preview or much play in shower. Who trained this girl? For me it was just ok session 7/10. Yes easy bbfscip on young-ish girl. To put a number would think early 30s. Not terrible wouldn't repeat unless she gets retrained and begins to do a much better job. She almost reached for her phone but I kept her distracted. Did not hear chirps as others said so maybe she silenced her boyfriend's texts bahahaha.
[QUOTE=Ghost626;5310319]The last great quality chick I saw from sexyangels is Luna. Look like Luna got worn out. Change name and bounce around agency.[/QUOTE]One of my former CF. I had so much fun with Luna. Recently was Wix at Booker Gray and was in Vegas for a week or two. She is bouncing around too much now. I hope she comes back to Sexyangels. Not sure why she left in the first place but I assume it was money based. She seemed to be their most popular there since Chanel (when chanel was good).
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5305845]I booked her yesterday for afternoon appointments with M was easy, same reliable above average service, same weight as before, did not gain covid weight, loved her DD tits that I can motor boat all day. 300 BBFSCIP, she just can't be beat. When you do mish, her tits go up and down, when you go doggy, tits swing front and back, OMG I could do her every day if I have enough dope. Oh, and nice as to grab too. Been in hobby over 15 years, she is one of the top for the service and price.[/QUOTE]This is a total noob question but who is M and how do I book with them?
No, not the same Gold.
[QUOTE=AlphaQ1;5310325]There is another girl called Gold under Gray booker (Tom), is that the same Gold?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ZeroDude;5310575]Well, after almost 1. 5 years of not traveling, I'm finally hitting the road again. I looked back 10+ pages and could not determine what agencies upsell bb. Is there a list that shows who does and doesn't? I always hated places that upsell. Would love to do a no holds bar threesome.[/QUOTE]I've made a list of strictly no-upcharge k-girl agencies in Los Angeles.
[URL]https://rentry.co/la_bbfs[/URL]
M.
[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/aKndu2KCPapj[/URL]
LAVixens.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/LAVixens[/URL]
Sexy Fun K-girls (SFK).
[URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/kdolls.socal[/URL]
Los Angeles Asian.
[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Losangelesasian[/URL]
Pepsi Club.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/pepsiclub[/URL]
Precious K-love (PKL).
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Preciousklove[/URL]
K-girls in LA (Booker Jane).
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/kgirlsinla[/URL]
Angels in West LA.
[URL]https://angelsinwla.wordpress.com/[/URL]
Sesang Girls.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SesangGirls[/URL]
Pink Angels Sarah. I can see why there are mixed reviews. She is young, thin, and an easy BBFS CIPX2. However, kinda of ends there with very minimal / pathetic BBBJ, no real DFK (which is hard to get out of her), and her apathetic / rushed demeanor during the session. Still two pops but was out in 45 minutes. I even chose a late time 10 pm. Could have had another after me maybe? Regardless, definitely a mixed bag many of you will just have to try out to find out if you like her.
LA Asians Nana. I've tried to booker her in the past. Ironically I was browsing Candygirlla and Chanel was no upcharge which was the same on LA Asians. Shot a text to the booker and Nana was on the list. I'm very torn on her. Definitely lives up to the legend of old. Still, older, not quite fat or chubby but tick for sure. Not really my type with an okayish face. Short and stout though. But on the flip side: she's like M. Hana on crack in terms of service. Sloppy DFK, BBBJ, RIM, basically licks you everywhere and sucks you dry. I busted first on her CG cause she was so aggressive. It was kinda hot. Definitely a seasoned provider, with a killer massage to boot. Although I felt kinda nasty leaving, like a few times with M. Hana and at $260. Kinda hard to turn that down. Nonetheless, service oriented guys should seek her out or try her out at least once.
Visited Lisha from SA last week late afternoon. She's a petite plump little girl with nice tits, average ass and a pretty face. Would say she's in her early 30's. Session was ok, she seemed sleepy / bored throughout, but gave pretty good service otherwise. Kept trying to communicate with me through a phone voice translator because she doesn't speak a lick of English. Round 1 started off with a nice BBBJ which she did a pretty good job of avoiding teeth contact, missionary where she complained a little and I popped pretty quick because it felt so nice and wet. After cleaning up she gave a short massage and more of the back and forth translating. She was kind of hesitant for round 2 I think, but we started up again missionary, doggy, and finally flat on her stomach where I finished. All in all a good time, besides the bored attitude, might repeat but maybe a different time of the day.
[QUOTE=CptfPower;5301590]How is the DFK department with (Lisha).[/QUOTE]She's one of the few that would stick her tongue out far enough where our lips weren't even touching while we macked down. At the height of our tryst, our tongues tangled like a pair of swashbuckling pirates.
[QUOTE=StopTheMonger;5311849]Pink Angels Sarah. I can see why there are mixed reviews. She is young, thin, and an easy BBFS CIPX2. However, kinda of ends there with very minimal / pathetic BBBJ, no real DFK (which is hard to get out of her), and her apathetic / rushed demeanor during the session. Still two pops but was out in 45 minutes. I even chose a late time 10 pm. Could have had another after me maybe? Regardless, definitely a mixed bag many of you will just have to try out to find out if you like her.
LA Asians Nana. I've tried to booker her in the past. Ironically I was browsing Candygirlla and Chanel was no upcharge which was the same on LA Asians. Shot a text to the booker and Nana was on the list. I'm very torn on her. Definitely lives up to the legend of old. Still, older, not quite fat or chubby but tick for sure. Not really my type with an okayish face. Short and stout though. But on the flip side: she's like M. Hana on crack in terms of service. Sloppy DFK, BBBJ, RIM, basically licks you everywhere and sucks you dry. I busted first on her CG cause she was so aggressive. It was kinda hot. Definitely a seasoned provider, with a killer massage to boot. Although I felt kinda nasty leaving, like a few times with M. Hana and at $260. Kinda hard to turn that down. Nonetheless, service oriented guys should seek her out or try her out at least once.[/QUOTE]100% agree with both of your mini review.
Sarah left little be desired as far as service. I hope she changes or might not do well in LA.
Nana also spot on. Like a thick gymnast body and if she lost some weight might be on many monger lists. Still a bargain for a full on service queen. Recently reviewed her at 8/10 on TER. Fun session nice girl but more of an in a pinch girl as she isn't my body type. No regrets, we went at it like animals.